This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
On Thursday 21 August 2003 01:53, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> No, it also appears in C extended asm statements. I'm not quite sure
> whether this can ever happen with the m68k syntaxes, but consider this
> C source:
> int global_magic_pointer __asm__("a0");
> // Later...
> __asm__ ("move.l (a0)+,%0" : "=rm" (tmp) : : "a0");
> If the %0 is emitted with the wrong syntax, the asm statement would no
> longer compile and assemble even if GAS supports both syntaxes --
> unless GAS supports mixing syntaxes within a single statement.
as.info says it does, indeed. Isn't it nice? :-)
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html