This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch?
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 10:26, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:11:57AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:34:50AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > Jakub submitted a patch for 3.2/3.3/trunk:
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00392.html
> > >
> > > For some reason, it is not in 3.2/3.3. Without it, glibc won't work
> > > correctly on ia64. Can it be checked into 3.2/3.3?
> >
> > 3.2 is gone and done. For 3.3.2 it's up to Mark. But this seems very odd -
> > people have been shipping distros with 3.2.x on ia64. What have
> > they been doing about this problem?
>
> Red Hat uses gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch, which has the patch. The same goes
> for gcc-3_3-rhl-branch. See:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-10/msg00011.html
>
> Any reason not to fix gcc 3.3?
H.J. --
I'll look at the patch.
However, I've been very clear -- file PRs in GNATS, mark the target
release field appropriately, attach a patch to the PR, add me to the CC
list.
Sending me stuff out-of-band like this is not helpful.
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC