This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
> From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>
> On Sep 19, 2003, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> > I have an unconfirmed suspicion that this second one is an issue
> > with sharing config.cache among all of the target libraries.
>
> Can't be. It's more likely a bug in some target library that
> incorrectly passes LD down to multilibs. LD may have to have a
> different value for different multilibs, and several target libs
> already know to pass the original LD down.
>
> Hmm... libstdc++-v3/configure says:
>
> ### am handles this now? ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_MULTILIBS=$LD
>
> Nope, AFAIK it doesn't. Looks like taking this out may have caused
> the problem.
Funny, I was just tracking the history of ORIGINAL_LD_FOR_MULTILIBS
this morning because I recalled you solved something similar to the
current problem a while ago. I found these links:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00714.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01640.html
I suppose Phil deleted this when he converted libstdc++-v3 to autoconf
2.5? I'm not fluent in v2.5, what needs to be put back and where?
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu