gcc archive
thread index for August, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

• RE: Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integerand float, Chris Lattner
• Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integer and float, Olivier Galibert
• tree-ssa merge from mainline?, Nathanael Nerode
• [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build, Linus Sjöberg
  • Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build, Paul Brook
    • Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build, Linus Sjöberg
• LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Dan Kegel
  • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Larry McVoy
    • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Dan Kegel
  • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Daniel Jacobowitz
    • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Dan Kegel
      • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Larry McVoy
  • Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?, Martin J. Bligh
• Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os, Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os, Roger Sayle
• Thank you for your interest., autoreply-no-reply-please
• Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390, Frank Heckenbach
• Email was blocked., MAILsweeper
• gcc-3.4-20030827 snapshot bootstrap failure on solaris2.8, Qiong Cai
• serial port issue, wilson k.j
• G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?, Wu Yongwei
  • Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?, Carlo Wood
• [tree-ssa] having problems recently, Eyal Lebedinsky
  • Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently, Eyal Lebedinsky
    • Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently, Eyal Lebedinsky
    • Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently, Eyal Lebedinsky
• [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Dan Kegel
  • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Florian Weimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Robert Dewar
  • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Robert Dewar
  • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Richard Kenner
  • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Robert Dewar
    • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Russ Allbery
      • Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?, Randy.Dunlap
• Please resend your email..., Viet Email
• Evil code in config.gcc (vsta), Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Evil code in config.gcc (vsta), Zack Weinberg
• bootstrap gcc 3.3.1 on solaris 2.8, Victor Secarin
• bootstrap gcc 3.1.1 on solaris 2.8, Victor Secarin
• --enable-languages no longer works, Kaveh R. Ghazi
  • Re: --enable-languages no longer works, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: --enable-languages no longer works, Kaveh R. Ghazi
• Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413), Simon Marlow
• Naive suggestion about multilibs, Bradley Lucier
• unsubscribe please, Thomas Anders
• any experiences with gcc builds on Pentium-M, Robert Dewar
• The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog, Kelley Cook
  • Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog, Zack Weinberg
  • Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog, DJ Delorie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog, Nathanael Nerode
• "short pretty" names?, Chris Lattner
  • Re: "short pretty" names?, John Levon
    • Re: "short pretty" names?, Chris Lattner
      • Re: "short pretty" names?, John Levon
      • Re: "short pretty" names?, Chris Lattner
  • Re: "short pretty" names?, Gabriel Dos Reis
    • g++ Warning Incorrect?, Chip Cuntz
      • Re: g++ Warning Incorrect?, tm_gccmail
• Question about inline asm, Marcos Lois Bermúdez
• BIT_ANDTC_EXPR, Josef Zlomek
  • Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR, Andrew Pinski
  • Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?, Josef Zlomek
    • Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?, Geoff Keating
      • Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?, Josef Zlomek
• building cross gcc-3.3 on i686 for target i586, Agri
• "Ziem," - Where is your Green Card?, John Anderson
• MS obj not recogn. I need answer, Primaria Falticeni SDU
  • Re: MS obj not recogn. I need answer, Janis Johnson
• Successful build of GCC, Martin Villarreal
• TOC overflow on linuxppc64, Mohammed Tajuddin
  • Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64, Alan Modra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64, Steve Munroe
    • Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64, Christoph Hellwig
      • Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64, Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto), Nathanael Nerode
• Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems, Mohan Embar
  • Re: Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems, Tom Tromey
• Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto, Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto, Joe Buck
      • Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto, Nathanael Nerode
    • Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto), Zack Weinberg
      • Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto), Joe Buck
      • Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto), Paul Koning
• Known gcc testsuite issues (was: gcc-3.3, host==x86, target==ppc7450), Dan Kegel
• libjava build is broken on SMP, H. J. Lu
  • libjava build is broken on SMP, Andrew Haley
    • Re: libjava build is broken on SMP, Mohan Embar
  • Re: libjava build is broken on SMP, Mohan Embar
  • Re: libjava build is broken on SMP, Mohan Embar
• gcc 3.3.1 on IA64, Reinhold Bader
  • Re: gcc 3.3.1 on IA64, Andrew Pinski
• ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL called for __builtin_ function, Anders Ådland
• help with RTL and .md files, Linas Vepstas
• undefined symbol: __bb_init_func, Neal D. Becker
  • Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func, Dale Johannesen
    • Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func, Neal D. Becker
      • Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func, Richard Henderson
      • Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func, Neal D. Becker
• Is this a bfd bug? (binutils version 2.13), Bharathi Seshadri
• [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model, Karel Gardas
  • Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model, Mike Stump
  • Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model, Neil Booth
    • Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model, Karel Gardas
• More info on solaris8 problem, Neal D. Becker
  • Re: More info on solaris8 problem, Jeff Sturm
• still problem with solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld, Neal D. Becker
• gcc bug, Vadim Dvorkin
  • Re: gcc bug, Ranjit Mathew
• suscribe, Marcos Lois Bermúdez
• Inconsistent g++3.2 debug information on AIX, Michael Veksler
• disable libgcc, Gabriele Caracausi
  • Re: disable libgcc, Eric Christopher
    • R: disable libgcc, Gabriele Caracausi
      • Re: R: disable libgcc, Eric Christopher
      • Re: R: disable libgcc, Janis Johnson
• writing a new backend to gcc, John Carlson
• Why this change? It could break a lot of code, The Software Team
  • Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code, Andrew Pinski
  • Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code, Joe Buck
• [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Karel Gardas
  • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Per Bothner
    • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Mike Stump
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Mike Stump
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Mike Stump
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Ian Lance Taylor
    • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Karel Gardas
      • Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?, Mike Stump
• [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux, Karel Gardas
  • Re: [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux, Per Bothner
• SSA PRE and Open64, Eric Christopher
  • Re: SSA PRE and Open64, law
    • Re: SSA PRE and Open64, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: SSA PRE and Open64, law
      • Re: SSA PRE and Open64, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: SSA PRE and Open64, law
• Flag granularity (was gcc-patches: New insns for the s390 backend(2)), Laurent GUERBY
• solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?, Neal D. Becker
  • Re: solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?, Phil Edwards
• Linking MS lib Visual FoxPro 6, Primaria Falticeni SDU
• -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5, Andrew Pinski
• gcc-ss-3.4-20030827 is now available, gccadmin
• gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?, GTFSTBK
  • Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?, Andrew Pinski
• word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Nitin Gupta
  • Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Richard Henderson
    • Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Jim Wilson
      • Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Jim Wilson
    • RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Nitin Gupta
      • Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Richard Henderson
      • RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Nitin Gupta
  • Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port, Jim Wilson
• Compile GCC without a library, Anders Ådland
  • Re: Compile GCC without a library, Phil Edwards
• RTL, SRUTHY C.N.
  • Re: RTL, Jim Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RTL, SRUTHY C.N.
• temporary object, He HongFu
  • Re: temporary object, Dr. Franz Fehringer
  • Re: temporary object, Joe Buck
• [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap ICE tree-ssa-dom.c:877, judd.jenne
• [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
  • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Jason Merrill
    • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
  • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Diego Novillo
    • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Diego Novillo
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
    • Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview, Zdenek Dvorak
• PATCH: Require GNU Make to build GCC, Mark Mitchell
• Thanks for writing to me at Toll-free Consortium., Charles Azer
• Coreutils head and tail problems, Andrew Walrond
  • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Daniel Berlin
  • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Joe Buck
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Joe Buck
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Andrew Walrond
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Joe Buck
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Andrew Walrond
    • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Joseph S. Myers
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Phil Edwards
      • Re: Coreutils head and tail problems, Daniel Berlin
• New stabs with gcc HEAD, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
• ABI documentation, SRUTHY C.N.
  • Re: ABI documentation, Jim Wilson
• Auto-Reply: Re: Your application, resumes
  • My Resume., Toon Moene
• [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Chris Devers
• [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof, Chris Devers
      • new book pdf up for review, was Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 [...], Chris Devers
• [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Russ Allbery
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Christopher Faylor
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Russ Allbery
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Russ Allbery
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Richard Earnshaw
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make, Chris Devers
• sorry about the spam that got through, Christopher Faylor
• Re: [libobjc patch] Fix libobjc/gc.c compilation error, Jim Wilson
• Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembleroutput, Jim Wilson
• Re: [ARIN-20030825.3802] Re: Details, hostmaster
• À´×Ô xinhuanet.com µÄÍËÐÅ, PostMaster
• [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization, Geoff Keating
• [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings, Jim Wilson
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings, Geoff Keating
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings, Jim Wilson
• [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Ziemowit Laski
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Matt Austern
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Matt Austern
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Joseph S. Myers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Joseph S. Myers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Joseph S. Myers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Joseph S. Myers
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Felix Lee
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Colin Douglas Howell
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Ziemowit Laski
    • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Colin Douglas Howell
      • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb, Devang Patel
• -fomit-frame-pointer, Piotr Wyderski
  • Re: -fomit-frame-pointer, Jim Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: -fomit-frame-pointer, Piotr Wyderski
• about to port GCC, Alvaro Hernando Salazar V.
  • Re: about to port GCC, Jim Wilson
    • Re: about to port GCC, Joe Buck
  • Re: about to port GCC, Stephane Carrez
    • Errors in DLL linking with a MS-style lib, Primaria Falticeni SDU
• offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC, Tao Zhang
  • Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC, Jim Wilson
    • Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC, Tao Zhang
      • Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC, Jim Wilson
• Naming the originator in new testcases, Wolfgang Bangerth
  • Re: Naming the originator in new testcases, Gabriel Dos Reis
• Confirmation accepted, qmail
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Confirmation accepted, qmail
  • Confirmation accepted, qmail
• gcc-ss-3.3-20030825 is now available, gccadmin
• Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?, Philipp Thomas
  • Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?, Andrew Pinski
  • Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?, Gabriel Dos Reis
• G++ ABI mismatches, Chris Lattner
  • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Nathan Sidwell
    • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Richard Henderson
      • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Chris Lattner
      • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Richard Henderson
      • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Chris Lattner
      • Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Richard Henderson
      • Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: G++ ABI mismatches, Nathan Sidwell
• Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?, Chris Lattner
  • Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?, Nathan Sidwell
    • Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?, Chris Lattner
      • Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?, Richard Henderson
• using objcopy --redefine-sym, Wagner Toledo Correa
  • Re: using objcopy --redefine-sym, Jim Wilson
• Reload and reg_equiv_constant, Richard Sandiford
  • Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant, Andrew Pinski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant, Ulrich Weigand
    • Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant, Richard Sandiford
  • Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant, Ulrich Weigand
• How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example), Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example), Andrew Pinski
    • Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example), Gerald Pfeifer
      • Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example), Diego Novillo
• [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure, Gerald Pfeifer
• DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Andreas Tobler
    • Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Jim Wilson
  • Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Richard Henderson
  • Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help, Ranjit Mathew
• Binarie gcc for mac, Wendy Zhou
  • Re: Binarie gcc for mac, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: Binarie gcc for mac, Chris Devers
• PATCH for: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containingrelease tag?, Gerald Pfeifer
• error: stray '\' in program, Gabriele Caracausi
  • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Philipp Thomas
    • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Neil Booth
      • R: error: stray '\' in program, Gabriele Caracausi
      • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Nick Ing-Simmons
      • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Kris Warkentin
      • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Neil Booth
      • R: error: stray '\' in program, Gabriele Caracausi
      • Re: error: stray '\' in program, Zack Weinberg
• cgraph maintainership, Gerald Pfeifer
• Problem in .md file, Nitin Jain
  • Re: Problem in .md file, Jim Wilson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Problem in .md file, Nitin Jain
    • Re: Problem in .md file, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: Problem in .md file, Jim Wilson
• What does un-cse exactly refer to?, Kazu Hirata
  • Re: What does un-cse exactly refer to?, Jim Wilson
• [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Gerald Pfeifer
    • Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Gerald Pfeifer
      • gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25..., Chris Devers
      • Re: gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25..., Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions, Bernardo Innocenti
• long long data type support, fahad al-zahrani
  • Re: long long data type support, Joe Buck
• [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Jim Wilson
    • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Gabriel Paubert
    • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Gabriel Paubert
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers, Zack Weinberg
• [using gcc book] compound literals, Chris Devers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Stephan T. Lavavej
    • Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals, Jim Wilson
      • Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals, Chris Devers
  • Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Stephan T. Lavavej
    • Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Chris Devers
      • Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Russ Allbery
      • [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Chris Devers
      • Re: [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals, Gerald Pfeifer
• Your details, mspiro
• Re: Details, postmaster
• Virus / harmful content found in EMail, root
• COND_EXPR lowering patch, Zdenek Dvorak
  • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, David Edelsohn
    • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
  • [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
    • Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
    • Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
  • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
    • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
    • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Zdenek Dvorak
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, law
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Diego Novillo
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Andrew MacLeod
      • Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch, Zdenek Dvorak
• Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?, Anders Ådland
  • Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?, Geoff Keating
  • Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?, Joern Rennecke
• [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information, Mukta Punjani, Noida
  • Re: [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information, Michael Matz
• mainline problem, Jeremy Sanders
  • Re: mainline problem, Andreas Jaeger
    • Re: mainline problem, Jeremy Sanders
      • Re: mainline problem, Andreas Jaeger
• Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd), Brian Hart
  • Re: Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd), Alexandre Oliva
• A virus was detected on your message, Mailsweeper
• [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure, Eyal Lebedinsky
  • Re: [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure, Eyal Lebedinsky
• GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Mark Mitchell
  • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Gerald Pfeifer
    • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Mark Mitchell
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), David Edelsohn
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Mark Mitchell
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Gerald Pfeifer
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Gabriel Dos Reis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Wolfgang Bangerth
    • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Mark Mitchell
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Geoff Keating
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Joe Buck
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Karel Gardas
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Joe Buck
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Gerald Pfeifer
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Jan Hubicka
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Karel Gardas
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Jan Hubicka
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Karel Gardas
      • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Jan Hubicka
    • Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22), Karel Gardas
• to_line blowing up, Mike Stump
  • Re: to_line blowing up, Jim Wilson
  • Re: to_line blowing up, Neil Booth
    • Re: to_line blowing up, Mike Stump
      • Re: to_line blowing up, Neil Booth
      • Re: to_line blowing up, Mike Stump
• Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?, Bradley Lucier
  • Re: Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?, Andrew Pinski
• full space, this user is limit quota, kingf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • full space, this user is limit quota, club
• Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Mark Mitchell
  • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Daniel Jacobowitz
  • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Richard Henderson
    • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Richard Henderson
    • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Richard Henderson
      • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Mark Mitchell
  • Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode, Richard Henderson
• Recursive, Julilo Cesar Vieira da Silva
  • Re: Recursive, Jim Wilson
  • Re: Recursive, Eric Christopher
  • Re: Recursive, tm_gccmail
• type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4..., Fons Rademakers
  • Re: type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4..., Andrew Pinski
• C99 and i387 Floating-point assignments, John Vickers
• Out of town till end of Aug., Jean-Luc Dugelay
• Suggestion: Template instantiation debugging, Christopher Eltschka
• Applying patch to gcc3.2.7, Ravi
  • Re: Applying patch to gcc3.2.7, Zack Weinberg
• Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Alexandre Courbot
  • Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Vladimir N. Makarov
    • Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Alexandre Courbot
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Alexandre Courbot
    • Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Alexandre Courbot
    • Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Jim Wilson
      • Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?, Alexandre Courbot
• build breakage in cvs head, Olaf Hering
  • Re: build breakage in cvs head, Andreas Jaeger
    • Re: build breakage in cvs head, Olaf Hering
• Using the autoresponder, Demon Support Responder
• Automatic Response, Anne George
• Error Report, stayvis ng
  • Re: Error Report, Jim Wilson
  • Re: Error Report, Zack Weinberg
• m32r-elf build requires gdb?, Dara Hazeghi
  • Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?, Jim Wilson
    • Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?, Dara Hazeghi
      • Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?, Jim Wilson
• m68k-elf target broken again, Dara Hazeghi
• Experience Client Support, Experience Technical Support
• expect 5.39 import, Andrew Cagney
  • Re: expect 5.39 import, Nick Clifton
    • Re: expect 5.39 import, Andrew Cagney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: expect 5.39 import, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
    • Re: expect 5.39 import, Andrew Cagney
• Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags, Peter Barada
• [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes, Jeff Sturm
  • Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes, Jan Hubicka
    • Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes, Jeff Sturm
      • Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes, Andrew Haley
• C++ name mangling tool, Bhavesh P. Davda
• The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.6 is released, H. J. Lu
• how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5, Hongbo Rong
  • Re: how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5, Daniel Jacobowitz
• seperate libiberty, Glenn McGrath
  • Re: seperate libiberty, Andrew Pinski
• Parallel build broken, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Parallel build broken, Zack Weinberg
• Receipt of email to Chase Bill Management Center, BillSupport Chase
• Quality Issues on mainline, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Quality Issues on mainline, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: Quality Issues on mainline, Gerald Pfeifer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quality Issues on mainline, Dan Kegel
  • Re: Quality Issues on mainline, Wolfgang Bangerth
• RE:Re: Re: My details - Prohibited File Extension Blocked, MAILsweeper
• recent commit, Camm Maguire
  • Re: recent commit, David Mosberger
    • Re: recent commit, Camm Maguire
      • Re: recent commit, David Mosberger
      • Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit, Camm Maguire
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • recent commit, Camm Maguire
• Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches, Kris Warkentin
  • Re: Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches, Jim Wilson
• [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, JUDD JENNE
  • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 (Was [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap), Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, law
      • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6, Jason Merrill
    • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, judd.jenne
      • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, judd.jenne
      • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap, Andrew Pinski
• Your resume has been received, NOTESSB02
  • Observation on the recent junk mail flood, Paul Koning
    • Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood, Zack Weinberg
      • OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood), Kelley Cook
      • Re: OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood), Daniel Berlin
      • Re: OT: Sobig, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood, Christopher Faylor
• Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision, Roger Sayle
  • Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision, Roger Sayle
• ColdFire/uClinux status update, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update, Richard Henderson
    • Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update, Zack Weinberg
• away from my mail, Mogens Kjaer
• --with-ld breakage for me., Loisel, Sebastien
  • Re: --with-ld breakage for me., Andrew Pinski
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: --with-ld breakage for me., Loisel, Sebastien
• Estimated Response Time, Advanced PCS
• Warning: Possible Virus Infection, VirWatch
• Add self to MAINTAINERS (mainline & branch), Bernardo Innocenti
• [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2003-08-17, Diego Novillo
• Re: Wicked screensaver, toon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wicked screensaver, toon
• Our apologies for the virus reject notices, Super-User
  • Re: Our apologies for the virus reject notices, Zack Weinberg
• A Virus has been detected., MAILsweeper
• Is this meant to compile?, Chris Lattner
  • Re: Is this meant to compile?, Zack Weinberg
    • Re: Is this meant to compile?, Chris Lattner
• Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Volker Reichelt
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Jim Wilson
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Richard Henderson
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Joseph S. Myers
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, John Vickers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Volker Reichelt
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Jim Wilson
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Volker Reichelt
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Bradley Lucier
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Zack Weinberg
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Jim Wilson
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Bradley Lucier
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Jim Wilson
      • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Jim Wilson
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, John Vickers
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Chris Lattner
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Volker Reichelt
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, John Vickers
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
  • Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision, Robert Dewar
• Email Content Rejection Notice, wedontlikespame
• CVS write access, Bernardo Innocenti
• gcc-ss-3.4-20030820 is now available, gccadmin
• Possible virus in Email sent by you, root
• strange warning with gcc 3.x, Gunther Nikl
  • Re: strange warning with gcc 3.x, Joe Buck
• Re: Re: My details, Unexpected reply handler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: My details, Arnt Gulbrandsen
• gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1, Serge Cohen
• automated response,
• [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Gunther Nikl
  • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Richard Henderson
    • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Gunther Nikl
    • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Richard Henderson
      • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Jason Merrill
      • Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables, Gunther Nikl
• New cross target for uClinux, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux, David McCullough
    • Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux, Bernardo Innocenti
• Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc, Richard Kenner
  • Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc, Joel Sherrill
    • Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc, Mike Stump
  • Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc, Joe Buck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc, Richard Kenner
• GCC Porting problem, Petar Penchev
  • Re: GCC Porting problem, Jim Wilson
• We would like to offer our sincere thanks to you for writing to us., Administrator
• RE: Re: Your application, MAILsweeper
• warnings building mainline for x86_64-freebsd, Dara Hazeghi
• Out of Office AutoReply: Your application, Zepeda, Margarita {Quaker}
• Re: Thank you!, Unexpected reply handler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thank you!, swoosh
• Multiple input-file patch for gcov 3.2.3, Ed Swierk
• Out of Office AutoReply: My details, Eracleous,CH
• Votre message à la liste Traduc est en attente d'approbation, traduc-admin
• Bugzilla adding fulltext index, Daniel Berlin
• libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Shaun Jackman
  • Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Shaun Jackman
    • Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Phil Edwards
    • Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Alexandre Oliva
      • Re: [RESOLVED] libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Shaun Jackman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h, Dara Hazeghi
• g++ compile option question, Halifa Yehezkel-BYH005
  • Re: g++ compile option question, Martin Brain
  • Re: g++ compile option question, Frank Mehnert
  • g++ compile option question, Andrew Haley
    • Re: g++ compile option question, Joel Sherrill
• init_priority with GCC, Frank Mehnert
  • Re: init_priority with GCC, Jim Wilson
    • Re: init_priority with GCC, Phil Edwards
• Please Reply - linuxdevices s081914212328348, linuxdevices-request
• Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target, Steve Watt
• how are stack slot addresses resolved?, Christian Lindig
• Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology, James Michael DuPont
  • Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology, Diego Novillo
    • Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology, James Michael DuPont
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology, James Michael DuPont
• Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813, Dan Kegel
  • Re: Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813, Dan Kegel
• crosstool-0.19: added gcc-3.4-20030813 support, Dan Kegel
• Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Bernd Schmidt
  • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Phil Edwards
  • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Richard Henderson
    • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, David Edelsohn
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, David Edelsohn
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Geoff Keating
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Fergus Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Richard Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Richard Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Fergus Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Richard Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Fergus Henderson
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Marc Espie
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Marc Espie
  • Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors, Geoff Keating
• gcc-ss-3.3-20030818 is now available, gccadmin
• Where did output_add_string go?, Diego Novillo
  • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Gabriel Dos Reis
    • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Diego Novillo
      • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Diego Novillo
      • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Gabriel Dos Reis
    • Re: Where did output_add_string go?, Diego Novillo
• Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc., Nitin Gupta
  • Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc., Richard Henderson
    • RE: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc., Nitin Gupta
      • Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc., Nathan Sidwell
      • Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc., David Edelsohn
• How to find missing "?, Andy Jackman
  • Re: How to find missing "?, Andreas Schwab
    • Re: How to find missing "?, Andy Jackman
      • Re: How to find missing "?, Stephen Biggs
• DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra, Mukta Punjani, Noida
  • Re: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra, Michael Matz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra, Mukta Punjani, Noida
• compile-server branch live, Per Bothner
• Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813, Dan Kegel
  • Re: Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813, Phil Edwards
• Devel rebuild question, Lally Singh
  • Re: Devel rebuild question, Paul Brook
    • Re: Devel rebuild question, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Devel rebuild question, Mike Stump
• some types probs using 3.3.1, Ozzy
  • Re: some types probs using 3.3.1, Jim Wilson
• [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean, Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean, Daniel Berlin
• A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED, H. J. Lu
  • Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED, H. J. Lu
    • Bug in array reference (Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED), H. J. Lu
• Friendly install, Miguel M.
  • Re: Friendly install, Gerald Pfeifer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Friendly install, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
    • Re: Friendly install, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: Friendly install, Gerald Pfeifer
      • Re: Friendly install, Mike Stump
• m68k C++ exception handling, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: m68k C++ exception handling, Andreas Schwab
    • Re: m68k C++ exception handling, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k C++ exception handling, Andreas Schwab
• [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86, Diego Novillo
  • Re: [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86, Zdenek Dvorak
• Gcc installation problem, Long Fei
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: Gcc installation problem, Dan Kegel
    • Re: Gcc installation problem, Mike Stump
      • Re: Gcc installation problem, Dan Kegel
      • RE: Gcc installation problem, Long Fei
      • Re: Gcc installation problem, Joe Buck
  • RE: Gcc installation problem, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Gcc installation problem, Daniel Berlin
  • Re: Gcc installation problem, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Gcc installation problem, Daniel Berlin
  • Re: Gcc installation problem, Robert Dewar
    • Re: Gcc installation problem, Dan Kegel
      • Re: Gcc installation problem, Daniel Berlin
• Inquiry about RTL, SRUTHY C.N.
  • Re: Inquiry about RTL, tm_gccmail
  • Re: Inquiry about RTL, Jim Wilson
• Version Number, Miguel M.
  • Re: Version Number, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Version Number, Joe Buck
• [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on alpha, Diego Novillo
• Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16), Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16), Gabriel Dos Reis
• C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Mark Mitchell
    • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR, Mark Mitchell
• gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1, Richard Jackson
• Gcc3.3 installation problem, Long Fei
  • Re: Gcc3.3 installation problem, Jim Wilson
• 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined, Dan Kegel
  • Re: 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined, kaz Kojima
• 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS, Kurt Garloff
  • Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS, Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS, Mark Mitchell
• Another parallel bootstrap problem [was Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8], Bradley Lucier
• EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS, Mark Mitchell
  • Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS, Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS, Ian Lance Taylor
• link dependencies, martin . schaffner
• Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning:`packed' attribute ignored", Dan Kegel
  • Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored", Jim Wilson
    • Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored", Dan Kegel
• Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Loisel, Sebastien
  • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Andrew Pinski
  • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Fergus Henderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Loisel, Sebastien
    • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Fergus Henderson
  • RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Loisel, Sebastien
  • RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Loisel, Sebastien
    • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Jamie Lokier
      • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Sebastien Loisel
      • Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations, Jamie Lokier
• tree-dump inquiry, Dan DaCosta
  • Re: tree-dump inquiry, Jim Wilson
    • Re: tree-dump inquiry, Dan DaCosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tree-dump inquiry, Dan DaCosta
• Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify, Andrew Pinski
  • Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify, law
• Fix CVU prefix for GenTrunk, Richard Almquist
• How does --with-sysroot work?, H. J. Lu
  • Re: How does --with-sysroot work?, Daniel Jacobowitz
    • Re: How does --with-sysroot work?, H. J. Lu
      • Re: How does --with-sysroot work?, Daniel Jacobowitz
• Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files., gp
  • Re: Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files., Neil Booth
• m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Gunther Nikl
    • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Gunther Nikl
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Per Bothner
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, William C. Cox
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Jamie Lokier
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Andreas Schwab
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Ian Lance Taylor
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Joe Buck
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Andreas Schwab
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Don Lindsay
      • Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax, Andreas Schwab
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Gunther Nikl
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Peter Barada
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Peter Barada
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Bernardo Innocenti
      • Re: m68k patch reviews, Gunther Nikl
• Problem with macro params containing commas, Jean-Eric Cuendet
  • Re: Problem with macro params containing commas, Nathan Sidwell
  • Re: Problem with macro params containing commas, skaller
    • Re: Problem with macro params containing commas, Andreas Schwab
      • Re: Problem with macro params containing commas, Phil Edwards
• [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1, Linus Sjöberg
  • Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1, Frank Ch. Eigler
    • Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1, Linus Sjöberg
• creating 64 bit binaries on solaris 8, Mobarek, Khaled (Robert Walters)
• how do i subscribe ?, Lee Manickum
• compile on solarsi, He HongFu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: compile on solarsi, Jim Wilson
• [libiberty] Why is configure trying to use binfmt-0090?, Bernd Jendrissek
• Is -Winline working at all?, Roberto Bagnara
• -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?, Dan Kegel
  • [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libcnot being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?), Dan Kegel
    • Re: [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?), Alexandre Oliva
• Delete xm-iq2000.h, Zack Weinberg
• libgloss patches, Bernardo Innocenti
  • Re: libgloss patches, Andrew Pinski
• SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?, Bradley Lucier
  • Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?, Kaveh R. Ghazi
    • Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?, Bradley Lucier
      • Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?, Kaveh R. Ghazi
• build status additions for GCC 3.3.1, Janis Johnson
• [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end, Daniel Berlin
  • Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end, Jason Merrill
    • Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end, Daniel Berlin
      • Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end, Jason Merrill
    • Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end, Daniel Berlin
• [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin, Joost VandeVondele
  • Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin, Andrew Pinski
• gcj and xgamestation, Geoffrey Poremba
  • Re: gcj and xgamestation, Tom Tromey
    • Re: gcj and xgamestation, Anthony Green
    • Re: gcj and xgamestation, Geoffrey Poremba
      • Re: gcj and xgamestation, Tom Tromey
      • Re: gcj and xgamestation, Martin Brain
• how to compile the C++ program in Linux, Yang, Huaining
  • Re: how to compile the C++ program in Linux, tm_gccmail
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • How to compile the C++ program in Linux, Yang, Huaining
• Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Matthew Wilcox
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, John David Anglin
    • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Matthew Wilcox
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, John David Anglin
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Matthew Wilcox
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Joe Buck
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Joe Buck
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Andrew Pinski
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Joe Buck
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Mark Mitchell
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Kai Henningsen
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Erik Trulsson
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Joe Buck
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, Erik Trulsson
      • Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?, John David Anglin
• gcc-ss-3.4-20030813 is now available, gccadmin
• sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?, Claus Fischer
  • Re: sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?, Andrew Pinski
• Successful build of gcc 3.3.1 on i686-pc-cygwin, Dimitry Andric
• gcc 2.95 question about .note section, root
  • Re: gcc 2.95 question about .note section, Jim Wilson
• Larger Compilations / Speed, Frank-René Schäfer
  • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Diego Novillo
    • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Theodore Papadopoulo
      • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Andrew Pinski
    • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Per Bothner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, F. Schaefer
    • Re: Larger Compilations / Speed, Colin Douglas Howell
• Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual, Martijn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • duplicate entry in gcc manual, Martijn
  • Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual, Kelley Cook
• Porting gcc, Petar Penchev
  • Re: Porting gcc, Ben Elliston
• gcc version string on the branch is "experimental", Matthias Klose
  • Re: gcc version string on the branch is "experimental", Mark Mitchell
• GCC 3.3.1: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC, Luca Saiu
• scanf issue (store only specified tokens), Carlo Florendo
  • Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens), Zack Weinberg
    • Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens), Carlo Florendo
  • Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens), Carlo Florendo
• gcov questions, Ed Swierk
  • Re: gcov questions, Nathan Sidwell
    • Re: gcov questions, Ed Swierk
      • Re: gcov questions, Nathan Sidwell
      • Re: gcov questions, Ed Swierk
• Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, Michael Matz
  • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, skaller
    • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, Michael Matz
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, skaller
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, skaller
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, skaller
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, Gabriel Dos Reis
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour, skaller
      • Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined beh