This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:30:29 +0200
Subject: Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance
References: <3F99510B.60807@suse.de> <20031024121737.1de79765.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

following up to Jerry heads up of a while ago (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-02/msg00056.html) I really would like to have some feedback from the compiler people about this horrible thing.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-02/msg00302.html
(This is what should be linked in the TODO, sorry)

VERY STUPID me! A while ago I have discussed privately with Nathan Richard's reply...

The point is, now I understand that, at the time, I didn't really get Richard's point: this made me unconsiously believe I had already tried (I tried!) changing the signature in all the meaningful ways...

'll let you know...

Paolo.

References:
- HORRIBLE inliner defaillance
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: HORRIBLE inliner defaillance
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]