This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
- From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot dot org>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:23:53 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types
On 6 Nov 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Matt Austern <austern@apple.com> writes:
> | So my question: since we've got three flags, in principle we've got
> | 2^3 = eight possible combinations of flags. I bet most of those eight
> | don't make any sense. Which combinations are errors, which are
> | meaningful, and what are the distinctions between the meaningful
> | combinations? Should the answer to that question be documented
> | somewhere?
>
> I don't know what the answers should be, but yes they should be
> documented.
Better yet, could all of these flags be folded into the DECL_VISIBILITY
work? Perhaps establish some clear semantics for these flags, and get
the front-ends to generate the _correct_ flags?
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/