gcc archive
date index for November, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2003
23:30 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Diego Novillo
22:04 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Devang Patel
21:45 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Jan Hubicka
21:41 Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels Denys Duchier
20:43 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions Richard Henderson
20:03 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Arnaud Charlet
19:55 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Jan Hubicka
19:50 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Diego Novillo
19:26 Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Jan Hubicka
19:08 mainline multilib parallel builds still broken Bradley Lucier
18:08 [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions Diego Novillo
17:35 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing Gerrit P. Haase
16:10 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICEin stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Andreas Jaeger
15:27 [tree-ssa] Merge in progress Diego Novillo
15:00 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Steven Bosscher
14:51 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:53 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
13:49 Re: Tree-ssa branch does not build Daniel Berlin
13:46 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
13:34 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Arnaud Charlet
12:45 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Toon Moene
12:43 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Eric Botcazou
12:14 Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues. Naveen Sharma, Noida
11:29 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Arnaud Charlet
10:31 Re: FORTH, anyone? Andrew Haley
07:10 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Per Bothner
07:03 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Phil Edwards
06:24 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Per Bothner
05:34 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Matt Austern
04:52 Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"? Jim Wilson
04:43 Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:34 wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"? Jonathan Wilson
03:57 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:52 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Ian Lance Taylor
03:15 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Glenn Burkhardt
02:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
02:48 Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions Jim Blandy
02:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Jim Wilson
02:34 Re: What's with this C construct? Jim Wilson
02:27 Re: Syntax error... Jim Wilson
02:22 Re: Potential syntax error? Jim Wilson
02:14 Re: Good riddance, again... Jim Wilson
01:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:55 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Phil Edwards
01:47 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Jim Wilson
01:44 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
01:22 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
01:12 Re: FORTH, anyone? Phil Edwards
01:11 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
01:08 Re: PCH bit me Geoff Keating
01:07 [Committed] Install gccinstall.info (was fastjar.info not installed any longer?) Kelley Cook
01:06 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Robert Dewar
00:57 What's with this C construct? aspiesrule
00:43 Re: PCH bit me Geoff Keating
00:20 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:13 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
00:11 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Richard Kenner

November 29, 2003
23:58 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Zack Weinberg
23:55 Syntax error... aspiesrule
23:52 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Jim Wilson
23:48 More on those infernal unmatched braces... aspiesrule
23:35 Potential syntax error? aspiesrule
23:26 Good riddance, again... aspiesrule
23:24 Re: Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base... Jim Wilson
23:21 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp Marc Espie
23:20 Re: Adding files to Makefile compile/link... Jim Wilson
23:11 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:09 Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Jim Wilson
22:56 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Jim Wilson
22:51 Re: thanks for the memory work Geoff Keating
22:39 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Jim Wilson
21:53 Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp Neil Booth
21:34 Re: FORTH, anyone? Phil Edwards
21:30 Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base... aspiesrule
21:17 Adding files to Makefile compile/link... aspiesrule
20:52 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Josef Zlomek
19:41 Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? David Edelsohn
19:20 Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant? Richard Henderson
19:14 Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Christopher Faylor
18:26 Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5? Scott Robert Ladd
18:17 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Glenn Burkhardt
18:14 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Kris Warkentin
17:09 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:58 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:54 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:00 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Kai Henningsen
15:48 PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp Marc Espie
15:23 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Daniel Jacobowitz
14:55 Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section Richard Earnshaw
14:44 Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section Ian Lance Taylor
14:14 FORTH, anyone? aspiesrule
12:16 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Eric Botcazou
11:53 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Mark Kettenis
11:28 arm-elf-gcc and nobits section Amol Lad
10:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Zdenek Dvorak
09:54 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:47 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Alan Modra
06:44 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Andrew MacLeod
06:41 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Michael Elizabeth Chastain
06:13 gcc 3.3.2 built for AIX 5.2.0.0 Wayne Fordyce
06:09 Re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables Andreas Tobler
04:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Diego Novillo
04:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Diego Novillo
04:26 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
04:20 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? David Edelsohn
04:10 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Andrew Pinski
04:06 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? David Edelsohn
04:01 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Phil Edwards
03:44 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Nathanael Nerode
03:35 Re: configuring gcc Jim Wilson
03:33 Re: sizeof on const Jim Wilson
03:24 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer? Jim Wilson
03:16 Re: help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2 Jim Wilson
03:11 Re: Gcc toolkit needed Jim Wilson
03:05 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Alan Modra
03:04 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.ono such file or directory Jim Wilson
02:55 Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info Jim Wilson
02:47 Re: va_start behaving strange Jim Wilson
02:33 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? David Edelsohn
02:30 Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn Jim Wilson
02:24 Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn Jim Wilson
02:13 Re: Help needed Jim Wilson
01:42 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Alan Modra
01:36 Re: Disable warnings in code Zack Weinberg
00:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
00:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg

November 28, 2003
23:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Jan Hubicka
23:22 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
23:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Zdenek Dvorak
22:11 Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels Richard Henderson
21:58 [rfc] debugging anonymous unions Richard Henderson
21:47 Re: GTY GC question Andrew MacLeod
21:46 re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables Jack Howarth
21:25 Re: GTY GC question Jan Hubicka
21:21 Re: GTY GC question Andrew MacLeod
21:04 Re: File extensions for C++ source? Phil Edwards
21:01 Re: GTY GC question Jan Hubicka
20:46 GTY GC question Andrew MacLeod
20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Jan Hubicka
20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed. Daniel Berlin
20:38 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Richard Henderson
20:15 File extensions for C++ source? aspiesrule
18:40 configuring gcc Patricia Peratto
18:21 Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Franz Sirl
18:12 ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Andrew Haley
18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
18:06 ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1? Kris Warkentin
17:33 best meds at the best price............................................................................... Theron Espinoza
17:26 Re: Ada test failures at -O2 Laurent GUERBY
17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Diego Novillo
17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
17:08 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
16:45 Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables Brad Lucier
16:19 Re: Ada test failures at -O2 Richard Kenner
15:45 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Eric Botcazou
15:24 re: help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM Dan Kegel
13:17 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Christian Joensson
12:53 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Eric Botcazou
11:59 Ada test failures at -O2 Laurent GUERBY
11:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Jan Hubicka
11:08 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb Christian Joensson
10:58 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Mark Kettenis
09:38 help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM Aitor Garcia
02:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed. Daniel Berlin
01:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Jan Hubicka
00:19 asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels Denys Duchier

November 27, 2003
23:49 Re: Ptrs to IO space? Richard Henderson
23:48 Re: Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering... Richard Henderson
23:44 Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Richard Henderson
23:42 Re: problem with subregs. Jim Wilson
23:29 Re: Do we still need ggc-simple Ben Elliston
23:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Richard Henderson
23:17 Ptrs to IO space? aspiesrule
23:15 Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering... aspiesrule
23:08 DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer Mark Kettenis
22:36 successful build 3.3.2 with i386-pc-solaris2.9 Kevin Rose
21:37 Re: tail-call optimization question Jan Hubicka
19:50 Re: New target porting time estimates? Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:48 Re: accessing mirrors Gerald Pfeifer
19:39 accessing mirrors bruno doutriaux
18:55 tail-call optimization question Musachy Barroso
17:57 Re: problem with subregs. Tal Agmon
16:04 [tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots Diego Novillo
15:59 sizeof on const Tal Agmon
15:21 Fwd: Severe performance degradation when calling functions Paul Brook
10:50 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
10:34 Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer? Gunther Nikl
09:45 fastjar.info not installed any longer? Gerald Pfeifer
09:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Zdenek Dvorak
09:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Zdenek Dvorak
08:35 help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2 Peter T. Bense
08:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed. Jan Hubicka
08:03 Re: Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi Zack Weinberg
07:14 Re: odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite Andrew Pinski
05:25 Re: PCH bit me Alan Modra
04:29 Re: PCH bit me Daniel Jacobowitz
04:23 PCH bit me Alan Modra
04:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed. Diego Novillo
03:33 odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite Jack Howarth
01:58 Fwd: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? aspiesrule
01:35 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? aspiesrule
01:34 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? aspiesrule
00:44 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Daniel Berlin

November 26, 2003
23:57 Re: thanks for the memory work Steven Bosscher
22:59 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Russ Allbery
22:38 cachecc1, a gcc cache Benoit Poulot-Cazajous
21:26 Re: [tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we??? law
21:06 __null is set to zero? (gcc/cp/lex.c 3.3.2 src) using Gimpel Flexelint Ken Wolcott
19:53 Re: Now, we have a problem... Carlo Wood
19:18 Re: thanks for the memory work law
19:10 Re: Visibility attribute Geoff Keating
19:00 Re: thanks for the memory work Geoff Keating
18:58 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Geoff Keating
18:58 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? Richard Kenner
18:41 Re: thanks for the memory work law
18:26 Re: thanks for the memory work Andrew MacLeod
18:06 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? Geert Bosch
17:59 Re: thanks for the memory work law
17:50 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? Arnaud Charlet
17:47 Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? Geert Bosch
17:34 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
17:18 Now, we have a problem... aspiesrule
17:04 gcc-ss-3.4-20031126 is now available gccadmin
17:02 (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore? aspiesrule
16:30 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Benjamin Kosnik
15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Diego Novillo
15:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Zdenek Dvorak
15:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Diego Novillo
15:39 Gcc toolkit needed azaka
15:36 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Giovanni Bajo
15:31 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Jason Merrill
14:40 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Volker Reichelt
14:33 gcc 3.4 experimental? Jack Howarth
13:55 [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed. Diego Novillo
13:53 Re: thanks for the memory work Daniel Berlin
13:50 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Daniel Berlin
13:34 RE: Crash in garbage collector Jon Beniston
13:23 Re: thanks for the memory work Andrew MacLeod
12:58 [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]? Zdenek Dvorak
12:46 PATCH for Re: New mirror Gerald Pfeifer
12:05 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory mohanlal jangir
06:58 Re: Visibility attribute H. J. Lu
06:54 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Benjamin Kosnik
06:05 Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Jason Merrill
06:03 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
05:34 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
05:30 Visibility attribute Matt Austern
05:29 Re: thanks for the memory work law
05:25 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
05:05 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Andrew Pinski
04:28 Re: thanks for the memory work law
04:26 Re: thanks for the memory work Daniel Berlin
04:26 Re: thanks for the memory work law
03:49 Re: thanks for the memory work Andrew MacLeod
03:46 Re: thanks for the memory work Andrew MacLeod
03:28 Mailing List Question Adrian Bellomo
03:06 Re: thanks for the memory work law
03:03 Re: thanks for the memory work law
02:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Zack Weinberg
01:17 Re: thanks for the memory work Andrew MacLeod
00:49 [www-patch] Testing C++ changes Volker Reichelt

November 25, 2003
23:56 Re: thanks for the memory work Steven Bosscher
23:54 Re: thanks for the memory work Jan Hubicka
23:49 Re: thanks for the memory work law
23:25 [tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we??? Steven Bosscher
23:14 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support David Carlton
23:12 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support David Carlton
23:04 Re: thanks for the memory work Steven Bosscher
22:24 Re: Ada GNARL naming convention Arnaud Charlet
22:23 3.2 code bloat from debug info Glenn Burkhardt
22:04 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Daniel Berlin
21:55 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
21:30 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Geoff Keating
20:15 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Devang Patel
19:58 __builtin_expect usage and g++ Anders Fugmann
19:48 Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support Daniel Berlin
19:42 DWARF: C++ namespace support Devang Patel
18:07 va_start behaving strange Gabor Greif
18:02 Ada GNARL naming convention John R. Shannon
17:51 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops David Edelsohn
17:21 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Dan Kegel
17:03 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Jack Howarth
17:01 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Dan Kegel
16:01 Help needed Chandramohan . Seeniappan
15:31 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops David Edelsohn
15:13 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops David Edelsohn
14:06 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Jack Howarth
13:27 Re: Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ? Andreas Schwab
13:17 gcc cvs HEAD Ada testsuite on cygwin: failed run-time assertion : Tasking not implemented on this configuration Christian Joensson
12:53 Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ? Marc Espie
12:09 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Dorit Naishlos
12:05 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
11:11 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Jan Hubicka
11:07 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
10:47 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory qinfeng . zhang
10:39 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory mohanlal jangir
10:29 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss
10:07 Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory qinfeng . zhang
09:41 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Gabriel Paubert
07:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
07:02 building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory mohanlal jangir
06:37 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Dan Kegel
04:37 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
02:23 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-11-24 Diego Novillo
00:44 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Robert Moss

November 24, 2003
23:38 Re: cvs gcc 3.4 check Andrew Pinski
23:36 cvs gcc 3.4 check Jack Howarth
23:33 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Jack Howarth
23:18 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc Ashutosh Dixit
22:39 Re: Crash in garbage collector Richard Sandiford
22:05 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
22:03 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI Jim Dehnert
21:54 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Geoff Keating
21:52 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Geoff Keating
21:48 Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility Geoff Keating
20:54 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops David Edelsohn
20:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
20:46 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops Jack Howarth
20:27 Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility Eric Christopher
20:24 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? tm_gccmail
20:14 GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn McM57
19:43 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Andrew Pinski
19:43 Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops David Edelsohn
19:37 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Dan Nicolaescu
19:26 impact of -minsert-sched-nops Jack Howarth
18:27 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
18:05 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Jan Hubicka
17:45 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI Carlo Wood
17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20031124 is now available gccadmin
17:10 Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
17:08 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax Joe Buck
17:03 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119 Dan Kegel
16:26 Re: Linux compiler Question Phil Edwards
16:14 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc Gabriel Dos Reis
16:07 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
15:56 Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc Richard Earnshaw
15:46 "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc Ashutosh Dixit
15:08 Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot20031119 Robert Moss
14:42 Re: ASSIGNMENT papers? Gerald Pfeifer
14:35 Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
12:08 Re: Bug or my mistake? Gareth McCaughan
11:03 Linux compiler Question Mohammed Sultan
10:10 Re: gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5 Gerald Pfeifer
10:01 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
09:41 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
09:27 setjmp vs. gcc's __builtin_setjmp [Was: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139] Christian Joensson
08:28 Re: Intermodule constant propagation Andrew Pinski
08:17 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI Kai Henningsen
08:03 Intermodule constant propagation Mircea Namolaru
07:17 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI Mark Mitchell
07:03 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
06:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
05:15 Re: place internet call from your telephone line cendd
03:39 Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI Carlo Wood
02:40 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
02:09 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI Mark Mitchell
00:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd

November 23, 2003
23:40 A complexity in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor
23:16 Re: gcc and LSU rejects Andrew Pinski
23:05 Re: gcc and LSU rejects Jack Howarth
22:26 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jamie Lokier
22:13 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Branko Äibej
20:57 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
20:37 Re: gcc and LSU rejects Andrew Pinski
20:21 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax Jan Hubicka
20:11 gcc and LSU rejects Jack Howarth
20:06 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
19:30 Re: Testing C++ changes Tom Tromey
18:50 gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5 Jack Howarth
18:19 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
18:09 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
17:33 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
17:21 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
16:22 Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Jan Hubicka
16:15 Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1? Scott Robert Ladd
16:08 Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4 Jan Hubicka
15:58 Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy. Nathan Sidwell
14:09 Re: Why symcat.h is not included anymore? Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:51 Why symcat.h is not included anymore? Tal Agmon
09:00 AW: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing Michael Sogtrop
04:46 Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing Gerrit P. Haase
04:46 Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI Ian Lance Taylor

November 22, 2003
21:28 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Richard Stallman
16:50 __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing Michael Sögtrop
16:06 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139 Christian Joensson
15:25 Re: gc question Jan Hubicka
10:53 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139 Gerrit P. Haase
10:39 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139 Gerrit P. Haase
08:26 Re: Testing C++ changes Gerald Pfeifer
06:34 Re: C++ demangler ABI vs. g++ Carlo Wood
02:33 C++ demangler ABI vs. g++ Ian Lance Taylor
02:28 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change John David Anglin
02:14 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.4, first pass John David Anglin
02:03 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax DJ Delorie
01:54 Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax Joe Buck
01:45 jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax DJ Delorie
01:23 Re: Targets to obsolete for 3.4, second pass Mark Mitchell
01:20 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline Mark Mitchell
01:16 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Mark Mitchell
00:01 Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy. Stephan T. Lavavej

November 21, 2003
23:56 Re: gc question Geoff Keating
22:54 g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy. Leandro Lucarella
21:48 Re: gc question Daniel Berlin
21:45 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Joe Buck
21:39 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} tm_gccmail
21:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change David Edelsohn
21:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange Andreas Jaeger
21:09 Re: gc question law
20:30 Re: gc question Daniel Berlin
20:27 gc question law
20:11 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange Andreas Jaeger
20:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly? Frank Ch. Eigler
19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly? Zdenek Dvorak
19:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly? Diego Novillo
19:01 [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly? Zdenek Dvorak
18:18 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change David Edelsohn
17:36 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange Andreas Jaeger
15:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change David Edelsohn
13:10 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139 Arnaud Charlet
13:07 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Arnaud Charlet
12:48 Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139 Christian Joensson
12:31 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Gerald Pfeifer
11:34 Re: hungarian mirror Gerald Pfeifer
11:09 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
11:06 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
11:02 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
11:01 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
10:42 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Arnaud Charlet
10:40 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Gerald Pfeifer
09:42 Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change Andreas Jaeger
08:53 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline Nathan Sidwell
08:21 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Arnaud Charlet
08:10 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Richard Henderson
07:48 Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? Arnaud Charlet
07:20 Re: must_alias question law
07:05 Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi Phil Edwards
06:35 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
03:06 Re: must_alias question Diego Novillo
03:03 Re: must_alias question Diego Novillo
02:16 Bug or my mistake? Lally Singh
01:30 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
01:15 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
00:57 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
00:56 Re: Crash in garbage collector Geoff Keating
00:47 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
00:44 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
00:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
00:30 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
00:13 Re: must_alias question Diego Novillo
00:00 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka

November 20, 2003
23:56 Re: Jump threading and loops Jan Hubicka
23:52 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
23:47 Ada: jmp_buf size incorrect Ulrich Weigand
23:46 Re: Jump threading and loops Zdenek Dvorak
23:35 Jump threading and loops Jan Hubicka
23:32 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Bruce Korb
23:24 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
23:18 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
22:43 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
22:27 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Phil Edwards
21:55 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
21:44 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
21:40 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
21:33 Re: must_alias question Diego Novillo
21:32 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} bkorb
21:19 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
21:15 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
21:05 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
21:02 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
20:50 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
20:48 Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document. Chris Lattner
20:35 Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"? H. J. Lu
20:31 Re: must_alias question Jan Hubicka
19:46 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Albert Chin-A-Young
19:21 Re: -B file prefix never used Markus Johansson
19:14 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
18:57 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Paul Eggert
18:38 Re: -B file prefix never used Geert Bosch
18:29 [tree-ssa]: A typo in Makefile.tpl? H. J. Lu
18:25 Crash in garbage collector Jon Beniston
17:48 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
16:45 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
14:12 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Rainer Orth
14:12 Re: must_alias question Diego Novillo
14:03 Re: [tree-ssa] which snapshot is good Diego Novillo
12:25 -B file prefix never used Markus Johansson
11:34 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Eric Botcazou
10:04 must_alias question Jan Hubicka
09:33 Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
09:31 flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub} Ben Elliston
09:26 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Andrew Haley
06:17 [tree-ssa] which snapshot is good Henrik Sorensen
04:22 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily Alexandre Oliva
01:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
00:55 Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document. Jim Wilson
00:46 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:41 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
00:37 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
00:34 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:33 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:29 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
00:21 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:20 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
00:17 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:15 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
00:14 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
00:13 Re: Tree sharing issues... Diego Novillo
00:13 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
00:07 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Diego Novillo
00:02 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Diego Novillo

November 19, 2003
23:46 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
23:41 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Geoff Keating
23:34 Re: Question about libffi closure Jakub Jelinek
23:33 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
23:30 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
23:29 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
23:27 Re: Tree sharing issues... Richard Henderson
23:23 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
23:21 Re: Tree sharing issues... Richard Henderson
23:20 Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Richard Henderson
23:17 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
23:12 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
23:10 Re: why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77 Toon Moene
23:08 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
23:02 TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem Jan Hubicka
23:02 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
22:59 Do we still need ggc-simple Steven Bosscher
22:56 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
22:50 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
22:46 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
22:31 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
22:31 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
22:27 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
22:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
22:23 Re: Question about libffi closure Andrew Haley
22:20 Re: Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
22:17 Re: Tree sharing issues... law
22:15 Re: Question about libffi closure David Edelsohn
22:13 Tree sharing issues... Jan Hubicka
22:12 Re: Question about libffi closure Andrew Haley
21:58 CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document. Chris Lattner
21:51 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
21:49 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
21:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
21:45 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
21:44 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
21:36 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
21:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
21:30 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
21:28 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
21:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
21:23 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
21:22 End-of-unit changes in decl visibility Richard Sandiford
21:18 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
21:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened David Edelsohn
21:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
20:52 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
20:50 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
20:49 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
20:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
20:46 Re: Question about libffi closure David Edelsohn
20:40 Re: Question about libffi closure Jeff Sturm
20:36 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
20:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
20:33 Re: Question about libffi closure Andreas Jaeger
20:29 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
20:23 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
20:16 Re: using a personal "double" type Mike Stump
20:02 Re: Testing C++ changes Tom Tromey
19:47 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
19:39 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
19:34 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
19:26 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
19:14 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
19:12 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
19:09 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
19:09 Re: Testing C++ changes Mark Mitchell
19:06 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
19:04 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
19:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
19:01 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
18:56 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Richard Henderson
18:51 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
18:48 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
18:43 why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77 Jack Howarth
18:38 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
18:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
18:25 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Andrew MacLeod
18:05 Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure law
17:44 Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure Jan Hubicka
17:30 using a personal "double" type FEYEL Frederic.
17:07 gcc-ss-3.4-20031119 is now available gccadmin
16:56 Question about libffi closure Andrew Haley
15:08 Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline Wolfgang Bangerth
14:49 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Diego Novillo
14:39 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Richard Henderson
14:31 Question about libffi closure Andreas Jaeger
14:16 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Diego Novillo
13:23 Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline Volker Reichelt
13:17 Re: Testing C++ changes Jason Merrill
10:45 Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis Martin Reinecke
08:47 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Andrew Haley
08:08 Re: getting gcc rpms for older versions Jim Wilson
08:02 Re: x386 function prologue Jim Wilson
07:53 Re: Writing a frontend to gcc for a new language developed at Ericsson Jim Wilson
06:56 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Richard Henderson
06:55 Re: IA64: roblem with OUTGOING_ARG Jim Wilson
06:24 getting gcc rpms for older versions Jeevan, Joseph John
05:19 Re: Compressed rtl project Daniel Berlin
05:04 Re: Compressed rtl project law
04:09 Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias Per Bothner
02:49 Re: Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )type information Gabriel Dos Reis
02:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened Andrew Pinski
00:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument Richard Henderson
00:35 Compressed rtl project Zdenek Dvorak
00:20 [tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument Zdenek Dvorak

November 18, 2003
23:43 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily Tom Tromey
23:12 [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened Diego Novillo
22:59 Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/) Ken Wolcott
21:58 Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin:libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )typeinformation Gerald Pfeifer
21:57 RE: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/) Josephine O'Para
21:40 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily Daniel Jacobowitz
21:23 Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/) Ken Wolcott
21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily Andreas Schwab
21:18 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily Andreas Schwab
21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily