This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
- From: Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- To: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- Cc: "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 14:28:51 +0200
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] SSA bug or feature?
- References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F37391@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:21:27PM +0200, S. Bosscher wrote:
> This means that one of them is used before it is defined, so how
Yep, I didn't found any explanation to why we end to such an SSA code.
> could it possibly be valid? Is this just after rewriting into SSA,
> or after one or more ssa passes?
>
I'm just before out of SSA with -O2.
I will further investigate on this case: eliminate some of the optimizers,
see what was the first SSA code we come from, ...