This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?
> > operator_name_info [(int) BIT_ANDTC_EXPR].name = "&~";
> > As I expected, it seems to be X & ~Y.
> > What do you think about killing BIT_ANDTC_EXPR ?
> > There are only few uses of it, majority of them is in something like
> > this:
> > case BIT_AND_EXPR:
> > case BIT_ANDTC_EXPR:
> > case BIT_OR_EXPR:
> > something;
> > break;
> It does seem to be unnecessary. Would you like to make a patch?
Yes, I'll make a patch.