This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>,Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:23:57 +0200
Subject: Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
References: <200308141855.23393.bernie@develer.com><m3d6f2tkgq.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <jeada65a2a.fsf@sykes.suse.de><200308192002.12032.bernie@develer.com>

Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com> writes:

|> So I wonder, how could they use the MIT syntax _and_ PIC at the same
|> time if it wasn't supported by GCC?

GCC *does* have PIC support with MIT syntax, but it works different from
the ELF model.  The main difference are how the PIC register is set up and
how references to the GOT and PLT are annotated.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]