This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:44:15 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <200311182140.14138.stevenb@suse.de>, Steven Bosscher writes:
>On Tuesday 18 November 2003 21:28, law@redhat.com wrote:
>> What do folks here think about tagging the branch nightly so that
>> patch reversal is easier?
>
>You know of course that some people are unhappy with the number of tags we
>have already. So please no.
And what precisely is the problem with having lots of tags.
> People should just properly test their patches
>on a few machines, especially if you have access to so many, like most of us.
I'm not disagreeing with this. I'm only trying to make it easier on
Diego & myself. I've waste an insane amount of time on a regular basis
because of this problem. Being able to revert to the tree from the
night before would make it a lot easier for Diego and myself to determine
the culprits and have them shot :-)
jeff