This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813
- From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
- To: GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 23:23:05 -0700
- Subject: Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813
I built and tested gcc-3.4-20030813 / glibc-2.3.2 on
ppc405, ppc750, and sh4 today. Regression test summaries available at
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/summaries/
I'm only just starting to look at the results. Here are three ICE's:
First, a problem that shows up on both powerpc variants. The summaries
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/summaries/powerpc-405-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2.gcc.sum
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/summaries/powerpc-750-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2.gcc.sum
show:
FAIL: gcc.dg/altivec-5.c (test for excess errors)
The log shows:
gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/altivec-5.c:12: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2064
Second, a problem shows up in two tests only on sh4: the summary
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/summaries/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2.gcc.sum
shows:
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/vector-2 c_compat_x_tst.o compile
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/vector-2 c_compat_y_tst.o compile
The log shows:
gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/vector-2_x.c:7: internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:259
gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/vector-2_y.c:7: internal compiler error: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:259
Third, a problem that shows up only on sh4: the summary
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/summaries/sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4-20030813-glibc-2.3.2.gcc.sum
shows:
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr1.C (test for excess errors)
The log shows:
gcc-3.4-20030813/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr1.C:48: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-lang.c:330
Are these results useful, or do the gcc developers already know about them?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045