This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:35:20 -0400
Subject: Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
References: <16231.11404.551858.47556@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:30:20PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The current libgcj build requires a process size > 256M bytes.
> 
> Is this unreasonable?  Should we be able to build on boxes with less
> swap than that?  Or shall we just say "512M swap or don't bother
> building libgcj" ?

Has anyone profiled this - is it all reasonably necessary or is some of
it e.g. LD being dumb?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Advice requested: how big can we be?
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Advice requested: how big can we be?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]