This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:22:01PM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-09 at 13:43, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> > 1) elimination of LOOP_EXPRs 
> I had originally though LOOP_EXPRs would be useful, but ultimately, no
> one could explain how :-). So I see no problem with eliminating them,
There was some discussions about higher level loop expressions (after a promotion
of some LOOP_EXPRs) for representing parallel do loops. But I see no problem
in flagging the candidate loops with some attributes instead of having yet
another expression for higher refinements.