This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch?
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:26:59 -0700
- Subject: Re: Missed gcc 3.2/3.3 patch?
- References: <20031015163450.GA14700@lucon.org> <20031016101157.B2389@synopsys.com>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:11:57AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:34:50AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Jakub submitted a patch for 3.2/3.3/trunk:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00392.html
> >
> > For some reason, it is not in 3.2/3.3. Without it, glibc won't work
> > correctly on ia64. Can it be checked into 3.2/3.3?
>
> 3.2 is gone and done. For 3.3.2 it's up to Mark. But this seems very odd -
> people have been shipping distros with 3.2.x on ia64. What have
> they been doing about this problem?
Red Hat uses gcc-3_2-rhl8-branch, which has the patch. The same goes
for gcc-3_3-rhl-branch. See:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-10/msg00011.html
Any reason not to fix gcc 3.3?
H.J.