This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:21:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?
- References: <3F8D50D5.1020401@coyotegulch.com> <u8r81ezaf6.fsf@gromit.moeb>
Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com> writes:
> > Now that I'm ready to publish Acovea (Analysis of Compiler Options Via
> > Evolutionary Algorithm), I'm wondering which version of gcc I should
> > analyze.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:18:53PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> 3.4 is soon in feature freeze, so it's too late for major changes.
Right, but if Scott should discover that, say, a different combination of
-f options in -O2 would be significantly better, it seems that this would
be a low-risk change that still could be accepted.