gcc archive
date index for September, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2003
22:12 Re: tree-ssa-vrp Zdenek Dvorak
22:06 Re: tree-ssa-vrp Zdenek Dvorak
22:06 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Eric Christopher
22:04 Re: tree-ssa-vrp Steven Bosscher
21:57 tree-ssa-vrp Zdenek Dvorak
21:55 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation David Carlton
21:42 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Nathanael Nerode
21:38 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Daniel Jacobowitz
20:56 Re: Sibcall arguments passed on the stack Dale Johannesen
20:35 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Joseph S. Myers
20:30 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Paul Koning
20:11 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Zack Weinberg
20:04 Sibcall arguments passed on the stack John David Anglin
19:42 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Daniel Berlin
19:37 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation David Carlton
18:49 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Daniel Berlin
18:44 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Devang Patel
18:36 configure.in/config.gcc thread logic: how should it work? Nathanael Nerode
17:42 PATCH: Support ILP32 in ld ia64 tests H. J. Lu
17:36 Re: gcc-3.2: config problem Doru Carastan
17:17 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Eric Christopher
16:33 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window Richard Henderson
15:33 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation David Carlton
14:29 Re: Several tree-ssa issues Loren James Rittle
13:34 Successful build of gcc-3.3.1 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Arnold Vogelsang
13:12 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window chen haibo
12:45 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Joel Sherrill
12:19 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions David Howells
12:10 Re: RTL Sruthy C.N
12:10 Re: RTL Sruthy C.N
11:42 Proposed targets to deprecate for 3.4 Nathanael Nerode
11:13 Tips tambahan melimpahkan usaha Setyo W
10:57 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Nathanael Nerode
10:41 unsubscribe...... Gyan Ranjan Singh, Noida
10:39 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Ralf Corsepius
09:52 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Nathanael Nerode
09:18 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file Janne Karhunen
07:42 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Naveen Sharma, Noida
07:29 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gabriel Dos Reis
07:23 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gabriel Dos Reis
06:56 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:20 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window chen haibo
02:15 Re: Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Ralf Corsepius
01:17 Re: DWARF debugging format implementation Daniel Berlin
00:42 DWARF debugging format implementation Devang Patel

September 29, 2003
23:46 Re: C++ language lawyer question Mike Stump
23:29 Re: C++ language lawyer question Bruce Stephens
23:21 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gerald Pfeifer
22:54 Re: C++ language lawyer question Mike Stump
22:53 Re: C++ language lawyer question Bruce Stephens
22:41 C++ language lawyer question Gerald Pfeifer
22:04 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Richard Henderson
22:03 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"? Geoff Keating
21:28 gcc-3.2: config problem Doru Carastan
21:02 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Jamie Lokier
20:31 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions tm_gccmail
19:58 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c Andreas Schwab
19:45 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Gabriel Paubert
19:45 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions David Edelsohn
19:45 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c Florian Weimer
19:38 Re: Patch for the bounds checking section of http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html Gerald Pfeifer
17:38 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Richard Henderson
17:32 Several tree-ssa issues Gerald Pfeifer
17:32 Re: Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c Gaute B Strokkenes
17:21 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Jamie Lokier
17:17 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions David Edelsohn
17:02 gcc-ss-3.3-20030929 is now available gccadmin
16:59 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Richard Henderson
16:52 Re: gcc3.2 slow link time Jakub Jelinek
16:47 gcc3.2 slow link time Corey Ernst
16:13 Re: Worm and virus free code. Alexandre Oliva
15:39 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file Janne Karhunen
15:01 Re: __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:37 Vladimir Makarov appointed GCC scheduler co-maintainer David Edelsohn
14:34 __alignof__(T) not compile time constant? Richard Guenther
14:29 Re: [Bug libstdc++/11706] std::pow(T, int) implementation pessimizescode Richard Guenther
13:37 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Frank Heckenbach
12:22 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Andi Kleen
12:14 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"? Rainer Orth
11:44 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Gerhard Tonn
11:18 Re: Efficient overflow checking (was: plans for nested functions) Gabriel Paubert
10:48 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Gabriel Paubert
01:14 Re: Worm and virus free code. Ian Lance Taylor
00:42 compile successfully but cannot run. He HongFu

September 28, 2003
23:29 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Ulrich Weigand
21:49 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Frank Heckenbach
21:25 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Ulrich Weigand
20:42 [tree-ssa] Weird things happen to GC with checking disabled Steven Bosscher
20:19 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nestedfunctions Frank Heckenbach
14:46 Re: Porting GCC troubles : about register window Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:37 Porting GCC troubles : about register window chen haibo
09:31 Re: Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"? Neil Booth
08:04 Re: [spam] Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file Janne Karhunen
05:54 Re: [PATCH] [tree-ssa] another miscompile due to BOOL_TYPE_SIZE being INT_TYPE_SIZE (bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin) Andrew Pinski
00:39 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX David Edelsohn
00:14 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Robert Dewar

September 27, 2003
23:45 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Steven Bosscher
22:18 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Robert Dewar
22:16 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Robert Dewar
22:14 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Robert Dewar
21:03 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
21:02 Re: request Phil Edwards
20:35 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:27 Re: C++ testsuite failures on AIX Jan Hubicka
20:19 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
20:13 Disabling fixproto: alpha-dec-osf4.0f Russ Allbery
20:13 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:15 Who should set main_input_filename to "<stdin>"? Roger Sayle
18:57 Re: Disabling fixproto: powerpc-eabi[sim]altivec Geoff Keating
18:51 [PATCH] [tree-ssa] another miscompile due to BOOL_TYPE_SIZE being INT_TYPE_SIZE (bootstrap failure on ppc-apple-darwin) Andrew Pinski
17:45 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
17:15 request Loukas D. Peristeras
17:05 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Richard Henderson
17:02 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:59 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:42 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Jeff Sturm
16:38 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
13:37 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation ofsingle file Jeff Sturm
13:09 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Jan Hubicka
12:49 RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only. Carlo Wood
11:11 Re: HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file Carlo Wood
10:24 HUGE compilation time / memory requirement in compilation of single file Janne Karhunen
09:43 Disabling fixproto: powerpc-eabi[sim]altivec Nathanael Nerode
09:38 Disabling fixproto: OS-less embedded targets? Nathanael Nerode
05:53 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:52 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Tom Tromey
03:26 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Richard Kenner
01:57 Patch for the bounds checking section of http://gcc.gnu.org/extensions.html William Bader
01:20 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Gabriel Dos Reis
01:13 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
00:22 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Gabriel Dos Reis
00:03 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Richard Henderson

September 26, 2003
23:30 Re: [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Linus Torvalds
22:05 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
21:57 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Joseph S. Myers
21:36 [tree-ssa][rfc] plans for nested functions Richard Henderson
20:39 Re: inline asm constraints for conditions Richard Henderson
19:52 Re: GCC and memory segments Jim Wilson
18:51 Re: question about symbols in object file and -ffast-math with optimization turned on Joe Buck
18:47 question about symbols in object file and -ffast-math with optimization turned on Myles Sussman
18:42 Re: Really, really const Michael Matz
18:25 Re: ask g77 Toon Moene
18:07 inline asm constraints for conditions David Howells
18:02 Re: Really, really const Richard Henderson
16:43 Re: hppa64-linux vs. hppa-linux: Why this difference? John David Anglin
16:16 Worm and virus free code. markw
14:36 Re: [tree-ssa]quick SSAPRE question Daniel Berlin
14:26 Re: Bizarre symbol names generated by g++ Daniel Jacobowitz
14:24 Re: printing 64-bit numbers in HEX Daniel Jacobowitz
14:18 Re: Really, really const Robert Dewar
12:51 Re: Really, really const Michael Matz
12:16 printing 64-bit numbers in HEX Kishen Bahudhanam
11:52 Re: Bizarre symbol names generated by g++ Karel Gardas
11:46 Bizarre symbol names generated by g++ Paul Harman
11:34 RE: need help Jon Beniston
11:32 [tree-ssa]quick SSAPRE question Per Fransson
11:28 need help Eitan
10:57 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
10:54 GCC and memory segments Etienne Lorrain
10:47 Re: Optimising redundant compares Richard Earnshaw
10:41 RE: Optimising redundant compares Jon Beniston
09:15 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
09:12 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
09:07 Re: GCC and memory segments Bernd Jendrissek
09:00 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
08:50 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
08:32 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
08:30 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
08:29 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
08:26 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
08:22 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
08:18 Re: Really, really const Steven Bosscher
07:59 Re: Really, really const Andrew Haley
07:51 Re: Really, really const Gabriel Dos Reis
07:01 Really, really const Andrew Haley
06:56 Re: Optimising redundant compares Jim Wilson
06:50 Re: Optimising redundant compares Jim Wilson
06:31 Re: GCC and memory segments Jim Wilson
04:13 hppa64-linux vs. hppa-linux: Why this difference? Nathanael Nerode
02:56 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Nathanael Nerode
02:09 [Solved] Re: Arbitrary function as template parameter? Lally Singh
00:26 Re: Arbitrary function as template parameter? Phil Edwards
00:21 Arbitrary function as template parameter? Lally Singh

September 25, 2003
23:57 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Tom Tromey
21:39 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
21:16 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Carlo Wood
18:12 RE: Optimising redundant compares Jon Beniston
17:58 RE: Optimising redundant compares Jon Beniston
17:34 Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
17:31 Starting to track patches through bugzilla Daniel Berlin
17:21 Re: Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast Bradley Lucier
10:25 Re: Optimising redundant compares Nathan Sidwell
09:49 Optimising redundant compares Jon Beniston
08:44 Re: GCC and memory segments Bernd Jendrissek
06:38 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Alexandre Courbot
05:24 Re: static inline Jim Wilson
05:13 Re: gcc comes out with Aborted Jim Wilson
05:02 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Jim Wilson
05:00 Re: Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast David Edelsohn
04:54 Trying to build on DYNIX/ptx: 'strbuf' in cppcharset.c Nathanael Nerode
04:51 Re: RTL Jim Wilson
04:38 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Jim Wilson
04:37 Some benchmarks with Apple's -fast Bradley Lucier
04:29 Bootstrap broken? Ralph Loader
04:11 RTL Sruthy C.N
04:11 Re: Parallel build broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu David Edelsohn
04:04 Parallel build broken on i686-pc-linux-gnu Gabriel Dos Reis
01:18 Memory needed for bootstrap? Ralph Loader
00:05 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for? Zack Weinberg

September 24, 2003
23:30 Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C) Bryce McKinlay
23:08 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Richard Kenner
23:00 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Ian Lance Taylor
22:10 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for? Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:53 Re: Handling aliases in debug information Michael Elizabeth Chastain
19:46 Re: integral location_t Neil Booth
19:31 Re: Handling aliases in debug information Elena Zannoni
18:47 Re: integral location_t Mike Stump
18:34 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Mike Stump
18:26 Re: integral location_t Per Bothner
18:26 gcc comes out with Aborted SVR Anand
18:14 Handling aliases in debug information Andrew Haley
18:12 Re: ask g77 pete
18:11 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030924 on sparc64-linux: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC redefined Christian Joensson
18:11 Re: [PATCH] Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue Phil Edwards
18:11 gcc-ss-3.4-20030924 is now available gccadmin
18:10 Port contribution (legal prerequisites) Marcus Comstedt
13:16 [PATCH] Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue Ulrich Weigand
12:38 ask g77 Bayu Notonegoro
12:11 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for? DJ Delorie
12:07 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Alexandre Courbot
12:02 RE: Abusive (?) promotions to int Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
11:41 Re: integral location_t Carlo Wood
10:21 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Gabriel Dos Reis
10:16 Re: Abusive (?) promotions to int Andreas Schwab
09:57 Abusive (?) promotions to int Alexandre Courbot
09:16 Re: What else can I disable fixproto for? Richard Earnshaw
08:48 Re: Arrays and Alignment Andreas Schwab
07:54 Re: [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C) Eric Botcazou
07:31 [3.3.2] regressions on the branch (pack-test-2.c, parameter-declaration-1.C) Matthias Klose
06:57 static inline He HongFu
06:01 Re: integral location_t Per Bothner
05:43 Re: integral location_t Neil Booth
04:02 Re: loop optimizer naivety law
03:58 What else can I disable fixproto for? Nathanael Nerode
00:27 Re: what with the logo Branko Äibej

September 23, 2003
22:43 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? Carlos O'Donell
22:37 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Rainer Orth
22:37 Re: integral location_t Per Bothner
22:29 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Rainer Orth
22:27 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Ziemowit Laski
22:26 Re: GCC and memory segments Jim Wilson
22:17 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Rainer Orth
22:10 Re: Arrays and Alignment Gabriel Dos Reis
22:04 Re: Arrays and Alignment Neil Booth
21:54 Re: Arrays and Alignment Gabriel Dos Reis
21:53 Re: Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue Zack Weinberg
21:41 Testsuite failures due to Makefile issue Ulrich Weigand
21:40 Re: Arrays and Alignment Neil Booth
21:22 Re: Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Rainer Orth
21:05 Bootstrap failure in targhooks.c Nathanael Nerode
20:44 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Geoff Keating
19:56 Re: Arrays and Alignment Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50 Re: Arrays and Alignment Richard Kenner
19:44 Re: Arrays and Alignment Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40 Re: Arrays and Alignment Michael N. Moran
19:36 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
19:29 Re: Arrays and Alignment Andreas Schwab
19:29 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Jason Merrill
19:25 Arrays and Alignment Michael N. Moran
18:06 Re: help for doubts Joe Buck
17:29 Re: Linkonce vs comdat Ian Lance Taylor
17:24 Re: Linkonce vs comdat Matt Austern
16:37 Re: libffi test suite maintainer Tom Tromey
16:10 Re: Gcc To-Do list Janis Johnson
15:28 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions Mark Mitchell
14:35 Re: Linkonce vs comdat James Lemke
14:20 [tree-ssa] DWARF2 debug info missing. Carlo Wood
13:15 Re: Patches to C++ front end have caused numerous regressions Jan Hubicka
10:57 help for doubts dennis jacob
10:51 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
10:47 Re: loop optimizer naivety Glen Nakamura
10:35 Re: loop optimizer naivety Richard Guenther
10:27 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
10:14 Re: loop optimizer naivety Richard Guenther
10:03 Re: loop optimizer naivety Glen Nakamura
09:49 Gcc To-Do list Andrew Haley
09:36 Gcc To-Do list Tal Agmon
09:36 Re: bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916 Enache Adrian
09:25 Re: DECL_RESULT not available for declared (but not defined) function? Gabriel Dos Reis
09:15 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
09:09 DECL_RESULT not available for declared (but not defined) function? Alexandre Courbot
08:58 GCC and memory segments Petar Penchev
08:37 Re: integral location_t Nathan Sidwell
08:37 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
08:29 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
07:56 Re: loop optimizer naivety Glen Nakamura
07:53 Re: loop optimizer naivety law
06:46 Re: arrays and typedefs Jim Wilson
06:40 Re: loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
06:20 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h Jim Wilson
05:59 Re: Promotion of integer return types to int Jim Wilson
05:33 Re: libffi test suite maintainer Andreas Tobler
05:33 Re: bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916 Jim Wilson
05:17 Re: RFC: debug line info & inlining; patch proposal and request forcomments. Jim Wilson
05:08 Re: TO: Jim Wilson, Deepak B. Nayak, Ritu, ... Jim Wilson
05:01 Re: Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Jim Wilson
04:53 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? Alan Modra
04:48 Re: CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE Jim Wilson
03:10 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h Jim Wilson
02:22 Re: libffi test suite maintainer David Edelsohn
02:17 Sekali sms ke hp siapapun dapat 250 Agung Andik Wibawa
01:36 Re: motorola altivec extension question Jim Wilson
01:25 Re: Stuck lock on anoncvs server. Phil Edwards
01:21 Stuck lock on anoncvs server. Ralph Loader
00:12 Re: Need help with fixing this two year old backend bug in mainline. Jim Wilson

September 22, 2003
23:16 Re: Linkonce vs comdat Ian Lance Taylor
23:06 Re: Linkonce vs comdat Mike Stump
22:02 Linkonce vs comdat Matt Austern
21:31 Re: motorola altivec extension question Spundun Bhatt
21:18 Re: loop optimizer naivety law
20:45 loop optimizer naivety Eric Botcazou
20:16 Re: Does GASP continue existing? tm_gccmail
17:07 Re: integral location_t Richard Henderson
17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030922 is now available gccadmin
16:26 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan Richard Kenner
15:48 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:20 Re: integral location_t law
15:18 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan Gerald Pfeifer
15:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Alexandre Oliva
14:58 Re: integral location_t Carlo Wood
14:53 Re: integral location_t law
13:49 Re: A minor adjustment to the development plan Richard Kenner
13:27 A minor adjustment to the development plan Gerald Pfeifer
13:24 RE: what with the logo Gerald Pfeifer
13:01 Re: trouble building gcc when the sources are on a readonly partition Rainer Orth
12:45 Re: mips/xm-iris5.h Rainer Orth
12:13 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741 Richard Kenner
12:07 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andrew Haley
11:16 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Carlo Wood
11:02 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andrew Haley
10:57 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andrew Haley
10:44 RE: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c S. Bosscher
10:24 CASE_VECTOR_SHORTEN_MODE Tal Agmon
09:41 PATCH for RE: what with the logo Gerald Pfeifer
08:42 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andrew Haley
08:40 Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Ayal Zaks
07:56 Re: integral location_t Nathan Sidwell
07:16 Re: PR optimization/9786 Eric Botcazou
06:17 integral location_t Richard Henderson
04:30 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741 John David Anglin
03:50 RE: what with the logo Stephan T. Lavavej
03:31 RE: what with the logo Luke Stebbing
03:04 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? John David Anglin
02:49 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? Carlos O'Donell
02:45 Re: patch rereview requested for PRs 6860, 10467 and 11741 Richard Kenner
02:31 Re: [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? Daniel Jacobowitz
02:24 [hppa-linux] HEAD broken? Carlos O'Donell
00:17 RFC: debug line info & inlining; patch proposal and request for comments. Carlo Wood
00:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias? Per Bothner

September 21, 2003
23:27 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Carlo Wood
23:11 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Carlo Wood
21:55 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andrew Haley
20:18 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Gabriel Dos Reis
19:33 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
17:59 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions Gabriel Dos Reis
17:20 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions Florian Weimer
15:51 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Gabriel Dos Reis
15:39 Re: Lots of suggestions for the gcc manual Gerald Pfeifer
15:15 Re: Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Andreas Jaeger
14:41 Maintainer of tree-inline.c and expr.c Carlo Wood
13:33 RE: Anyone dealing with bug 12113? S. Bosscher
13:30 Anyone dealing with bug 12113? Eyal Lebedinsky
07:51 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions Eric Botcazou
04:11 Re: what with the logo Jamie Lokier
00:26 TO: Jim Wilson, Deepak B. Nayak, Ritu, ... Canqun Yang

September 20, 2003
13:22 Re: [tree-ssa] libgfortran build error in intrinsics/random.c Steven Bosscher
13:19 Software Pipelining in GCC Canqun Yang
13:01 [tree-ssa] libgfortran build error in intrinsics/random.c Diego Novillo
08:09 trouble building gcc when the sources are on a readonly partition Enache Adrian
07:41 bug in current gcc-3.4 20030916 Enache Adrian
05:34 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Jason Merrill
04:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias? Andrew Haley
04:11 mips/xm-iris5.h Nathanael Nerode
00:25 Re: what with the logo Stephan T. Lavavej

September 19, 2003
22:08 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
22:01 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Gabriel Dos Reis
21:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias? Jeff Sturm
21:12 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Zack Weinberg
21:12 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
21:09 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Paul Brook
20:54 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
20:22 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Devang Patel
20:07 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Jason Merrill
20:04 Re: Ziemowit Laski becomes Objective-C co-maintainer Ziemowit Laski
19:58 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
19:45 [gfortran] Random number generator Paul Brook
19:45 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Jason Merrill
19:17 Ziemowit Laski becomes Objective-C co-maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
18:49 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Zack Weinberg
18:28 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Jason Merrill
18:24 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Phil Edwards
18:14 Re: [tree-ssa] trouble with gfortran on mips-sgi-IRIX6 Rainer Orth
18:06 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Jeff Sturm
18:03 [tree-ssa] trouble with gfortran on mips-sgi-IRIX6 William S.
17:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Andrew MacLeod
16:48 Re: what with the logo Joe Buck
15:18 Re: what with the logo Peter Barada
14:44 [Patch, Applied] Re: array11.C failing on all LP64 targets Andrew Pinski
14:42 Re: what with the logo Bernd Jendrissek
14:30 array11.C failing on all LP64 targets Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:24 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Alexandre Courbot
14:23 RE: what with the logo Stephan T. Lavavej
14:17 Promotion of integer return types to int Alexandre Courbot
14:13 Need help with fixing this two year old backend bug in mainline. Carlo Wood
14:08 arrays and typedefs Richard Buchmann
14:07 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? David Edelsohn
14:03 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:55 bits/demangle.h:155: warning: unused parameter 'cv_qualifier' Vladimir A. Merzliakov
13:43 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:37 Re: Problems with loop unroller and gcse in 3.3? Richard Guenther
13:34 Re: libstdc++-v3 testsuite bug -- uninitialized variable Benjamin Kosnik
13:19 Problems with loop unroller and gcse in 3.3? Richard Guenther
13:14 Re: what with the logo Joel Sherrill
13:10 Re: what with the logo Peter Barada
13:04 RE: what with the logo Daniel Berlin
11:27 Re: Does GASP continue existing? Alan Modra
10:47 Does GASP continue existing? Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso
10:39 RE: what with the logo Rupert Wood
10:39 Successful build of gcc-3.3.1 on i586-pc-linux-gnu Arnold Vogelsang
08:48 what with the logo rick
08:47 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
08:35 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Gabriel Dos Reis
07:25 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Mark Mitchell
05:22 libstdc++-v3 testsuite bug -- uninitialized variable law
02:08 Re: C++: Tag transparent binding contour Gabriel Dos Reis

September 18, 2003
19:44 Re: [tree-ssa] DISREGARD PREVIOUS POST 'gmake install' not working on mips-sgi-IRIX6 William S.
19:38 Re: Weekly gcc images Phil Edwards
19:31 Weekly gcc images don fisher
19:22 [tree-ssa] 'gmake install' not working on mips-sgi-IRIX6 William S.
18:46 Re: PR 12236 Mark Mitchell
18:12 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Jim Wilson
17:44 Re: system.h causes bootstrap failure Loren James Rittle
15:59 Re: 3.4 installation problems: libc is somewhere unusual Paul Jarc
14:45 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions Nathan Sidwell
14:40 Re: [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions Florian Weimer
14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Branch broken law
13:58 [3.4] Incomplete types and template definitions Florian Weimer
13:32 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
13:32 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9: No rule to make target `all' Gerald Pfeifer
13:12 [tree-ssa] Branch broken Diego Novillo
12:50 Re: Questions on schedule-insns and IA32 Joern Rennecke
12:26 Re: system.h causes bootstrap failure Daniel Jacobowitz
11:01 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Alexandre Courbot
10:14 system.h causes bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
05:12 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Per Bothner
04:36 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Daniel Berlin
04:23 Re: gcc 3.3.2 build regression Andrew Pinski
04:20 gcc 3.3.2 build regression Olaf Hering
03:14 PR 12236 Mark Mitchell
00:37 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions Alexandre Oliva

September 17, 2003
23:34 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux H. J. Lu
23:28 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
23:22 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Rainer Orth
23:22 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
23:22 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Richard Henderson
23:17 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Greg Schafer
23:09 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Rainer Orth
23:06 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Greg Schafer
22:55 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Greg Schafer
22:32 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Rainer Orth
22:28 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux H. J. Lu
22:12 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Eric Christopher
22:09 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Rainer Orth
22:08 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Joe Buck
22:07 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Rainer Orth
22:03 Re: Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux Eric Christopher
21:58 Gcc 3.3/3.4 are broken on Linux H. J. Lu
21:29 Re: PR optimization/9786 Mike Stump
20:58 Re: Gcc 3.3 regressions Alexandre Oliva
20:36 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Per Bothner
20:14 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Daniel Berlin
20:12 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Per Bothner
19:56 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Geoff Keating
19:39 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Zack Weinberg
19:35 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Andreas Jaeger
19:35 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Daniel Berlin
19:31 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Martin Brain
18:57 Re: Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Zack Weinberg
18:46 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Laurent GUERBY
18:41 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Steven Bosscher
18:33 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Jim Wilson
18:29 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Douglas Kilpatrick
18:27 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Phil Edwards
18:23 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bob Rossi
18:22 Re: Questions on schedule-insns and IA32 Jim Wilson
18:19 Re: libffi test suite maintainer Anthony Green
18:16 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Douglas Kilpatrick
18:13 Re: Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Jim Wilson
18:11 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Martin Brain
18:08 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
18:04 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Chris Lattner
17:57 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Martin Brain
17:44 motorola altivec extension question Spundun Bhatt
17:31 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Russ Allbery
17:19 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
17:17 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20030917 is now available gccadmin
16:02 libffi test suite maintainer Tom Tromey
15:45 Re: Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times for others Bradley Lucier
15:32 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
15:24 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Tom Tromey
14:02 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Gerald Pfeifer
13:58 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:49 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Paul Koning
13:41 Questions on schedule-insns and IA32 Steve Snyder
13:16 Dynamic FUNCTION_OUTGOING_VALUE? Alexandre Courbot
12:56 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Art Haas
12:50 Re: [gcc] Re: RTL templates names Alexandre Courbot
12:47 Re: [gcc] Re: RTL templates names Petar Penchev
12:19 Re: RTL templates names Alexandre Courbot
10:53 RTL templates names Petar Penchev
09:26 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
08:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
08:11 bootstrap failure: i386-unknown-freebsd4.8 Gerald Pfeifer
07:55 sparc-sun-solaris2.9: No rule to make target `all' Gerald Pfeifer
07:38 Re: Controlling what kind of value ends in a register Jim Wilson
07:31 Re: Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times forothers Jim Wilson
07:16 Re: Expression and Meta Templates Problem using C++ (Wrong results) Olaf Petzold
06:59 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Steven Bosscher
06:34 Re: PR optimization/9786 Eric Botcazou
06:17 Gcc 3.3 regressions H. J. Lu
06:16 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Andreas Jaeger
03:40 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Alan Modra
03:28 Re: PR optimization/9786 John David Anglin
03:22 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
02:07 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Alan Modra
01:44 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
01:42 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
01:13 Re: PR optimization/9786 Richard Kenner

September 16, 2003
23:41 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Mike Stump
23:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses law
23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Daniel Jacobowitz
23:08 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses law
21:58 Zem Laski for ObjC maintenance Stan Shebs
21:13 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Ian Lance Taylor
21:12 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc David Edelsohn
21:08 Re: PR optimization/9786 Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: PR optimization/9786 Mike Stump
21:04 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Richard Henderson
21:00 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Eric Botcazou
20:55 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Richard Henderson
20:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Diego Novillo
20:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses law
20:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Diego Novillo
20:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Daniel Berlin
20:18 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Joe Buck
20:14 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Rainer Orth
20:12 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Joe Buck
19:59 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Michael Matz
19:57 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Art Haas
19:53 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
19:48 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Rainer Orth
19:48 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Daniel Jacobowitz
19:42 Re: A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Karel Gardas
19:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Diego Novillo
19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Diego Novillo
19:34 Re: Apple's -fast option for gcc Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 A user's experiences with GCC-3.4 snapshots Art Haas
19:30 Apple's -fast option for gcc Bradley Lucier
19:27 Scheduling for one processor variant, but reporting times for others Bradley Lucier
19:23 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Jeff Sturm
18:46 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Joern Rennecke
18:46 Re: Reference-to-pointer argument bug? Gabriel Dos Reis
18:46 Copying collection and our ggc_collect practices Daniel Berlin
18:40 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:38 Reference-to-pointer argument bug? jsalz-gcc
18:33 [tree-ssa] Memory usage in compute_immediate_uses Daniel Jacobowitz
18:31 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:45 Re: Controlling what kind of value ends in a register Joern Rennecke
16:53 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
16:47 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Karel Gardas
16:24 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? Jeff Sturm
16:17 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
16:14 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? Daniel Berlin
16:10 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? Paul Koning
16:07 Controlling what kind of value ends in a register Alexandre Courbot
16:06 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
16:04 Re: Local variable memory allocation Michael Matz
16:02 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Joe Buck
15:59 Re: c++ >> and signed numbers? Joe Buck
15:54 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? S. Bosscher
15:52 RE: Advice requested: how big can we be? S. Bosscher
15:47 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
15:43 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andreas Jaeger
15:42 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
15:35 Re: Advice requested: how big can we be? Daniel Jacobowitz
15:31 Advice requested: how big can we be? Andrew Haley
15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias? Andrew Haley
15:17 Re: Local variable memory allocation Darragh O'Brien
14:49 Re: Reload problem Eric Botcazou
14:38 Re: Local variable memory allocation John Levon
14:32 Re: Local variable memory allocation Michael Matz
14:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Java: Decls that alias? Jeff Sturm
12:31 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Michael Matz
12:08 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
11:14 Local variable memory allocation Darragh O'Brien
10:34 RE: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030915 on i786-cygwin: ICE in libgcc2.c: In function `__popcountsi2': libgcc.c:751 internal compiler error... Christian Joensson
09:42 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
07:58 Partnering Enquiry from CifroSoft LLC (Russia) Vitaly Demin
07:58 Partnering Enquiry from CifroSoft LLC (Russia) Vitaly Demin
07:04 Re: m68k call_value insn Gunther Nikl
06:50 PR optimization/9786 Eric Botcazou
04:54 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Matt Thomas
04:43 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Ian Lance Taylor
04:32 Re: [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Matt Thomas
04:21 [Bug gcc/12279] Re: GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Ian Lance Taylor
03:53 GCC 3.4-20030913 VAX lossage. Matt Thomas
03:17 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++ Jeff Sturm
03:10 Re: c++ >> and signed numbers? Jim Wilson
03:03 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++ Eric Christopher
02:59 Re: I wanna have GCC mailing list. Jim Wilson
02:58 Re: Expression and Meta Templates Problem using C++ (Wrong results) Jim Wilson
02:51 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++ Steve Pribyl
02:48 Re: needed: copyright assignment form Jim Wilson
02:45 Re: The address of a symbol_ref Jim Wilson
01:59 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS Zack Weinberg
01:56 Re: gcc with out glibc and glibc++ Eric Christopher
01:48 gcc with out glibc and glibc++ Steve Pribyl

September 15, 2003
22:33 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS Ian Lance Taylor
20:09 RE: InLine Daniel Berlin
20:06 RE: InLine Manuel Báez Larraín
20:00 Re: InLine Daniel Berlin
19:58 InLine Manuel Báez Larraín
19:44 Re: m68k call_value insn Bernardo Innocenti
19:21 RFC: improve induction variable choice Dale Johannesen
18:54 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS Manoj Srivastava
18:41 Re: The address of a symbol_ref tm_gccmail
18:37 needed: copyright assignment form Robert Bowdidge
17:12 gcc-ss-3.3-20030915 is now available gccadmin
16:51 Re: yacc/bison build errors on current CVS Ian Lance Taylor
15:56 Re: list of GCC hosts and targets? Phil Edwards