This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
On Monday 18 August 2003 13:42, Gunther Nikl wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 05:14:24PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> > No way, I've always wanted to drop the Motorola syntax because it's
> > used only by a few non-mainstream targets. But you're the second person
> > pointing it out, so maybe I've not explained myself clearly :-)
> > sources.redhat.com seems to be down right now, but *should* be the
> > correct link to my initial argument:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-07/msg00390.html
> I have read it again and no, there you are suggesting to remove MIT
> assembler syntax.
Oh. I must have been on drugs or something when I wrote that!
Please forgive me, I'm usually much more coherent than that :-)
...and I couldn't even check before posting because of that
sever outage. Argh!
> MIT: movel a6@(4),d0
> MOT: move.l 4(a6),d0
> Now which one is the syntax that you want to get rid off?
Of course I meant to remove the least used one, which is...
err... mumble mumble... the MIT syntax :-)
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html