This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 20 Nov 2003 02:21:48 -0200
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200311182044.hAIKiFXI001985@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Nov 18, 2003, law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <200311182140.14138.stevenb@suse.de>, Steven Bosscher writes:
>> On Tuesday 18 November 2003 21:28, law@redhat.com wrote:
>>> What do folks here think about tagging the branch nightly so that
>>> patch reversal is easier?
>>
>> You know of course that some people are unhappy with the number of tags we
>> have already. So please no.
> And what precisely is the problem with having lots of tags.
Well, for one, my local replication of the GCC CVS repository is far
slower on days in which GCC snapshots are taken. No big deal, but
still slightly annoying.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer