This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
Have you actually tested the insert (both edge and non) iterators, for
And what happened to tree/block statement iterators? You said you
I don't like the purpose for that block statement iterators were
and their internals; otherwise I like the idea.
Bootstrap with -ftree-pre will tell you if you broke them (PRE isn't on
by default because of one small bug elsewhere causing it to make one
elimination in 253.perlbmk's util.c file, causing an infinite loop in
but I think most of us do. Do they still work, or have you
got a replacement for it? (Fingers crossed: double linked chain? ;-)
They of course still work; I haven't touched tree statement iterators,
just run on the chains.