gcc archive
date index for November, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

November 30, 2003

23:30	Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Diego Novillo
22:04	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Devang Patel
21:45	Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Jan Hubicka
21:41	Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels	Denys Duchier
20:43	Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions	Richard Henderson
20:03	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Arnaud Charlet
19:55	Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Jan Hubicka
19:50	Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Diego Novillo
19:26	Re: [tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Jan Hubicka
19:08	mainline multilib parallel builds still broken	Bradley Lucier
18:08	[tree-ssa] New testsuite regressions	Diego Novillo
17:35	Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing	Gerrit P. Haase
16:10	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICEin stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Andreas Jaeger
15:27	[tree-ssa] Merge in progress	Diego Novillo
15:00	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Steven Bosscher
14:51	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:53	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Scott Robert Ladd
13:49	Re: Tree-ssa branch does not build	Daniel Berlin
13:46	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Scott Robert Ladd
13:34	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Arnaud Charlet
12:45	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Toon Moene
12:43	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Eric Botcazou
12:14	Re: [RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.	Naveen Sharma, Noida
11:29	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Arnaud Charlet
10:31	Re: FORTH, anyone?	Andrew Haley
07:10	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Per Bothner
07:03	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Phil Edwards
06:24	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Per Bothner
05:34	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Matt Austern
04:52	Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?	Jim Wilson
04:43	Re: wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:34	wny does GCC warn about "no newline at end of file"?	Jonathan Wilson
03:57	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:52	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Ian Lance Taylor
03:15	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Glenn Burkhardt
02:58	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Zack Weinberg
02:48	Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions	Jim Blandy
02:47	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Jim Wilson
02:34	Re: What's with this C construct?	Jim Wilson
02:27	Re: Syntax error...	Jim Wilson
02:22	Re: Potential syntax error?	Jim Wilson
02:14	Re: Good riddance, again...	Jim Wilson
01:58	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:55	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Phil Edwards
01:47	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Jim Wilson
01:44	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Robert Dewar
01:22	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Robert Dewar
01:12	Re: FORTH, anyone?	Phil Edwards
01:11	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Scott Robert Ladd
01:08	Re: PCH bit me	Geoff Keating
01:07	[Committed] Install gccinstall.info (was fastjar.info not installed any longer?)	Kelley Cook
01:06	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Robert Dewar
00:57	What's with this C construct?	aspiesrule
00:43	Re: PCH bit me	Geoff Keating
00:20	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:13	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Zack Weinberg
00:11	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Richard Kenner

November 29, 2003

23:58	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Zack Weinberg
23:55	Syntax error...	aspiesrule
23:52	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Jim Wilson
23:48	More on those infernal unmatched braces...	aspiesrule
23:35	Potential syntax error?	aspiesrule
23:26	Good riddance, again...	aspiesrule
23:24	Re: Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base...	Jim Wilson
23:21	Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp	Marc Espie
23:20	Re: Adding files to Makefile compile/link...	Jim Wilson
23:11	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:09	Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Jim Wilson
22:56	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Jim Wilson
22:51	Re: thanks for the memory work	Geoff Keating
22:39	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Jim Wilson
21:53	Re: PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp	Neil Booth
21:34	Re: FORTH, anyone?	Phil Edwards
21:30	Good riddance, old GC_get_stack_base...	aspiesrule
21:17	Adding files to Makefile compile/link...	aspiesrule
20:52	Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Josef Zlomek
19:41	Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	David Edelsohn
19:20	Re: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?	Richard Henderson
19:14	Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Christopher Faylor
18:26	Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?	Scott Robert Ladd
18:17	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Glenn Burkhardt
18:14	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Kris Warkentin
17:09	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:58	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:54	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:00	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Kai Henningsen
15:48	PATCH: work-around for bug in -traditional-cpp	Marc Espie
15:23	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:55	Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section	Richard Earnshaw
14:44	Re: arm-elf-gcc and nobits section	Ian Lance Taylor
14:14	FORTH, anyone?	aspiesrule
12:16	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Eric Botcazou
11:53	Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Mark Kettenis
11:28	arm-elf-gcc and nobits section	Amol Lad
10:41	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Zdenek Dvorak
09:54	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:47	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Alan Modra
06:44	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Andrew MacLeod
06:41	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
06:13	gcc 3.3.2 built for AIX 5.2.0.0	Wayne Fordyce
06:09	Re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables	Andreas Tobler
04:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Diego Novillo
04:28	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Diego Novillo
04:26	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
04:20	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	David Edelsohn
04:10	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Andrew Pinski
04:06	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	David Edelsohn
04:01	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Phil Edwards
03:44	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Nathanael Nerode
03:35	Re: configuring gcc	Jim Wilson
03:33	Re: sizeof on const	Jim Wilson
03:24	Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?	Jim Wilson
03:16	Re: help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2	Jim Wilson
03:11	Re: Gcc toolkit needed	Jim Wilson
03:05	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Alan Modra
03:04	Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.ono such file or directory	Jim Wilson
02:55	Re: 3.2 code bloat from debug info	Jim Wilson
02:47	Re: va_start behaving strange	Jim Wilson
02:33	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	David Edelsohn
02:30	Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn	Jim Wilson
02:24	Re: GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn	Jim Wilson
02:13	Re: Help needed	Jim Wilson
01:42	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Alan Modra
01:36	Re: Disable warnings in code	Zack Weinberg
00:28	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Steven Bosscher
00:25	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Zack Weinberg

November 28, 2003

23:27	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Jan Hubicka
23:22	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
23:17	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Zdenek Dvorak
22:11	Re: asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels	Richard Henderson
21:58	[rfc] debugging anonymous unions	Richard Henderson
21:47	Re: GTY GC question	Andrew MacLeod
21:46	re: Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables	Jack Howarth
21:25	Re: GTY GC question	Jan Hubicka
21:21	Re: GTY GC question	Andrew MacLeod
21:04	Re: File extensions for C++ source?	Phil Edwards
21:01	Re: GTY GC question	Jan Hubicka
20:46	GTY GC question	Andrew MacLeod
20:46	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Jan Hubicka
20:44	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.	Daniel Berlin
20:38	Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Richard Henderson
20:15	File extensions for C++ source?	aspiesrule
18:40	configuring gcc	Patricia Peratto
18:21	Re: ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Franz Sirl
18:12	ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Andrew Haley
18:10	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
18:06	ppc problem with .rodata.str1.4. binutils requirement for gcc 3.3.1?	Kris Warkentin
17:33	best meds at the best price...............................................................................	Theron Espinoza
17:26	Re: Ada test failures at -O2	Laurent GUERBY
17:11	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Diego Novillo
17:11	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Steven Bosscher
17:08	[tree-ssa] bootstrap failure	Steven Bosscher
16:45	Fink on Darwin sets ld environment variables	Brad Lucier
16:19	Re: Ada test failures at -O2	Richard Kenner
15:45	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Eric Botcazou
15:24	re: help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM	Dan Kegel
13:17	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Christian Joensson
12:53	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Eric Botcazou
11:59	Ada test failures at -O2	Laurent GUERBY
11:58	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Jan Hubicka
11:08	Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20031128 on sparc-linux: ICE in stage1/xgcc (gnat1): ada/sem_type.adb	Christian Joensson
10:58	Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Mark Kettenis
09:38	help with gcc-3.3.2 for ARM	Aitor Garcia
02:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.	Daniel Berlin
01:45	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Jan Hubicka
00:19	asm(...) and how to properly align jump labels	Denys Duchier

November 27, 2003

23:49	Re: Ptrs to IO space?	Richard Henderson
23:48	Re: Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering...	Richard Henderson
23:44	Re: DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Richard Henderson
23:42	Re: problem with subregs.	Jim Wilson
23:29	Re: Do we still need ggc-simple	Ben Elliston
23:24	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Richard Henderson
23:17	Ptrs to IO space?	aspiesrule
23:15	Volatiles and speculative memory access reordering...	aspiesrule
23:08	DWARF2 CFI in absence of a frame pointer	Mark Kettenis
22:36	successful build 3.3.2 with i386-pc-solaris2.9	Kevin Rose
21:37	Re: tail-call optimization question	Jan Hubicka
19:50	Re: New target porting time estimates?	Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:48	Re: accessing mirrors	Gerald Pfeifer
19:39	accessing mirrors	bruno doutriaux
18:55	tail-call optimization question	Musachy Barroso
17:57	Re: problem with subregs.	Tal Agmon
16:04	[tree-ssa] RPM packages available for branch snapshots	Diego Novillo
15:59	sizeof on const	Tal Agmon
15:21	Fwd: Severe performance degradation when calling functions	Paul Brook
10:50	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Zack Weinberg
10:34	Re: fastjar.info not installed any longer?	Gunther Nikl
09:45	fastjar.info not installed any longer?	Gerald Pfeifer
09:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Zdenek Dvorak
09:27	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Zdenek Dvorak
08:35	help compiling gcc with -mtune=c3-2	Peter T. Bense
08:22	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branch closed.	Jan Hubicka
08:03	Re: Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi	Zack Weinberg
07:14	Re: odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite	Andrew Pinski
05:25	Re: PCH bit me	Alan Modra
04:29	Re: PCH bit me	Daniel Jacobowitz
04:23	PCH bit me	Alan Modra
04:09	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.	Diego Novillo
03:33	odd failures in 20031126 snapshot for g77 testsuite	Jack Howarth
01:58	Fwd: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	aspiesrule
01:35	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	aspiesrule
01:34	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	aspiesrule
00:44	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Daniel Berlin

November 26, 2003

23:57	Re: thanks for the memory work	Steven Bosscher
22:59	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Russ Allbery
22:38	cachecc1, a gcc cache	Benoit Poulot-Cazajous
21:26	Re: [tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we???	law
21:06	__null is set to zero? (gcc/cp/lex.c 3.3.2 src) using Gimpel Flexelint	Ken Wolcott
19:53	Re: Now, we have a problem...	Carlo Wood
19:18	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
19:10	Re: Visibility attribute	Geoff Keating
19:00	Re: thanks for the memory work	Geoff Keating
18:58	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Geoff Keating
18:58	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	Richard Kenner
18:41	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
18:26	Re: thanks for the memory work	Andrew MacLeod
18:06	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	Geert Bosch
17:59	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
17:50	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	Arnaud Charlet
17:47	Re: (GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	Geert Bosch
17:34	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss
17:18	Now, we have a problem...	aspiesrule
17:04	gcc-ss-3.4-20031126 is now available	gccadmin
17:02	(GNAT) Do we need misc.c:gnat_adjust_rli anymore?	aspiesrule
16:30	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Benjamin Kosnik
15:57	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Diego Novillo
15:49	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Zdenek Dvorak
15:41	Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Diego Novillo
15:39	Gcc toolkit needed	azaka
15:36	Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes	Giovanni Bajo
15:31	Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes	Jason Merrill
14:40	Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes	Volker Reichelt
14:33	gcc 3.4 experimental?	Jack Howarth
13:55	[tree-ssa] Bootstraps broken on alpha, ia64 and ppc. Branchclosed.	Diego Novillo
13:53	Re: thanks for the memory work	Daniel Berlin
13:50	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Daniel Berlin
13:34	RE: Crash in garbage collector	Jon Beniston
13:23	Re: thanks for the memory work	Andrew MacLeod
12:58	[tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?	Zdenek Dvorak
12:46	PATCH for Re: New mirror	Gerald Pfeifer
12:05	Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory	mohanlal jangir
06:58	Re: Visibility attribute	H. J. Lu
06:54	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Benjamin Kosnik
06:05	Re: [www-patch] Testing C++ changes	Jason Merrill
06:03	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss
05:34	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Ben Elliston
05:30	Visibility attribute	Matt Austern
05:29	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
05:25	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
05:05	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Andrew Pinski
04:28	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
04:26	Re: thanks for the memory work	Daniel Berlin
04:26	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
03:49	Re: thanks for the memory work	Andrew MacLeod
03:46	Re: thanks for the memory work	Andrew MacLeod
03:28	Mailing List Question	Adrian Bellomo
03:06	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
03:03	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
02:03	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Zack Weinberg
01:17	Re: thanks for the memory work	Andrew MacLeod
00:49	[www-patch] Testing C++ changes	Volker Reichelt

November 25, 2003

23:56	Re: thanks for the memory work	Steven Bosscher
23:54	Re: thanks for the memory work	Jan Hubicka
23:49	Re: thanks for the memory work	law
23:25	[tree-ssa] We are removing annotations, or are we???	Steven Bosscher
23:14	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	David Carlton
23:12	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	David Carlton
23:04	Re: thanks for the memory work	Steven Bosscher
22:24	Re: Ada GNARL naming convention	Arnaud Charlet
22:23	3.2 code bloat from debug info	Glenn Burkhardt
22:04	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Daniel Berlin
21:55	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
21:30	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Geoff Keating
20:15	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Devang Patel
19:58	__builtin_expect usage and g++	Anders Fugmann
19:48	Re: DWARF: C++ namespace support	Daniel Berlin
19:42	DWARF: C++ namespace support	Devang Patel
18:07	va_start behaving strange	Gabor Greif
18:02	Ada GNARL naming convention	John R. Shannon
17:51	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	David Edelsohn
17:21	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Dan Kegel
17:03	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Jack Howarth
17:01	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Dan Kegel
16:01	Help needed	Chandramohan . Seeniappan
15:31	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	David Edelsohn
15:13	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	David Edelsohn
14:06	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Jack Howarth
13:27	Re: Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ?	Andreas Schwab
13:17	gcc cvs HEAD Ada testsuite on cygwin: failed run-time assertion : Tasking not implemented on this configuration	Christian Joensson
12:53	Bug in traditional cpp in gcc 3.3.2 ?	Marc Espie
12:09	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Dorit Naishlos
12:05	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss
11:11	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Jan Hubicka
11:07	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss
10:47	Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory	qinfeng . zhang
10:39	Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory	mohanlal jangir
10:29	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss
10:07	Re: building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no suchfile or directory	qinfeng . zhang
09:41	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Gabriel Paubert
07:46	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
07:02	building cross compiler from cygwin windows to linux: crti.o no such file or directory	mohanlal jangir
06:37	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Dan Kegel
04:37	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Richard Stallman
02:23	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-11-24	Diego Novillo
00:44	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Robert Moss

November 24, 2003

23:38	Re: cvs gcc 3.4 check	Andrew Pinski
23:36	cvs gcc 3.4 check	Jack Howarth
23:33	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Jack Howarth
23:18	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Andrew Pinski
22:49	Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc	Ashutosh Dixit
22:39	Re: Crash in garbage collector	Richard Sandiford
22:05	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
22:03	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI	Jim Dehnert
21:54	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Geoff Keating
21:52	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Geoff Keating
21:48	Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility	Geoff Keating
20:54	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	David Edelsohn
20:46	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
20:46	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Jack Howarth
20:27	Re: End-of-unit changes in decl visibility	Eric Christopher
20:24	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	tm_gccmail
20:14	GCC 3.2.3 - Undefined symbols .L_Ennn	McM57
19:43	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Andrew Pinski
19:43	Re: impact of -minsert-sched-nops	David Edelsohn
19:37	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Dan Nicolaescu
19:26	impact of -minsert-sched-nops	Jack Howarth
18:27	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
18:05	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Jan Hubicka
17:45	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI	Carlo Wood
17:12	gcc-ss-3.3-20031124 is now available	gccadmin
17:10	Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
17:08	Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax	Joe Buck
17:03	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119	Dan Kegel
16:26	Re: Linux compiler Question	Phil Edwards
16:14	Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:07	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
15:56	Re: "Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc	Richard Earnshaw
15:46	"Incomplete type" and "redefinition" errors in gcc	Ashutosh Dixit
15:08	Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4 snapshot20031119	Robert Moss
14:42	Re: ASSIGNMENT papers?	Gerald Pfeifer
14:35	Re: The need for a libobjc maintainer	Gerald Pfeifer
12:08	Re: Bug or my mistake?	Gareth McCaughan
11:03	Linux compiler Question	Mohammed Sultan
10:10	Re: gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5	Gerald Pfeifer
10:01	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
09:41	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
09:27	setjmp vs. gcc's __builtin_setjmp [Was: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139]	Christian Joensson
08:28	Re: Intermodule constant propagation	Andrew Pinski
08:17	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI	Kai Henningsen
08:03	Intermodule constant propagation	Mircea Namolaru
07:17	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI	Mark Mitchell
07:03	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
06:33	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
05:15	Re: place internet call from your telephone line	cendd
03:39	Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI	Carlo Wood
02:40	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
02:09	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI	Mark Mitchell
00:09	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Scott Robert Ladd

November 23, 2003

23:40	A complexity in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor
23:16	Re: gcc and LSU rejects	Andrew Pinski
23:05	Re: gcc and LSU rejects	Jack Howarth
22:26	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Jamie Lokier
22:13	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Branko Äibej
20:57	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Scott Robert Ladd
20:37	Re: gcc and LSU rejects	Andrew Pinski
20:21	Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax	Jan Hubicka
20:11	gcc and LSU rejects	Jack Howarth
20:06	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Jan Hubicka
19:30	Re: Testing C++ changes	Tom Tromey
18:50	gcc 3.4 and -O4/-O5	Jack Howarth
18:19	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Jan Hubicka
18:09	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Scott Robert Ladd
17:33	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Jan Hubicka
17:21	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Scott Robert Ladd
16:22	Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Jan Hubicka
16:15	Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?	Scott Robert Ladd
16:08	Re: Inner-loop optimization regression from 3.3 to 3.4	Jan Hubicka
15:58	Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.	Nathan Sidwell
14:09	Re: Why symcat.h is not included anymore?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:51	Why symcat.h is not included anymore?	Tal Agmon
09:00	AW: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing	Michael Sogtrop
04:46	Re: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing	Gerrit P. Haase
04:46	Handling of cast operators in the mangling ABI	Ian Lance Taylor

November 22, 2003

21:28	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Richard Stallman
16:50	__static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int) missing	Michael Sögtrop
16:06	Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Christian Joensson
15:25	Re: gc question	Jan Hubicka
10:53	Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Gerrit P. Haase
10:39	Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Gerrit P. Haase
08:26	Re: Testing C++ changes	Gerald Pfeifer
06:34	Re: C++ demangler ABI vs. g++	Carlo Wood
02:33	C++ demangler ABI vs. g++	Ian Lance Taylor
02:28	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change	John David Anglin
02:14	Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.4, first pass	John David Anglin
02:03	Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax	DJ Delorie
01:54	Re: jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax	Joe Buck
01:45	jump bypass confuses noce_try_minmax	DJ Delorie
01:23	Re: Targets to obsolete for 3.4, second pass	Mark Mitchell
01:20	Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline	Mark Mitchell
01:16	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Mark Mitchell
00:01	Re: g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.	Stephan T. Lavavej

November 21, 2003

23:56	Re: gc question	Geoff Keating
22:54	g++ weird behavoir with values returned by copy.	Leandro Lucarella
21:48	Re: gc question	Daniel Berlin
21:45	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Joe Buck
21:39	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	tm_gccmail
21:15	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change	David Edelsohn
21:14	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange	Andreas Jaeger
21:09	Re: gc question	law
20:30	Re: gc question	Daniel Berlin
20:27	gc question	law
20:11	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange	Andreas Jaeger
20:02	Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?	Frank Ch. Eigler
19:51	Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?	Zdenek Dvorak
19:12	Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?	Diego Novillo
19:01	[tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?	Zdenek Dvorak
18:18	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change	David Edelsohn
17:36	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLELchange	Andreas Jaeger
15:15	Re: Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change	David Edelsohn
13:10	Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Arnaud Charlet
13:07	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Arnaud Charlet
12:48	Re: Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Christian Joensson
12:31	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Gerald Pfeifer
11:34	Re: hungarian mirror	Gerald Pfeifer
11:09	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
11:06	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
11:02	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
11:01	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
10:42	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Arnaud Charlet
10:40	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Gerald Pfeifer
09:42	Mainline bootstrap fails for x86_64-linux-gnu with PARALLEL change	Andreas Jaeger
08:53	Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types inmainline	Nathan Sidwell
08:21	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Arnaud Charlet
08:10	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Richard Henderson
07:48	Re: Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	Arnaud Charlet
07:20	Re: must_alias question	law
07:05	Slightly ambiguous wording in cppopts.texi	Phil Edwards
06:35	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
03:06	Re: must_alias question	Diego Novillo
03:03	Re: must_alias question	Diego Novillo
02:16	Bug or my mistake?	Lally Singh
01:30	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
01:15	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
00:57	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
00:56	Re: Crash in garbage collector	Geoff Keating
00:47	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
00:44	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
00:33	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
00:30	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
00:13	Re: must_alias question	Diego Novillo
00:00	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka

November 20, 2003

23:56	Re: Jump threading and loops	Jan Hubicka
23:52	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
23:47	Ada: jmp_buf size incorrect	Ulrich Weigand
23:46	Re: Jump threading and loops	Zdenek Dvorak
23:35	Jump threading and loops	Jan Hubicka
23:32	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Bruce Korb
23:24	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
23:18	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
22:43	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
22:27	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Phil Edwards
21:55	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
21:44	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
21:40	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
21:33	Re: must_alias question	Diego Novillo
21:32	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	bkorb
21:19	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
21:15	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
21:05	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
21:02	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
20:50	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
20:48	Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.	Chris Lattner
20:35	Does "make check" work for Ada without "make install"?	H. J. Lu
20:31	Re: must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
19:46	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Albert Chin-A-Young
19:21	Re: -B file prefix never used	Markus Johansson
19:14	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
18:57	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Paul Eggert
18:38	Re: -B file prefix never used	Geert Bosch
18:29	[tree-ssa]: A typo in Makefile.tpl?	H. J. Lu
18:25	Crash in garbage collector	Jon Beniston
17:48	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
16:45	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
14:12	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Rainer Orth
14:12	Re: must_alias question	Diego Novillo
14:03	Re: [tree-ssa] which snapshot is good	Diego Novillo
12:25	-B file prefix never used	Markus Johansson
11:34	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Eric Botcazou
10:04	must_alias question	Jan Hubicka
09:33	Re: flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Ben Elliston
09:31	flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}	Ben Elliston
09:26	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Andrew Haley
06:17	[tree-ssa] which snapshot is good	Henrik Sorensen
04:22	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Alexandre Oliva
01:26	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
00:55	Re: CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.	Jim Wilson
00:46	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:41	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
00:37	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
00:34	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:33	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:29	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
00:21	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:20	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
00:17	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:15	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
00:14	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
00:13	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Diego Novillo
00:13	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
00:07	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Diego Novillo
00:02	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Diego Novillo

November 19, 2003

23:46	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
23:41	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Geoff Keating
23:34	Re: Question about libffi closure	Jakub Jelinek
23:33	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
23:30	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
23:29	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
23:27	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Richard Henderson
23:23	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
23:21	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Richard Henderson
23:20	Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Richard Henderson
23:17	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
23:12	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
23:10	Re: why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77	Toon Moene
23:08	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
23:02	TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem	Jan Hubicka
23:02	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
22:59	Do we still need ggc-simple	Steven Bosscher
22:56	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
22:50	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
22:46	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
22:31	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
22:31	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
22:27	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
22:25	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
22:23	Re: Question about libffi closure	Andrew Haley
22:20	Re: Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
22:17	Re: Tree sharing issues...	law
22:15	Re: Question about libffi closure	David Edelsohn
22:13	Tree sharing issues...	Jan Hubicka
22:12	Re: Question about libffi closure	Andrew Haley
21:58	CONSTRUCTOR Confusion about the gccinternals document.	Chris Lattner
21:51	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
21:49	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
21:47	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
21:45	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
21:45	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
21:45	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
21:44	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
21:36	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
21:34	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
21:30	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
21:28	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
21:26	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
21:23	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
21:22	End-of-unit changes in decl visibility	Richard Sandiford
21:18	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
21:13	Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened	David Edelsohn
21:01	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
20:52	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
20:50	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
20:49	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
20:47	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
20:46	Re: Question about libffi closure	David Edelsohn
20:40	Re: Question about libffi closure	Jeff Sturm
20:36	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
20:34	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
20:33	Re: Question about libffi closure	Andreas Jaeger
20:29	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
20:23	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
20:16	Re: using a personal "double" type	Mike Stump
20:02	Re: Testing C++ changes	Tom Tromey
19:47	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
19:39	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
19:34	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
19:26	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
19:14	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
19:12	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
19:09	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
19:09	Re: Testing C++ changes	Mark Mitchell
19:06	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
19:04	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
19:01	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
19:01	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
18:56	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Richard Henderson
18:51	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
18:48	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
18:43	why -fno-globals at -O3 with g77	Jack Howarth
18:38	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
18:25	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
18:25	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Andrew MacLeod
18:05	Re: Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	law
17:44	Tree-SSA self checking infrastructure	Jan Hubicka
17:30	using a personal "double" type	FEYEL Frederic.
17:07	gcc-ss-3.4-20031119 is now available	gccadmin
16:56	Question about libffi closure	Andrew Haley
15:08	Re: Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline	Wolfgang Bangerth
14:49	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Diego Novillo
14:39	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Richard Henderson
14:31	Question about libffi closure	Andreas Jaeger
14:16	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Diego Novillo
13:23	Status of two-stage name-lookup and covariant return types in mainline	Volker Reichelt
13:17	Re: Testing C++ changes	Jason Merrill
10:45	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Martin Reinecke
08:47	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Andrew Haley
08:08	Re: getting gcc rpms for older versions	Jim Wilson
08:02	Re: x386 function prologue	Jim Wilson
07:53	Re: Writing a frontend to gcc for a new language developed at Ericsson	Jim Wilson
06:56	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Richard Henderson
06:55	Re: IA64: roblem with OUTGOING_ARG	Jim Wilson
06:24	getting gcc rpms for older versions	Jeevan, Joseph John
05:19	Re: Compressed rtl project	Daniel Berlin
05:04	Re: Compressed rtl project	law
04:09	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Per Bothner
02:49	Re: Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )type information	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:32	Re: [tree-ssa] Branch re-opened	Andrew Pinski
00:50	Re: [tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument	Richard Henderson
00:35	Compressed rtl project	Zdenek Dvorak
00:20	[tree-ssa] RETURN_EXPR argument	Zdenek Dvorak

November 18, 2003

23:43	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Tom Tromey
23:12	[tree-ssa] Branch re-opened	Diego Novillo
22:59	Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)	Ken Wolcott
21:58	Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin:libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )typeinformation	Gerald Pfeifer
21:57	RE: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)	Josephine O'Para
21:40	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Daniel Jacobowitz
21:23	Re: Help with installing gcc (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/)	Ken Wolcott
21:18	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Andreas Schwab
21:18	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Andreas Schwab
21:16	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Diego Novillo
21:15	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	law
21:01	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Andreas Schwab
21:00	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Jason Merrill
20:47	New mirror	M A
20:45	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	law
20:37	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Steven Bosscher
20:33	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Jan Hubicka
20:30	Re: [tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	law
20:19	[tree-ssa] More patch reversals. Branch closed temporarily	Diego Novillo
19:02	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Scott Robert Ladd
18:57	Re: [tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Richard Henderson
18:48	cross gnatmake doesn't find cross tools	Ralf Corsepius
18:34	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Jan Hubicka
18:28	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Scott Robert Ladd
18:25	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Scott Robert Ladd
17:56	[tree-ssa] How to make DECLs that alias	Andrew Haley
17:38	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Erik Trulsson
17:36	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Richard Earnshaw
17:32	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Scott Robert Ladd
17:31	Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit	law
17:20	x386 function prologue	Bharat Madan
17:15	Re: [tree-ssa PATCH] Pick memory consumption low hanging fruit	law
17:00	Re: Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Dan Nicolaescu
15:12	Optimization: Conclusions from Evolutionary Analysis	Scott Robert Ladd
14:20	Re: basic block reordering question.	Josef Zlomek
13:21	Re: CVS not executing commands!	Ian Lance Taylor
12:20	Re: Can I convert Java codes to C++ codes via your gcc/gcj software?	Ranjit Mathew
12:13	Re: JAVA COMPILER	Paolo Carlini
12:02	Re: JAVA COMPILER	Ranjit Mathew
09:40	JAVA COMPILER	Sammy
08:24	Can I convert Java codes to C++ codes via your gcc/gcj software?	xueheng
08:22	Re: CVS not executing commands!	Paolo Carlini
08:07	CVS not executing commands!	Paolo Carlini
06:20	Re: merge_translation_unit_decls / duplicate_decls	Geoffrey Keating
06:19	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Andreas Tobler
05:54	merge_translation_unit_decls / duplicate_decls	Per Bothner
04:39	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:13	Re: New target porting time estimates?	Ian Lance Taylor

November 17, 2003

23:00	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Toon Moene
22:19	Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)	Diego Novillo
22:12	Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)	Richard Henderson
20:49	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Jim Wilson
20:49	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Pavel Pisa
20:45	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Jim Wilson
20:28	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	David Edelsohn
20:23	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	tm_gccmail
20:03	Re: problem with subregs.	Jim Wilson
19:52	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Jim Wilson
19:39	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Paul Brook
19:28	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	tm_gccmail
19:27	Re: More PRE problems	law
19:17	Re: problem with subregs.	Tal Agmon
19:05	Re: Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options	Scott Robert Ladd
18:55	Re: Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options	Artem B. Bityuckiy
18:44	Released: An Evolutionary Analysis of GNU C Options	Scott Robert Ladd
18:33	Re: pascal strings in C	Dale Johannesen
17:31	Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)	Diego Novillo
17:15	gcc-ss-3.3-20031117 is now available	gccadmin
16:55	CFG and trees	Andrew MacLeod
16:54	Re: Shrinking install/specific.html	Gerald Pfeifer
16:39	Re: [tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)	law
16:38	Re: More PRE problems	Daniel Berlin
16:36	Re: [tree-ssa] moving phi nodes?	law
15:55	Re: More PRE problems	law
15:37	Re: More PRE problems	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:09	Re: More PRE problems	law
13:31	[tree-ssa] New bootstrap error on ia64 (stmt_ann)	Andreas Schwab
13:09	Failure to build gnat tools on cygwin: *** [../../gnatchop.exe] Error 139	Christian Joensson
10:20	[RFC] Addressing Mode Selection Issues.	Naveen Sharma, Noida
09:31	Re: New target porting time estimates?	Richard Tierney
09:03	Pointer alignment	Eric Botcazou
06:24	RE: PATCH for: Broken Documentation Link	Stephan T. Lavavej
01:47	pascal strings in C	Andy

November 16, 2003

23:35	Re: gcc IPA?	Jim Wilson
23:26	Re: g77 executable linkage	Jim Wilson
23:10	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Jim Wilson
23:06	Writing a frontend to gcc for a new language developed at Ericsson	Mikael Wittberg
22:27	Re: Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc	Jim Wilson
18:23	Re: Test cases	Thomas Neumann
17:06	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:57	Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp	Gerald Pfeifer
15:27	Re: Test cases	Falk Hueffner
15:01	Re: Test Cases	Joost VandeVondele
14:23	Re: Test cases	Gerald Pfeifer
13:24	cpplib and iconv.h (bootstrap failure)	Gerald Pfeifer
12:53	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Andreas Tobler
12:38	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Gerald Pfeifer
12:29	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information	Giovanni Bajo
11:48	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Geoff Keating
11:26	PATCH for: Broken Documentation Link	Gerald Pfeifer
10:11	Broken Documentation Link	Stephan T. Lavavej
06:25	[tree-ssa] moving phi nodes?	Richard Henderson
01:33	gcc IPA?	Jack Howarth

November 15, 2003

23:18	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Jan Hubicka
22:01	GCC/G++ Idea	Maciej Zenczykowski
20:16	[tree-ssa] ICE while compiling tree-ssa with another tree-ssain fortran/match.c	Melvin Hadasht
20:07	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Gerald Pfeifer
20:03	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Gerald Pfeifer
19:55	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145:error: overloaded function with no contextual type information	Andreas Jaeger
19:52	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Richard Henderson
19:35	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Carlo Wood
18:14	Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp	Mark Mitchell
17:23	Re: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error:overloaded function with no contextual type information	Andreas Tobler
17:19	Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information	Christian Joensson
16:04	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Jan Hubicka
12:54	Re: Disable warnings in code	Robert Dewar
12:28	Re: New target porting time estimates?	Robert Dewar
11:54	Re: 3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp	Gerald Pfeifer
08:33	g77 executable linkage	Jack Howarth
04:16	Release of new gcc api technology : introspector datacubes	James Michael DuPont
04:07	Disable warnings in code	Tron Thomas
03:47	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Andrew Pinski
03:38	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Andrew Pinski
02:12	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
01:55	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	DJ Delorie
01:49	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
01:47	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Phil Edwards
01:21	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Jan Hubicka
01:19	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Jan Hubicka
00:52	3.3.2 prerelease still on ftp	Dara Hazeghi
00:18	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Matt Austern
00:01	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Phil Edwards

November 14, 2003

23:52	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:45	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:06	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	H. J. Lu
22:42	Re: basic block reordering question.	Andrew MacLeod
22:39	Re: [tree-ssa] on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu hangs.	Andrew Pinski
22:32	[tree-ssa] on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu hangs.	Toon Moene
22:31	Re: basic block reordering question.	Richard Henderson
22:16	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Ian Lance Taylor
22:10	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	tm_gccmail
20:51	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Matt Austern
20:51	Re: More PRE problems	Daniel Berlin
20:32	Re: New target porting time estimates?	Ian Lance Taylor
20:27	Re: More PRE problems	Daniel Berlin
20:25	Re: basic block reordering question.	Andrew MacLeod
20:17	Re: basic block reordering question.	Richard Henderson
19:57	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	tm_gccmail
19:50	Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target	Bernardo Innocenti
19:46	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	tm_gccmail
19:40	Re: Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc	tm_gccmail
19:39	More PRE problems	law
19:23	Patch submission procedures	Gerald Pfeifer
19:03	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Joe Buck
18:51	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:44	New target porting time estimates?	Richard Tierney
18:40	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Robert Dewar
18:38	IA64: roblem with OUTGOING_ARG	Michael Matz
18:10	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Tom Tromey
17:40	Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target	Joe Buck
17:21	Re: Shrinking install/specific.html	Dara Hazeghi
15:59	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	H. J. Lu
15:59	basic block reordering question.	Andrew MacLeod
15:59	Re: State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Peter Barada
15:44	State of m68k float emulation in lb1sf68.asm (muldf, divdf)	Pavel Pisa
15:07	Re: Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64	Andreas Jaeger
15:04	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
15:01	Re: Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64 (Was: Re: Ada config for x86_64-linux)	Richard Kenner
14:01	Ada is still broken on AMD64 and IA64 (Was: Re: Ada config forx86_64-linux)	Andreas Jaeger
13:52	Re: Precompiled headers	Robert Vazan
13:42	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Ian Lance Taylor
13:28	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:56	Re: Can't bootstrap gc cvs HEAD on cygwin: sem_aggr.adb:2097:14: Unmatched actual in call	Arnaud Charlet
11:42	Can't bootstrap gc cvs HEAD on cygwin: sem_aggr.adb:2097:14: Unmatched actual in call	Christian Joensson
10:45	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Jan Hubicka
10:07	Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target	Richard Henderson
10:05	Re: Shrinking install/specific.html	Joseph S. Myers
09:16	Shrinking install/specific.html	Dara Hazeghi
08:36	Re: Extension of the CSiBE benchmark	Lars Albertsson
08:26	Re: ping: [m68k] Add m68k-uclinux-uclibc target	Bernardo Innocenti
08:25	Successful Build - gcc-3.3.2	s7726
08:13	Macro Labels in local scope: Works with g++ but breaks with gcc	Rama Singh
07:01	[tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin	Andrew Pinski
05:42	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Peter Barada
04:38	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
04:26	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:15	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Ian Lance Taylor
04:11	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
04:08	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:00	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:11	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
03:06	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	DJ Delorie
02:57	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
02:54	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	DJ Delorie
02:53	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	DJ Delorie
02:43	Re: Bugzilla request: time for a 3.5 target	Wolfgang Bangerth
02:16	Re: stabs+ debug info	Ian Lance Taylor
01:53	stabs+ debug info	Waldek Hebisch
01:36	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
01:28	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Carlo Wood
01:22	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Chris Lattner
01:14	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	H. J. Lu
00:01	Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementationpessimizescode	Benjamin Kosnik

November 13, 2003

23:48	Re: 64-Bit GCC	Joe Buck
23:41	Re: 64-Bit GCC	Robert Dewar
23:24	Bugzilla request: time for a 3.5 target	Steven Bosscher
23:12	Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling	Jim Wilson
23:04	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Diego Novillo
22:47	Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval	law
22:44	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
22:39	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Steven Bosscher
22:26	Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed	Carlo Wood
22:12	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
22:04	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
22:04	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Steven Bosscher
21:57	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Richard Henderson
21:53	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Richard Henderson
21:53	Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode	Richard Guenther
21:44	Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval	Andrew MacLeod
21:42	Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode	Richard Guenther
21:33	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
21:26	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Daniel Berlin
21:20	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Diego Novillo
21:10	Re: [tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval	law
20:37	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Richard Guenther
20:22	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Diego Novillo
20:10	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Joe Buck
20:08	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Joe Buck
20:07	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Diego Novillo
20:05	Re: [tree-ssa] extra copy	Diego Novillo
19:55	[tree-ssa] extra copy	Dan Nicolaescu
19:51	[tree-ssa] cfg_remove_useless_stmts and invert_truthval	Andrew MacLeod
19:36	Re: 64-Bit GCC	Joe Buck
17:45	RE: 64-Bit GCC	Krishnamurthy, Balaji
17:40	Re: 64-Bit GCC	Joe Buck
17:26	64-Bit GCC	Krishnamurthy, Balaji
17:20	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Steven Bosscher
16:51	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
16:48	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	law
16:41	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
16:40	Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)	Mark Mitchell
16:34	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Diego Novillo
16:32	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
16:29	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	law
16:19	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
16:18	Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)	Richard Earnshaw
16:12	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Daniel Berlin
16:09	Re: g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)	Joseph S. Myers
15:58	g++ build failure (Was: C++ PATCH: PR 12735)	Joern Rennecke
15:31	Re: Deliberate padding between static and stack variables?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:16	Baselines for CSiBE benchmark	Arpad Beszedes
13:34	Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling	Andreas Krebbel
12:29	Deliberate padding between static and stack variables?	Nicholas Nethercote
11:57	Re: output format of gcc -E?	John Marshall
11:25	New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Andrew Haley
10:40	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Jan Hubicka
10:20	Re: output format of gcc -E?	Jakub Jelinek
10:08	output format of gcc -E?	Dan Kegel
07:23	Re: Extreme PRE compile times	Steven Bosscher
05:40	Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc	Jim Wilson
05:01	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
04:51	Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt	law
04:42	Extreme PRE compile times	law
03:16	Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc	Daniel Jacobowitz
02:37	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-11-11	Diego Novillo
01:52	demengler in libstdc++ is changed	H. J. Lu
01:48	Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt	Richard Henderson
01:28	Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc	Andrew Pinski
01:27	script to intersperse C code throughout assembly dump	Marty Hauff
01:26	Re: Changing installation dir after building gcc	Jim Wilson
00:59	Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt	Jan Hubicka
00:51	Re: [tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt	Richard Henderson
00:25	[tree-ssa] gimple and fold_stmt	Jan Hubicka
00:05	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	H. J. Lu

November 12, 2003

22:30	subversions.gnu.org broken again?	Joe Buck
21:38	[Problem in inlining, web.c] Re: g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f	Toon Moene
20:23	sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.2 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
18:06	Re: something that would be nice	Joe Buck
17:44	Re: gcc 3.4 and altivec code generation?	David Edelsohn
17:37	g77.f-torture/execute/labug1.f	Jack Howarth
17:08	gcc 3.4 and altivec code generation?	Jack Howarth
17:07	gcc-ss-3.4-20031112 is now available	gccadmin
16:59	Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs	Jack Howarth
15:45	Successful build of gcc-3.3.2 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f	Arnold Vogelsang
13:31	Changing installation dir after building gcc	Antti Kerola
13:11	Re: libgcj problems on panther	Andreas Tobler
12:09	Re: something that would be nice	Robert Dewar
11:00	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi	Eric Botcazou
08:07	Re: PATCH: RFA reload.c patch	Jim Wilson
08:04	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Christian Joensson
07:23	Re: C source interspersed through assembly output	Jim Wilson
07:03	Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling	Jim Wilson
05:21	Re: something that would be nice	John S. Dyson
04:06	RE: C source interspersed through assembly output	Rayson Ho
03:55	Re: C source interspersed through assembly output	Michel Lespinasse
03:36	C source interspersed through assembly output	Marty Hauff
03:31	Re: something that would be nice	Marty Hauff
00:46	Re: something that would be nice	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:44	Re: something that would be nice	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:40	Re: something that would be nice	Mike Stump
00:34	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Tom Tromey
00:32	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Tom Tromey

November 11, 2003

23:25	Re: something that would be nice	Matt Wells
23:23	Re: something that would be nice	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:13	Re: something that would be nice	Matt Wells
23:12	Re: something that would be nice	Matt Austern
23:07	Re: something that would be nice	Matt Wells
23:05	Re: something that would be nice	Mike Stump
22:59	Re: something that would be nice	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:48	something that would be nice	Matt Wells
22:29	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	H. J. Lu
22:11	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Jakub Jelinek
22:02	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Andrew Haley
22:00	Re: How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?	Ziemowit Laski
21:57	Re: New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	H. J. Lu
21:26	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	Jan Hubicka
21:06	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	law
20:58	Re: How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?	Ian Lance Taylor
20:53	How to add a (sub)target-specific '-W...' or '-f...' option?	Ziemowit Laski
19:11	New crash in crtstuff.c since Oct 31	Tom Tromey
17:38	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Jan Hubicka
17:23	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	Jan Hubicka
17:10	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	Richard Henderson
16:27	[tree-ssa]: Detecting low-GIMPLE (was Re: [tree-ssa] Illegibledumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file)	Diego Novillo
14:20	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Christian Joensson
10:04	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Christian Joensson
09:59	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Arnaud Charlet
09:28	Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling	Andreas Krebbel
09:25	templates with pointer arguments	Fery
08:56	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	Jan Hubicka
07:47	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Christian Joensson
07:39	Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs	Jim Wilson
05:28	Re: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed	Mark Mitchell
04:41	Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs	Jack Howarth
02:20	Re: sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs	Ian Lance Taylor
00:59	Re: problem with subregs.	Jim Wilson
00:59	sanity of Fortran COMMONs in shared libs	Jack Howarth
00:26	Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	Steven Bosscher
00:22	Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	Diego Novillo

November 10, 2003

23:11	Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	law
22:45	Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction	Andrew MacLeod
22:39	Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs. tree-optimizer interaction	Richard Henderson
22:35	Re: Precompiled headers	Mike Stump
21:53	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
21:46	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
21:42	Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs. tree-optimizer interaction	law
21:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction	Andrew MacLeod
21:26	[tree-ssa] Branch unfrozen	Diego Novillo
21:22	Re: [tree-ssa] Work around for an unfortunate fold-const vs.tree-optimizer interaction	Diego Novillo
21:19	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Daniel Berlin
21:12	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Diego Novillo
20:56	Re: Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Andreas Schwab
20:53	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
20:51	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
20:35	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
20:10	Re: tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	law
19:55	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Daniel Berlin
19:54	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
19:47	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
19:43	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
19:40	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
19:34	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Steven Bosscher
19:29	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
19:22	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
19:13	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
19:12	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi	Jan Hubicka
19:10	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
19:09	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
19:02	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Zdenek Dvorak
19:00	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	Jan Hubicka
19:00	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
18:55	Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04	law
18:46	Ada testsuite failures for gcc cvs HEAD 20031110 on cygwin: xxx	Christian Joensson
18:41	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:20	Re: Typo in i386.c?	Dara Hazeghi
17:14	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Carlo Wood
17:07	gcc-ss-3.3-20031110 is now available	gccadmin
16:56	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi	Eric Botcazou
16:39	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Daniel Berlin
15:50	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
15:16	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Carlo Wood
15:14	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:32	Re: problem with subregs.	Tal Agmon
14:29	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
14:26	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:24	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
14:12	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:10	Re: Future of gccbug	Wolfgang Bangerth
14:06	Re: Future of gccbug	Wolfgang Bangerth
13:35	8080.com.cn	web
13:28	8080.com.cn	web
12:53	Re: problem with subregs.	Tal Agmon
12:33	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
12:03	Re: HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
11:41	Re: compile time using 2.96	Ben Elliston
11:07	HJ's patches break 3.3 install?	Richard Guenther
10:54	successful build/install of gcc 3.3.2 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.3	Jonathan Thornburg
10:44	Re: Future of gccbug	Richard Earnshaw
10:33	Re: Future of gccbug	Richard Earnshaw
09:26	RE: Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known	Danny Smith
07:51	Re: Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known	Christian Joensson
06:49	Re: Future of gccbug	Eric Botcazou
06:30	Re: Typo in i386.c?	Jim Wilson
06:18	Re: Bug 12098: Detecting a valid assembler	Jim Wilson
02:17	Re: Typo in i386.c?	Dara Hazeghi
02:07	Re: Typo in i386.c?	Jim Wilson
01:58	Typo in i386.c?	Dara Hazeghi

November 09, 2003

22:37	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Zdenek Dvorak
22:06	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Diego Novillo
21:36	Re: Problem in configuring GCC for a new back end	Eric Christopher
21:11	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Andrew Pinski
20:41	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Zdenek Dvorak
20:21	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:15	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
20:09	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:53	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
19:49	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:39	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Daniel Berlin
19:30	Re: Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:28	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:26	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:22	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
19:18	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
19:16	Outcome of the bugzilla threads	Daniel Berlin
18:49	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Richard Henderson
18:39	Re: Future of gccbug	Eric Botcazou
18:19	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42	Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Jan Hubicka
17:22	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
16:47	Re: Future of gccbug	Richard Earnshaw
16:43	Re: Future of gccbug	Richard Earnshaw
16:39	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
16:30	Re: Future of gccbug	Andreas Schwab
16:26	[tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.	Diego Novillo
15:28	hungarian mirror	Czuczy Gergely
15:20	Re: Future of gccbug	Richard Earnshaw
12:46	RE: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed	S. Bosscher
11:45	Problem in configuring GCC for a new back end	Nitin Jain
06:57	Re: Dwarf question.	Josef Zlomek
06:01	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
05:51	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Douglas Gregor
05:45	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Matt Austern
05:11	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
05:06	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:02	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
02:38	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi	Jan Hubicka
02:34	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Jan Hubicka
02:03	Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog doc/invoke.texi	Andrew Pinski
01:48	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Andrew Pinski

November 08, 2003

22:36	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Matt Austern
22:22	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
21:54	Re: Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed	Carlo Wood
21:48	Deprecate targets targets which remain unbuildable for a long time?	Dara Hazeghi
21:26	Re: Static inline functions disappearing in new port (fixed)	Alleged Judas
21:24	Bug 12098: Detecting a valid assembler	Dara Hazeghi
19:09	Re: ix86 optimizer vagaries?	Roberto Bagnara
18:58	Re: files in wwwdocs/install?	Dara Hazeghi
18:28	Re: Bugzilla upgraded	Daniel Berlin
18:21	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Jan Hubicka
18:10	Re: ix86 optimizer vagaries?	Andrew Pinski
18:07	Re: Bugzilla upgraded	Daniel Berlin
17:59	Re: Bugzilla upgraded	Andrew Pinski
17:57	ix86 optimizer vagaries?	Roberto Bagnara
17:48	Re: Bugzilla upgraded	Daniel Berlin
17:45	Re: Bugzilla upgraded	Andrew Pinski
17:39	Bugzilla upgraded	Daniel Berlin
17:25	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Daniel Berlin
17:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Jan Hubicka
16:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Zdenek Dvorak
16:43	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Daniel Berlin
16:36	Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Jan Hubicka
13:53	[tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on PPC	Diego Novillo
12:58	Re: files in wwwdocs/install?	Gerald Pfeifer
12:41	Re: Precompiled headers	Robert Vazan
12:25	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Richard Guenther
11:21	Re: Future of gccbug	Kai Henningsen
03:42	Re: help setting a register to a constant	Jim Wilson
03:28	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Alex Rosenberg
03:05	files in wwwdocs/install?	Dara Hazeghi
01:08	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Ross Smith
00:36	Re: gcc-bugzilla-query (Re: Future of gccbug)	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:32	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
00:27	Re: Future of gccbug	Phil Edwards
00:18	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Jan Hubicka
00:05	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
00:01	Fix to rounding errors in fp-bit.c	Michael Eager

November 07, 2003

23:59	Re: [tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls	Jan Hubicka
23:58	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:47	gcc-bugzilla-query (Re: Future of gccbug)	Daniel Berlin
23:44	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:40	Re: Future of gccbug	Joseph S. Myers
23:40	Re: Future of gccbug	Andreas Schwab
23:39	Re: Future of gccbug	gnat-dev
23:37	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:37	Re: [tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls	Richard Henderson
23:37	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:31	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:29	Re: Future of gccbug	Andreas Schwab
23:25	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
23:25	Re: Future of gccbug	Joe Buck
23:22	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:20	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:19	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
23:15	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:10	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:09	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
23:06	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
23:03	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
22:54	Re: Future of gccbug	Ian Lance Taylor
22:54	Re: Future of gccbug	Joseph S. Myers
22:53	Re: Future of gccbug	gnat-dev
22:50	[tree-ssa] Gimple and tail calls	Jan Hubicka
22:47	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:44	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
22:42	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
22:39	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
22:36	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:30	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:25	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
22:21	Re: Future of gccbug	Joseph S. Myers
22:21	Re: Future of gccbug	Wolfgang Bangerth
22:05	Re: Future of gccbug	Joe Buck
21:51	Re: Future of gccbug	gnat-dev
21:48	help setting a register to a constant	Mihai Burcea
21:30	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:21	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:20	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:16	Re: Future of gccbug	gnat-dev
21:16	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:15	Re: Future of gccbug	Ian Lance Taylor
21:07	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
21:06	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Dan Kegel
21:01	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
20:51	Re: Future of gccbug	Phil Edwards
20:42	Re: Future of gccbug	Andreas Schwab
20:32	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
20:30	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Phil Edwards
20:27	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
20:22	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
20:18	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17	Declaring stage3 before stage2 patches were reviewed	Daniel Berlin
20:13	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13	Re: Precompiled headers	Mike Stump
20:13	Re: Precompiled headers	Mike Stump
20:11	Re: Dwarf question.	Daniel Berlin
20:09	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
20:06	Re: Dwarf question.	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:04	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
20:01	Re: Future of gccbug	gnat-dev
19:56	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:56	Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are thereany inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)	tm_gccmail
19:45	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
19:35	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:35	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Dan Kegel
19:29	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
19:26	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
19:20	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:12	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58	Targets to obsolete for 3.4, second pass	Nathanael Nerode
18:54	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
18:48	Re: [tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA	Daniel Berlin
18:37	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Martin Sebor
18:24	Re: Future of gccbug	Joseph S. Myers
18:18	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
18:18	Re: Future of gccbug	Rainer Orth
18:13	Re: Future of gccbug	Zack Weinberg
18:13	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08	Re: Future of gccbug	Daniel Berlin
18:05	Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)	Joe Buck
17:49	Re: Future of gccbug	Joe Buck
17:49	Dwarf question.	Edmar Wienskoski
17:38	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
17:35	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:34	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
17:34	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Jason Merrill
17:29	Re: Future of gccbug	Volker Reichelt
16:56	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
16:55	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:49	Re: Future of gccbug	Rainer Orth
16:40	Re: Future of gccbug	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:35	Re: Future of gccbug	Andrew Pinski
16:31	Re: Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:30	Future of gccbug	Volker Reichelt
16:18	Re: Degraded C++ error messages.	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:00	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
15:56	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:55	Re: Degraded C++ error messages	Wolfgang Bangerth
15:54	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Andreas Schwab
15:53	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
15:52	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:51	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
15:51	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:48	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Ken Wolcott
15:46	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
15:42	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
15:39	Re: Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?	Theodore Papadopoulo
15:37	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
15:32	Degraded C++ error messages.	Carlo Wood
15:30	Re: GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)	Christoph Hellwig
15:25	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
15:06	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
15:03	Thoughts on "const tree" and "const rtx"?	Roger Sayle
14:59	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Diego Novillo
14:58	GPL and loading/saving RTL (was: Beginner's question:Are there anyinter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?)	Benjamin Geer
14:57	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
14:56	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
14:48	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:48	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Diego Novillo
14:38	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Zdenek Dvorak
14:33	Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	Diego Novillo
14:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Diego Novillo
13:03	Re: [tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	Zdenek Dvorak
13:02	Re: Precompiled headers	Robert Vazan
11:24	Re: Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?	Jan Hubicka
11:18	Re: downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact	Nic Ferrier
11:12	Re: downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact	Gerald Pfeifer
10:04	Re: [tree-ssa] Branch stability	Joseph S. Myers
09:48	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Falk Hueffner
09:28	Re: Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?	Naveen Sharma, Noida
09:00	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Richard Guenther
08:48	Failure to build gnatlib and tools on cygwin: sysdep.c: In function `getc_immediate_common': sysdep.c:356: error: storage size of 'otermios_rec' isn't known	Christian Joensson
08:31	Re: [tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Zdenek Dvorak
08:25	Re: [tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA	Zdenek Dvorak
05:38	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Daniel Jacobowitz
05:33	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Ross Smith
04:59	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
04:47	Why does the athlon_fp DFA have so many states?	Ranjit Mathew
04:44	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:36	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Ian Lance Taylor
03:39	[tree-ssa] Illegible dumps with dump_cfg_function_to_file	Diego Novillo
02:59	Re: [tree-ssa] Branch stability	Andrew MacLeod
02:45	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Andrew Pinski
02:38	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
02:16	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:05	[tree-ssa] Branch stability	Diego Novillo
00:55	Re: using offsetof with g++	Matt Austern
00:40	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Geoff Keating
00:04	Re: Implementing Library calls	Jim Wilson

November 06, 2003

23:35	Re: Why doesn't -fno-common really work???	Jim Wilson
23:28	downloadable manual texinfo files and webmaster contact	Nic Ferrier
22:55	Re: compile time using 2.96	Mike Stump
22:37	Re: using offsetof with g++	Matt Austern
22:36	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:28	[tree-ssa]: BIND_EXPR removal breaks tree-PTA	Daniel Berlin
22:21	Re: using offsetof with g++	Michael Matz
22:16	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Richard Guenther
22:10	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
22:10	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Geoff Keating
22:07	Re: using offsetof with g++	Doug Evans
22:02	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Geoff Keating
22:01	Re: Use assert()s for optimization?	Falk Hueffner
22:00	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:55	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
21:52	Use assert()s for optimization?	Richard Guenther
21:51	Re: using offsetof with g++	Michael Matz
21:50	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:39	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Matt Austern
21:38	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Jim Wilson
21:22	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:05	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
21:04	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:02	Source code database	Jonathan Yavner
21:02	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
21:01	Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.htmlcorrect?	Toon Moene
20:57	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Matt Austern
20:49	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Joe Buck
20:48	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
20:47	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Chris Lattner
20:45	Re: [C++] GCC tree linkage types	Matt Austern
20:42	Re: using offsetof with g++	Joe Buck
20:42	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
20:26	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:24	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:18	Re: using offsetof with g++	Michael Matz
20:16	Re: using offsetof with g++	Joe Buck
20:14	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:08	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Daniel Berlin
20:03	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Zack Weinberg
19:57	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48	Re: using offsetof with g++	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:42	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Andrew Haley
19:39	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:35	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:34	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:19	Re: using offsetof with g++	Doug Evans
19:04	Re: using offsetof with g++	Matt Austern
19:03	Re: no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Dan Kegel
18:34	Re: using offsetof with g++	Joe Buck
18:18	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Joe Buck
18:09	using offsetof with g++	Doug Evans
17:47	tree_ssa_useless_type_conversions	Jan Hubicka
16:56	no --with-sysroot in binutil? Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Wolcott, Ken (MED, Compuware)
16:50	Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?	Rainer Orth
16:41	Implementing Library calls	John Lu
16:36	compile time using 2.96	Bob Rossi
16:20	Re: rtlopt loop unroller question	Zdenek Dvorak
16:07	Re: ICE in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1228	Richard Guenther
15:58	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	H. J. Lu
14:45	re: Why doesn't -fno-common really work???	Jack Howarth
14:33	[tree-ssa] New failures after 2003-11-06 changes	Diego Novillo
14:20	Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism	Michael Matz
14:16	Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism	Tal Agmon
14:14	Re: [tree-ssa] broken test cases	Diego Novillo
13:58	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Daniel Jacobowitz
12:58	[tree-ssa] broken test cases	Steven Bosschner
09:03	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Jim Wilson
08:58	Re: Building the Ada compiler... is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html correct?	Arnaud Charlet
08:50	Re: Gimplification and simplification	Jan Hubicka
08:43	Re: --with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Jim Wilson
08:42	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Andrew Haley
08:06	--with-sysroot not in gcc-3.3.x?	Dan Kegel
04:20	Why doesn't -fno-common really work???	Jack Howarth
03:25	Re: Nonlocal gotos: wrong frame pointer handling	Jim Wilson
03:15	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:55	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Jim Wilson
02:31	Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT	Jim Wilson
02:15	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimization in GCC backend ?	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:12	RE: Parse tree-dump	Long Fei
02:10	Re: Beginner's question:Are there any inter-procedural optimizationin GCC backend ?	Jim Wilson
01:59	RE: Parse tree-dump	qinfeng . zhang
01:57	RE: Parse tree-dump	Long Fei
01:52	Re: -Wl,<options> mechanism	Jim Wilson
01:39	Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT	qinfeng . zhang
01:34	Re: problem with subregs.	Jim Wilson
01:23	Re: class_narrowest_mode for MODE_INT	Jim Wilson
00:58	Parse tree-dump	Long Fei