gcc archive
date index for August, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

August 31, 2003

21:49	RE: Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integerand float	Chris Lattner
21:44	Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integer and float	Olivier Galibert
19:33	tree-ssa merge from mainline?	Nathanael Nerode
17:03	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Martin J. Bligh
16:18	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Larry McVoy
15:39	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Dan Kegel
15:24	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:54	Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os	Roger Sayle
14:09	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Dan Kegel
14:00	Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Larry McVoy
10:50	Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build	Linus Sjöberg
10:07	Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build	Paul Brook
09:21	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Jan Hubicka
07:33	[tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build	Linus Sjöberg
07:02	LMbench as gcc performance regression test?	Dan Kegel
03:42	Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os	Nathanael Nerode
03:27	Thank you for your interest.	autoreply-no-reply-please
03:19	Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390	Frank Heckenbach
03:00	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	Andrew Pinski
02:58	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	Daniel Berlin
02:49	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	judd.jenne
01:18	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Randy.Dunlap
01:00	Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently	Eyal Lebedinsky
00:18	Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently	Eyal Lebedinsky
00:17	Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently	Eyal Lebedinsky

August 30, 2003

23:04	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
21:32	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Karel Gardas
19:55	RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Nitin Gupta
17:57	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Russ Allbery
17:38	Email was blocked.	MAILsweeper
16:25	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Robert Dewar
16:01	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Richard Kenner
15:35	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Robert Dewar
15:19	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Florian Weimer
13:08	gcc-3.4-20030827 snapshot bootstrap failure on solaris2.8	Qiong Cai
12:39	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Jan Hubicka
12:36	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Jan Hubicka
11:24	Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?	Carlo Wood
07:28	serial port issue	wilson k.j
04:54	G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug?	Wu Yongwei
02:34	Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Robert Dewar
00:46	Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently	Andrew Pinski
00:39	[tree-ssa] having problems recently	Eyal Lebedinsky

August 29, 2003

23:43	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Gerald Pfeifer
22:44	Re: --enable-languages no longer works	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:30	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Joe Buck
22:20	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Karel Gardas
22:16	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Karel Gardas
22:16	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Karel Gardas
21:59	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Joe Buck
21:51	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Geoff Keating
21:40	[OT] Identifying unused include directives?	Dan Kegel
21:38	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit	Camm Maguire
21:29	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Mark Mitchell
21:19	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Wolfgang Bangerth
21:07	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Andrew MacLeod
20:53	Please resend your email...	Viet Email
20:50	Re: g++ Warning Incorrect?	tm_gccmail
20:41	Re: Evil code in config.gcc (vsta)	Zack Weinberg
20:38	g++ Warning Incorrect?	Chip Cuntz
20:18	Evil code in config.gcc (vsta)	Nathanael Nerode
20:08	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:00	Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?	Josef Zlomek
19:50	Re: "short pretty" names?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:25	Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?	Geoff Keating
19:18	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Andrew MacLeod
19:12	bootstrap gcc 3.3.1 on solaris 2.8	Victor Secarin
19:10	bootstrap gcc 3.1.1 on solaris 2.8	Victor Secarin
19:08	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	law
17:46	Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog	DJ Delorie
17:42	Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog	Nathanael Nerode
17:36	Re: --enable-languages no longer works	Andrew Pinski
17:03	Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog	Zack Weinberg
16:59	--enable-languages no longer works	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:44	Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413)	Simon Marlow
16:41	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Ian Lance Taylor
16:36	Naive suggestion about multilibs	Bradley Lucier
16:10	Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Richard Henderson
16:07	RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Nitin Gupta
15:58	unsubscribe please	Thomas Anders
15:53	Re: MS obj not recogn. I need answer	Janis Johnson
15:26	Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64	Jakub Jelinek
15:21	Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64	Christoph Hellwig
15:07	Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64	Steve Munroe
15:06	any experiences with gcc builds on Pentium-M	Robert Dewar
15:05	Re: "short pretty" names?	Chris Lattner
15:02	Re: "short pretty" names?	John Levon
14:57	Re: "short pretty" names?	Chris Lattner
14:53	Re: "short pretty" names?	John Levon
14:45	The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog	Kelley Cook
14:41	"short pretty" names?	Chris Lattner
14:24	Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it?	Josef Zlomek
13:59	Question about inline asm	Marcos Lois Bermúdez
13:24	Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR	Andrew Pinski
13:22	BIT_ANDTC_EXPR	Josef Zlomek
11:18	Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func	Neal D. Becker
09:02	Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model	Karel Gardas
08:43	building cross gcc-3.3 on i686 for target i586	Agri
08:04	"Ziem," - Where is your Green Card?	John Anderson
07:08	MS obj not recogn. I need answer	Primaria Falticeni SDU
04:31	Re: libjava build is broken on SMP	Mohan Embar
04:25	Successful build of GCC	Martin Villarreal
04:09	RTL	SRUTHY C.N.
01:35	Re: recent commit	David Mosberger
01:19	Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64	Alan Modra
01:04	Re: recent commit	Camm Maguire
00:54	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Mike Stump
00:34	TOC overflow on linuxppc64	Mohammed Tajuddin
00:22	Re: recent commit	David Mosberger

August 28, 2003

23:23	Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func	Richard Henderson
23:03	Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model	Neil Booth
22:52	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Ian Lance Taylor
22:20	Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto	Nathanael Nerode
21:56	Re: Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems	Tom Tromey
21:56	Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)	Paul Koning
21:44	Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto	Joe Buck
21:41	Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)	Joe Buck
21:40	Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)	Nathanael Nerode
21:30	Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model	Mike Stump
21:28	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Mike Stump
21:17	Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto)	Zack Weinberg
21:16	Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems	Mohan Embar
20:55	Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto	Andrew Pinski
20:52	Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto	Zack Weinberg
20:48	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Mike Stump
20:32	Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto	Nathanael Nerode
19:59	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Mike Stump
19:58	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
19:47	Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func	Neal D. Becker
19:43	Re: libjava build is broken on SMP	Mohan Embar
19:35	Re: R: disable libgcc	Janis Johnson
18:01	Known gcc testsuite issues (was: gcc-3.3, host==x86, target==ppc7450)	Dan Kegel
17:36	Re: libjava build is broken on SMP	Mohan Embar
17:10	libjava build is broken on SMP	Andrew Haley
17:04	libjava build is broken on SMP	H. J. Lu
17:03	Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func	Dale Johannesen
16:55	Re: R: disable libgcc	Eric Christopher
16:45	Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code	Joe Buck
16:36	Re: gcc 3.3.1 on IA64	Andrew Pinski
16:31	gcc 3.3.1 on IA64	Reinhold Bader
14:45	ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL called for __builtin_ function	Anders Ådland
14:26	Re: More info on solaris8 problem	Jeff Sturm
13:34	help with RTL and .md files	Linas Vepstas
13:09	undefined symbol: __bb_init_func	Neal D. Becker
12:59	Is this a bfd bug? (binutils version 2.13)	Bharathi Seshadri
12:13	[PCH] Automatic PCH creation model	Karel Gardas
12:09	Re: gcc bug	Ranjit Mathew
11:54	Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Ranjit Mathew
11:41	More info on solaris8 problem	Neal D. Becker
11:30	still problem with solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld	Neal D. Becker
11:13	gcc bug	Vadim Dvorkin
10:28	suscribe	Marcos Lois Bermúdez
10:16	Inconsistent g++3.2 debug information on AIX	Michael Veksler
09:00	Errors in DLL linking with a MS-style lib	Primaria Falticeni SDU
08:18	R: disable libgcc	Gabriele Caracausi
08:10	Re: disable libgcc	Eric Christopher
08:08	Re: about to port GCC	Stephane Carrez
08:00	disable libgcc	Gabriele Caracausi
07:35	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Karel Gardas
06:51	writing a new backend to gcc	John Carlson
04:53	Re: SSA PRE and Open64	law
03:24	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Ian Lance Taylor
02:44	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Andrew Pinski
00:47	Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code	Andrew Pinski
00:24	Why this change? It could break a lot of code	The Software Team
00:23	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Ian Lance Taylor

August 27, 2003

23:44	Re: [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux	Per Bothner
23:42	Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server?	Per Bothner
23:32	Re: SSA PRE and Open64	Daniel Berlin
23:02	Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Jim Wilson
23:01	Re: SSA PRE and Open64	law
22:59	Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Jim Wilson
22:46	Re: SSA PRE and Open64	Daniel Berlin
22:41	Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Jim Wilson
22:06	Re: RTL	Jim Wilson
21:43	[cs branch] how to start compile server?	Karel Gardas
20:49	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
20:46	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Jason Merrill
20:24	Re: SSA PRE and Open64	law
20:21	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	law
20:18	Re: Compile GCC without a library	Phil Edwards
20:16	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
20:13	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
20:00	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Diego Novillo
19:55	[cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux	Karel Gardas
19:53	SSA PRE and Open64	Eric Christopher
19:53	Re: solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?	Phil Edwards
19:52	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
19:52	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	law
19:45	Flag granularity (was gcc-patches: New insns for the s390 backend(2))	Laurent GUERBY
19:43	solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works?	Neal D. Becker
19:43	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Diego Novillo
19:41	Re: to_line blowing up	Mike Stump
18:08	Linking MS lib Visual FoxPro 6	Primaria Falticeni SDU
17:47	Re: -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5	Andrew Pinski
17:40	-pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5	Gerald Pfeifer
17:26	Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?	Andrew Pinski
17:08	gcc-ss-3.4-20030827 is now available	gccadmin
16:28	Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Richard Henderson
16:11	Re: temporary object	Joe Buck
15:51	gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ?	GTFSTBK
15:03	Re: temporary object	Dr. Franz Fehringer
14:56	word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port	Nitin Gupta
14:06	Compile GCC without a library	Anders Ådland
11:10	RTL	SRUTHY C.N.
09:55	temporary object	He HongFu
05:46	Re: to_line blowing up	Neil Booth
05:45	[tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap ICE tree-ssa-dom.c:877	judd.jenne
01:26	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Felix Lee
00:23	Re: to_line blowing up	Mike Stump

August 26, 2003

22:30	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
22:17	Re: [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Gerald Pfeifer
22:03	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Joseph S. Myers
21:57	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
21:30	Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Jason Merrill
21:25	My Resume.	Toon Moene
21:18	[OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Chris Devers
20:58	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Joseph S. Myers
20:58	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
20:58	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
20:58	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Daniel Berlin
20:58	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
20:58	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Gabriel Paubert
20:57	[tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview	Zdenek Dvorak
20:57	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
20:57	PATCH: Require GNU Make to build GCC	Mark Mitchell
20:57	Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings	Jim Wilson
20:57	Re: Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd)	Alexandre Oliva
20:57	Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Russ Allbery
20:07	Re: ABI documentation	Jim Wilson
20:02	Thanks for writing to me at Toll-free Consortium.	Charles Azer
19:44	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
19:13	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Neil Booth
19:06	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
18:33	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
18:31	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Zack Weinberg
18:22	Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?	Joern Rennecke
17:59	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Chris Devers
17:33	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Phil Edwards
17:32	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Zack Weinberg
17:16	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Zack Weinberg
17:15	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Zdenek Dvorak
17:09	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Zdenek Dvorak
17:07	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
17:04	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Joseph S. Myers
17:03	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Andrew Walrond
17:02	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Devang Patel
16:52	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Matt Austern
16:48	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Joseph S. Myers
16:43	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Joe Buck
16:40	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Zack Weinberg
16:40	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Joe Buck
16:37	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Andrew Walrond
16:34	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Joe Buck
16:20	Re: about to port GCC	Joe Buck
16:07	Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization	Geoff Keating
16:02	Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings	Geoff Keating
15:59	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Zack Weinberg
15:58	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Zack Weinberg
15:40	Re: Coreutils head and tail problems	Daniel Berlin
15:11	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
15:04	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
14:48	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Chris Devers
14:01	Re: gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25...	Gerald Pfeifer
13:39	R: error: stray '\' in program	Gabriele Caracausi
13:31	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Kris Warkentin
13:19	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Gerald Pfeifer
13:16	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Nick Ing-Simmons
12:35	Coreutils head and tail problems	Andrew Walrond
12:27	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Diego Novillo
10:41	Re: On inlining in C++	Nick Ing-Simmons
10:33	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03	New stabs with gcc HEAD	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
09:58	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Gabriel Paubert
09:39	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Joseph S. Myers
09:22	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Richard Earnshaw
09:05	Re: -fomit-frame-pointer	Piotr Wyderski
08:14	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Nathan Sidwell
07:56	gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25...	Chris Devers
07:43	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
07:12	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
07:04	Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Chris Devers
07:00	new book pdf up for review, was Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 [...]	Chris Devers
06:56	Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Stephan T. Lavavej
06:39	Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof	Chris Devers
06:32	Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings	Chris Devers
06:29	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Russ Allbery
06:28	Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof	Zack Weinberg
06:23	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
06:12	ABI documentation	SRUTHY C.N.
06:09	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
06:01	Re: to_line blowing up	Neil Booth
05:57	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Zack Weinberg
05:50	Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof	Chris Devers
05:48	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Russ Allbery
05:38	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
05:35	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
05:24	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Zack Weinberg
05:18	Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof	Zack Weinberg
05:17	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Christopher Faylor
05:16	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Mark Mitchell
05:15	Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC	Jim Wilson
05:14	Auto-Reply: Re: Your application	resumes
05:10	Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Russ Allbery
05:05	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Zack Weinberg
04:22	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Richard Henderson
04:20	Re: [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Chris Devers
04:18	[using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Chris Devers
04:04	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
04:02	[using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof	Chris Devers
03:53	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Matt Austern
03:53	[using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make	Chris Devers
03:37	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
03:22	sorry about the spam that got through	Christopher Faylor
03:13	Re: [libobjc patch] Fix libobjc/gc.c compilation error	Jim Wilson
02:55	Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembleroutput	Jim Wilson
02:47	Re: [ARIN-20030825.3802] Re: Details	hostmaster
02:47	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Colin Douglas Howell
02:46	Re: Loop optimizer issues	David Edelsohn
02:29	À´×Ô xinhuanet.com µÄÍËÐÅ	PostMaster
02:27	Re: Loop optimizer issues	Andrew Pinski
02:24	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15	Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings	Jim Wilson
01:58	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
01:51	Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC	Tao Zhang
01:51	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Ziemowit Laski
01:48	Re: Loop optimizer issues	Jim Wilson
01:44	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Colin Douglas Howell
01:43	[using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization	Chris Devers
01:39	Re: to_line blowing up	Jim Wilson
01:37	Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Ziemowit Laski
01:33	[using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings	Chris Devers
01:24	[using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb	Chris Devers
00:59	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Chris Devers
00:59	Re: -fomit-frame-pointer	Jim Wilson
00:57	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals	Chris Devers
00:57	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Jim Wilson
00:56	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals	Jim Wilson
00:55	Re: about to port GCC	Jim Wilson
00:47	Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC	Jim Wilson
00:33	Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Mark Mitchell

August 25, 2003

23:47	Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals	Chris Devers
23:46	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Richard Henderson
23:46	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
22:53	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Chris Lattner
22:41	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Richard Henderson
22:26	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Chris Lattner
22:20	-fomit-frame-pointer	Piotr Wyderski
22:19	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Richard Henderson
22:00	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Zdenek Dvorak
21:51	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
21:41	Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?	Richard Henderson
21:40	about to port GCC	Alvaro Hernando Salazar V.
21:32	Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Richard Henderson
21:24	offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC	Tao Zhang
20:46	Confirmation accepted	qmail
20:01	Re: What does un-cse exactly refer to?	Jim Wilson
19:55	Re: Problem in .md file	Jim Wilson
19:49	Re: using objcopy --redefine-sym	Jim Wilson
19:47	Re: Problem in .md file	Jim Wilson
19:27	Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Jim Wilson
19:19	Confirmation accepted	qmail
19:16	Re: Problem in .md file	Zack Weinberg
18:56	Re: Naming the originator in new testcases	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:49	Naming the originator in new testcases	Wolfgang Bangerth
18:38	R: error: stray '\' in program	Gabriele Caracausi
18:24	Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
18:22	Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant	Ulrich Weigand
18:17	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
18:07	Confirmation accepted	qmail
17:52	Problem in .md file	Nitin Jain
17:42	Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant	Richard Sandiford
17:33	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Zdenek Dvorak
17:29	Re: Loop optimizer issues	David Edelsohn
17:22	gcc-ss-3.3-20030825 is now available	gccadmin
17:17	Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant	Ulrich Weigand
16:08	Re: long long data type support	Joe Buck
15:50	Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
15:48	Re: Quality Issues on mainline	Wolfgang Bangerth
15:42	Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?	Chris Lattner
15:40	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
15:33	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
14:55	Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52	Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?	Andrew Pinski
14:44	Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here?	Philipp Thomas
14:07	Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
14:05	Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant	Andrew Pinski
13:58	[tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	Andrew MacLeod
13:21	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Neil Booth
12:18	Re: error: stray '\' in program	Philipp Thomas
11:42	Re: m68k patch reviews	Gunther Nikl
08:24	Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Alexandre Courbot
07:47	Re: G++ ABI mismatches	Nathan Sidwell
07:42	Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?	Nathan Sidwell
05:13	G++ ABI mismatches	Chris Lattner
03:45	Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling?	Chris Lattner
02:16	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Mark Mitchell
02:05	using objcopy --redefine-sym	Wagner Toledo Correa
01:45	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	David Edelsohn
01:23	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Bernardo Innocenti
00:24	Re: Quality Issues on mainline	Dan Kegel
00:14	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Mark Mitchell

August 24, 2003

22:09	Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)	Diego Novillo
22:03	Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)	Gerald Pfeifer
22:01	Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)	Andrew Pinski
21:18	Reload and reg_equiv_constant	Richard Sandiford
21:17	How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example)	Gerald Pfeifer
20:28	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
20:17	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	John Vickers
19:39	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Nathanael Nerode
19:26	Re: [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure	Gerald Pfeifer
18:37	[tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure	Gerald Pfeifer
17:46	Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Bernardo Innocenti
16:34	Re: Binarie gcc for mac	Chris Devers
16:20	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:18	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59	Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Andreas Tobler
15:53	DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help	Bernardo Innocenti
15:41	Re: Binarie gcc for mac	Andrew Pinski
15:38	Binarie gcc for mac	Wendy Zhou
15:00	Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Bernardo Innocenti
14:59	Re: [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information	Michael Matz
14:32	Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Gerald Pfeifer
14:12	Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Chris Devers
13:47	Re: GCC Weekly News?	Gerald Pfeifer
13:42	Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Gerald Pfeifer
13:30	PATCH for: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containingrelease tag?	Gerald Pfeifer
13:18	Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes	Andrew Haley
11:55	error: stray '\' in program	Gabriele Caracausi
11:26	Re: Quality Issues on mainline	Gerald Pfeifer
09:44	cgraph maintainership	Gerald Pfeifer
09:43	Problem in .md file	Nitin Jain
09:19	Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Gerald Pfeifer
09:00	What does un-cse exactly refer to?	Kazu Hirata
08:28	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Mark Mitchell
07:48	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Richard Henderson
07:45	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Richard Henderson
05:50	Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes	Jeff Sturm
03:00	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	law
02:42	[using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions	Chris Devers
02:11	Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Chris Devers
01:58	Re: [using gcc book] compound literals	Stephan T. Lavavej
01:51	long long data type support	fahad al-zahrani
01:48	Re: [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure	Eyal Lebedinsky
01:33	[using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers	Chris Devers
01:25	[using gcc book] compound literals	Chris Devers
01:20	full space, this user is limit quota	club
01:08	Your details	mspiro
00:55	Re: Details	postmaster
00:45	Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch	David Edelsohn

August 23, 2003

21:28	Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes	Jan Hubicka
21:04	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Mark Mitchell
20:56	Virus / harmful content found in EMail	root
20:16	Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?	Geoff Keating
19:38	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Zack Weinberg
18:21	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Richard Henderson
17:52	COND_EXPR lowering patch	Zdenek Dvorak
13:15	Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS?	Anders Ådland
11:33	[new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information	Mukta Punjani, Noida
09:32	Re: mainline problem	Andreas Jaeger
09:25	Re: mainline problem	Jeremy Sanders
09:00	Re: mainline problem	Andreas Jaeger
08:29	mainline problem	Jeremy Sanders
07:01	Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd)	Brian Hart
04:22	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	Andrew Pinski
03:15	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
03:14	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	judd.jenne
03:13	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
02:45	A virus was detected on your message	Mailsweeper
01:53	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
01:49	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
01:47	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
01:31	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
01:10	[tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure	Eyal Lebedinsky
01:03	Re: m68k patch reviews	Bernardo Innocenti

August 22, 2003

23:08	Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:04	Re: m68k patch reviews	Peter Barada
22:56	GCC Release Status (2003-08-22)	Mark Mitchell
22:55	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
22:41	to_line blowing up	Mike Stump
22:22	Re: Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?	Andrew Pinski
22:11	Re: m68k patch reviews	Bernardo Innocenti
21:47	Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap?	Bradley Lucier
21:32	Re: Recursive	tm_gccmail
21:22	full space, this user is limit quota	kingf
21:06	Re: Recursive	Eric Christopher
20:26	Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode	Mark Mitchell
19:38	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Florian Weimer
18:47	Re: m68k patch reviews	Peter Barada
18:41	Re: Recursive	Jim Wilson
18:32	Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Jim Wilson
17:31	Recursive	Julilo Cesar Vieira da Silva
17:17	Re: m68k patch reviews	Bernardo Innocenti
17:10	Re: Applying patch to gcc3.2.7	Zack Weinberg
17:06	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Volker Reichelt
16:36	Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Alexandre Courbot
15:57	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Jason Merrill
15:51	Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Vladimir N. Makarov
15:12	Re: type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4...	Andrew Pinski
15:07	type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4...	Fons Rademakers
14:56	Re: expect 5.39 import	Andrew Cagney
14:34	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	John Vickers
14:29	C99 and i387 Floating-point assignments	John Vickers
13:44	Re: build breakage in cvs head	Olaf Hering
13:33	Out of town till end of Aug.	Jean-Luc Dugelay
13:21	Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Alexandre Courbot
13:17	Suggestion: Template instantiation debugging	Christopher Eltschka
11:40	Applying patch to gcc3.2.7	Ravi
11:38	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
11:35	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Robert Dewar
11:12	Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Alexandre Courbot
10:44	Register-passed arguments copied to the stack?	Alexandre Courbot
10:10	Re: OT: Sobig	Florian Weimer
09:43	Re: m68k patch reviews	Gunther Nikl
08:48	Re: Error Report	Zack Weinberg
08:22	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Gunther Nikl
08:04	Re: build breakage in cvs head	Andreas Jaeger
07:21	build breakage in cvs head	Olaf Hering
07:15	Re: expect 5.39 import	Nick Clifton
04:35	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Jim Wilson
04:33	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:31	Using the autoresponder	Demon Support Responder
03:46	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	law
03:45	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	law
03:08	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Chris Lattner
02:43	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Jason Merrill
02:30	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
02:14	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Jason Merrill
01:50	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Bradley Lucier
01:05	Automatic Response	Anne George
00:10	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
00:01	Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?	Jim Wilson
00:01	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski

August 21, 2003

23:50	Re: Wicked screensaver	toon
23:43	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Jim Wilson
23:39	Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?	Dara Hazeghi
23:33	Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb?	Jim Wilson
23:28	Re: Error Report	Jim Wilson
23:18	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Zack Weinberg
23:11	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
23:10	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Jim Wilson
23:08	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Bradley Lucier
22:52	Error Report	stayvis ng
22:28	Re: expect 5.39 import	Andrew Cagney
22:24	m32r-elf build requires gdb?	Dara Hazeghi
22:18	m68k-elf target broken again	Dara Hazeghi
21:35	Experience Client Support	Experience Technical Support
21:35	Re: expect 5.39 import	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
21:22	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Jason Merrill
20:53	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Daniel Berlin
20:52	expect 5.39 import	Andrew Cagney
20:48	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Volker Reichelt
20:45	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	law
20:31	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
19:21	Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags	Peter Barada
19:14	Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags	Bernardo Innocenti
19:10	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Jason Merrill
19:02	[unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes	Jeff Sturm
18:53	RE: --with-ld breakage for me.	Loisel, Sebastien
18:51	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Jim Wilson
18:31	Re: m68k patch reviews	Bernardo Innocenti
18:11	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Richard Henderson
17:54	Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood	Christopher Faylor
17:53	Re: Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches	Jim Wilson
17:37	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Daniel Berlin
17:28	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
17:15	Re: OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood)	Daniel Berlin
17:10	OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood)	Kelley Cook
17:06	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Andrew Pinski
16:50	C++ name mangling tool	Bhavesh P. Davda
16:24	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Jason Merrill
16:23	Re: how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:23	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6	Jason Merrill
16:19	Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood	Zack Weinberg
16:17	Re: Parallel build broken	Zack Weinberg
16:12	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 (Was [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap)	Andrew Pinski
16:04	The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.6 is released	H. J. Lu
15:22	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	Daniel Berlin
14:44	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	John Vickers
14:44	how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5	Hongbo Rong
14:20	Re: seperate libiberty	Andrew Pinski
14:04	seperate libiberty	Glenn McGrath
14:02	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Volker Reichelt
13:37	Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	Andrew Pinski
13:34	Re: Quality Issues on mainline	Andrew Pinski
13:24	Observation on the recent junk mail flood	Paul Koning
13:16	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Gunther Nikl
11:57	recent commit	Camm Maguire
10:04	Parallel build broken	Gerald Pfeifer
09:29	Receipt of email to Chase Bill Management Center	BillSupport Chase
09:05	Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1	Linus Sjöberg
08:36	Quality Issues on mainline	Gerald Pfeifer
06:48	Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS	Mark Mitchell
06:35	RE:Re: Re: My details - Prohibited File Extension Blocked	MAILsweeper
06:06	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Richard Henderson
05:40	Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update	Zack Weinberg
05:39	Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision	Roger Sayle
05:15	Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update	Richard Henderson
04:52	recent commit	Camm Maguire
04:27	Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches	Kris Warkentin
04:08	[tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap	JUDD JENNE
03:46	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
03:44	Your resume has been received	NOTESSB02
03:30	Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision	Roger Sayle
03:29	ColdFire/uClinux status update	Bernardo Innocenti
03:29	away from my mail	Mogens Kjaer
00:40	Re: --with-ld breakage for me.	Andrew Pinski
00:36	--with-ld breakage for me.	Loisel, Sebastien
00:13	Estimated Response Time	Advanced PCS
00:12	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti

August 20, 2003

23:54	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Jamie Lokier
22:40	Warning: Possible Virus Infection	VirWatch
22:36	Add self to MAINTAINERS (mainline & branch)	Bernardo Innocenti
22:36	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Andreas Schwab
22:33	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:26	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Don Lindsay
22:23	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Phil Edwards
22:04	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Joseph S. Myers
21:27	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:01	[tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2003-08-17	Diego Novillo
20:56	Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Jim Wilson
19:57	Re: some types probs using 3.3.1	Jim Wilson
19:55	Re: GCC Porting problem	Jim Wilson
19:52	Re: Our apologies for the virus reject notices	Zack Weinberg
19:51	Re: Wicked screensaver	toon
19:34	Re: [RESOLVED] libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Shaun Jackman
19:23	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?	cgd
19:17	Our apologies for the virus reject notices	Super-User
19:12	Re: Is this meant to compile?	Chris Lattner
19:11	A Virus has been detected.	MAILsweeper
19:09	Re: Is this meant to compile?	Zack Weinberg
18:43	Is this meant to compile?	Chris Lattner
18:29	Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision	Volker Reichelt
18:27	Re: gcov questions	Ed Swierk
18:27	Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc	Mike Stump
18:26	Email Content Rejection Notice	wedontlikespame
18:21	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
17:59	Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux	Bernardo Innocenti
17:50	Re: tree-dump inquiry	Dan DaCosta
17:44	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
17:33	Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc	Richard Kenner
17:15	CVS write access	Bernardo Innocenti
17:00	gcc-ss-3.4-20030820 is now available	gccadmin
16:44	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
16:43	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
16:37	Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Richard Henderson
16:29	Re: Re: My details	Arnt Gulbrandsen
16:11	Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc	Joe Buck
16:04	Re: strange warning with gcc 3.x	Joe Buck
15:59	Possible virus in Email sent by you	root
15:52	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
15:30	strange warning with gcc 3.x	Gunther Nikl
14:40	Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux	David McCullough
14:17	Re: Re: My details	Unexpected reply handler
14:01	gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1	Serge Cohen
13:59	automated response
13:34	[3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables	Gunther Nikl
12:52	New cross target for uClinux	Bernardo Innocenti
11:58	Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc	Joel Sherrill
11:55	Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc	Richard Kenner
11:32	GCC Porting problem	Petar Penchev
10:58	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Marc Espie
10:54	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Marc Espie
09:01	We would like to offer our sincere thanks to you for writing to us.	Administrator
08:32	Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology	James Michael DuPont
08:29	Re: gcov questions	Nathan Sidwell
06:26	RE: Re: Your application	MAILsweeper
05:46	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Neil Booth
04:46	warnings building mainline for x86_64-freebsd	Dara Hazeghi
02:37	Out of Office AutoReply: Your application	Zepeda, Margarita {Quaker}
02:02	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
01:41	Re: Thank you!	swoosh
00:59	Re: Thank you!	Unexpected reply handler
00:40	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored"	Dan Kegel
00:24	Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Alexandre Oliva
00:05	Re: init_priority with GCC	Phil Edwards

August 19, 2003

23:48	Re: init_priority with GCC	Jim Wilson
23:23	Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology	Diego Novillo
23:00	Re: gcc 2.95 question about .note section	Jim Wilson
22:55	Re: tree-dump inquiry	Jim Wilson
22:51	Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored"	Jim Wilson
22:41	Re: Gcc3.3 installation problem	Jim Wilson
22:20	Re: compile on solarsi	Jim Wilson
21:04	Multiple input-file patch for gcov 3.2.3	Ed Swierk
21:03	Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Dara Hazeghi
20:54	Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Phil Edwards
20:49	Re: gcov questions	Ed Swierk
20:31	Re: Inquiry about RTL	Jim Wilson
20:29	Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Shaun Jackman
18:58	Out of Office AutoReply: My details	Eracleous,CH
18:24	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Andreas Schwab
18:16	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Joe Buck
18:06	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
18:02	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
17:56	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
17:51	Votre message à la liste Traduc est en attente d'approbation	traduc-admin
17:21	Bugzilla adding fulltext index	Daniel Berlin
17:15	Re: g++ compile option question	Joel Sherrill
17:02	Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology	James Michael DuPont
16:26	g++ compile option question	Andrew Haley
16:20	Re: g++ compile option question	Frank Mehnert
16:11	Re: g++ compile option question	Martin Brain
15:50	libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h	Shaun Jackman
15:24	g++ compile option question	Halifa Yehezkel-BYH005
15:10	init_priority with GCC	Frank Mehnert
15:00	Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.	David Edelsohn
14:51	Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.	Nathan Sidwell
14:44	RE: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.	Nitin Gupta
14:21	Please Reply - linuxdevices s081914212328348	linuxdevices-request
10:39	Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target	Steve Watt
09:44	how are stack slot addresses resolved?	Christian Lindig
08:24	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Andreas Schwab
07:35	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:10	Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology	James Michael DuPont
06:56	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Fergus Henderson
06:53	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:46	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:38	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:16	Re: Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813	Dan Kegel
06:08	Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813	Dan Kegel
06:06	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Richard Henderson
04:31	Re: Gcc installation problem	Daniel Berlin
04:13	Re: Gcc installation problem	Dan Kegel
03:59	Re: Gcc installation problem	Robert Dewar
03:52	Re: Gcc installation problem	Daniel Berlin
03:41	Re: Gcc installation problem	Robert Dewar
03:13	Re: Gcc installation problem	Daniel Berlin
03:06	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
02:57	RE: Gcc installation problem	Robert Dewar
00:44	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Fergus Henderson
00:30	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Fergus Henderson
00:25	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Richard Henderson

August 18, 2003

23:55	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Geoff Keating
23:53	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Geoff Keating
23:51	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	William C. Cox
23:21	Re: Gcc installation problem	Joe Buck
23:01	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Diego Novillo
21:55	crosstool-0.19: added gcc-3.4-20030813 support	Dan Kegel
21:53	RE: Gcc installation problem	Long Fei
21:49	Re: m68k C++ exception handling	Andreas Schwab
21:49	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Diego Novillo
20:43	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:33	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
19:59	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Richard Henderson
19:52	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
19:51	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Per Bothner
19:21	Re: Gcc installation problem	Dan Kegel
19:15	Re: Gcc installation problem	Mike Stump
19:11	Re: Friendly install	Mike Stump
19:02	Re: Devel rebuild question	Mike Stump
18:51	Re: Inquiry about RTL	tm_gccmail
18:48	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	tm_gccmail
18:48	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
18:41	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	David Edelsohn
18:40	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	David Edelsohn
18:33	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:20	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
18:17	Re: Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813	Phil Edwards
18:13	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Richard Henderson
18:11	Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Phil Edwards
18:09	Re: m68k C++ exception handling	Bernardo Innocenti
18:05	Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.	Richard Henderson
17:59	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Diego Novillo
17:22	Re: Version Number	Joe Buck
17:21	Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors	Bernd Schmidt
17:05	gcc-ss-3.3-20030818 is now available	gccadmin
17:03	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:49	Re: Where did output_add_string go?	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25	Where did output_add_string go?	Diego Novillo
16:09	Bug in array reference (Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED)	H. J. Lu
15:48	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Scott Robert Ladd
15:42	Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc.	Nitin Gupta
14:30	Re: How to find missing "?	Stephen Biggs
12:51	RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra	Mukta Punjani, Noida
12:28	Re: How to find missing "?	Andy Jackman
12:01	Re: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra	Michael Matz
11:40	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Gunther Nikl
11:36	Re: How to find missing "?	Andreas Schwab
10:50	How to find missing "?	Andy Jackman
10:31	DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra	Mukta Punjani, Noida
09:45	Re: m68k C++ exception handling	Andreas Schwab
06:36	compile-server branch live	Per Bothner
05:11	Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS	Ian Lance Taylor

August 17, 2003

21:41	Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Zdenek Dvorak
21:07	Re: Devel rebuild question	Gerald Pfeifer
21:01	Re: Friendly install	Gerald Pfeifer
20:52	Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS	Nathanael Nerode
20:05	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	David Edelsohn
20:03	Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813	Dan Kegel
19:50	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Nathanael Nerode
19:06	Re: Friendly install	Andrew Pinski
19:04	Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED	H. J. Lu
19:02	Re: Friendly install	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
17:07	Re: Devel rebuild question	Paul Brook
16:37	Re: [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean	Daniel Berlin
15:58	Devel rebuild question	Lally Singh
12:50	Re: Friendly install	Gerald Pfeifer
11:24	some types probs using 3.3.1	Ozzy
10:41	[tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean	Andreas Jaeger
07:37	A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED	H. J. Lu
05:50	Friendly install	Miguel M.
02:11	m68k C++ exception handling	Bernardo Innocenti
00:49	Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Andreas Jaeger

August 16, 2003

20:32	re: Gcc installation problem	Dan Kegel
18:12	Re: [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86	Zdenek Dvorak
17:24	[tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86	Diego Novillo
15:01	Gcc installation problem	Long Fei
14:08	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Jamie Lokier
11:34	Inquiry about RTL	SRUTHY C.N.
10:17	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Erik Trulsson
09:53	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:43	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Kai Henningsen
09:14	Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16)	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:59	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Sebastien Loisel
06:18	Re: Version Number	Gerald Pfeifer
06:07	Version Number	Miguel M.
01:39	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Jamie Lokier
00:09	RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Loisel, Sebastien

August 15, 2003

23:54	[tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on alpha	Diego Novillo
23:46	RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Loisel, Sebastien
23:06	Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16)	Zack Weinberg
19:17	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Mark Mitchell
19:03	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:54	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Mark Mitchell
18:34	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	David Mosberger
18:29	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Mark Mitchell
18:26	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:20	Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Mark Mitchell
18:12	C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:03	Re: Problem with macro params containing commas	Phil Edwards
16:20	gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1	Richard Jackson
16:12	Gcc3.3 installation problem	Long Fei
15:25	Re: 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined	kaz Kojima
15:24	Re: Problem with macro params containing commas	Andreas Schwab
15:15	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
14:04	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
13:39	3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined	Dan Kegel
13:04	Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS	Andreas Jaeger
12:44	Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(	Jan Hubicka
12:25	3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS	Kurt Garloff
12:07	Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:18	Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time	Andrew Pinski
11:12	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Jan Hubicka
09:50	Re: Problem with macro params containing commas	skaller
08:05	Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code(	Jan Hubicka
08:04	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Phil Edwards
08:03	Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Gunther Nikl
05:14	Re: [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?)	Alexandre Oliva
04:02	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Fergus Henderson
03:49	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Fergus Henderson
02:50	Another parallel bootstrap problem [was Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8]	Bradley Lucier
02:21	EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS	Mark Mitchell
01:36	link dependencies	martin . schaffner
00:47	RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Loisel, Sebastien
00:25	Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning:`packed' attribute ignored"	Dan Kegel
00:08	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Ian Lance Taylor

August 14, 2003

23:26	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
23:21	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Falk Hueffner
23:01	Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Andrew Pinski
22:18	Fldcw, rounding and optimizations	Loisel, Sebastien
22:03	Re: tree-dump inquiry	Dan DaCosta
21:57	tree-dump inquiry	Dan DaCosta
21:31	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	David Mosberger
20:54	Re: How does --with-sysroot work?	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:51	Re: How does --with-sysroot work?	H. J. Lu
20:38	Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify	law
20:25	Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify	Andrew Pinski
20:22	Re: Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files.	Neil Booth
19:19	Fix CVU prefix for GenTrunk	Richard Almquist
18:56	Re: gcj and xgamestation	Martin Brain
18:42	[patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libcnot being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?)	Dan Kegel
18:41	Re: gcj and xgamestation	Tom Tromey
18:22	Re: Problem with macro params containing commas	Nathan Sidwell
18:18	Re: How does --with-sysroot work?	Daniel Jacobowitz
18:17	How does --with-sysroot work?	H. J. Lu
18:14	Re: gcj and xgamestation	Geoffrey Poremba
18:01	Re: gcc version string on the branch is "experimental"	Mark Mitchell
17:21	Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files.	gp
17:19	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Per Bothner
17:00	Re: gcj and xgamestation	Anthony Green
16:55	m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax	Bernardo Innocenti
16:53	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:49	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:47	Re: RFC - detect static data overruns	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:45	Re: gcj and xgamestation	Tom Tromey
16:11	Problem with macro params containing commas	Jean-Eric Cuendet
16:08	Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1	Frank Ch. Eigler
15:52	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Zack Weinberg
15:45	Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:33	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
15:26	Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?	Bradley Lucier
15:20	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
15:18	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
14:29	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Erik Trulsson
14:27	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
14:08	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
11:53	Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Diego Novillo
10:21	[tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1	Linus Sjöberg
10:11	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Jan Hubicka
09:47	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Gerald Pfeifer
09:46	creating 64 bit binaries on solaris 8	Mobarek, Khaled (Robert Walter
09:44	how do i subscribe ?	Lee Manickum
08:20	compile on solarsi	He HongFu
07:37	[libiberty] Why is configure trying to use binfmt-0090?	Bernd Jendrissek
07:31	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:10	Is -Winline working at all?	Roberto Bagnara
07:07	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
07:03	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	skaller
06:54	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
06:47	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Andreas Jaeger
06:44	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
06:24	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Colin Douglas Howell
06:07	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	F. Schaefer
06:00	-Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?	Dan Kegel
05:15	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Ian Lance Taylor
05:09	Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:18	Delete xm-iq2000.h	Zack Weinberg
02:32	Re: libgloss patches	Andrew Pinski
02:27	libgloss patches	Bernardo Innocenti
02:25	Re: 64-bit on ia-32	Fergus Henderson
02:13	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Mark Mitchell
01:58	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken (not anymore)	Bernardo Innocenti
01:56	SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8?	Bradley Lucier
00:35	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Zack Weinberg
00:21	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Andrew Pinski
00:13	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Zack Weinberg

August 13, 2003

23:51	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Richard Henderson
23:36	Re: function addresses and ld.so	David Mosberger
23:13	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Joe Buck
22:59	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Mike Stump
22:45	Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code	Gerald Pfeifer
22:36	Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?	Gerald Pfeifer
22:34	Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end	Daniel Berlin
22:31	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Andrew Pinski
22:31	build status additions for GCC 3.3.1	Janis Johnson
22:28	Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Gerald Pfeifer
22:26	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Joe Buck
22:20	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Joe Buck
22:20	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Andrew Pinski
22:09	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Andrew Pinski
21:57	[tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Zdenek Dvorak
21:55	Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end	Jason Merrill
21:44	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Joe Buck
21:41	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Matthew Wilcox
21:25	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	John David Anglin
21:19	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	John David Anglin
21:19	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Andrew Pinski
21:14	Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end	Daniel Berlin
21:06	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Matthew Wilcox
20:59	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Andrew Pinski
20:58	Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end	Jason Merrill
20:49	Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	John David Anglin
20:49	Re: handling of warnings	Matt Austern
20:29	Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?	Peter Niemayer
19:57	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Matt Austern
19:53	[tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end	Daniel Berlin
19:22	Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin	Andrew Pinski
19:20	Re: sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?	Andrew Pinski
19:19	[tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin	Joost VandeVondele
18:32	Re: how to compile the C++ program in Linux	tm_gccmail
18:17	gcj and xgamestation	Geoffrey Poremba
18:16	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
18:15	re: no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option	Dan Kegel
18:13	How to compile the C++ program in Linux	Yang, Huaining
18:11	how to compile the C++ program in Linux	Yang, Huaining
17:52	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
17:17	Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?	Matthew Wilcox
17:01	gcc-ss-3.4-20030813 is now available	gccadmin
16:45	Re: fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh?	Bruce Korb
16:35	sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible?	Claus Fischer
16:14	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14	Re: handling of warnings	Gerald Pfeifer
16:07	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Scott Robert Ladd
16:07	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
16:02	Re: handling of warnings	Michael Matz
15:56	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:47	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
15:44	Re: Porting gcc	Ben Elliston
15:30	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
15:14	Successful build of gcc 3.3.1 on i686-pc-cygwin	Dimitry Andric
15:02	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:56	Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual	Kelley Cook
14:52	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
14:52	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
14:26	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:16	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Andrew Pinski
14:14	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
14:10	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Theodore Papadopoulo
14:01	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:59	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
13:39	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
13:31	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Michael Matz
13:16	gcc 2.95 question about .note section	root
13:13	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Diego Novillo
13:13	Re: Larger Compilations / Speed	Gerald Pfeifer
13:06	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:06	Larger Compilations / Speed	Frank-René Schäfer
12:53	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
12:41	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Michael Matz
12:35	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
12:23	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:18	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
12:15	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:14	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
12:09	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
11:29	duplicate entry in gcc manual	Martijn
11:29	Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual	Martijn
11:27	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
11:19	Re: handling of warnings	Andrew Pinski
11:15	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Andrew Pinski
11:12	Re: handling of warnings	skaller
11:03	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Michael Matz
10:53	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	skaller
09:46	Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Igor Bukanov
08:37	Porting gcc	Petar Penchev
08:26	Re: gcov questions	Nathan Sidwell
08:22	gcc version string on the branch is "experimental"	Matthias Klose
04:26	GCC 3.3.1: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC	Luca Saiu
04:23	Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)	Carlo Florendo
04:18	Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)	Carlo Florendo
04:11	Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens)	Zack Weinberg
04:09	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Bradley Lucier
03:59	scanf issue (store only specified tokens)	Carlo Florendo
01:07	gcov questions	Ed Swierk
00:58	Re: handling of warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:50	Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour	Michael Matz
00:48	Re: biarch gcc	Alan Modra

August 12, 2003

23:45	Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Diego Novillo
23:36	[tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg]	Zdenek Dvorak
23:31	Re: 64-bit on ia-32	Andrew Pinski
23:31	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Andrew Pinski
23:29	handling of warnings	skaller
23:27	Re: function addresses and ld.so	Matthew Wilcox
23:26	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
22:48	Re: biarch gcc	Michael Matz
22:38	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Michael Matz
22:35	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Scott Robert Ladd
22:28	64-bit on ia-32	Johan Rydberg
22:24	function addresses and ld.so	Camm Maguire
22:17	Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Janis Johnson
22:14	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
22:05	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	tm_gccmail
21:49	Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources	Gerald Pfeifer
21:45	Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0	Janis Johnson
21:40	Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically	Michael Meissner
21:39	Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?	Gerald Pfeifer
21:22	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	skaller
21:19	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	tm_gccmail
21:15	fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh?	Nathanael Nerode
21:09	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Ian Lance Taylor
20:40	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Nathanael Nerode
20:33	Re: Profiling gcc building Mozilla	Jim Wilson
20:22	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
20:12	Re: biarch gcc	Peter Bergner
19:53	Re: How to use protoize ?	Jim Wilson
19:41	Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0	Shrisha Rao
18:51	Profiling gcc building Mozilla	Will Cohen
18:40	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	tm_gccmail
18:19	Re: MCF5407 porting..	tm_gccmail
17:39	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
17:22	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
17:18	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
16:57	no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option	Vaughn, David A
16:45	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Scott Robert Ladd
16:25	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Nathanael Nerode
16:15	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
16:10	Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?	Jakub Jelinek
16:09	Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Diego Novillo
16:02	Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?	Volker Reichelt
15:51	Re: biarch gcc	H. J. Lu
15:50	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Scott Robert Ladd
15:49	Re: biarch gcc	Jakub Jelinek
15:47	Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?	Tolga Dalman
15:46	Re: biarch gcc	Andreas Jaeger
15:32	Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug?	Volker Reichelt
15:27	Re: biarch gcc	Eric Christopher
15:02	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?	cgd
14:58	biarch gcc	Alan Modra
14:50	Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler	Andrew Pinski
14:36	Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler	Andrew Haley
14:00	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Pop Sébastian
13:53	Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler	Gerald Pfeifer
13:49	MCF5407 BDM cable..	software
13:38	Unit-at-a-time compilation	Andrew Haley
13:21	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	Fergus Henderson
12:57	Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler	Laurent Pinchart
12:27	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Benjamin Kosnik
11:24	Re: Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:35	Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type	skaller
09:19	MCF5407 porting..	software
07:27	Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically	Georgy Yunayev
06:56	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?	Eric Christopher
06:48	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
06:47	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Phil Edwards
06:44	Re: Testcases and approval	Nathanael Nerode
06:34	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link?	cgd
06:32	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Nathanael Nerode
06:31	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.	Phil Edwards
06:31	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link?	Phil Edwards
06:27	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.	Eric Christopher
06:26	Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?	Eric Christopher
06:20	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux.	Nathanael Nerode
06:19	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
06:08	probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink?	cgd
06:06	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Nathanael Nerode
05:38	Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)	Jim Wilson
01:07	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Scott Robert Ladd
01:05	Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report	Scott Robert Ladd
00:30	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Andrew Pinski
00:17	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating

August 11, 2003

23:37	Re: How to use Inline assembly?	tm_gccmail
23:36	Re: SH3 memory allocation	tm_gccmail
23:32	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
23:14	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
23:13	Re: Opening large files with C	Rayson Ho
23:11	Re: GCC Framework support in Linux	Mike Stump
23:09	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Scott Robert Ladd
23:08	Re: Opening large files with C	Mike Stump
23:01	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Michael Matz
22:53	gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0	Shrisha Rao
22:50	Copyright Assignment	Pauli
22:46	Opening large files with C	Vladimir Espinosa Angarica
22:38	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
22:29	Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)	Daniel Berlin
22:23	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Michael Matz
22:18	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	Eric Christopher
22:00	Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)	Andrew MacLeod
21:46	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
21:33	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
21:25	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
21:24	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
21:19	Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)	Daniel Berlin
21:11	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	Richard Sandiford
21:00	gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted?	Peter Niemayer
20:55	Re: SH3 memory allocation	Jim Wilson
20:54	Re: How to use protoize ?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:53	Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)	Andrew MacLeod
20:47	Re: How to use Inline assembly?	Jim Wilson
20:43	Re: upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture	Jim Wilson
20:40	Re: What is the correct logic for casesi	Jim Wilson
20:39	[tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations (wasRe: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.)	Daniel Berlin
20:34	Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Andrew Pinski
20:26	Re: How to use protoize ?	Jim Wilson
20:24	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
20:20	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Daniel Berlin
20:16	Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4?	Scott Robert Ladd
20:15	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
20:15	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
20:12	Issues with latest gcc/glibc and static linking (modutils)	Martin Schlemmer
20:08	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
20:07	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
20:06	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
20:04	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
20:03	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Steven Bosscher
20:00	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
19:51	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
19:47	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
19:45	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
19:41	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
19:35	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
19:23	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
19:23	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
19:22	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
19:10	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
19:08	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
19:02	Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources	Andreas Schwab
18:49	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
18:38	Re: Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically	Jim Wilson
18:35	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
18:32	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
18:20	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew MacLeod
18:20	Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources	Jim Fischer
18:18	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Benjamin Kosnik
17:58	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
17:51	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	Eric Christopher
17:51	Testcases and approval	Andrew Pinski
17:46	Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Geoff Keating
17:41	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Andrew MacLeod
17:28	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	David Wuertele
17:11	gcc-ss-3.3-20030811 is now available	gccadmin
17:11	Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Gerald Pfeifer
17:09	Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Martin
17:04	Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Benjamin Kosnik
16:44	Re: dfa scheduler, bundling and packing	Vladimir Makarov
16:38	Re: Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE)	Janis Johnson
16:35	Re: comments on onlinedocs webpage	Gerald Pfeifer
16:26	Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Janis Johnson
16:17	dfa scheduler, bundling and packing	Richard Henderson
16:13	Re: [uClibc] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc	Manuel Novoa III
16:11	Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?	Gerald Pfeifer
15:53	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Kelley Cook
15:52	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Michael Matz
15:33	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
15:30	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
15:06	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
15:00	Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE)	Arpad Beszedes
14:59	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	law
13:45	RE: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav
13:05	GCC 3.3.1: bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux on SuperH	kaz Kojima
12:36	SH3 memory allocation	Raul Ito
11:30	Re: gcc and c4x ..	Svein E. Seldal
11:09	gcc and c4x ..	Lars Segerlund
10:47	Re: GCC 3.3.1 Released	Gerald Pfeifer
10:31	How to use Inline assembly?	eny lee
10:15	Re: Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org	Gerald Pfeifer
09:57	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Andrew Haley
09:57	Re: RFC - detect static data overruns	Gerald Pfeifer
08:39	Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	Richard Sandiford
08:21	Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically	Georgy Yunayev
07:06	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
06:34	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Brad Lucier
06:22	PCH not being used, but I can't tell why	Phil Edwards
06:12	upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture	Michal Schulz
05:19	Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org	Stephan T. Lavavej
00:51	Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?	Bernardo Innocenti
00:23	Fwd: [Introspector-developers] ANN : Call for help with a porting of VCG to Dotgnu pnet/c	James Michael DuPont

August 10, 2003

23:56	What is the correct logic for casesi	Marty Hauff
23:17	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
23:06	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Steven Bosscher
22:57	3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly?	Bernardo Innocenti
21:50	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Diego Novillo
21:41	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Daniel Berlin
21:40	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
21:38	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Diego Novillo
21:33	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Daniel Berlin
21:31	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Daniel Berlin
21:25	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Diego Novillo
21:21	Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC	Phil Edwards
21:17	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Daniel Berlin
21:14	Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Diego Novillo
20:45	Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC	Phil Edwards
20:35	[tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's	Daniel Berlin
20:28	gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included	David Wuertele
20:27	Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Valery A.Khamenya
20:12	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Diego Novillo
20:01	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
20:00	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Pop Sébastian
19:50	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
19:40	Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:38	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Daniel Berlin
19:03	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
19:00	Re: How to use protoize ?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:58	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Fergus Henderson
18:56	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Lars Brinkhoff
18:48	Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolvedsymbols during link	Bruno . Voigt
18:39	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Diego Novillo
18:37	Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC	Andreas Jaeger
18:03	Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:01	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Daniel Berlin
17:59	Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.	Daniel Berlin
17:48	Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Valery A.Khamenya
17:31	Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC	Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:28	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Diego Novillo
17:10	Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Diego Novillo
17:07	Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.	Diego Novillo
17:01	GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbolsduring link	Bruno . Voigt
16:35	Re: is movccsi a standard names?	Richard Earnshaw
15:41	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
15:31	autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC	Richard Sandiford
13:44	Re: 3.3.1 build successes	Dr. Franz Fehringer
13:38	Re: Problem in split_basic_block	Richard Kenner
13:00	[tree-ssa]: I've got LICM done, but it requires Zdenek's changes	Daniel Berlin
11:24	Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage	Askadar
10:25	Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9	Holger Weiss
09:26	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
08:50	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
08:06	Re: CHECK_DEAD_NOTES abort in sched1 for sh-elf	Jim Wilson
07:43	Re: How to use protoize ?	Jim Wilson
07:35	Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test	kaz Kojima
07:22	Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Valery A.Khamenya
06:55	Re: Problem in split_basic_block	Jim Wilson
06:48	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
06:44	Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc	Christoph Hellwig
06:35	Re: questions	Jim Wilson
06:30	Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test	Jim Wilson
06:03	Re: is movccsi a standard names?	Jim Wilson
05:42	[tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.	Daniel Berlin
05:07	Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Valery A.Khamenya
00:28	How to use protoize ?	Kaveh R. Ghazi

August 09, 2003

23:48	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken	Bernardo Innocenti
23:40	[tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change.	Daniel Berlin
23:35	Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparc-sun-solaris2.9	Holger Weiss
23:26	why are you waiting	aa31362
23:01	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
22:35	GCC target for uClinux with uClibc	Bernardo Innocenti
21:40	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken	Phil Edwards
21:24	Re: GCC Framework support in Linux	Neil Booth
20:19	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Steven Bosscher
20:00	Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Per Bothner
19:08	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Matt Kraai
18:19	Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Andrew Pinski
18:15	Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux	Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav
18:11	Re: Commit approval pls: PR 9877, 8336, plus other stuff	Tom Tromey
17:43	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
17:21	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
17:18	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
16:28	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken	Bernardo Innocenti
14:53	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
13:38	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Steven Bosscher
13:02	RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme	Valery A.Khamenya
11:56	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Steven Bosscher
08:49	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Zdenek Dvorak
08:00	SH: may miscompile zero extension and test	kaz Kojima
07:15	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken	Phil Edwards
07:15	Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken	Phil Edwards
02:09	Re: 3.3.1 build successes	John David Anglin
01:37	[ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20030808snapshot)	Bernardo Innocenti
01:24	gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6	Shrisha Rao
01:08	Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit	Daniel Berlin
01:02	3.3.1 build successes	Joe Buck
00:26	additions to 3.2 and 3.3 build status lists	Janis Johnson