This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>, rth at redhat dot com,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:11:35 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310030908220.26917-100000@ops2.one-point.com><1065193592.3619.81.camel@steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl>

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> How important is it that the branch continue to support -fdisable-gimple?
> There already are C and C++ programs that do not compile with
> -fdisable-gimple (such as the test case for PR8361), and nobody has
> complained so apparently it's not all that important.

Well, it's interesting in that the test case for PR8361 fails both
with -fdisable-gimple and without -- and with two different failure
modes! :-(

It would be really, really good could someone finally debug this and
fix tree-ssa.

Gerald

PS: I'm even willing to take a bet that fixing this bug will help
uncover further tree-ssa bugs triggered by my code.

References:
- [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple
  - From: Jeff Sturm
- Re: [tree-ssa] -fdisable-gimple
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]