This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PR 8898 closed ?
- From: "Nicolas BRUNOT" <n dot brunot at cadwin dot com>
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:40:22 +0100
- Subject: PR 8898 closed ?
Sorry if this is not the right list for that topic
I already sent a comment to 'gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org' and
'charlet@gcc.gnu.org', but without any feedback, and nothing appeared about
the PR, may be because it was closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8898
PR was closed, and the given reason was
"If there's still a bug, it is in mingw, not in GNAT or GCC (I used
a combination of multiple -wl,--stack option under windows with
no trouble), so I am closing this PR. "
This is not surprising there is no trouble, because a patch was applied, to
prevent crash at compile time.
Actually, there is no crash, but given option has no effect, so the problem
is still there.
The author of the patch didn't close the PR
See comment #5 from Danny Smith
I heard once that the problem could be due to the way Gnat handle the order
of options.
Anybody knows what is the correct explanation, and where is the problem,
GCC, GNAT or MinGW ?