gcc archive
author index for August, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

• 2003-08-20 13:59 automated response

Alvaro Hernando Salazar V.

• 2003-08-25 21:40 about to port GCC

Anders Ådland

• 2003-08-23 13:15 Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?
• 2003-08-27 14:06 Compile GCC without a library
• 2003-08-28 14:45 ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL called for __builtin_ function

Frank-René Schäfer

• 2003-08-13 13:06 Larger Compilations / Speed

Linus Sjöberg

• 2003-08-04 07:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-08-05 07:43 [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build
• 2003-08-05 08:59 Re: [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build
• 2003-08-14 10:21 [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1
• 2003-08-21 09:05 Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1
• 2003-08-31 07:33 [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build
• 2003-08-31 10:50 Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-08-03 01:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-03 20:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-05 08:39 Re: [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build
• 2003-08-06 22:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 20:00 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-12 14:00 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit

Антон

• 2003-08-04 14:58 Source code for GCC

aa31362

• 2003-08-09 23:26 why are you waiting

Aaron Lehmann

• 2003-08-08 02:52 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4

Administrator

• 2003-08-20 09:01 We would like to offer our sincere thanks to you for writing to us.

Advanced PCS

• 2003-08-21 00:13 Estimated Response Time

Agri

• 2003-08-29 08:43 building cross gcc-3.3 on i686 for target i586

Alan Modra

• 2003-08-05 02:41 bugzilla mail loop
• 2003-08-07 05:32 rpath and libtool == testsuite woes
• 2003-08-08 03:04 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes
• 2003-08-12 14:58 biarch gcc
• 2003-08-13 00:48 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-29 01:19 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-08-06 13:44 Re: GCC Weekly News?

Alexandre Courbot

• 2003-08-22 10:44 Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?
• 2003-08-22 11:12 Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?
• 2003-08-22 13:21 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?
• 2003-08-22 16:36 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?
• 2003-08-25 08:24 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-08-01 10:31 Re: Using conditional instructions in a macro
• 2003-08-03 13:44 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux)
• 2003-08-03 13:46 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-04 12:47 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 13:52 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 16:09 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 16:30 Re: Source code for GCC
• 2003-08-04 16:45 Re: LD_PROFILE usage
• 2003-08-04 17:03 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:05 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:14 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:21 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:30 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-08-06 18:40 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-07 18:16 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes
• 2003-08-08 20:24 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes
• 2003-08-15 05:14 Re: [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?)
• 2003-08-20 00:24 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h
• 2003-08-26 20:57 Re: Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd)

Amol Lad

• 2003-08-04 14:50 LD_PROFILE usage

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-08-03 09:14 multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-03 14:09 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-03 15:16 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-03 18:09 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-06 04:37 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-10 18:37 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC
• 2003-08-12 15:46 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-14 06:47 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-15 13:04 Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS
• 2003-08-17 00:49 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-17 10:41 [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean
• 2003-08-22 08:04 Re: build breakage in cvs head
• 2003-08-23 09:00 Re: mainline problem
• 2003-08-23 09:32 Re: mainline problem

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-08-11 19:02 Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources
• 2003-08-15 15:24 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas
• 2003-08-18 09:45 Re: m68k C++ exception handling
• 2003-08-18 11:36 Re: How to find missing "?
• 2003-08-18 21:49 Re: m68k C++ exception handling
• 2003-08-19 08:24 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-19 18:24 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-20 22:36 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-08-24 15:59 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help

Andrew Cagney

• 2003-08-21 20:52 expect 5.39 import
• 2003-08-21 22:28 Re: expect 5.39 import
• 2003-08-22 14:56 Re: expect 5.39 import

Andrew Haley

• 2003-08-01 13:55 [tree-ssa] java bytecode tests failures
• 2003-08-04 16:43 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:02 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:21 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-11 09:57 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 13:38 Unit-at-a-time compilation
• 2003-08-12 14:36 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler
• 2003-08-19 16:26 g++ compile option question
• 2003-08-24 13:18 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-08-28 17:10 libjava build is broken on SMP

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-08-11 17:41 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-11 18:20 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 18:32 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 18:35 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:53 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)
• 2003-08-11 22:00 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)
• 2003-08-12 16:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-25 13:58 [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 15:40 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 18:17 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 18:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 23:46 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 19:44 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 20:57 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 22:30 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-29 19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-29 21:07 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview

Andrew Morton

• 2003-08-04 04:56 missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 11:22 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-08-01 18:11 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-08-01 20:42 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-04 11:55 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-08-04 13:56 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 15:15 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-05 12:59 Re: tree-ssa MacOS X build
• 2003-08-05 13:44 No longer able to detect exception model right
• 2003-08-06 02:15 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 02:52 Re: PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-06 05:34 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 06:20 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 11:51 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 23:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 18:19 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux
• 2003-08-11 17:51 Testcases and approval
• 2003-08-11 20:34 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 00:30 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 14:50 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler
• 2003-08-12 23:31 Re: 64-bit on ia-32
• 2003-08-12 23:31 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-13 11:15 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 11:19 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 14:16 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed
• 2003-08-13 19:20 Re: sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?
• 2003-08-13 19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin
• 2003-08-13 20:59 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 21:19 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 22:09 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 22:20 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 22:31 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-14 00:21 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 02:32 Re: libgloss patches
• 2003-08-14 20:25 Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify
• 2003-08-14 23:01 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-15 11:18 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time
• 2003-08-17 19:06 Re: Friendly install
• 2003-08-21 00:40 Re: --with-ld breakage for me.
• 2003-08-21 13:34 Re: Quality Issues on mainline
• 2003-08-21 13:37 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap
• 2003-08-21 14:20 Re: seperate libiberty
• 2003-08-21 16:12 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 (Was [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap)
• 2003-08-21 17:06 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-21 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-21 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-21 23:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 02:30 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 15:12 Re: type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4...
• 2003-08-22 22:22 Re: Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?
• 2003-08-23 04:22 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap
• 2003-08-24 15:41 Re: Binarie gcc for mac
• 2003-08-24 22:01 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)
• 2003-08-25 14:05 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant
• 2003-08-25 14:52 Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?
• 2003-08-26 02:27 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-08-27 17:26 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?
• 2003-08-27 17:47 Re: -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5
• 2003-08-28 00:47 Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code
• 2003-08-28 02:44 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 16:36 Re: gcc 3.3.1 on IA64
• 2003-08-28 20:55 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto
• 2003-08-29 13:24 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR
• 2003-08-29 17:36 Re: --enable-languages no longer works
• 2003-08-30 00:46 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently
• 2003-08-31 03:00 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap

Andrew Shewmaker

• 2003-08-07 19:16 Re: GCC Weekly News?

Andrew Walrond

• 2003-08-26 12:35 Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 16:37 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 17:03 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems

Andy Jackman

• 2003-08-18 10:50 How to find missing "?
• 2003-08-18 12:28 Re: How to find missing "?

Anne George

• 2003-08-22 01:05 Automatic Response

Anthony Green

• 2003-08-05 17:06 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for?
• 2003-08-14 17:00 Re: gcj and xgamestation

Arnt Gulbrandsen

• 2003-08-20 16:29 Re: Re: My details

Arpad Beszedes

• 2003-08-11 15:00 Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE)

Askadar

• 2003-08-10 11:24 Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage

autoreply-no-reply-please

• 2003-08-31 03:27 Thank you for your interest.

Ben Elliston

• 2003-08-13 15:44 Re: Porting gcc

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-08-11 17:04 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage
• 2003-08-11 18:18 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 12:27 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2003-08-03 06:38 cross-compiling libiberty in gcc-3.4
• 2003-08-04 05:47 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20030804 snapshot)
• 2003-08-08 02:39 Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4
• 2003-08-08 03:41 libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-08 14:00 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4
• 2003-08-08 15:10 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4
• 2003-08-08 18:17 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-08 18:42 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-08 23:08 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-08 23:12 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-09 01:37 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20030808snapshot)
• 2003-08-09 16:28 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-09 22:35 GCC target for uClinux with uClibc
• 2003-08-09 23:48 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-10 22:57 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?
• 2003-08-11 00:51 Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?
• 2003-08-14 01:58 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken (not anymore)
• 2003-08-14 02:27 libgloss patches
• 2003-08-14 16:55 m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-15 15:15 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-17 02:11 m68k C++ exception handling
• 2003-08-18 18:09 Re: m68k C++ exception handling
• 2003-08-18 18:48 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-18 20:33 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-19 18:02 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-20 12:52 New cross target for uClinux
• 2003-08-20 15:52 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-20 17:15 CVS write access
• 2003-08-20 17:59 Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux
• 2003-08-20 22:36 Add self to MAINTAINERS (mainline & branch)
• 2003-08-21 00:12 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-21 03:29 ColdFire/uClinux status update
• 2003-08-21 18:31 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-21 19:14 Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags
• 2003-08-22 17:17 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-22 22:11 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-23 01:03 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-24 15:00 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-24 15:53 DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-08-24 17:46 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-08-25 01:23 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2003-08-14 07:37 [libiberty] Why is configure trying to use binfmt-0090?

Bernd Schmidt

• 2003-08-04 16:46 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:28 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 18:44 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-18 17:21 Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors

Bharathi Seshadri

• 2003-08-28 12:59 Is this a bfd bug? (binutils version 2.13)

Bhavesh P. Davda

• 2003-08-21 16:50 C++ name mangling tool

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2003-08-04 12:38 First? gfortran build for mips-sgi-irix6.5

BillSupport Chase

• 2003-08-21 09:29 Receipt of email to Chase Bill Management Center

Boaz Harrosh

• 2003-08-06 07:32 Re: __declspec(selectany)

Brad Lucier

• 2003-08-11 06:34 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme

Bradley Lucier

• 2003-08-13 04:09 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-14 01:56 SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?
• 2003-08-14 15:26 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?
• 2003-08-15 02:50 Another parallel bootstrap problem [was Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8]
• 2003-08-21 23:08 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 01:50 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 21:47 Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?
• 2003-08-29 16:36 Naive suggestion about multilibs

Brian Hart

• 2003-08-23 07:01 Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd)

Bruce Korb

• 2003-08-07 13:42 Test email (should bounce)
• 2003-08-13 16:45 Re: fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh?

Bruno . Voigt

• 2003-08-10 17:01 GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbolsduring link
• 2003-08-10 18:48 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolvedsymbols during link

Camm Maguire

• 2003-08-12 22:24 function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 14:08 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 14:27 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 15:18 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 15:20 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 15:33 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 23:26 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-15 14:04 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-21 04:52 recent commit
• 2003-08-21 11:57 recent commit
• 2003-08-29 01:04 Re: recent commit
• 2003-08-29 21:38 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit

Carlo Florendo

• 2003-08-13 03:59 scanf issue (store only specified tokens)
• 2003-08-13 04:18 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)
• 2003-08-13 04:23 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)

Carlo Wood

• 2003-08-30 11:24 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?

cgd

• 2003-08-01 14:47 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-12 06:08 probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?
• 2003-08-12 06:34 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?
• 2003-08-12 15:02 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?
• 2003-08-20 19:23 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?

Charles Azer

• 2003-08-26 20:02 Thanks for writing to me at Toll-free Consortium.

Chip Cuntz

• 2003-08-29 20:38 g++ Warning Incorrect?

Chris Devers

• 2003-08-02 15:41 Re: Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port
• 2003-08-24 01:25 [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-24 01:33 [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-24 02:11 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-24 02:42 [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-24 14:12 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-24 16:34 Re: Binarie gcc for mac
• 2003-08-25 23:47 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals
• 2003-08-26 00:57 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals
• 2003-08-26 00:59 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-26 01:24 [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 01:33 [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-08-26 01:43 [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization
• 2003-08-26 01:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 03:37 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 03:53 [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 04:02 [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof
• 2003-08-26 04:04 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 04:18 [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-26 04:20 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-26 05:35 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 05:38 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 05:50 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof
• 2003-08-26 06:09 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 06:23 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 06:32 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-08-26 06:39 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof
• 2003-08-26 07:00 new book pdf up for review, was Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 [...]
• 2003-08-26 07:04 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-26 07:56 gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25...
• 2003-08-26 14:48 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-26 15:04 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 15:11 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 17:07 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 17:59 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 21:18 [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals

Chris Lattner

• 2003-08-03 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-07 21:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-20 18:43 Is this meant to compile?
• 2003-08-20 19:12 Re: Is this meant to compile?
• 2003-08-22 03:08 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-25 03:45 Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?
• 2003-08-25 05:13 G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-25 15:42 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?
• 2003-08-25 22:26 Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-25 22:53 Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-29 14:41 "short pretty" names?
• 2003-08-29 14:57 Re: "short pretty" names?
• 2003-08-29 15:05 Re: "short pretty" names?
• 2003-08-31 21:49 RE: Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integerand float

Christian Lindig

• 2003-08-19 09:44 how are stack slot addresses resolved?

Christoph Hellwig

• 2003-08-10 06:44 Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc
• 2003-08-29 15:21 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64

Christopher Eltschka

• 2003-08-22 13:17 Suggestion: Template instantiation debugging

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-08-01 02:29 Re: duplicates of list messages
• 2003-08-21 17:54 Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood
• 2003-08-26 03:22 sorry about the spam that got through
• 2003-08-26 05:17 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make

Claus Fischer

• 2003-08-13 16:35 sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?

club

• 2003-08-24 01:20 full space, this user is limit quota

Colin Douglas Howell

• 2003-08-01 01:22 duplicates of list messages
• 2003-08-01 15:47 Re: gcc or g77 in MS Windows
• 2003-08-14 06:24 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed
• 2003-08-26 01:44 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 02:46 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-08-28 17:03 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func

Dan DaCosta

• 2003-08-14 21:57 tree-dump inquiry
• 2003-08-14 22:03 Re: tree-dump inquiry
• 2003-08-20 17:50 Re: tree-dump inquiry

Dan Kegel

• 2003-08-03 16:15 re: cross-compiling libiberty in gcc-3.4
• 2003-08-05 22:17 re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-06 04:18 Re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-06 05:04 Re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-13 18:15 re: no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option
• 2003-08-14 06:00 -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?
• 2003-08-14 18:42 [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libcnot being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?)
• 2003-08-15 00:25 Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning:`packed' attribute ignored"
• 2003-08-15 13:39 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined
• 2003-08-16 20:32 re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-17 20:03 Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813
• 2003-08-18 19:21 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-18 21:55 crosstool-0.19: added gcc-3.4-20030813 support
• 2003-08-19 04:13 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 06:08 Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813
• 2003-08-19 06:16 Re: Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813
• 2003-08-20 00:40 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored"
• 2003-08-25 00:24 Re: Quality Issues on mainline
• 2003-08-28 18:01 Known gcc testsuite issues (was: gcc-3.3, host==x86, target==ppc7450)
• 2003-08-29 21:40 [OT] Identifying unused include directives?
• 2003-08-31 07:02 LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
• 2003-08-31 14:09 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
• 2003-08-31 15:39 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-08-03 21:28 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-03 21:30 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-03 21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-04 14:39 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 16:38 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 16:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 17:52 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 02:51 Bugzilla Bug 605 fun fixed
• 2003-08-05 03:00 Re: bugzilla mail loop
• 2003-08-05 03:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 13:57 Re: Dominator Information in new-ra
• 2003-08-06 16:47 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 18:53 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-07 18:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 18:56 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 21:30 Re: GCC Buzilla Modifications
• 2003-08-07 23:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-08 20:05 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 01:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 14:53 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 23:40 [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.
• 2003-08-10 05:42 [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 13:00 [tree-ssa]: I've got LICM done, but it requires Zdenek's changes
• 2003-08-10 17:59 Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.
• 2003-08-10 18:01 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 19:38 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 19:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 20:35 [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:17 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:31 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:33 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:41 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 23:17 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-11 20:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:39 [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations (wasRe: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)
• 2003-08-11 21:19 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)
• 2003-08-11 21:25 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 22:29 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)
• 2003-08-13 19:53 [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-08-13 21:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-08-13 22:34 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-08-17 16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean
• 2003-08-19 03:13 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 03:52 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 04:31 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 17:21 Bugzilla adding fulltext index
• 2003-08-21 15:22 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap
• 2003-08-21 17:15 Re: OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood)
• 2003-08-21 17:37 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-21 20:53 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-26 15:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-27 22:46 Re: SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-27 23:32 Re: SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-31 02:58 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap

Daniel Blueman

• 2003-08-01 08:58 [IA32] -fschedule-insns and -fschedule-insns2...

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-08-04 17:53 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-14 16:47 Re: RFC - detect static data overruns
• 2003-08-14 16:49 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-14 16:53 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-14 18:18 Re: How does --with-sysroot work?
• 2003-08-14 20:54 Re: How does --with-sysroot work?
• 2003-08-20 22:33 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-21 16:23 Re: how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5
• 2003-08-22 23:08 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-31 15:24 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?

Dara Hazeghi

• 2003-08-19 21:03 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h
• 2003-08-20 04:46 warnings building mainline for x86_64-freebsd
• 2003-08-21 22:18 m68k-elf target broken again
• 2003-08-21 22:24 m32r-elf build requires gdb?
• 2003-08-21 23:39 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?

Dave Hudson

• 2003-08-01 11:13 Re: GCC

David Edelsohn

• 2003-08-04 15:14 Re: GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1
• 2003-08-17 20:05 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-18 18:40 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 18:41 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 15:00 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.
• 2003-08-24 00:45 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 01:45 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-25 17:29 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-08-26 02:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues

David McCullough

• 2003-08-20 14:40 Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux

David Mosberger

• 2003-08-13 23:36 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 21:31 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-15 18:32 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-29 00:22 Re: recent commit
• 2003-08-29 01:35 Re: recent commit

David O'Brien

• 2003-08-04 04:42 Re: GCC

David Wuertele

• 2003-08-10 20:28 gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-11 17:28 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included

Demon Support Responder

• 2003-08-22 04:31 Using the autoresponder

Deskin Miller

• 2003-08-05 16:22 cross compiler missing header?

Devang Patel

• 2003-08-06 02:36 Re: PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-26 17:02 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

Diego Novillo

• 2003-08-01 13:45 [tree-ssa] java bytecode tests failures
• 2003-08-01 22:17 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-02 23:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-03 02:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-04 18:32 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 20:20 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 20:33 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-05 13:25 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-06 21:37 [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 00:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 00:40 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 00:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 23:03 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 23:39 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 17:07 Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.
• 2003-08-10 17:10 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 18:39 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 20:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 20:12 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
• 2003-08-10 21:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:25 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:38 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-10 21:50 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's
• 2003-08-11 15:30 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 15:33 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:07 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 16:09 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 23:45 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-13 13:13 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed
• 2003-08-14 11:53 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-15 23:54 [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on alpha
• 2003-08-16 17:24 [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-08-18 16:25 Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-18 17:59 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-18 21:12 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-18 23:01 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-19 23:23 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology
• 2003-08-20 21:01 [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2003-08-17
• 2003-08-24 22:09 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)
• 2003-08-26 12:27 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-27 19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview

Dimitrie O. Paun

• 2003-08-06 04:40 Re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-06 05:13 Re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-06 14:17 Re: __declspec(selectany)

Dimitry Andric

• 2003-08-13 15:14 Successful build of gcc 3.3.1 on i686-pc-cygwin

DJ Delorie

• 2003-08-01 20:10 current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-01 22:13 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-02 00:30 need function decl/type in get_parm_info
• 2003-08-02 00:42 on vacation...
• 2003-08-29 17:46 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog

Don Lindsay

• 2003-08-20 22:26 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

Dorit Naishlos

• 2003-08-01 16:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues

Douglas B Rupp

• 2003-08-06 23:42 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:45 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:47 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:56 Re: Problem in split_basic_block

Dr. Franz Fehringer

• 2003-08-10 13:44 Re: 3.3.1 build successes
• 2003-08-27 15:03 Re: temporary object

Ed Swierk

• 2003-08-13 01:07 gcov questions
• 2003-08-19 20:49 Re: gcov questions
• 2003-08-19 21:04 Multiple input-file patch for gcov 3.2.3
• 2003-08-20 18:27 Re: gcov questions

eny lee

• 2003-08-11 10:31 How to use Inline assembly?

Eracleous,CH

• 2003-08-19 18:58 Out of Office AutoReply: My details

Eric Christopher

• 2003-08-11 17:51 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-11 22:18 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-12 06:26 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?
• 2003-08-12 06:27 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.
• 2003-08-12 06:56 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?
• 2003-08-12 15:27 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-22 21:06 Re: Recursive
• 2003-08-27 19:53 SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-28 08:10 Re: disable libgcc
• 2003-08-28 16:55 Re: R: disable libgcc

Erik Schnetter

• 2003-08-03 11:18 Implementing real*16 in Fortran
• 2003-08-03 20:39 Re: Implementing real*16 in Fortran

Erik Trulsson

• 2003-08-06 02:50 Re: Gcc optimization flags
• 2003-08-14 14:29 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-16 10:17 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

Experience Technical Support

• 2003-08-21 21:35 Experience Client Support

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-08-23 01:10 [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure
• 2003-08-24 01:48 Re: [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure
• 2003-08-30 00:39 [tree-ssa] having problems recently
• 2003-08-31 00:17 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently
• 2003-08-31 00:18 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently
• 2003-08-31 01:00 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently

F. Schaefer

• 2003-08-14 06:07 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed

fahad al-zahrani

• 2003-08-24 01:51 long long data type support

Falk Hueffner

• 2003-08-02 11:16 Re: Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port
• 2003-08-14 23:21 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code

Felix Lee

• 2003-08-27 01:26 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

Fergus Henderson

• 2003-08-06 03:26 Re: __declspec(selectany)
• 2003-08-10 18:58 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-12 13:21 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-08-14 02:25 Re: 64-bit on ia-32
• 2003-08-15 03:49 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-15 04:02 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-19 00:30 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 00:44 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 06:56 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors

Florian Weimer

• 2003-08-22 10:10 Re: OT: Sobig
• 2003-08-22 19:38 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-30 15:19 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?

Fons Rademakers

• 2003-08-22 15:07 type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4...

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-08-14 16:08 Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1

Frank Heckenbach

• 2003-08-04 02:45 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal
• 2003-08-31 03:19 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390

Frank Mehnert

• 2003-08-19 15:10 init_priority with GCC
• 2003-08-19 16:20 Re: g++ compile option question

Fred Fish

• 2003-08-08 00:04 RFC - detect static data overruns

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-08-01 20:46 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-04 12:55 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 13:07 On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 13:11 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 14:32 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 14:47 The Zen of Optimizing C++ - What is the sound of one compiler inlining?
• 2003-08-04 17:18 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:22 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:28 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:40 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:44 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:48 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:50 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:52 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:05 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 18:09 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:12 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:15 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:27 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:29 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:31 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:33 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:42 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:46 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-05 03:17 Class definitions in C++
• 2003-08-05 08:26 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 09:54 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 10:06 simple-declaration (was: Re: On inlining in C++)
• 2003-08-05 13:09 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 13:22 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 13:39 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 16:50 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 17:26 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 17:57 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:30 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:33 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:53 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 09:26 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 12:45 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-10 18:03 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link
• 2003-08-10 19:40 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link
• 2003-08-12 11:24 Re: Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-08-13 00:58 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 12:15 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 12:23 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 12:41 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 13:06 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 14:01 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 14:26 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 15:02 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 15:56 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 16:14 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-14 07:31 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-15 12:07 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(
• 2003-08-15 18:12 C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 18:26 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 18:34 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 19:03 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-16 09:14 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16)
• 2003-08-16 09:53 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-18 16:49 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-18 17:03 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-18 18:33 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 20:43 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 21:49 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-19 06:38 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 06:46 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 06:53 Re: Where did output_add_string go?
• 2003-08-19 07:35 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-20 21:27 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 13:16 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 04:33 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-24 16:14 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-24 16:18 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-24 16:20 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-25 14:55 Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?
• 2003-08-25 18:56 Re: Naming the originator in new testcases
• 2003-08-26 02:24 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 02:47 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 10:33 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-29 19:50 Re: "short pretty" names?
• 2003-08-29 20:08 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-29 21:59 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-08-26 09:58 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers

Gabriele Caracausi

• 2003-08-24 11:55 error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-25 18:38 R: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-26 13:39 R: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-28 08:00 disable libgcc
• 2003-08-28 08:18 R: disable libgcc

gccadmin

• 2003-08-04 17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030804 is now available
• 2003-08-06 16:59 gcc-ss-3.4-20030806 is now available
• 2003-08-11 17:11 gcc-ss-3.3-20030811 is now available
• 2003-08-13 17:01 gcc-ss-3.4-20030813 is now available
• 2003-08-18 17:05 gcc-ss-3.3-20030818 is now available
• 2003-08-20 17:00 gcc-ss-3.4-20030820 is now available
• 2003-08-25 17:22 gcc-ss-3.3-20030825 is now available
• 2003-08-27 17:08 gcc-ss-3.4-20030827 is now available

Ged Haywood

• 2003-08-03 16:20 Successful build of gcc 3.2.3 on Slackware 9.0

Geoff Keating

• 2003-08-01 19:33 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-03 23:00 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-08-04 18:45 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 19:09 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-08-05 18:17 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 07:03 Re: PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-07 19:22 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 19:30 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-07 20:41 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-07 23:21 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-08 02:13 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-08 23:53 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files
• 2003-08-11 17:46 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-11 19:08 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-11 21:33 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 00:17 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 06:48 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 23:26 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-18 19:52 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-18 23:53 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 23:55 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-20 16:43 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-20 16:44 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-23 20:16 Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?
• 2003-08-26 16:02 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-08-26 16:07 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization
• 2003-08-29 19:25 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?
• 2003-08-29 21:51 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Geoffrey Poremba

• 2003-08-13 18:17 gcj and xgamestation
• 2003-08-14 18:14 Re: gcj and xgamestation

Georgy Yunayev

• 2003-08-11 08:21 Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-08-12 07:27 Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-08-04 16:55 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-05 09:37 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-05 18:39 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?)
• 2003-08-05 21:41 GCC Weekly News?
• 2003-08-06 08:55 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 10:10 Re: Bug report - How to attach a file?
• 2003-08-06 15:44 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-06 19:11 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include
• 2003-08-11 09:57 Re: RFC - detect static data overruns
• 2003-08-11 10:15 Re: Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-08-11 10:47 Re: GCC 3.3.1 Released
• 2003-08-11 16:11 Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?
• 2003-08-11 16:35 Re: comments on onlinedocs webpage
• 2003-08-11 17:11 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage
• 2003-08-12 13:53 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler
• 2003-08-12 21:39 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?
• 2003-08-12 21:49 Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources
• 2003-08-13 13:13 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed
• 2003-08-13 16:14 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 22:28 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-13 22:36 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?
• 2003-08-13 22:45 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-14 09:47 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-16 06:18 Re: Version Number
• 2003-08-17 12:50 Re: Friendly install
• 2003-08-17 21:01 Re: Friendly install
• 2003-08-17 21:07 Re: Devel rebuild question
• 2003-08-21 08:36 Quality Issues on mainline
• 2003-08-21 10:04 Parallel build broken
• 2003-08-24 09:19 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-24 09:44 cgraph maintainership
• 2003-08-24 11:26 Re: Quality Issues on mainline
• 2003-08-24 13:30 PATCH for: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containingrelease tag?
• 2003-08-24 13:42 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-24 13:47 Re: GCC Weekly News?
• 2003-08-24 14:32 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions
• 2003-08-24 18:37 [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure
• 2003-08-24 19:26 Re: [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure
• 2003-08-24 21:17 How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)
• 2003-08-24 22:03 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)
• 2003-08-26 13:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-26 14:01 Re: gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25...
• 2003-08-26 22:17 Re: [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-27 17:40 -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5
• 2003-08-29 23:43 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Glenn McGrath

• 2003-08-21 14:04 seperate libiberty

gp

• 2003-08-14 17:21 Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files.

Greg Schafer

• 2003-08-08 04:51 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files
• 2003-08-08 11:16 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files

GTFSTBK

• 2003-08-27 15:51 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-08-15 08:03 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-18 11:40 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-20 13:34 [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-20 15:30 strange warning with gcc 3.x
• 2003-08-21 13:07 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-22 08:22 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-22 09:43 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-25 11:42 Re: m68k patch reviews

H. J. Lu

• 2003-08-12 15:51 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-14 18:17 How does --with-sysroot work?
• 2003-08-14 20:51 Re: How does --with-sysroot work?
• 2003-08-17 07:37 A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED
• 2003-08-17 19:04 Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED
• 2003-08-18 16:09 Bug in array reference (Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED)
• 2003-08-21 16:04 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.6 is released
• 2003-08-28 17:04 libjava build is broken on SMP

Halifa Yehezkel-BYH005

• 2003-08-19 15:24 g++ compile option question

hartmut . schirmer

• 2003-08-08 06:26 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically

He HongFu

• 2003-08-06 00:57 where is the "tree"'s definition?
• 2003-08-14 08:20 compile on solarsi
• 2003-08-27 09:55 temporary object

Helmut Schröger

• 2003-08-04 07:34 GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1

Holger Weiss

• 2003-08-09 23:35 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparc-sun-solaris2.9
• 2003-08-10 10:25 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9

Hongbo Rong

• 2003-08-21 14:44 how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5

hostmaster

• 2003-08-26 02:47 Re: [ARIN-20030825.3802] Re: Details

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2003-08-12 21:09 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-14 05:15 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-15 00:08 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-18 05:11 Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS
• 2003-08-19 03:06 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-19 17:56 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-19 18:06 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-21 03:46 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-28 00:23 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 03:24 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 22:52 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-29 16:41 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?

Igor Bukanov

• 2003-08-13 09:46 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour

J. Kean Johnston

• 2003-08-05 19:42 Commit approval pls: PR 9877, 8336, plus other stuff

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-08-03 18:54 Re: Implementing real*16 in Fortran
• 2003-08-12 15:49 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-12 16:10 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?
• 2003-08-29 15:26 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64

James Michael DuPont

• 2003-08-11 00:23 Fwd: [Introspector-developers] ANN : Call for help with a porting of VCG to Dotgnu pnet/c
• 2003-08-19 07:10 Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology
• 2003-08-19 17:02 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology
• 2003-08-20 08:32 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-08-16 01:39 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-16 14:08 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-20 23:54 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-08-07 13:11 On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-14 10:11 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-15 08:05 Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(
• 2003-08-15 11:12 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-15 12:44 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(
• 2003-08-23 21:28 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-08-30 12:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-30 12:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-31 09:21 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Janis Johnson

• 2003-08-06 16:58 Re: undefined symbol
• 2003-08-09 00:26 additions to 3.2 and 3.3 build status lists
• 2003-08-11 16:26 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage
• 2003-08-11 16:38 Re: Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE)
• 2003-08-12 21:45 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0
• 2003-08-12 22:17 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage
• 2003-08-13 22:31 build status additions for GCC 3.3.1
• 2003-08-28 19:35 Re: R: disable libgcc
• 2003-08-29 15:53 Re: MS obj not recogn. I need answer

Jason Merrill

• 2003-08-07 18:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 21:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 22:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-13 20:58 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-08-13 21:55 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end
• 2003-08-21 16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-21 16:24 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-21 19:10 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-21 21:22 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 02:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 02:43 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-26 21:30 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview

Jean-Eric Cuendet

• 2003-08-14 16:11 Problem with macro params containing commas

Jean-Luc Dugelay

• 2003-08-22 13:33 Out of town till end of Aug.

Jeff Sturm

• 2003-08-21 19:02 [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-08-24 05:50 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes
• 2003-08-28 14:26 Re: More info on solaris8 problem

Jeffrey . S . Whitaker

• 2003-08-05 11:45 tree-ssa MacOS X build

Jeremy Sanders

• 2003-08-23 08:29 mainline problem
• 2003-08-23 09:25 Re: mainline problem

Jim Fischer

• 2003-08-11 18:20 Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources

Jim Wilson

• 2003-08-08 04:11 Re: comments on onlinedocs webpage
• 2003-08-08 04:54 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-08-10 06:03 Re: is movccsi a standard names?
• 2003-08-10 06:30 Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test
• 2003-08-10 06:35 Re: questions
• 2003-08-10 06:55 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-10 07:43 Re: How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-10 08:06 Re: CHECK_DEAD_NOTES abort in sched1 for sh-elf
• 2003-08-11 18:38 Re: Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-08-11 20:26 Re: How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-11 20:40 Re: What is the correct logic for casesi
• 2003-08-11 20:43 Re: upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture
• 2003-08-11 20:47 Re: How to use Inline assembly?
• 2003-08-11 20:55 Re: SH3 memory allocation
• 2003-08-12 05:38 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)
• 2003-08-12 19:53 Re: How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-12 20:33 Re: Profiling gcc building Mozilla
• 2003-08-19 20:31 Re: Inquiry about RTL
• 2003-08-19 22:20 Re: compile on solarsi
• 2003-08-19 22:41 Re: Gcc3.3 installation problem
• 2003-08-19 22:51 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored"
• 2003-08-19 22:55 Re: tree-dump inquiry
• 2003-08-19 23:00 Re: gcc 2.95 question about .note section
• 2003-08-19 23:48 Re: init_priority with GCC
• 2003-08-20 19:55 Re: GCC Porting problem
• 2003-08-20 19:57 Re: some types probs using 3.3.1
• 2003-08-20 20:56 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 17:53 Re: Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches
• 2003-08-21 18:51 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 23:10 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 23:28 Re: Error Report
• 2003-08-21 23:33 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?
• 2003-08-21 23:43 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 00:01 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?
• 2003-08-22 04:35 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 18:32 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?
• 2003-08-22 18:41 Re: Recursive
• 2003-08-25 19:27 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-08-25 19:47 Re: Problem in .md file
• 2003-08-25 19:49 Re: using objcopy --redefine-sym
• 2003-08-25 19:55 Re: Problem in .md file
• 2003-08-25 20:01 Re: What does un-cse exactly refer to?
• 2003-08-26 00:47 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC
• 2003-08-26 00:55 Re: about to port GCC
• 2003-08-26 00:56 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals
• 2003-08-26 00:57 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-26 00:59 Re: -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-08-26 01:39 Re: to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-26 01:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-08-26 02:15 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-08-26 02:55 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembleroutput
• 2003-08-26 03:13 Re: [libobjc patch] Fix libobjc/gc.c compilation error
• 2003-08-26 05:15 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC
• 2003-08-26 20:07 Re: ABI documentation
• 2003-08-26 20:57 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings
• 2003-08-27 22:06 Re: RTL
• 2003-08-27 22:41 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port
• 2003-08-27 22:59 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port
• 2003-08-27 23:02 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port

Joe Buck

• 2003-08-04 16:31 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 16:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 16:37 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 16:50 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:08 processor architects say it's hard to work with us?
• 2003-08-04 17:12 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-04 17:19 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:33 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:34 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:09 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 19:12 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 22:57 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-06 01:24 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 01:34 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 01:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 02:00 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 02:02 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 02:20 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 16:35 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 16:37 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 16:47 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 16:51 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 19:49 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-07 19:33 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-09 01:02 3.3.1 build successes
• 2003-08-13 21:44 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 22:20 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 22:26 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 23:13 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-18 17:22 Re: Version Number
• 2003-08-18 23:21 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 18:16 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-20 16:04 Re: strange warning with gcc 3.x
• 2003-08-20 16:11 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc
• 2003-08-25 16:08 Re: long long data type support
• 2003-08-26 16:20 Re: about to port GCC
• 2003-08-26 16:34 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 16:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 16:43 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-27 16:11 Re: temporary object
• 2003-08-28 16:45 Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code
• 2003-08-28 21:41 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)
• 2003-08-28 21:44 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto
• 2003-08-29 21:58 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-29 22:30 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Joe Wong

• 2003-08-06 05:31 attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 06:19 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 11:34 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 15:01 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-08-19 17:15 Re: g++ compile option question
• 2003-08-20 11:58 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc

Joerg . Richter

• 2003-08-04 07:50 Re: GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-08-26 18:22 Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?

Johan Rydberg

• 2003-08-12 22:28 64-bit on ia-32

John Anderson

• 2003-08-29 08:04 "Ziem," - Where is your Green Card?

John Carlson

• 2003-08-28 06:51 writing a new backend to gcc

John David Anglin

• 2003-08-09 02:09 Re: 3.3.1 build successes
• 2003-08-13 20:49 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 21:19 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 21:25 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

John Levon

• 2003-08-29 14:53 Re: "short pretty" names?
• 2003-08-29 15:02 Re: "short pretty" names?

John Vickers

• 2003-08-21 14:44 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 14:29 C99 and i387 Floating-point assignments
• 2003-08-22 14:34 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-24 20:17 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision

Jon Bright

• 2003-08-06 06:22 Re: __declspec(selectany)

Joost VandeVondele

• 2003-08-05 06:58 Re: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?)
• 2003-08-13 19:19 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin

Josef Zlomek

• 2003-08-29 13:22 BIT_ANDTC_EXPR
• 2003-08-29 14:24 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?
• 2003-08-29 20:00 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-08-05 12:19 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?)
• 2003-08-05 12:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-08-20 22:04 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-26 09:39 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 16:48 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 17:04 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 20:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 22:03 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

JUDD JENNE

• 2003-08-21 04:08 [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap

judd.jenne

• 2003-08-23 03:14 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap
• 2003-08-27 05:45 [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap ICE tree-ssa-dom.c:877
• 2003-08-31 02:49 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap

Julilo Cesar Vieira da Silva

• 2003-08-22 17:31 Recursive

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-08-05 21:12 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-05 21:12 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-16 09:43 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

Karel Gardas

• 2003-08-27 19:55 [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux
• 2003-08-27 21:43 [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 07:35 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 12:13 [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model
• 2003-08-29 09:02 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model
• 2003-08-29 22:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-29 22:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-29 22:20 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-30 21:32 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-08-01 03:38 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def
• 2003-08-04 22:28 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-10 00:28 How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-10 17:31 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC
• 2003-08-10 19:00 Re: How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-11 20:54 Re: How to use protoize ?
• 2003-08-14 05:09 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?
• 2003-08-14 15:45 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?
• 2003-08-29 16:59 --enable-languages no longer works
• 2003-08-29 22:44 Re: --enable-languages no longer works

kaz Kojima

• 2003-08-09 08:00 SH: may miscompile zero extension and test
• 2003-08-10 07:35 Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test
• 2003-08-11 13:05 GCC 3.3.1: bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux on SuperH
• 2003-08-15 15:25 Re: 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined

Kazu Hirata

• 2003-08-24 09:00 What does un-cse exactly refer to?

Kean Johnston

• 2003-08-05 10:03 libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for?
• 2003-08-05 12:06 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for?
• 2003-08-05 17:43 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for?
• 2003-08-06 05:02 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for?
• 2003-08-08 07:06 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes
• 2003-08-08 20:16 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken

Kelley Cook

• 2003-08-08 19:02 Re: GCC 3.3 branch open
• 2003-08-11 15:53 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux
• 2003-08-13 14:56 Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual
• 2003-08-21 17:10 OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood)
• 2003-08-29 14:45 The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog

ken . miller

• 2003-08-06 21:58 GCC Target for ZSPxxx DSP core

kernel_learner

• 2003-08-01 21:08 Efficacy of optimizations.

Kevin Atkinson

• 2003-08-08 21:08 Re: On inlining in C++

kingf

• 2003-08-22 21:22 full space, this user is limit quota

Kris Warkentin

• 2003-08-21 04:27 Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches
• 2003-08-26 13:31 Re: error: stray '\' in program

Kurt Garloff

• 2003-08-15 12:25 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS

Lally Singh

• 2003-08-17 15:58 Devel rebuild question

Larry McVoy

• 2003-08-31 14:00 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?
• 2003-08-31 16:18 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?

Lars Brinkhoff

• 2003-08-10 18:56 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme

Lars Segerlund

• 2003-08-05 07:39 Re: processor architects say it's hard to work with us?
• 2003-08-05 07:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-08-06 09:17 Re: GCC Weekly News?
• 2003-08-11 11:09 gcc and c4x ..

Laurent GUERBY

• 2003-08-01 21:40 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-04 17:57 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:36 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-27 19:45 Flag granularity (was gcc-patches: New insns for the s390 backend(2))

Laurent Pinchart

• 2003-08-12 12:57 Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler

law

• 2003-08-01 18:10 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-08-04 16:34 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 20:08 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-05 00:47 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-06 16:31 Re: [tree-ssa] CFG cleanup (was: Re: clean)
• 2003-08-11 14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 15:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 17:58 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 21:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 21:46 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 22:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 17:39 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-13 18:16 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-14 20:38 Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify
• 2003-08-21 20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 03:45 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-22 03:46 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-08-24 03:00 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 15:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 15:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 21:51 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 07:12 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 07:43 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 18:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 19:06 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-27 19:52 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:21 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:24 Re: SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-27 23:01 Re: SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-28 04:53 Re: SSA PRE and Open64
• 2003-08-29 19:08 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview

Lee Manickum

• 2003-08-14 09:44 how do i subscribe ?

Linas Vepstas

• 2003-08-28 13:34 help with RTL and .md files

linuxdevices-request

• 2003-08-19 14:21 Please Reply - linuxdevices s081914212328348

Loisel, Sebastien

• 2003-08-14 22:18 Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-15 00:47 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-15 23:46 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-16 00:09 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations
• 2003-08-21 00:36 --with-ld breakage for me.
• 2003-08-21 18:53 RE: --with-ld breakage for me.

Long Fei

• 2003-08-06 02:31 Gcc optimization flags
• 2003-08-15 16:12 Gcc3.3 installation problem
• 2003-08-16 15:01 Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-18 21:53 RE: Gcc installation problem

Luca Saiu

• 2003-08-13 04:26 GCC 3.3.1: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC

MAILsweeper

• 2003-08-20 06:26 RE: Re: Your application
• 2003-08-20 19:11 A Virus has been detected.
• 2003-08-21 06:35 RE:Re: Re: My details - Prohibited File Extension Blocked
• 2003-08-23 02:45 A virus was detected on your message
• 2003-08-30 17:38 Email was blocked.

Manuel Novoa III

• 2003-08-11 16:13 Re: [uClibc] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc

Marc Espie

• 2003-08-02 10:35 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-08-08 20:37 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-20 10:54 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-20 10:58 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors

Marcelo Zannin da Rosa

• 2003-08-04 19:01 library creation

Marcos Lois Bermúdez

• 2003-08-28 10:28 suscribe
• 2003-08-29 13:59 Question about inline asm

Mark Hahn

• 2003-08-04 22:05 Re: std::pow implementation

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-08-03 16:12 GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 12:09 Re: gcc/gcc version.c
• 2003-08-05 03:28 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 15:04 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 15:47 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-07 20:59 GCC Buzilla Modifications
• 2003-08-08 18:09 GCC 3.3 branch open
• 2003-08-08 19:05 Re: GCC 3.3 branch open
• 2003-08-14 02:13 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-14 18:01 Re: gcc version string on the branch is "experimental"
• 2003-08-15 02:21 EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS
• 2003-08-15 18:20 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 18:29 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 18:54 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-15 19:17 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR
• 2003-08-21 06:48 Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS
• 2003-08-22 20:26 Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-22 22:56 GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-23 21:04 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-24 08:28 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-25 00:14 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-25 02:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-26 00:33 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-26 05:16 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-26 20:57 PATCH: Require GNU Make to build GCC
• 2003-08-29 21:29 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Mark Wielaard

• 2003-08-02 22:34 Fast Free Eclipse Prize

Marshall, Simon

• 2003-08-08 10:48 3.3.1 build failure on SuSE 2.4.20
• 2003-08-08 12:51 RE: 3.3.1 build failure on SuSE 2.4.20

Martijn

• 2003-08-13 11:29 Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual
• 2003-08-13 11:29 duplicate entry in gcc manual

Martin

• 2003-08-01 08:45 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-01 11:37 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-11 17:09 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage

martin . schaffner

• 2003-08-15 01:36 link dependencies

Martin Brain

• 2003-08-14 18:56 Re: gcj and xgamestation
• 2003-08-19 16:11 Re: g++ compile option question

Martin J. Bligh

• 2003-08-31 17:03 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?

Martin Schlemmer

• 2003-08-11 20:12 Issues with latest gcc/glibc and static linking (modutils)

Martin Villarreal

• 2003-08-29 04:25 Successful build of GCC

Marty Hauff

• 2003-08-10 23:56 What is the correct logic for casesi

Matt Austern

• 2003-08-13 19:57 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-08-13 20:49 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-26 03:53 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 16:52 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

Matt Kraai

• 2003-08-04 21:00 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-09 19:08 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux

Matthew Wilcox

• 2003-08-12 23:27 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-13 17:17 Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 21:06 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
• 2003-08-13 21:41 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

Matthias Benkmann

• 2003-08-05 11:59 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 18:03 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 18:13 Re: On inlining in C++

Matthias Klose

• 2003-08-13 08:22 gcc version string on the branch is "experimental"

Michael Eager

• 2003-08-07 15:42 Re: cross compiler missing header?

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-08-17 19:02 Re: Friendly install
• 2003-08-21 21:35 Re: expect 5.39 import
• 2003-08-26 10:03 New stabs with gcc HEAD

Michael Matz

• 2003-08-01 02:59 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-04 11:14 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 13:06 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 13:39 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-06 12:26 Re: Dominator Information in new-ra
• 2003-08-11 15:52 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 22:38 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 22:48 Re: biarch gcc
• 2003-08-13 00:50 Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 11:03 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 12:40 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 13:31 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 16:02 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-18 12:01 Re: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-08-24 14:59 Re: [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information

Michael Meissner

• 2003-08-12 21:40 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically

Michael Veksler

• 2003-08-28 10:16 Inconsistent g++3.2 debug information on AIX

Michal Schulz

• 2003-08-11 06:12 upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture

Miguel M.

• 2003-08-16 06:07 Version Number
• 2003-08-17 05:50 Friendly install

Mike Stump

• 2003-08-04 19:51 Re: System call comparison
• 2003-08-05 05:49 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:10 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 21:41 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-11 23:08 Re: Opening large files with C
• 2003-08-11 23:11 Re: GCC Framework support in Linux
• 2003-08-13 22:59 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-18 19:02 Re: Devel rebuild question
• 2003-08-18 19:11 Re: Friendly install
• 2003-08-18 19:15 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-20 18:27 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc
• 2003-08-22 22:41 to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-27 00:23 Re: to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-27 19:41 Re: to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-28 19:59 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 20:48 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 21:28 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-28 21:30 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model
• 2003-08-29 00:54 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?

Mobarek, Khaled (Robert Walters)

• 2003-08-14 09:46 creating 64 bit binaries on solaris 8

Mogens Kjaer

• 2003-08-21 03:29 away from my mail

Mohammed Tajuddin

• 2003-08-29 00:34 TOC overflow on linuxppc64

Mohan Embar

• 2003-08-28 17:36 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP
• 2003-08-28 19:43 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP
• 2003-08-28 21:16 Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems
• 2003-08-29 04:31 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP

mspiro

• 2003-08-24 01:08 Your details

Mukta Punjani, Noida

• 2003-08-05 09:24 Dominator Information in new-ra
• 2003-08-18 10:31 DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-08-18 12:51 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra
• 2003-08-23 11:33 [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-08-01 08:34 Re: different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
• 2003-08-13 08:26 Re: gcov questions
• 2003-08-14 18:22 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas
• 2003-08-19 14:51 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.
• 2003-08-20 08:29 Re: gcov questions
• 2003-08-25 07:42 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?
• 2003-08-25 07:47 Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-26 08:14 Re: G++ ABI mismatches

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-08-03 14:48 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-03 16:52 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-03 17:24 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 19:19 [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 20:44 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 22:49 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-06 06:57 Testsuite: separating optimization tests from correctness tests?
• 2003-08-07 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 19:20 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 19:24 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-12 06:06 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux
• 2003-08-12 06:20 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.
• 2003-08-12 06:32 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 06:44 Re: Testcases and approval
• 2003-08-12 16:25 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 20:40 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 21:15 fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh?
• 2003-08-17 19:50 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-17 20:52 Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS
• 2003-08-24 19:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)
• 2003-08-28 20:32 Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto
• 2003-08-28 21:40 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)
• 2003-08-28 22:20 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto
• 2003-08-29 17:42 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog
• 2003-08-29 20:18 Evil code in config.gcc (vsta)
• 2003-08-31 03:42 Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os
• 2003-08-31 19:33 tree-ssa merge from mainline?

Neal D. Becker

• 2003-08-27 19:43 solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?
• 2003-08-28 11:30 still problem with solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld
• 2003-08-28 11:41 More info on solaris8 problem
• 2003-08-28 13:09 undefined symbol: __bb_init_func
• 2003-08-28 19:47 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func
• 2003-08-29 11:18 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func

Neil Booth

• 2003-08-03 12:30 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-08-03 21:25 System call comparison
• 2003-08-04 08:49 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-08-09 21:24 Re: GCC Framework support in Linux
• 2003-08-14 20:22 Re: Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files.
• 2003-08-20 05:46 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-25 13:21 Re: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-26 06:01 Re: to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-26 19:13 Re: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-27 05:46 Re: to_line blowing up
• 2003-08-28 23:03 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model

Nick Clifton

• 2003-08-22 07:15 Re: expect 5.39 import

Nick Ing-Simmons

• 2003-08-26 10:41 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-26 13:16 Re: error: stray '\' in program

Nitin Gupta

• 2003-08-18 15:42 Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.
• 2003-08-19 14:44 RE: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.
• 2003-08-27 14:56 word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port
• 2003-08-29 16:07 RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port
• 2003-08-30 19:55 RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port

Nitin Jain

• 2003-08-24 09:43 Problem in .md file
• 2003-08-25 17:52 Problem in .md file

NOTESSB02

• 2003-08-21 03:44 Your resume has been received

Olaf Hering

• 2003-08-22 07:21 build breakage in cvs head
• 2003-08-22 13:44 Re: build breakage in cvs head

Olivier Galibert

• 2003-08-31 21:44 Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integer and float

Ove Kaaven

• 2003-08-06 13:53 Re: __declspec(selectany)

Ozzy

• 2003-08-17 11:24 some types probs using 3.3.1

Pablo Bleyer Kocik

• 2003-08-03 19:37 C++ STD headers not being generated for multilib arm-elf cross compiler

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-08-01 07:56 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-01 19:49 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.

Pascal Francq

• 2003-08-01 10:20 Using conditional instructions in a macro

Paul Brook

• 2003-08-04 18:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-08-17 17:07 Re: Devel rebuild question
• 2003-08-31 10:07 Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build

Paul Govereau

• 2003-08-06 05:37 Stack walking help

Paul Jarc

• 2003-08-04 17:15 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux)

Paul Koning

• 2003-08-21 13:24 Observation on the recent junk mail flood
• 2003-08-28 21:56 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)

Pauli

• 2003-08-11 22:50 Copyright Assignment

Per Bothner

• 2003-08-09 20:00 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 06:48 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 15:41 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 19:03 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 21:40 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-11 07:06 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-13 17:52 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-14 17:19 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed
• 2003-08-18 06:36 compile-server branch live
• 2003-08-18 19:51 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
• 2003-08-27 23:42 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?
• 2003-08-27 23:44 Re: [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux

Petar Penchev

• 2003-08-13 08:37 Porting gcc
• 2003-08-20 11:32 GCC Porting problem

Peter Barada

• 2003-08-21 19:21 Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags
• 2003-08-22 18:47 Re: m68k patch reviews
• 2003-08-22 23:04 Re: m68k patch reviews

Peter Bergner

• 2003-08-12 20:12 Re: biarch gcc

Peter Niemayer

• 2003-08-11 21:00 gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?
• 2003-08-13 20:29 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?

Phil Edwards

• 2003-08-04 03:06 Re: multilibbing libgfortran
• 2003-08-04 04:44 Re: C++ STD headers not being generated for multilib arm-elf cross compiler
• 2003-08-04 19:22 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-04 19:27 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 19:29 Re: library creation
• 2003-08-05 02:44 Re: bugzilla mail loop
• 2003-08-05 20:10 Re: No longer able to detect exception model right
• 2003-08-05 22:44 Re: GCC Weekly News?
• 2003-08-06 02:19 PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-06 02:47 Re: PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-06 07:53 Re: PCH magic numbers
• 2003-08-06 08:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-06 16:20 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-08-08 19:03 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-09 07:15 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-09 07:15 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-09 21:40 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken
• 2003-08-10 20:45 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC
• 2003-08-10 21:21 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC
• 2003-08-11 06:22 PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-11 18:49 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-11 19:23 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-11 23:32 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 06:19 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 06:31 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-12 06:31 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.
• 2003-08-12 06:47 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-12 20:22 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-12 22:14 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-15 08:04 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-15 17:03 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas
• 2003-08-18 18:11 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 18:17 Re: Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813
• 2003-08-18 18:20 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-19 20:54 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h
• 2003-08-20 00:05 Re: init_priority with GCC
• 2003-08-20 02:02 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-20 17:44 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-20 18:21 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why
• 2003-08-20 22:23 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?
• 2003-08-26 17:33 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-27 19:53 Re: solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?
• 2003-08-27 20:18 Re: Compile GCC without a library
• 2003-08-30 23:04 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why

Philipp Thomas

• 2003-08-01 15:17 Re: gcc or g77 in MS Windows
• 2003-08-25 12:18 Re: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-25 14:44 Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?

Piotr Gogolewski

• 2003-08-03 11:25 gcc 3.2.3 (Linux)

Piotr Wyderski

• 2003-08-25 22:20 -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-08-26 09:05 Re: -fomit-frame-pointer

postmaster

• 2003-08-24 00:55 Re: Details
• 2003-08-26 02:29 À´×Ô xinhuanet.com µÄÍËÐÅ

Primaria Falticeni SDU

• 2003-08-27 18:08 Linking MS lib Visual FoxPro 6
• 2003-08-28 09:00 Errors in DLL linking with a MS-style lib
• 2003-08-29 07:08 MS obj not recogn. I need answer

Qiong Cai

• 2003-08-30 13:08 gcc-3.4-20030827 snapshot bootstrap failure on solaris2.8

qmail

• 2003-08-25 18:07 Confirmation accepted
• 2003-08-25 19:19 Confirmation accepted
• 2003-08-25 20:46 Confirmation accepted

Randy.Dunlap

• 2003-08-31 01:18 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-08-28 11:54 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-08-28 12:09 Re: gcc bug

Raul Ito

• 2003-08-11 12:36 SH3 memory allocation

Ravi

• 2003-08-22 11:40 Applying patch to gcc3.2.7

Rayson Ho

• 2003-08-11 23:13 Re: Opening large files with C

Reinhold Bader

• 2003-08-28 16:31 gcc 3.3.1 on IA64

resumes

• 2003-08-26 05:14 Auto-Reply: Re: Your application

Richard Almquist

• 2003-08-14 19:19 Fix CVU prefix for GenTrunk

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-08-04 17:54 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-05 09:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-06 09:07 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 09:30 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-10 16:35 Re: is movccsi a standard names?
• 2003-08-26 09:22 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make

Richard Guenther

• 2003-08-04 19:00 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-05 08:19 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 09:37 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 09:57 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 13:00 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 13:15 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 13:29 Re: On inlining in C++

Richard Henderson

• 2003-08-06 20:59 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 20:30 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 21:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 21:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-08 21:19 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-11 16:17 dfa scheduler, bundling and packing
• 2003-08-13 23:51 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-18 18:05 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.
• 2003-08-18 18:13 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-18 19:59 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 00:25 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-19 06:06 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors
• 2003-08-20 16:37 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-21 05:15 Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update
• 2003-08-21 06:06 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 18:11 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables
• 2003-08-23 18:21 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-24 07:45 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-24 07:48 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-25 21:32 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help
• 2003-08-25 21:41 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?
• 2003-08-25 22:19 Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-25 22:41 Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-25 23:46 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-26 04:22 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches
• 2003-08-27 16:28 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port
• 2003-08-28 23:23 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func
• 2003-08-29 16:10 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port

Richard Jackson

• 2003-08-15 16:20 gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1

Richard Kenner

• 2003-08-01 02:49 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-01 03:03 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-01 22:15 Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-01 23:07 Followup on cfg splitting problem and proposed patch
• 2003-08-03 12:57 ADDRESSOF handling in alpha_expand_block_move
• 2003-08-06 22:52 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 01:05 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 01:07 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 01:09 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 19:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 20:31 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-08 01:46 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-08 21:21 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-10 13:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-20 11:55 Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc
• 2003-08-20 17:33 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc
• 2003-08-30 16:01 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-08-05 07:44 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-10 15:31 autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC
• 2003-08-11 08:39 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-11 21:11 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included
• 2003-08-24 21:18 Reload and reg_equiv_constant
• 2003-08-25 17:42 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant

Robert Dewar

• 2003-08-01 04:17 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-01 09:52 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications.
• 2003-08-01 09:56 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-04 16:35 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 16:44 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 16:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:05 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:11 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:23 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:26 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:33 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:35 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:36 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:38 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:39 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:41 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 17:43 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-04 17:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:08 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:17 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:19 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:21 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:22 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 18:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 18:38 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning
• 2003-08-04 20:11 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 20:24 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 21:48 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 22:23 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-05 03:00 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-05 14:49 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 14:51 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 14:56 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 16:46 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 16:58 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 17:49 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 03:01 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 18:56 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-19 02:57 RE: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 03:41 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-19 03:59 Re: Gcc installation problem
• 2003-08-22 11:35 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 11:38 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 22:55 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 01:31 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 01:47 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 01:49 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 01:53 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 03:13 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-23 03:15 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-24 20:28 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-29 15:06 any experiences with gcc builds on Pentium-M
• 2003-08-30 02:34 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?
• 2003-08-30 15:35 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?
• 2003-08-30 16:25 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?

Roberto Bagnara

• 2003-08-14 07:10 Is -Winline working at all?

Roger Sayle

• 2003-08-01 00:06 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def
• 2003-08-01 15:39 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def
• 2003-08-21 03:30 Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 05:39 Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-31 14:54 Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os

root

• 2003-08-13 13:16 gcc 2.95 question about .note section
• 2003-08-20 15:59 Possible virus in Email sent by you
• 2003-08-23 20:56 Virus / harmful content found in EMail

Russ Allbery

• 2003-08-26 05:10 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 05:48 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 06:29 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 20:57 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-30 17:57 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?

S. Bosscher

• 2003-08-05 07:11 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?)

sami ozen

• 2003-08-06 07:14 undefined symbol
• 2003-08-06 07:22 undefined symbol
• 2003-08-06 18:06 Re: undefined symbol

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2003-08-07 13:18 CHECK_DEAD_NOTES abort in sched1 for sh-elf

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-08-02 03:24 Re: Efficacy of optimizations.
• 2003-08-05 16:23 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 17:28 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:46 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 02:03 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 03:01 Re: Gcc optimization flags
• 2003-08-08 14:39 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code
• 2003-08-11 20:16 Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-11 23:09 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 01:05 Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 01:07 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 15:50 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?
• 2003-08-12 16:45 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 22:35 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-13 16:07 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-18 15:48 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report

Sebastien Loisel

• 2003-08-16 08:59 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations

Serge Cohen

• 2003-08-20 14:01 gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1

Shaun Jackman

• 2003-08-19 15:50 libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h
• 2003-08-19 20:29 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h
• 2003-08-20 19:34 Re: [RESOLVED] libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h

Shen Hui

• 2003-08-05 03:38 is movccsi a standard names?

Shrisha Rao

• 2003-08-09 01:24 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6
• 2003-08-11 22:53 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0
• 2003-08-12 19:41 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0

Simon Marlow

• 2003-08-29 16:44 Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413)

skaller

• 2003-08-12 10:35 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-08-12 21:22 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-08-12 23:29 handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 10:53 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 11:12 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 11:27 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 12:09 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 12:14 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 12:18 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 12:35 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 12:53 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 13:39 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 13:59 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 14:14 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 14:52 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 14:52 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 15:30 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour
• 2003-08-13 15:47 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-13 16:07 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-14 06:44 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-14 06:54 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-14 07:03 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type
• 2003-08-14 07:07 Re: handling of warnings
• 2003-08-15 09:50 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas

sns

• 2003-08-07 01:23 business

software

• 2003-08-12 09:19 MCF5407 porting..
• 2003-08-12 13:49 MCF5407 BDM cable..

SRUTHY C.N.

• 2003-08-16 11:34 Inquiry about RTL
• 2003-08-26 06:12 ABI documentation
• 2003-08-27 11:10 RTL
• 2003-08-29 04:09 RTL

stayvis ng

• 2003-08-21 22:52 Error Report

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-08-11 05:19 Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-08-24 01:58 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals
• 2003-08-26 06:56 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals

Stephane Carrez

• 2003-08-28 08:08 Re: about to port GCC

Stephen Biggs

• 2003-08-18 14:30 Re: How to find missing "?

Steve Munroe

• 2003-08-29 15:07 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64

Steve Watt

• 2003-08-19 10:39 Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-08-03 16:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03)
• 2003-08-04 15:13 [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 19:21 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 20:02 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 20:27 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-04 22:04 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity?
• 2003-08-05 08:55 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 19:11 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 07:37 Re: where is the "tree"'s definition?
• 2003-08-06 07:42 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-06 11:51 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++?
• 2003-08-06 13:05 [tree-ssa] CFG cleanup (was: Re: clean)
• 2003-08-06 23:11 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 13:10 Re: GCC Weekly News?
• 2003-08-07 19:29 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 11:56 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 13:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 20:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 23:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:03 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit

Super-User

• 2003-08-20 19:17 Our apologies for the virus reject notices

Svein E. Seldal

• 2003-08-11 11:30 Re: gcc and c4x ..

swoosh

• 2003-08-20 01:41 Re: Thank you!

Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav

• 2003-08-09 18:15 Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux
• 2003-08-11 13:45 RE: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux

Tao Zhang

• 2003-08-25 21:24 offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC
• 2003-08-26 01:51 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC

The Deus

• 2003-08-08 20:50 questions

The Software Team

• 2003-08-28 00:24 Why this change? It could break a lot of code

The Worm

• 2003-08-05 16:15 gcc-core-3.3.tar.bz2 has wrong NEWS file (3.2.2)

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2003-08-04 12:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-04 13:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-13 14:10 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed

Thomas Anders

• 2003-08-29 15:58 unsubscribe please

Thomas Kunert

• 2003-08-05 07:37 Re: On inlining in C++
• 2003-08-05 08:55 Re: On inlining in C++

Tiwary, Rajiv

• 2003-08-01 14:07 gcc or g77 in MS Windows
• 2003-08-01 15:25 RE: gcc or g77 in MS Windows

tm_gccmail

• 2003-08-01 19:24 RE: gcc or g77 in MS Windows
• 2003-08-01 20:33 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?)
• 2003-08-01 21:23 Re: Efficacy of optimizations.
• 2003-08-04 22:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-08-08 19:35 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4
• 2003-08-11 23:36 Re: SH3 memory allocation
• 2003-08-11 23:37 Re: How to use Inline assembly?
• 2003-08-12 18:19 Re: MCF5407 porting..
• 2003-08-12 18:40 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 21:19 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-12 22:05 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-13 18:32 Re: how to compile the C++ program in Linux
• 2003-08-18 18:48 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report
• 2003-08-18 18:51 Re: Inquiry about RTL
• 2003-08-22 21:32 Re: Recursive
• 2003-08-29 20:50 Re: g++ Warning Incorrect?

Tobias Jordan

• 2003-08-02 17:21 built gcc-3.2.3 on hpux10.20 successfully

Tolga Dalman

• 2003-08-12 15:47 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?

Tom Tromey

• 2003-08-01 00:41 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls
• 2003-08-01 04:01 Java PRs
• 2003-08-09 18:11 Re: Commit approval pls: PR 9877, 8336, plus other stuff
• 2003-08-14 16:45 Re: gcj and xgamestation
• 2003-08-14 18:41 Re: gcj and xgamestation
• 2003-08-28 21:56 Re: Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems

toon

• 2003-08-20 19:51 Re: Wicked screensaver
• 2003-08-21 23:50 Re: Wicked screensaver

Toon Moene

• 2003-08-26 21:25 My Resume.

traduc-admin

• 2003-08-19 17:51 Votre message à la liste Traduc est en attente d'approbation

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-08-25 17:17 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant
• 2003-08-25 18:22 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant

Unexpected reply handler

• 2003-08-20 00:59 Re: Thank you!
• 2003-08-20 14:17 Re: Re: My details

Vadim Dvorkin

• 2003-08-28 11:13 gcc bug

Valery A.Khamenya

• 2003-08-09 13:02 RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 05:07 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 07:22 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 17:48 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme
• 2003-08-10 20:27 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme

Vaughn, David A

• 2003-08-12 16:57 no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option

Victor Secarin

• 2003-08-29 19:10 bootstrap gcc 3.1.1 on solaris 2.8
• 2003-08-29 19:12 bootstrap gcc 3.3.1 on solaris 2.8

Viet Email

• 2003-08-29 20:53 Please resend your email...

VirWatch

• 2003-08-20 22:40 Warning: Possible Virus Infection

Vladimir Espinosa Angarica

• 2003-08-11 22:46 Opening large files with C

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-08-11 16:44 Re: dfa scheduler, bundling and packing

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2003-08-22 15:51 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?

Volker Reichelt

• 2003-08-08 08:17 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files
• 2003-08-12 15:32 Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?
• 2003-08-12 16:02 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?
• 2003-08-20 18:29 Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 14:02 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-21 20:48 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 17:06 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision

Wagner Toledo Correa

• 2003-08-25 02:05 using objcopy --redefine-sym

wedontlikespame

• 2003-08-20 18:26 Email Content Rejection Notice

Wendy Zhou

• 2003-08-24 15:38 Binarie gcc for mac

Will Cohen

• 2003-08-12 18:51 Profiling gcc building Mozilla

William C. Cox

• 2003-08-18 23:51 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax

wilson k.j

• 2003-08-30 07:28 serial port issue

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-08-25 15:48 Re: Quality Issues on mainline
• 2003-08-25 18:49 Naming the originator in new testcases
• 2003-08-29 21:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)

Wu Yongwei

• 2003-08-30 04:54 G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?

Yang, Huaining

• 2003-08-13 18:11 how to compile the C++ program in Linux
• 2003-08-13 18:13 How to compile the C++ program in Linux

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-08-01 20:38 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-01 22:59 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl?
• 2003-08-02 01:37 Re: need function decl/type in get_parm_info
• 2003-08-03 16:26 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux)
• 2003-08-04 05:46 Re: GCC
• 2003-08-04 19:55 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-04 20:18 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status
• 2003-08-06 01:15 Re: where is the "tree"'s definition?
• 2003-08-06 04:31 Re: Gcc optimization flags
• 2003-08-06 22:14 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-06 23:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:45 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:57 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-06 23:57 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 00:16 Re: Problem in split_basic_block
• 2003-08-07 07:01 intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-07 20:59 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-08 00:48 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help
• 2003-08-13 04:11 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)
• 2003-08-14 00:13 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 00:35 Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-14 04:18 Delete xm-iq2000.h
• 2003-08-14 15:52 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
• 2003-08-15 23:06 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16)
• 2003-08-20 19:09 Re: Is this meant to compile?
• 2003-08-20 19:52 Re: Our apologies for the virus reject notices
• 2003-08-21 05:40 Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update
• 2003-08-21 16:17 Re: Parallel build broken
• 2003-08-21 16:19 Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood
• 2003-08-21 23:18 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision
• 2003-08-22 08:48 Re: Error Report
• 2003-08-22 17:10 Re: Applying patch to gcc3.2.7
• 2003-08-23 19:38 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode
• 2003-08-25 19:16 Re: Problem in .md file
• 2003-08-26 05:05 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 05:18 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof
• 2003-08-26 05:24 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 05:57 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
• 2003-08-26 06:28 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof
• 2003-08-26 15:58 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 15:59 Re: error: stray '\' in program
• 2003-08-26 16:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 17:16 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems
• 2003-08-26 17:32 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 18:31 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers
• 2003-08-28 20:52 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto
• 2003-08-28 21:17 Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)
• 2003-08-29 17:03 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog
• 2003-08-29 20:41 Re: Evil code in config.gcc (vsta)

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-08-02 23:31 [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-03 16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-03 16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-04 17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures
• 2003-08-07 19:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 21:27 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 22:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-07 22:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-08 17:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-08 17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-08 17:24 [tree-ssa] Handling of variable scopes?
• 2003-08-08 20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-08 23:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 08:49 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 17:18 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 17:21 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-09 17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 08:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-10 09:26 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:04 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-11 20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 17:18 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 17:22 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
• 2003-08-12 23:36 [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-13 21:57 [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-16 18:12 Re: [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86
• 2003-08-17 21:41 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]
• 2003-08-23 17:52 COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 17:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-25 22:00 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 17:09 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 17:15 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch
• 2003-08-26 20:57 [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-26 21:57 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 19:52 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:13 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:16 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-27 20:49 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview
• 2003-08-28 19:58 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview

Zepeda, Margarita {Quaker}

• 2003-08-20 02:37 Out of Office AutoReply: Your application

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-08-26 01:37 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb
• 2003-08-26 01:51 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)