This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 7:41 PM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
Have you actually tested the insert (both edge and non) iterators,
And what happened to tree/block statement iterators? You said you
I don't like the purpose for that block statement iterators were
and their internals; otherwise I like the idea.
yes, to some amount (they are also used in ordinary un-ssa).
But un-ssa has actually not, to my knowledge, every exposed a bug in
the iterators, while PRE has done it frequently.
I'd be happy to test them if you sent me the huge patch.
now they are trivial, I don't fear there would be any major problems
here is the patch; it should bootstrap at least c and c++.
It appears you broke walk_tree on GIMPLE'd trees.
Points-to uses it.
If you'd really like me to switch it to use tsi's, i will, but it was
written before tsi's existed.