This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada updates frozen


kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

>     I am presently testing a patch which reverts GET_MODE_BITSIZE to its
>     original meaning (i.e. GET_MODE_SIZE * BITS_PER_UNIT) and introduces
>     a new macro GET_MODE_PRECISION which is used in a very few places
>     (notably mode_for_size).  
>
> So you're going to rename it as mode_for_precion?

Yes, although not immediately; I intend to submit a minimal but
contentful change followed by a series of large mechanical name
changes.

> And what about the _TYPE_SIZE macros?  Will they go back to being *sizes*
> or remain precisions?

They need to remain precision (and I will rename them as such)
otherwise we cannot know which type to use for C long double on ia64
and i386.

The way the back end specifies the ABI's requirements for type sizes
(precisions) is unpleasantly C-centric and I would welcome ideas on
how to make it more generic.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]