This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, law at redhat dot com, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:22:48 -0700
Subject: Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)
References: <200310230020.h9N0KJ0U028864@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <1067018391.31433.60.camel@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <20031024113004.A2349@synopsys.com>

On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 11:30:04AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> Another alternative is the following: if we had a dump format that
> would contain a description of the layout of each class that is encountered,
> then we could simply run the compiler twice, once with the 3.2 ABI,
> once with the 3.4 ABI, and then diff the dumps.

Debug info has this.  Just need a bit o code to use, say, libdwarf
to read and compare them.


r~

References:
- Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)
  - From: law
- Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: -Wabi is misdesigned (answers the wrong question)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]