This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03)

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 12:55:07 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03)
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200310032250.h93Moti1003175@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <200310040820.54458.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 23:21, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I see no choice but to do the release anyhow; I can't see how having
> > no release is better for the world than having a release with a lot of
> > bug fixes, even if it does have some regressions.
> 
> Even regressions wrt to the previous release? See PR 12223.

Yes, those are more significant -- but that particular PR has been
fixed; it just wans't marked that way.

> > If there are 3.3.2 PRs for which a patch has been posted, but not
> > reviewed, please (a) put a pointer to the patch in the PR, and (b) add
> > me to the Cc list for the PR.  I will try to review and/or apply all
> > that I get.  Please don't send me mail directly; that will only make
> > it harder for me to keep track of what's going on.
> 
> Done for 3 PRs.

Thanks!  I've reviewed them.

Yours,

-- 
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- GCC Release Status (2003-10-03)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC Release Status (2003-10-03)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]