This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:12:49 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0308100106230.21446@dberlin.org> <1060535465.27906.30.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <9B833DB0-CB5C-11D7-B915-000A95A34564@dberlin.org> <1060540799.27906.52.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <36DDA702-CB6A-11D7-AE61-000A95A34564@dberlin.org>

On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:38, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> > I meant implementing bsi_move in terms of bsi_remove and bsi_insert.  
> > Is
> > that feasible?
> Yes, but it will require adding an extra argument to bsi_remove and 
> remove_stmt.
> 
Or commonize some of the code in bsi_remove/remove_stmt.  Though, if
that's too intrusive then I guess we add the argument.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

References:
- [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]