This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
Op zo 10-08-2003, om 21:49 schreef Daniel Berlin:
> Just as a note about stability, his patches pass all but 2 regression
> tests, and
> build and run all of SPEC with no problems (other than the gcc
> miscompares we get anyway).
Ehrm... there are some other problems, in particular with exception
handling. For example, the test case for PR8361 doesn't compile, and a
large body of C++ I'm working on doesn't compile either. I already
pointed that out yesterday.
> SPECFP base on the C programs without his changes :
>
> 177.mesa 1400 173 808
> 179.art 2600 428 607
> 183.equake 1300 142 917
> 188.ammp 2200 554 397
>
>
> With his changes:
> 177.mesa 1400 171 820
> 179.art 2600 419 620
> 183.equake 1300 138 944
> 188.ammp 2200 540 407
Yummie that's impressive. Hope you can stamp out the bugs, Zdenek :)
Gr.
Steven
PS. Hmm now I think of it, how are those numbers possible? Didn't
these patches break the loop optimizer???