This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)



On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Joe Buck wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 05:30:39PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, August 3, 2003, at 1:24 PM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> > >> The 3.3.1 target should be removed from bugzilla, but I do not know
> > >> how to do this.
> > >
> > > Should it?  I'm not sure about that.  It's still the correct target
> > > for the many *resolved* bugs which were fixed in 3.3.1; or will they
> > > have their target set to "--"?
> >
> > They are fixed, so they shouldn't have a milestone target anymore,
> > unless you want one so you can tell what *was* fixed in 3.3.1.
> >
> > > If so, make sure not to remove the target until the 3.3.1 release
> > > notes are final, with the corresponding list generated.  :-)
> > >
> > > At any rate, it should not be allowed as a target for open bugs any
> > > more.
> >
> > I don't think i need to make bugzilla have support for "non-open"
> > milestones, since the people targeting things (IE not the users) know
> > which are open and which aren't.
>
> But you will be erasing historical data (about which bugs were fixed in
> which release).  How will we ever get that data back once you destroy it?

Err, I suggested we not delete old milestones if you want to know what
was fixed in a given version. You must be misreading me.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]