This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack



On Tuesday, September 30, 2003, at 01:04 PM, John David Anglin wrote:


Regarding PR optimization/12372, what's supposed to keep the insns
that copy an argument from one stack to another for a sibcall from
being deleted?  There's no libcall block for a sibcall, and the
stack slots used don't form part of the call usage information.

rth suggested here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00828.html that the stack slots ought to be in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE. My patch, which started that thread, will not fix 12372, so rth is probably right, as usual.

Steven Bosscher suggested that PR 11969 may be related.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]