gcc archive
date index for August, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

August 31, 2003
21:49 RE: Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integerand float Chris Lattner
21:44 Strict aliasing and converting binary patterns between integer and float Olivier Galibert
19:33 tree-ssa merge from mainline? Nathanael Nerode
17:03 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Martin J. Bligh
16:18 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Larry McVoy
15:39 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Dan Kegel
15:24 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:54 Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os Roger Sayle
14:09 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Dan Kegel
14:00 Re: LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Larry McVoy
10:50 Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build Linus Sjöberg
10:07 Re: [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build Paul Brook
09:21 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Jan Hubicka
07:33 [tree-ssa] ICE on nightly build Linus Sjöberg
07:02 LMbench as gcc performance regression test? Dan Kegel
03:42 Re: [PATCH] PR middle-end/11823: Tune jump tables for -Os Nathanael Nerode
03:27 Thank you for your interest. autoreply-no-reply-please
03:19 Re: Nonlocal gotos on s390 Frank Heckenbach
03:00 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap Andrew Pinski
02:58 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap Daniel Berlin
02:49 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap judd.jenne
01:18 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Randy.Dunlap
01:00 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently Eyal Lebedinsky
00:18 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently Eyal Lebedinsky
00:17 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently Eyal Lebedinsky

August 30, 2003
23:04 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
21:32 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Karel Gardas
19:55 RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Nitin Gupta
17:57 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Russ Allbery
17:38 Email was blocked. MAILsweeper
16:25 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Robert Dewar
16:01 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Richard Kenner
15:35 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Robert Dewar
15:19 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Florian Weimer
13:08 gcc-3.4-20030827 snapshot bootstrap failure on solaris2.8 Qiong Cai
12:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Jan Hubicka
12:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Jan Hubicka
11:24 Re: G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug? Carlo Wood
07:28 serial port issue wilson k.j
04:54 G++ 3.3.1 Specialization bug? Wu Yongwei
02:34 Re: [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Robert Dewar
00:46 Re: [tree-ssa] having problems recently Andrew Pinski
00:39 [tree-ssa] having problems recently Eyal Lebedinsky

August 29, 2003
23:43 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Gerald Pfeifer
22:44 Re: --enable-languages no longer works Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:30 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Joe Buck
22:20 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Karel Gardas
22:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Karel Gardas
22:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Karel Gardas
21:59 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:58 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Joe Buck
21:51 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Geoff Keating
21:40 [OT] Identifying unused include directives? Dan Kegel
21:38 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: recent commit Camm Maguire
21:29 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Mark Mitchell
21:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Wolfgang Bangerth
21:07 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Andrew MacLeod
20:53 Please resend your email... Viet Email
20:50 Re: g++ Warning Incorrect? tm_gccmail
20:41 Re: Evil code in config.gcc (vsta) Zack Weinberg
20:38 g++ Warning Incorrect? Chip Cuntz
20:18 Evil code in config.gcc (vsta) Nathanael Nerode
20:08 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:00 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it? Josef Zlomek
19:50 Re: "short pretty" names? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:25 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it? Geoff Keating
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Andrew MacLeod
19:12 bootstrap gcc 3.3.1 on solaris 2.8 Victor Secarin
19:10 bootstrap gcc 3.1.1 on solaris 2.8 Victor Secarin
19:08 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview law
17:46 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog DJ Delorie
17:42 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog Nathanael Nerode
17:36 Re: --enable-languages no longer works Andrew Pinski
17:03 Re: The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog Zack Weinberg
16:59 --enable-languages no longer works Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:44 Global register variables (bugs #7871, #10684, and #11413) Simon Marlow
16:41 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Ian Lance Taylor
16:36 Naive suggestion about multilibs Bradley Lucier
16:10 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Richard Henderson
16:07 RE: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Nitin Gupta
15:58 unsubscribe please Thomas Anders
15:53 Re: MS obj not recogn. I need answer Janis Johnson
15:26 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64 Jakub Jelinek
15:21 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64 Christoph Hellwig
15:07 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64 Steve Munroe
15:06 any experiences with gcc builds on Pentium-M Robert Dewar
15:05 Re: "short pretty" names? Chris Lattner
15:02 Re: "short pretty" names? John Levon
14:57 Re: "short pretty" names? Chris Lattner
14:53 Re: "short pretty" names? John Levon
14:45 The use of the toplevel ChangeLog and config/ChangeLog Kelley Cook
14:41 "short pretty" names? Chris Lattner
14:24 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR - kill it? Josef Zlomek
13:59 Question about inline asm Marcos Lois Bermúdez
13:24 Re: BIT_ANDTC_EXPR Andrew Pinski
13:22 BIT_ANDTC_EXPR Josef Zlomek
11:18 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func Neal D. Becker
09:02 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model Karel Gardas
08:43 building cross gcc-3.3 on i686 for target i586 Agri
08:04 "Ziem," - Where is your Green Card? John Anderson
07:08 MS obj not recogn. I need answer Primaria Falticeni SDU
04:31 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP Mohan Embar
04:25 Successful build of GCC Martin Villarreal
04:09 RTL SRUTHY C.N.
01:35 Re: recent commit David Mosberger
01:19 Re: TOC overflow on linuxppc64 Alan Modra
01:04 Re: recent commit Camm Maguire
00:54 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Mike Stump
00:34 TOC overflow on linuxppc64 Mohammed Tajuddin
00:22 Re: recent commit David Mosberger

August 28, 2003
23:23 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func Richard Henderson
23:03 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model Neil Booth
22:52 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Ian Lance Taylor
22:20 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto Nathanael Nerode
21:56 Re: Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems Tom Tromey
21:56 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto) Paul Koning
21:44 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto Joe Buck
21:41 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto) Joe Buck
21:40 Re: Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto) Nathanael Nerode
21:30 Re: [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model Mike Stump
21:28 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Mike Stump
21:17 Targets with pre-C89 libraries (was Re: Help wanted from targetmaintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto) Zack Weinberg
21:16 Patch: Fix libjava parallel make problems Mohan Embar
20:55 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto Zack Weinberg
20:48 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Mike Stump
20:32 Help wanted from target maintainers re: fixincludes/fixproto Nathanael Nerode
19:59 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Mike Stump
19:58 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
19:47 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func Neal D. Becker
19:43 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP Mohan Embar
19:35 Re: R: disable libgcc Janis Johnson
18:01 Known gcc testsuite issues (was: gcc-3.3, host==x86, target==ppc7450) Dan Kegel
17:36 Re: libjava build is broken on SMP Mohan Embar
17:10 libjava build is broken on SMP Andrew Haley
17:04 libjava build is broken on SMP H. J. Lu
17:03 Re: undefined symbol: __bb_init_func Dale Johannesen
16:55 Re: R: disable libgcc Eric Christopher
16:45 Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code Joe Buck
16:36 Re: gcc 3.3.1 on IA64 Andrew Pinski
16:31 gcc 3.3.1 on IA64 Reinhold Bader
14:45 ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL called for __builtin_ function Anders Ådland
14:26 Re: More info on solaris8 problem Jeff Sturm
13:34 help with RTL and .md files Linas Vepstas
13:09 undefined symbol: __bb_init_func Neal D. Becker
12:59 Is this a bfd bug? (binutils version 2.13) Bharathi Seshadri
12:13 [PCH] Automatic PCH creation model Karel Gardas
12:09 Re: gcc bug Ranjit Mathew
11:54 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Ranjit Mathew
11:41 More info on solaris8 problem Neal D. Becker
11:30 still problem with solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld Neal D. Becker
11:13 gcc bug Vadim Dvorkin
10:28 suscribe Marcos Lois Bermúdez
10:16 Inconsistent g++3.2 debug information on AIX Michael Veksler
09:00 Errors in DLL linking with a MS-style lib Primaria Falticeni SDU
08:18 R: disable libgcc Gabriele Caracausi
08:10 Re: disable libgcc Eric Christopher
08:08 Re: about to port GCC Stephane Carrez
08:00 disable libgcc Gabriele Caracausi
07:35 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Karel Gardas
06:51 writing a new backend to gcc John Carlson
04:53 Re: SSA PRE and Open64 law
03:24 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Ian Lance Taylor
02:44 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Andrew Pinski
00:47 Re: Why this change? It could break a lot of code Andrew Pinski
00:24 Why this change? It could break a lot of code The Software Team
00:23 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Ian Lance Taylor

August 27, 2003
23:44 Re: [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux Per Bothner
23:42 Re: [cs branch] how to start compile server? Per Bothner
23:32 Re: SSA PRE and Open64 Daniel Berlin
23:02 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Jim Wilson
23:01 Re: SSA PRE and Open64 law
22:59 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Jim Wilson
22:46 Re: SSA PRE and Open64 Daniel Berlin
22:41 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Jim Wilson
22:06 Re: RTL Jim Wilson
21:43 [cs branch] how to start compile server? Karel Gardas
20:49 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Jason Merrill
20:24 Re: SSA PRE and Open64 law
20:21 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview law
20:18 Re: Compile GCC without a library Phil Edwards
20:16 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
20:13 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Diego Novillo
19:55 [cs branch] compilation failure on GNU/Linux Karel Gardas
19:53 SSA PRE and Open64 Eric Christopher
19:53 Re: solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works? Phil Edwards
19:52 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
19:52 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview law
19:45 Flag granularity (was gcc-patches: New insns for the s390 backend(2)) Laurent GUERBY
19:43 solaris8 --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld works? Neal D. Becker
19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Diego Novillo
19:41 Re: to_line blowing up Mike Stump
18:08 Linking MS lib Visual FoxPro 6 Primaria Falticeni SDU
17:47 Re: -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5 Andrew Pinski
17:40 -pthread lacking documentation on *-linux-gnu and sysv5 Gerald Pfeifer
17:26 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ? Andrew Pinski
17:08 gcc-ss-3.4-20030827 is now available gccadmin
16:28 Re: word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Richard Henderson
16:11 Re: temporary object Joe Buck
15:51 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 ? GTFSTBK
15:03 Re: temporary object Dr. Franz Fehringer
14:56 word alignment for non fp/sp register pointers for SPARClet port Nitin Gupta
14:06 Compile GCC without a library Anders Ådland
11:10 RTL SRUTHY C.N.
09:55 temporary object He HongFu
05:46 Re: to_line blowing up Neil Booth
05:45 [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap ICE tree-ssa-dom.c:877 judd.jenne
01:26 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Felix Lee
00:23 Re: to_line blowing up Mike Stump

August 26, 2003
22:30 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
22:17 Re: [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Gerald Pfeifer
22:03 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Joseph S. Myers
21:57 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
21:30 Re: [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Jason Merrill
21:25 My Resume. Toon Moene
21:18 [OT] patches, was Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Chris Devers
20:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Joseph S. Myers
20:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
20:58 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
20:58 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Daniel Berlin
20:58 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
20:58 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Gabriel Paubert
20:57 [tree-ssa] COND_EXPR lowering preview Zdenek Dvorak
20:57 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
20:57 PATCH: Require GNU Make to build GCC Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings Jim Wilson
20:57 Re: Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd) Alexandre Oliva
20:57 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Russ Allbery
20:07 Re: ABI documentation Jim Wilson
20:02 Thanks for writing to me at Toll-free Consortium. Charles Azer
19:44 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
19:13 Re: error: stray '\' in program Neil Booth
19:06 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
18:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
18:31 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Zack Weinberg
18:22 Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS? Joern Rennecke
17:59 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Chris Devers
17:33 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Phil Edwards
17:32 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Zack Weinberg
17:16 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Zack Weinberg
17:15 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Zdenek Dvorak
17:09 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Zdenek Dvorak
17:07 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
17:04 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Joseph S. Myers
17:03 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Andrew Walrond
17:02 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Devang Patel
16:52 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Matt Austern
16:48 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Joseph S. Myers
16:43 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Joe Buck
16:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Zack Weinberg
16:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Joe Buck
16:37 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Andrew Walrond
16:34 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Joe Buck
16:20 Re: about to port GCC Joe Buck
16:07 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization Geoff Keating
16:02 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings Geoff Keating
15:59 Re: error: stray '\' in program Zack Weinberg
15:58 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Zack Weinberg
15:40 Re: Coreutils head and tail problems Daniel Berlin
15:11 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
15:04 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
14:48 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Chris Devers
14:01 Re: gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25... Gerald Pfeifer
13:39 R: error: stray '\' in program Gabriele Caracausi
13:31 Re: error: stray '\' in program Kris Warkentin
13:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Gerald Pfeifer
13:16 Re: error: stray '\' in program Nick Ing-Simmons
12:35 Coreutils head and tail problems Andrew Walrond
12:27 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Diego Novillo
10:41 Re: On inlining in C++ Nick Ing-Simmons
10:33 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03 New stabs with gcc HEAD Michael Elizabeth Chastain
09:58 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Gabriel Paubert
09:39 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Joseph S. Myers
09:22 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Richard Earnshaw
09:05 Re: -fomit-frame-pointer Piotr Wyderski
08:14 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Nathan Sidwell
07:56 gcc book diffs, was Re: [using gcc book] 5.25... Chris Devers
07:43 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
07:12 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
07:04 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Chris Devers
07:00 new book pdf up for review, was Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 [...] Chris Devers
06:56 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Stephan T. Lavavej
06:39 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof Chris Devers
06:32 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings Chris Devers
06:29 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Russ Allbery
06:28 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof Zack Weinberg
06:23 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
06:12 ABI documentation SRUTHY C.N.
06:09 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
06:01 Re: to_line blowing up Neil Booth
05:57 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Zack Weinberg
05:50 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof Chris Devers
05:48 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Russ Allbery
05:38 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
05:35 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
05:24 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Zack Weinberg
05:18 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof Zack Weinberg
05:17 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Christopher Faylor
05:16 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches Mark Mitchell
05:15 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC Jim Wilson
05:14 Auto-Reply: Re: Your application resumes
05:10 Re: [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Russ Allbery
05:05 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Zack Weinberg
04:22 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches Richard Henderson
04:20 Re: [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions Chris Devers
04:18 [using gcc book] ch5.25 declaring attributes of functions Chris Devers
04:04 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
04:02 [using gcc book] ch5.6 referring to a type with typeof Chris Devers
03:53 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Matt Austern
03:53 [using gcc book] ch10.11 Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make Chris Devers
03:37 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
03:22 sorry about the spam that got through Christopher Faylor
03:13 Re: [libobjc patch] Fix libobjc/gc.c compilation error Jim Wilson
02:55 Re: Shifts by constants > 31 may generate illegal sparc assembleroutput Jim Wilson
02:47 Re: [ARIN-20030825.3802] Re: Details hostmaster
02:47 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Gabriel Dos Reis
02:46 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Colin Douglas Howell
02:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
02:29 xinhuanet.com PostMaster
02:27 Re: Loop optimizer issues Andrew Pinski
02:24 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15 Re: [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings Jim Wilson
01:58 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
01:51 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC Tao Zhang
01:51 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Ziemowit Laski
01:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jim Wilson
01:44 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Colin Douglas Howell
01:43 [using gcc book] ch3.8 options that control optimization Chris Devers
01:39 Re: to_line blowing up Jim Wilson
01:37 Re: [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Ziemowit Laski
01:33 [using gcc book] ch3.8 options to request or suppress warnings Chris Devers
01:24 [using gcc book] ch1 objective-c blurb Chris Devers
00:59 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Chris Devers
00:59 Re: -fomit-frame-pointer Jim Wilson
00:57 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals Chris Devers
00:57 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Jim Wilson
00:56 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals Jim Wilson
00:55 Re: about to port GCC Jim Wilson
00:47 Re: offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC Jim Wilson
00:33 Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: G++ ABI mismatches Mark Mitchell

August 25, 2003
23:47 Re: [using gcc book] 5.20 compound literals Chris Devers
23:46 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Richard Henderson
23:46 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
22:53 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Chris Lattner
22:41 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Richard Henderson
22:26 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Chris Lattner
22:20 -fomit-frame-pointer Piotr Wyderski
22:19 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Richard Henderson
22:00 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Zdenek Dvorak
21:51 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
21:41 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling? Richard Henderson
21:40 about to port GCC Alvaro Hernando Salazar V.
21:32 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Richard Henderson
21:24 offsets of stack variables with optimizations enabled in GCC Tao Zhang
20:46 Confirmation accepted qmail
20:01 Re: What does un-cse exactly refer to? Jim Wilson
19:55 Re: Problem in .md file Jim Wilson
19:49 Re: using objcopy --redefine-sym Jim Wilson
19:47 Re: Problem in .md file Jim Wilson
19:27 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Jim Wilson
19:19 Confirmation accepted qmail
19:16 Re: Problem in .md file Zack Weinberg
18:56 Re: Naming the originator in new testcases Gabriel Dos Reis
18:49 Naming the originator in new testcases Wolfgang Bangerth
18:38 R: error: stray '\' in program Gabriele Caracausi
18:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
18:22 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant Ulrich Weigand
18:17 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
18:07 Confirmation accepted qmail
17:52 Problem in .md file Nitin Jain
17:42 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant Richard Sandiford
17:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Zdenek Dvorak
17:29 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
17:22 gcc-ss-3.3-20030825 is now available gccadmin
17:17 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant Ulrich Weigand
16:08 Re: long long data type support Joe Buck
15:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
15:48 Re: Quality Issues on mainline Wolfgang Bangerth
15:42 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling? Chris Lattner
15:40 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
15:33 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
14:55 Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52 Re: Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here? Andrew Pinski
14:44 Is g++ not conforming to the C++ standard here? Philipp Thomas
14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
14:05 Re: Reload and reg_equiv_constant Andrew Pinski
13:58 [tree-ssa] Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch Andrew MacLeod
13:21 Re: error: stray '\' in program Neil Booth
12:18 Re: error: stray '\' in program Philipp Thomas
11:42 Re: m68k patch reviews Gunther Nikl
08:24 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Alexandre Courbot
07:47 Re: G++ ABI mismatches Nathan Sidwell
07:42 Re: Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling? Nathan Sidwell
05:13 G++ ABI mismatches Chris Lattner
03:45 Bug in implementation of C++ ABI exception handling? Chris Lattner
02:16 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Mark Mitchell
02:05 using objcopy --redefine-sym Wagner Toledo Correa
01:45 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) David Edelsohn
01:23 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Bernardo Innocenti
00:24 Re: Quality Issues on mainline Dan Kegel
00:14 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Mark Mitchell

August 24, 2003
22:09 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example) Diego Novillo
22:03 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example) Gerald Pfeifer
22:01 Re: How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example) Andrew Pinski
21:18 Reload and reg_equiv_constant Richard Sandiford
21:17 How to report tree-ssa bugs (and an example) Gerald Pfeifer
20:28 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
20:17 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision John Vickers
19:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Nathanael Nerode
19:26 Re: [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
18:37 [tree-ssa] parallel bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
17:46 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Bernardo Innocenti
16:34 Re: Binarie gcc for mac Chris Devers
16:20 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
16:18 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Andreas Tobler
15:53 DWARF2 unwinding documentation/help Bernardo Innocenti
15:41 Re: Binarie gcc for mac Andrew Pinski
15:38 Binarie gcc for mac Wendy Zhou
15:00 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions Bernardo Innocenti
14:59 Re: [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information Michael Matz
14:32 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions Gerald Pfeifer
14:12 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions Chris Devers
13:47 Re: GCC Weekly News? Gerald Pfeifer
13:42 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Gerald Pfeifer
13:30 PATCH for: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containingrelease tag? Gerald Pfeifer
13:18 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes Andrew Haley
11:55 error: stray '\' in program Gabriele Caracausi
11:26 Re: Quality Issues on mainline Gerald Pfeifer
09:44 cgraph maintainership Gerald Pfeifer
09:43 Problem in .md file Nitin Jain
09:19 Re: [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions Gerald Pfeifer
09:00 What does un-cse exactly refer to? Kazu Hirata
08:28 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
07:48 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Richard Henderson
07:45 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Richard Henderson
05:50 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes Jeff Sturm
03:00 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch law
02:42 [using gcc book] 5.25 declaring attributes of functions Chris Devers
02:11 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Chris Devers
01:58 Re: [using gcc book] compound literals Stephan T. Lavavej
01:51 long long data type support fahad al-zahrani
01:48 Re: [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure Eyal Lebedinsky
01:33 [using gcc book] 5.20 double-word integers Chris Devers
01:25 [using gcc book] compound literals Chris Devers
01:20 full space, this user is limit quota club
01:08 Your details mspiro
00:55 Re: Details postmaster
00:45 Re: COND_EXPR lowering patch David Edelsohn

August 23, 2003
21:28 Re: [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes Jan Hubicka
21:04 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
20:56 Virus / harmful content found in EMail root
20:16 Re: Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS? Geoff Keating
19:38 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Zack Weinberg
18:21 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Richard Henderson
17:52 COND_EXPR lowering patch Zdenek Dvorak
13:15 Defining LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS? Anders Ådland
11:33 [new-regalloc-branch] Emit remat information Mukta Punjani, Noida
09:32 Re: mainline problem Andreas Jaeger
09:25 Re: mainline problem Jeremy Sanders
09:00 Re: mainline problem Andreas Jaeger
08:29 mainline problem Jeremy Sanders
07:01 Segfault with operator delete[] (fwd) Brian Hart
04:22 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap Andrew Pinski
03:15 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
03:14 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap judd.jenne
03:13 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
02:45 A virus was detected on your message Mailsweeper
01:53 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
01:49 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
01:47 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
01:31 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
01:10 [tree-ssa] new bootstrap failure Eyal Lebedinsky
01:03 Re: m68k patch reviews Bernardo Innocenti

August 22, 2003
23:08 Re: Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Daniel Jacobowitz
23:04 Re: m68k patch reviews Peter Barada
22:56 GCC Release Status (2003-08-22) Mark Mitchell
22:55 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
22:41 to_line blowing up Mike Stump
22:22 Re: Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap? Andrew Pinski
22:11 Re: m68k patch reviews Bernardo Innocenti
21:47 Syntax error in configure? can anyone bootstrap? Bradley Lucier
21:32 Re: Recursive tm_gccmail
21:22 full space, this user is limit quota kingf
21:06 Re: Recursive Eric Christopher
20:26 Thread-local storage on IA64 in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Florian Weimer
18:47 Re: m68k patch reviews Peter Barada
18:41 Re: Recursive Jim Wilson
18:32 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Jim Wilson
17:31 Recursive Julilo Cesar Vieira da Silva
17:17 Re: m68k patch reviews Bernardo Innocenti
17:10 Re: Applying patch to gcc3.2.7 Zack Weinberg
17:06 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Volker Reichelt
16:36 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Alexandre Courbot
15:57 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Jason Merrill
15:51 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Vladimir N. Makarov
15:12 Re: type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4... Andrew Pinski
15:07 type promotion and function overloading change in gcc 3.4... Fons Rademakers
14:56 Re: expect 5.39 import Andrew Cagney
14:34 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision John Vickers
14:29 C99 and i387 Floating-point assignments John Vickers
13:44 Re: build breakage in cvs head Olaf Hering
13:33 Out of town till end of Aug. Jean-Luc Dugelay
13:21 Re: Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Alexandre Courbot
13:17 Suggestion: Template instantiation debugging Christopher Eltschka
11:40 Applying patch to gcc3.2.7 Ravi
11:38 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
11:35 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Robert Dewar
11:12 Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Alexandre Courbot
10:44 Register-passed arguments copied to the stack? Alexandre Courbot
10:10 Re: OT: Sobig Florian Weimer
09:43 Re: m68k patch reviews Gunther Nikl
08:48 Re: Error Report Zack Weinberg
08:22 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Gunther Nikl
08:04 Re: build breakage in cvs head Andreas Jaeger
07:21 build breakage in cvs head Olaf Hering
07:15 Re: expect 5.39 import Nick Clifton
04:35 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Jim Wilson
04:33 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
04:31 Using the autoresponder Demon Support Responder
03:46 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 law
03:45 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 law
03:08 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Chris Lattner
02:43 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Jason Merrill
02:30 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
02:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Jason Merrill
01:50 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Bradley Lucier
01:05 Automatic Response Anne George
00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
00:01 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb? Jim Wilson
00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski

August 21, 2003
23:50 Re: Wicked screensaver toon
23:43 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Jim Wilson
23:39 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb? Dara Hazeghi
23:33 Re: m32r-elf build requires gdb? Jim Wilson
23:28 Re: Error Report Jim Wilson
23:18 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Zack Weinberg
23:11 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
23:10 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Jim Wilson
23:08 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Bradley Lucier
22:52 Error Report stayvis ng
22:28 Re: expect 5.39 import Andrew Cagney
22:24 m32r-elf build requires gdb? Dara Hazeghi
22:18 m68k-elf target broken again Dara Hazeghi
21:35 Experience Client Support Experience Technical Support
21:35 Re: expect 5.39 import Michael Elizabeth Chastain
21:22 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Jason Merrill
20:53 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Daniel Berlin
20:52 expect 5.39 import Andrew Cagney
20:48 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Volker Reichelt
20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 law
20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
19:21 Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags Peter Barada
19:14 Re: new coldfire TARGET_ flags Bernardo Innocenti
19:10 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Jason Merrill
19:02 [unit-at-a-time] Java inlining woes Jeff Sturm
18:53 RE: --with-ld breakage for me. Loisel, Sebastien
18:51 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Jim Wilson
18:31 Re: m68k patch reviews Bernardo Innocenti
18:11 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Richard Henderson
17:54 Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood Christopher Faylor
17:53 Re: Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches Jim Wilson
17:37 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Daniel Berlin
17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
17:15 Re: OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood) Daniel Berlin
17:10 OT: Sobig (was Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood) Kelley Cook
17:06 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
16:50 C++ name mangling tool Bhavesh P. Davda
16:24 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Jason Merrill
16:23 Re: how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:23 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Jason Merrill
16:19 Re: Observation on the recent junk mail flood Zack Weinberg
16:17 Re: Parallel build broken Zack Weinberg
16:12 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap problem on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 (Was [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap) Andrew Pinski
16:04 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.6 is released H. J. Lu
15:22 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap Daniel Berlin
14:44 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision John Vickers
14:44 how to build gcc 2.95.3 for armv5 Hongbo Rong
14:20 Re: seperate libiberty Andrew Pinski
14:04 seperate libiberty Glenn McGrath
14:02 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Volker Reichelt
13:37 Re: [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap Andrew Pinski
13:34 Re: Quality Issues on mainline Andrew Pinski
13:24 Observation on the recent junk mail flood Paul Koning
13:16 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Gunther Nikl
11:57 recent commit Camm Maguire
10:04 Parallel build broken Gerald Pfeifer
09:29 Receipt of email to Chase Bill Management Center BillSupport Chase
09:05 Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1 Linus Sjöberg
08:36 Quality Issues on mainline Gerald Pfeifer
06:48 Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS Mark Mitchell
06:35 RE:Re: Re: My details - Prohibited File Extension Blocked MAILsweeper
06:06 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Richard Henderson
05:40 Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update Zack Weinberg
05:39 Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision Roger Sayle
05:15 Re: ColdFire/uClinux status update Richard Henderson
04:52 recent commit Camm Maguire
04:27 Which opcodes emitted by gcc for various arches Kris Warkentin
04:08 [tree-ssa][unit-at-a-time] bootstrap JUDD JENNE
03:46 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Ian Lance Taylor
03:44 Your resume has been received NOTESSB02
03:30 Re: Floating point trouble wit x86's extended precision Roger Sayle
03:29 ColdFire/uClinux status update Bernardo Innocenti
03:29 away from my mail Mogens Kjaer
00:40 Re: --with-ld breakage for me. Andrew Pinski
00:36 --with-ld breakage for me. Loisel, Sebastien
00:13 Estimated Response Time Advanced PCS
00:12 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti

August 20, 2003
23:54 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Jamie Lokier
22:40 Warning: Possible Virus Infection VirWatch
22:36 Add self to MAINTAINERS (mainline & branch) Bernardo Innocenti
22:36 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Andreas Schwab
22:33 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:26 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Don Lindsay
22:23 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Phil Edwards
22:04 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Joseph S. Myers
21:27 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Gabriel Dos Reis
21:01 [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2003-08-17 Diego Novillo
20:56 Re: Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Jim Wilson
19:57 Re: some types probs using 3.3.1 Jim Wilson
19:55 Re: GCC Porting problem Jim Wilson
19:52 Re: Our apologies for the virus reject notices Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: Wicked screensaver toon
19:34 Re: [RESOLVED] libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Shaun Jackman
19:23 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link? cgd
19:17 Our apologies for the virus reject notices Super-User
19:12 Re: Is this meant to compile? Chris Lattner
19:11 A Virus has been detected. MAILsweeper
19:09 Re: Is this meant to compile? Zack Weinberg
18:43 Is this meant to compile? Chris Lattner
18:29 Floating point trouble with x86's extended precision Volker Reichelt
18:27 Re: gcov questions Ed Swierk
18:27 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc Mike Stump
18:26 Email Content Rejection Notice wedontlikespame
18:21 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
17:59 Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux Bernardo Innocenti
17:50 Re: tree-dump inquiry Dan DaCosta
17:44 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
17:33 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc Richard Kenner
17:15 CVS write access Bernardo Innocenti
17:00 gcc-ss-3.4-20030820 is now available gccadmin
16:44 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
16:43 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
16:37 Re: [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Richard Henderson
16:29 Re: Re: My details Arnt Gulbrandsen
16:11 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc Joe Buck
16:04 Re: strange warning with gcc 3.x Joe Buck
15:59 Possible virus in Email sent by you root
15:52 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
15:30 strange warning with gcc 3.x Gunther Nikl
14:40 Re: [uClinux-dev] New cross target for uClinux David McCullough
14:17 Re: Re: My details Unexpected reply handler
14:01 gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev67-dec-osf5.1 Serge Cohen
13:59 automated response
13:34 [3.3/3.4] wrong handling of "extern const" variables Gunther Nikl
12:52 New cross target for uClinux Bernardo Innocenti
11:58 Re: Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc Joel Sherrill
11:55 Virus rejects on bug-gcc and help-gcc Richard Kenner
11:32 GCC Porting problem Petar Penchev
10:58 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Marc Espie
10:54 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Marc Espie
09:01 We would like to offer our sincere thanks to you for writing to us. Administrator
08:32 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology James Michael DuPont
08:29 Re: gcov questions Nathan Sidwell
06:26 RE: Re: Your application MAILsweeper
05:46 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Neil Booth
04:46 warnings building mainline for x86_64-freebsd Dara Hazeghi
02:37 Out of Office AutoReply: Your application Zepeda, Margarita {Quaker}
02:02 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
01:41 Re: Thank you! swoosh
00:59 Re: Thank you! Unexpected reply handler
00:40 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored" Dan Kegel
00:24 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Alexandre Oliva
00:05 Re: init_priority with GCC Phil Edwards

August 19, 2003
23:48 Re: init_priority with GCC Jim Wilson
23:23 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology Diego Novillo
23:00 Re: gcc 2.95 question about .note section Jim Wilson
22:55 Re: tree-dump inquiry Jim Wilson
22:51 Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning: `packed' attribute ignored" Jim Wilson
22:41 Re: Gcc3.3 installation problem Jim Wilson
22:20 Re: compile on solarsi Jim Wilson
21:04 Multiple input-file patch for gcov 3.2.3 Ed Swierk
21:03 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Dara Hazeghi
20:54 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Phil Edwards
20:49 Re: gcov questions Ed Swierk
20:31 Re: Inquiry about RTL Jim Wilson
20:29 Re: libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Shaun Jackman
18:58 Out of Office AutoReply: My details Eracleous,CH
18:24 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Andreas Schwab
18:16 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Joe Buck
18:06 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Ian Lance Taylor
18:02 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
17:56 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Ian Lance Taylor
17:51 Votre message la liste Traduc est en attente d'approbation traduc-admin
17:21 Bugzilla adding fulltext index Daniel Berlin
17:15 Re: g++ compile option question Joel Sherrill
17:02 Re: Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology James Michael DuPont
16:26 g++ compile option question Andrew Haley
16:20 Re: g++ compile option question Frank Mehnert
16:11 Re: g++ compile option question Martin Brain
15:50 libstdc++-v3/libmath: cannot find math.h Shaun Jackman
15:24 g++ compile option question Halifa Yehezkel-BYH005
15:10 init_priority with GCC Frank Mehnert
15:00 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc. David Edelsohn
14:51 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc. Nathan Sidwell
14:44 RE: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc. Nitin Gupta
14:21 Please Reply - linuxdevices s081914212328348 linuxdevices-request
10:39 Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target Steve Watt
09:44 how are stack slot addresses resolved? Christian Lindig
08:24 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Andreas Schwab
07:35 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
07:10 Call for Review: GCC introspector owl ontology James Michael DuPont
06:56 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Fergus Henderson
06:53 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:46 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
06:38 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
06:16 Re: Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813 Dan Kegel
06:08 Three ICEs in regression tests with gcc-3.4-20030813 Dan Kegel
06:06 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Richard Henderson
04:31 Re: Gcc installation problem Daniel Berlin
04:13 Re: Gcc installation problem Dan Kegel
03:59 Re: Gcc installation problem Robert Dewar
03:52 Re: Gcc installation problem Daniel Berlin
03:41 Re: Gcc installation problem Robert Dewar
03:13 Re: Gcc installation problem Daniel Berlin
03:06 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Ian Lance Taylor
02:57 RE: Gcc installation problem Robert Dewar
00:44 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Fergus Henderson
00:30 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Fergus Henderson
00:25 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Richard Henderson

August 18, 2003
23:55 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Geoff Keating
23:53 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Geoff Keating
23:51 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax William C. Cox
23:21 Re: Gcc installation problem Joe Buck
23:01 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Diego Novillo
21:55 crosstool-0.19: added gcc-3.4-20030813 support Dan Kegel
21:53 RE: Gcc installation problem Long Fei
21:49 Re: m68k C++ exception handling Andreas Schwab
21:49 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:12 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Diego Novillo
20:43 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
20:33 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
19:59 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Richard Henderson
19:52 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
19:51 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Per Bothner
19:21 Re: Gcc installation problem Dan Kegel
19:15 Re: Gcc installation problem Mike Stump
19:11 Re: Friendly install Mike Stump
19:02 Re: Devel rebuild question Mike Stump
18:51 Re: Inquiry about RTL tm_gccmail
18:48 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report tm_gccmail
18:48 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
18:41 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors David Edelsohn
18:40 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors David Edelsohn
18:33 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Gabriel Dos Reis
18:20 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
18:17 Re: Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813 Phil Edwards
18:13 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Richard Henderson
18:11 Re: Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Phil Edwards
18:09 Re: m68k C++ exception handling Bernardo Innocenti
18:05 Re: Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc. Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Diego Novillo
17:22 Re: Version Number Joe Buck
17:21 Problem with shared libraries, exceptions, and global constructors Bernd Schmidt
17:05 gcc-ss-3.3-20030818 is now available gccadmin
17:03 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:49 Re: Where did output_add_string go? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Where did output_add_string go? Diego Novillo
16:09 Bug in array reference (Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED) H. J. Lu
15:48 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Scott Robert Ladd
15:42 Structure Alignment Bug in Sparc. Nitin Gupta
14:30 Re: How to find missing "? Stephen Biggs
12:51 RE: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
12:28 Re: How to find missing "? Andy Jackman
12:01 Re: DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Michael Matz
11:40 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Gunther Nikl
11:36 Re: How to find missing "? Andreas Schwab
10:50 How to find missing "? Andy Jackman
10:31 DF_DU_CHAIN | DF_UD_CHAIN flags in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
09:45 Re: m68k C++ exception handling Andreas Schwab
06:36 compile-server branch live Per Bothner
05:11 Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS Ian Lance Taylor

August 17, 2003
21:41 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Zdenek Dvorak
21:07 Re: Devel rebuild question Gerald Pfeifer
21:01 Re: Friendly install Gerald Pfeifer
20:52 Re: EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS Nathanael Nerode
20:05 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report David Edelsohn
20:03 Two questions about multilib, libstdc++.so, /lib/nof, and gcc-3.4-20030813 Dan Kegel
19:50 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Nathanael Nerode
19:06 Re: Friendly install Andrew Pinski
19:04 Re: A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED H. J. Lu
19:02 Re: Friendly install Michael Elizabeth Chastain
17:07 Re: Devel rebuild question Paul Brook
16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean Daniel Berlin
15:58 Devel rebuild question Lally Singh
12:50 Re: Friendly install Gerald Pfeifer
11:24 some types probs using 3.3.1 Ozzy
10:41 [tree-ssa] libbanshee seems to be not 64-bit clean Andreas Jaeger
07:37 A question on POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED H. J. Lu
05:50 Friendly install Miguel M.
02:11 m68k C++ exception handling Bernardo Innocenti
00:49 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Andreas Jaeger

August 16, 2003
20:32 re: Gcc installation problem Dan Kegel
18:12 Re: [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86 Zdenek Dvorak
17:24 [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on x86 Diego Novillo
15:01 Gcc installation problem Long Fei
14:08 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Jamie Lokier
11:34 Inquiry about RTL SRUTHY C.N.
10:17 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Erik Trulsson
09:53 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Gabriel Dos Reis
09:43 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Kai Henningsen
09:14 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16) Gabriel Dos Reis
08:59 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Sebastien Loisel
06:18 Re: Version Number Gerald Pfeifer
06:07 Version Number Miguel M.
01:39 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Jamie Lokier
00:09 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Loisel, Sebastien

August 15, 2003
23:54 [tree-ssa-cfg] Bootstrap failure on alpha Diego Novillo
23:46 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Loisel, Sebastien
23:06 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon (TOMORROW, Sat Jul 16) Zack Weinberg
19:17 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Mark Mitchell
19:03 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
18:54 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Mark Mitchell
18:34 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so David Mosberger
18:29 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Mark Mitchell
18:26 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
18:20 Re: C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Mark Mitchell
18:12 C++: Missing documentation for MODOP_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
17:03 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas Phil Edwards
16:20 gcc 3.3.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Richard Jackson
16:12 Gcc3.3 installation problem Long Fei
15:25 Re: 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined kaz Kojima
15:24 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas Andreas Schwab
15:15 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
14:04 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
13:39 3.4 build problem on sh4: warning: "ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT"redefined Dan Kegel
13:04 Re: 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS Andreas Jaeger
12:44 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code( Jan Hubicka
12:25 3_3-branch: Honor MIN_INLINE_INSNS Kurt Garloff
12:07 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code( Gabriel Dos Reis
11:18 Re: Expenses of unit-at-a-time Andrew Pinski
11:12 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Jan Hubicka
09:50 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas skaller
08:05 Expenses of unit-at-a-time (Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code( Jan Hubicka
08:04 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Phil Edwards
08:03 Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Gunther Nikl
05:14 Re: [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?) Alexandre Oliva
04:02 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Fergus Henderson
03:49 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Fergus Henderson
02:50 Another parallel bootstrap problem [was Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8] Bradley Lucier
02:21 EXTRA_HOST_FLAGS Mark Mitchell
01:36 link dependencies martin . schaffner
00:47 RE: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Loisel, Sebastien
00:25 Compiling glibc-2.3.2 with gcc-3.4 yields "string2.h:80: warning:`packed' attribute ignored" Dan Kegel
00:08 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Ian Lance Taylor

August 14, 2003
23:26 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
23:21 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Falk Hueffner
23:01 Re: Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Andrew Pinski
22:18 Fldcw, rounding and optimizations Loisel, Sebastien
22:03 Re: tree-dump inquiry Dan DaCosta
21:57 tree-dump inquiry Dan DaCosta
21:31 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so David Mosberger
20:54 Re: How does --with-sysroot work? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:51 Re: How does --with-sysroot work? H. J. Lu
20:38 Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify law
20:25 Re: [tree-ssa] objective-c gimplify Andrew Pinski
20:22 Re: Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files. Neil Booth
19:19 Fix CVU prefix for GenTrunk Richard Almquist
18:56 Re: gcj and xgamestation Martin Brain
18:42 [patch 3.4] PR8180: --without-headers broken (was: -Dinhibit_libcnot being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure?) Dan Kegel
18:41 Re: gcj and xgamestation Tom Tromey
18:22 Re: Problem with macro params containing commas Nathan Sidwell
18:18 Re: How does --with-sysroot work? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:17 How does --with-sysroot work? H. J. Lu
18:14 Re: gcj and xgamestation Geoffrey Poremba
18:01 Re: gcc version string on the branch is "experimental" Mark Mitchell
17:21 Macro expansion works differently on ASM and C files. gp
17:19 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Per Bothner
17:00 Re: gcj and xgamestation Anthony Green
16:55 m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax Bernardo Innocenti
16:53 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:49 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included Daniel Jacobowitz
16:47 Re: RFC - detect static data overruns Daniel Jacobowitz
16:45 Re: gcj and xgamestation Tom Tromey
16:11 Problem with macro params containing commas Jean-Eric Cuendet
16:08 Re: [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1 Frank Ch. Eigler
15:52 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Zack Weinberg
15:45 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:33 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
15:26 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8? Bradley Lucier
15:20 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
15:18 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
14:29 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Erik Trulsson
14:27 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
14:08 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
11:53 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Diego Novillo
10:21 [tree-ssa] libmudflap on NetBSD 1.6.1 Linus Sjöberg
10:11 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Jan Hubicka
09:47 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Gerald Pfeifer
09:46 creating 64 bit binaries on solaris 8 Mobarek, Khaled (Robert Walter
09:44 how do i subscribe ? Lee Manickum
08:20 compile on solarsi He HongFu
07:37 [libiberty] Why is configure trying to use binfmt-0090? Bernd Jendrissek
07:31 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
07:10 Is -Winline working at all? Roberto Bagnara
07:07 Re: handling of warnings skaller
07:03 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type skaller
06:54 Re: handling of warnings skaller
06:47 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Andreas Jaeger
06:44 Re: handling of warnings skaller
06:24 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Colin Douglas Howell
06:07 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed F. Schaefer
06:00 -Dinhibit_libc not being set in gcc-3.4/gcc/configure? Dan Kegel
05:15 Re: function addresses and ld.so Ian Lance Taylor
05:09 Re: SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8? Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:18 Delete xm-iq2000.h Zack Weinberg
02:32 Re: libgloss patches Andrew Pinski
02:27 libgloss patches Bernardo Innocenti
02:25 Re: 64-bit on ia-32 Fergus Henderson
02:13 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Mark Mitchell
01:58 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken (not anymore) Bernardo Innocenti
01:56 SMP multilib configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8? Bradley Lucier
00:35 Re: function addresses and ld.so Zack Weinberg
00:21 Re: function addresses and ld.so Andrew Pinski
00:13 Re: function addresses and ld.so Zack Weinberg

August 13, 2003
23:51 Re: function addresses and ld.so Richard Henderson
23:36 Re: function addresses and ld.so David Mosberger
23:13 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Joe Buck
22:59 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Mike Stump
22:45 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Gerald Pfeifer
22:36 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted? Gerald Pfeifer
22:34 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Daniel Berlin
22:31 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Andrew Pinski
22:31 build status additions for GCC 3.3.1 Janis Johnson
22:28 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Gerald Pfeifer
22:26 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Joe Buck
22:20 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Joe Buck
22:20 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Andrew Pinski
22:09 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Andrew Pinski
21:57 [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Zdenek Dvorak
21:55 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Jason Merrill
21:44 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Joe Buck
21:41 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Matthew Wilcox
21:25 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? John David Anglin
21:19 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? John David Anglin
21:19 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Andrew Pinski
21:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Daniel Berlin
21:06 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Matthew Wilcox
20:59 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Andrew Pinski
20:58 Re: [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Jason Merrill
20:49 Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? John David Anglin
20:49 Re: handling of warnings Matt Austern
20:29 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted? Peter Niemayer
19:57 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type Matt Austern
19:53 [tree-ssa]: Invalid GIMPLE generated by C++ front end Daniel Berlin
19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin Andrew Pinski
19:20 Re: sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible? Andrew Pinski
19:19 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure /ice on cygwin Joost VandeVondele
18:32 Re: how to compile the C++ program in Linux tm_gccmail
18:17 gcj and xgamestation Geoffrey Poremba
18:16 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
18:15 re: no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option Dan Kegel
18:13 How to compile the C++ program in Linux Yang, Huaining
18:11 how to compile the C++ program in Linux Yang, Huaining
17:52 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
17:17 Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++? Matthew Wilcox
17:01 gcc-ss-3.4-20030813 is now available gccadmin
16:45 Re: fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh? Bruce Korb
16:35 sizeof array-typed function parameter: Warning possible? Claus Fischer
16:14 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14 Re: handling of warnings Gerald Pfeifer
16:07 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Scott Robert Ladd
16:07 Re: handling of warnings skaller
16:02 Re: handling of warnings Michael Matz
15:56 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
15:47 Re: handling of warnings skaller
15:44 Re: Porting gcc Ben Elliston
15:30 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
15:14 Successful build of gcc 3.3.1 on i686-pc-cygwin Dimitry Andric
15:02 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Gabriel Dos Reis
14:56 Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual Kelley Cook
14:52 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
14:52 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
14:26 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
14:16 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Andrew Pinski
14:14 Re: handling of warnings skaller
14:10 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Theodore Papadopoulo
14:01 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
13:59 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
13:39 Re: handling of warnings skaller
13:31 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Michael Matz
13:16 gcc 2.95 question about .note section root
13:13 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Diego Novillo
13:13 Re: Larger Compilations / Speed Gerald Pfeifer
13:06 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Gabriel Dos Reis
13:06 Larger Compilations / Speed Frank-René Schäfer
12:53 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
12:41 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Michael Matz
12:35 Re: handling of warnings skaller
12:23 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Gabriel Dos Reis
12:18 Re: handling of warnings skaller
12:15 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
12:14 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
12:09 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
11:29 duplicate entry in gcc manual Martijn
11:29 Re: duplicate entry in gcc manual Martijn
11:27 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
11:19 Re: handling of warnings Andrew Pinski
11:15 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Andrew Pinski
11:12 Re: handling of warnings skaller
11:03 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Michael Matz
10:53 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour skaller
09:46 Re: Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Igor Bukanov
08:37 Porting gcc Petar Penchev
08:26 Re: gcov questions Nathan Sidwell
08:22 gcc version string on the branch is "experimental" Matthias Klose
04:26 GCC 3.3.1: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC Luca Saiu
04:23 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens) Carlo Florendo
04:18 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens) Carlo Florendo
04:11 Re: scanf issue (store only specified tokens) Zack Weinberg
04:09 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Bradley Lucier
03:59 scanf issue (store only specified tokens) Carlo Florendo
01:07 gcov questions Ed Swierk
00:58 Re: handling of warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
00:50 Request for a C++ warning for undefined behaviour Michael Matz
00:48 Re: biarch gcc Alan Modra

August 12, 2003
23:45 Re: [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Diego Novillo
23:36 [tree-ssa] -> [tree-ssa-cfg] Zdenek Dvorak
23:31 Re: 64-bit on ia-32 Andrew Pinski
23:31 Re: function addresses and ld.so Andrew Pinski
23:29 handling of warnings skaller
23:27 Re: function addresses and ld.so Matthew Wilcox
23:26 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
22:48 Re: biarch gcc Michael Matz
22:38 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Michael Matz
22:35 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Scott Robert Ladd
22:28 64-bit on ia-32 Johan Rydberg
22:24 function addresses and ld.so Camm Maguire
22:17 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Janis Johnson
22:14 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
22:05 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report tm_gccmail
21:49 Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources Gerald Pfeifer
21:45 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0 Janis Johnson
21:40 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Michael Meissner
21:39 Re: gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted? Gerald Pfeifer
21:22 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type skaller
21:19 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report tm_gccmail
21:15 fixinc: svr4_ftw and _STYPES: huh? Nathanael Nerode
21:09 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Ian Lance Taylor
20:40 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Nathanael Nerode
20:33 Re: Profiling gcc building Mozilla Jim Wilson
20:22 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
20:12 Re: biarch gcc Peter Bergner
19:53 Re: How to use protoize ? Jim Wilson
19:41 Re: gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0 Shrisha Rao
18:51 Profiling gcc building Mozilla Will Cohen
18:40 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report tm_gccmail
18:19 Re: MCF5407 porting.. tm_gccmail
17:39 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
17:22 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
17:18 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
16:57 no call-graph produced when C++ program compiled with -pg option Vaughn, David A
16:45 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Scott Robert Ladd
16:25 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Nathanael Nerode
16:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
16:10 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug? Jakub Jelinek
16:09 Re: Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Diego Novillo
16:02 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug? Volker Reichelt
15:51 Re: biarch gcc H. J. Lu
15:50 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Scott Robert Ladd
15:49 Re: biarch gcc Jakub Jelinek
15:47 Re: Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug? Tolga Dalman
15:46 Re: biarch gcc Andreas Jaeger
15:32 Trouble with -pedantic and #include<cmath>, GCC or GLIBC bug? Volker Reichelt
15:27 Re: biarch gcc Eric Christopher
15:02 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link? cgd
14:58 biarch gcc Alan Modra
14:50 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler Andrew Pinski
14:36 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler Andrew Haley
14:00 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Pop Sébastian
13:53 Re: Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler Gerald Pfeifer
13:49 MCF5407 BDM cable.. software
13:38 Unit-at-a-time compilation Andrew Haley
13:21 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type Fergus Henderson
12:57 Possible GPL infringment in the HighTec GNU compiler Laurent Pinchart
12:27 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Benjamin Kosnik
11:24 Re: Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Gabriel Dos Reis
10:35 Re: invalid offsetof from non-POD type skaller
09:19 MCF5407 porting.. software
07:27 Re[4]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Georgy Yunayev
06:56 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink? Eric Christopher
06:48 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
06:47 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Phil Edwards
06:44 Re: Testcases and approval Nathanael Nerode
06:34 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of needto link? cgd
06:32 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Nathanael Nerode
06:31 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux. Phil Edwards
06:31 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need to link? Phil Edwards
06:27 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux. Eric Christopher
06:26 Re: probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink? Eric Christopher
06:20 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux. Nathanael Nerode
06:19 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
06:08 probs cross-building current libstdc++-v3, because of need tolink? cgd
06:06 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Nathanael Nerode
05:38 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021) Jim Wilson
01:07 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Scott Robert Ladd
01:05 Optimal Optimizations: A Very Preliminary Report Scott Robert Ladd
00:30 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Andrew Pinski
00:17 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating

August 11, 2003
23:37 Re: How to use Inline assembly? tm_gccmail
23:36 Re: SH3 memory allocation tm_gccmail
23:32 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
23:14 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
23:13 Re: Opening large files with C Rayson Ho
23:11 Re: GCC Framework support in Linux Mike Stump
23:09 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Scott Robert Ladd
23:08 Re: Opening large files with C Mike Stump
23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Michael Matz
22:53 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on GNU/Linux Red Hat 9.0 Shrisha Rao
22:50 Copyright Assignment Pauli
22:46 Opening large files with C Vladimir Espinosa Angarica
22:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
22:29 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.) Daniel Berlin
22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Michael Matz
22:18 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included Eric Christopher
22:00 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.) Andrew MacLeod
21:46 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
21:33 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
21:25 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
21:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
21:19 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.) Daniel Berlin
21:11 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included Richard Sandiford
21:00 gcc-3.3.1.tar.bz2 file on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/ tainted? Peter Niemayer
20:55 Re: SH3 memory allocation Jim Wilson
20:54 Re: How to use protoize ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:53 Re: [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations(was Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.) Andrew MacLeod
20:47 Re: How to use Inline assembly? Jim Wilson
20:43 Re: upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture Jim Wilson
20:40 Re: What is the correct logic for casesi Jim Wilson
20:39 [tree-ssa][PATCH] Let remove_stmt not always remoev annotations (wasRe: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.) Daniel Berlin
20:34 Re: Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Andrew Pinski
20:26 Re: How to use protoize ? Jim Wilson
20:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
20:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Daniel Berlin
20:16 Analyzing Optimization: What's New in 3.4? Scott Robert Ladd
20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
20:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
20:12 Issues with latest gcc/glibc and static linking (modutils) Martin Schlemmer
20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
20:07 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
20:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
20:04 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
20:03 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
20:00 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
19:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
19:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
19:35 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
19:23 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
19:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
19:22 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
19:10 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
19:08 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
19:02 Re: Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources Andreas Schwab
18:49 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
18:38 Re: Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Jim Wilson
18:35 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
18:32 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
18:20 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew MacLeod
18:20 Published MD5 checksums for GCC 3.3.1 sources Jim Fischer
18:18 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Benjamin Kosnik
17:58 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
17:51 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included Eric Christopher
17:51 Testcases and approval Andrew Pinski
17:46 Re: PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Geoff Keating
17:41 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Andrew MacLeod
17:28 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included David Wuertele
17:11 gcc-ss-3.3-20030811 is now available gccadmin
17:11 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Gerald Pfeifer
17:09 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Martin
17:04 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Benjamin Kosnik
16:44 Re: dfa scheduler, bundling and packing Vladimir Makarov
16:38 Re: Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE) Janis Johnson
16:35 Re: comments on onlinedocs webpage Gerald Pfeifer
16:26 Re: Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Janis Johnson
16:17 dfa scheduler, bundling and packing Richard Henderson
16:13 Re: [uClibc] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc Manuel Novoa III
16:11 Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly? Gerald Pfeifer
15:53 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Kelley Cook
15:52 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Michael Matz
15:33 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
15:30 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
15:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
15:00 Updated code-size benchmark (CSiBE) Arpad Beszedes
14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit law
13:45 RE: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav
13:05 GCC 3.3.1: bootstrap success report for GNU/Linux on SuperH kaz Kojima
12:36 SH3 memory allocation Raul Ito
11:30 Re: gcc and c4x .. Svein E. Seldal
11:09 gcc and c4x .. Lars Segerlund
10:47 Re: GCC 3.3.1 Released Gerald Pfeifer
10:31 How to use Inline assembly? eny lee
10:15 Re: Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
09:57 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew Haley
09:57 Re: RFC - detect static data overruns Gerald Pfeifer
08:39 Re: gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included Richard Sandiford
08:21 Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Georgy Yunayev
07:06 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
06:34 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Brad Lucier
06:22 PCH not being used, but I can't tell why Phil Edwards
06:12 upgrading from gcc-3.2 to anything newer on PowerPC architecture Michal Schulz
05:19 Thinko on http://gcc.gnu.org Stephan T. Lavavej
00:51 Re: 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly? Bernardo Innocenti
00:23 Fwd: [Introspector-developers] ANN : Call for help with a porting of VCG to Dotgnu pnet/c James Michael DuPont

August 10, 2003
23:56 What is the correct logic for casesi Marty Hauff
23:17 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
23:06 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
22:57 3.4 snapshots generated incorrectly? Bernardo Innocenti
21:50 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Diego Novillo
21:41 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Daniel Berlin
21:40 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
21:38 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Diego Novillo
21:33 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Daniel Berlin
21:31 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Daniel Berlin
21:25 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Diego Novillo
21:21 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC Phil Edwards
21:17 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Daniel Berlin
21:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Diego Novillo
20:45 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC Phil Edwards
20:35 [tree-ssa]: Dominator opts change LHS without changing VDEF's Daniel Berlin
20:28 gcc-3.3 mipsel -msoft-float broken? test case included David Wuertele
20:27 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Valery A.Khamenya
20:12 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Diego Novillo
20:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Pop Sébastian
19:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
19:40 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link Gabriel Dos Reis
19:38 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Daniel Berlin
19:03 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
19:00 Re: How to use protoize ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:58 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Fergus Henderson
18:56 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Lars Brinkhoff
18:48 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolvedsymbols during link Bruno . Voigt
18:39 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC Andreas Jaeger
18:03 Re: GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbols during link Gabriel Dos Reis
18:01 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Daniel Berlin
17:59 Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change. Daniel Berlin
17:48 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Valery A.Khamenya
17:31 Re: autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
17:10 Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Diego Novillo
17:07 Re: [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change. Diego Novillo
17:01 GCC 3.3.1: basic_string<unsigned char> class member var: unresolved symbolsduring link Bruno . Voigt
16:35 Re: is movccsi a standard names? Richard Earnshaw
15:41 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
15:31 autoconf 2.57 & setting of CC Richard Sandiford
13:44 Re: 3.3.1 build successes Dr. Franz Fehringer
13:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
13:00 [tree-ssa]: I've got LICM done, but it requires Zdenek's changes Daniel Berlin
11:24 Dead link on the libstdc++-v3 homepage Askadar
10:25 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 Holger Weiss
09:26 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
08:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
08:06 Re: CHECK_DEAD_NOTES abort in sched1 for sh-elf Jim Wilson
07:43 Re: How to use protoize ? Jim Wilson
07:35 Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test kaz Kojima
07:22 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Valery A.Khamenya
06:55 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Jim Wilson
06:48 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
06:44 Re: [uClinux-dev] GCC target for uClinux with uClibc Christoph Hellwig
06:35 Re: questions Jim Wilson
06:30 Re: SH: may miscompile zero extension and test Jim Wilson
06:03 Re: is movccsi a standard names? Jim Wilson
05:42 [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass. Daniel Berlin
05:07 Re[2]: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Valery A.Khamenya
00:28 How to use protoize ? Kaveh R. Ghazi

August 09, 2003
23:48 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
23:40 [tree-ssa]: Fix for PTA broken by find_referenced_vars change. Daniel Berlin
23:35 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.1/sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Holger Weiss
23:26 why are you waiting aa31362
23:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
22:35 GCC target for uClinux with uClibc Bernardo Innocenti
21:40 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Phil Edwards
21:24 Re: GCC Framework support in Linux Neil Booth
20:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
20:00 Re: RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Per Bothner
19:08 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Matt Kraai
18:19 Re: Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Andrew Pinski
18:15 Cannot build mainline gcc on x86 linux Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav
18:11 Re: Commit approval pls: PR 9877, 8336, plus other stuff Tom Tromey
17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
17:21 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
17:18 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
16:28 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
14:53 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
13:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
13:02 RTL/tree (from gcc) and Scheme Valery A.Khamenya
11:56 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
08:49 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
08:00 SH: may miscompile zero extension and test kaz Kojima
07:15 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Phil Edwards
07:15 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Phil Edwards
02:09 Re: 3.3.1 build successes John David Anglin
01:37 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20030808snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
01:24 gcc 3.3.1 successfully installed on PowerPC MacOSX 10.2.6/Darwin 6.6 Shrisha Rao
01:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
01:02 3.3.1 build successes Joe Buck
00:26 additions to 3.2 and 3.3 build status lists Janis Johnson

August 08, 2003
23:53 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files Geoff Keating
23:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
23:12 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
23:08 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
21:21 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
21:19 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Henderson
21:08 Re: On inlining in C++ Kevin Atkinson
20:50 questions The Deus
20:37 Re: On inlining in C++ Marc Espie
20:24 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes Alexandre Oliva
20:16 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Kean Johnston
20:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
20:05 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
19:35 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4 tm_gccmail
19:05 Re: GCC 3.3 branch open Mark Mitchell
19:03 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Phil Edwards
19:02 Re: GCC 3.3 branch open Kelley Cook
18:42 Re: libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
18:17 Re: GCC Bernardo Innocenti
18:09 GCC 3.3 branch open Mark Mitchell
17:24 [tree-ssa] Handling of variable scopes? Zdenek Dvorak
17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
17:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
15:10 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4 Bernardo Innocenti
14:39 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Scott Robert Ladd
14:00 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4 Bernardo Innocenti
12:51 RE: 3.3.1 build failure on SuSE 2.4.20 Marshall, Simon
11:16 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files Greg Schafer
10:48 3.3.1 build failure on SuSE 2.4.20 Marshall, Simon
08:17 Re: 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files Volker Reichelt
07:06 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes Kean Johnston
06:26 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically hartmut . schirmer
04:54 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically Jim Wilson
04:51 3.3.1 - random bytes in object files Greg Schafer
04:11 Re: comments on onlinedocs webpage Jim Wilson
03:41 libstdc++ multilib install broken Bernardo Innocenti
03:04 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes Alan Modra
02:52 Re: Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4 Aaron Lehmann
02:39 Big kernel size increase with gcc 3.4 Bernardo Innocenti
02:13 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help Geoff Keating
01:46 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
00:48 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help Zack Weinberg
00:04 RFC - detect static data overruns Fred Fish

August 07, 2003
23:39 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
23:21 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help Geoff Keating
23:19 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
23:03 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
22:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
22:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Jason Merrill
22:45 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
22:23 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
21:50 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Chris Lattner
21:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Henderson
21:30 Re: GCC Buzilla Modifications Daniel Berlin
21:27 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
21:24 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Richard Henderson
21:08 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Jason Merrill
20:59 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help Zack Weinberg
20:59 GCC Buzilla Modifications Mark Mitchell
20:41 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Geoff Keating
20:31 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
20:30 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Henderson
19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
19:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
19:33 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Joe Buck
19:30 Re: intermodule and comptypes - need some help Geoff Keating
19:29 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
19:24 Re: On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Nathanael Nerode
19:22 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Geoff Keating
19:20 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Nathanael Nerode
19:16 Re: GCC Weekly News? Andrew Shewmaker
19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Nathanael Nerode
19:01 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zdenek Dvorak
18:56 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
18:51 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Jason Merrill
18:16 Re: rpath and libtool == testsuite woes Alexandre Oliva
15:42 Re: cross compiler missing header? Michael Eager
13:42 Test email (should bounce) Bruce Korb
13:18 CHECK_DEAD_NOTES abort in sched1 for sh-elf Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
13:11 On inlining in C++ with unit-at-a-time code Jan Hubicka
13:10 Re: GCC Weekly News? Steven Bosscher
07:01 intermodule and comptypes - need some help Zack Weinberg
05:32 rpath and libtool == testsuite woes Alan Modra
01:23 business sns
01:09 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
01:07 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
01:05 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
00:43 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
00:40 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
00:38 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
00:16 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Zack Weinberg

August 06, 2003
23:57 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Zack Weinberg
23:57 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Zack Weinberg
23:56 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Douglas B Rupp
23:47 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Douglas B Rupp
23:45 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Zack Weinberg
23:45 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Douglas B Rupp
23:42 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Douglas B Rupp
23:38 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Zack Weinberg
23:13 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Andrew Pinski
23:11 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Steven Bosscher
22:52 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
22:41 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Pop Sébastian
22:14 Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Zack Weinberg
21:58 GCC Target for ZSPxxx DSP core ken . miller
21:37 [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit Diego Novillo
20:59 Re: Problem in split_basic_block Richard Henderson
19:49 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
19:11 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include Gerald Pfeifer
18:56 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
18:53 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
18:40 Re: On inlining in C++ Alexandre Oliva
18:06 Re: undefined symbol sami ozen
16:59 gcc-ss-3.4-20030806 is now available gccadmin
16:58 Re: undefined symbol Janis Johnson
16:51 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Joe Buck
16:47 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
16:47 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
16:37 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Joe Buck
16:35 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
16:31 Re: [tree-ssa] CFG cleanup (was: Re: clean) law
16:20 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
15:47 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Mark Mitchell
15:44 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Gerald Pfeifer
15:04 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Mark Mitchell
15:01 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Joe Wong
14:17 Re: __declspec(selectany) Dimitrie O. Paun
13:57 Re: Dominator Information in new-ra Daniel Berlin
13:53 Re: __declspec(selectany) Ove Kaaven
13:44 Re: GCC Weekly News? Aldy Hernandez
13:05 [tree-ssa] CFG cleanup (was: Re: clean) Steven Bosscher
12:45 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
12:26 Re: Dominator Information in new-ra Michael Matz
11:51 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Steven Bosscher
11:51 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Andrew Pinski
11:34 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Joe Wong
10:10 Re: Bug report - How to attach a file? Gerald Pfeifer
09:30 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Earnshaw
09:26 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
09:17 Re: GCC Weekly News? Lars Segerlund
09:07 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Earnshaw
08:55 Re: On inlining in C++ Gerald Pfeifer
08:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
07:53 Re: PCH magic numbers Phil Edwards
07:42 Re: On inlining in C++ Steven Bosscher
07:37 Re: where is the "tree"'s definition? Steven Bosscher
07:32 Re: __declspec(selectany) Boaz Harrosh
07:22 undefined symbol sami ozen
07:14 undefined symbol sami ozen
07:03 Re: PCH magic numbers Geoff Keating
06:57 Testsuite: separating optimization tests from correctness tests? Nathanael Nerode
06:22 Re: __declspec(selectany) Jon Bright
06:20 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Andrew Pinski
06:19 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Joe Wong
05:37 Stack walking help Paul Govereau
05:34 Re: attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Andrew Pinski
05:31 attribute ((constructor)) does not work in C++? Joe Wong
05:13 Re: __declspec(selectany) Dimitrie O. Paun
05:04 Re: __declspec(selectany) Dan Kegel
05:02 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for? Kean Johnston
04:40 Re: __declspec(selectany) Dimitrie O. Paun
04:37 Re: On inlining in C++ Andreas Jaeger
04:31 Re: Gcc optimization flags Zack Weinberg
04:18 Re: __declspec(selectany) Dan Kegel
03:26 Re: __declspec(selectany) Fergus Henderson
03:01 Re: Gcc optimization flags Scott Robert Ladd
03:01 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
02:52 Re: PCH magic numbers Andrew Pinski
02:50 Re: Gcc optimization flags Erik Trulsson
02:47 Re: PCH magic numbers Phil Edwards
02:36 Re: PCH magic numbers Devang Patel
02:31 Gcc optimization flags Long Fei
02:20 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
02:19 PCH magic numbers Phil Edwards
02:15 Re: On inlining in C++ Andrew Pinski
02:03 Re: On inlining in C++ Scott Robert Ladd
02:02 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
02:00 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
01:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Joe Buck
01:34 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
01:24 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
01:15 Re: where is the "tree"'s definition? Zack Weinberg
00:57 where is the "tree"'s definition? He HongFu

August 05, 2003
22:44 Re: GCC Weekly News? Phil Edwards
22:17 re: __declspec(selectany) Dan Kegel
21:41 Re: On inlining in C++ Mike Stump
21:41 GCC Weekly News? Gerald Pfeifer
21:12 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Kai Henningsen
21:12 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Kai Henningsen
20:10 Re: No longer able to detect exception model right Phil Edwards
19:53 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:46 Re: On inlining in C++ Scott Robert Ladd
19:42 Commit approval pls: PR 9877, 8336, plus other stuff J. Kean Johnston
19:33 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: On inlining in C++ Steven Bosscher
19:10 Re: On inlining in C++ Mike Stump
18:39 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?) Gerald Pfeifer
18:17 Re: On inlining in C++ Geoff Keating
18:13 Re: On inlining in C++ Matthias Benkmann
18:03 Re: On inlining in C++ Matthias Benkmann
17:57 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:49 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:43 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for? Kean Johnston
17:28 Re: On inlining in C++ Scott Robert Ladd
17:26 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:06 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for? Anthony Green
16:58 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
16:50 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:46 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
16:23 Re: On inlining in C++ Scott Robert Ladd
16:22 cross compiler missing header? Deskin Miller
16:15 gcc-core-3.3.tar.bz2 has wrong NEWS file (3.2.2) The Worm
14:56 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
14:51 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
14:49 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
13:44 No longer able to detect exception model right Andrew Pinski
13:39 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:29 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
13:25 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Diego Novillo
13:22 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:15 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
13:09 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:00 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
12:59 Re: tree-ssa MacOS X build Andrew Pinski
12:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Joseph S. Myers
12:19 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?) Joseph S. Myers
12:06 Re: libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for? Kean Johnston
11:59 Re: On inlining in C++ Matthias Benkmann
11:45 tree-ssa MacOS X build Jeffrey . S . Whitaker
10:06 simple-declaration (was: Re: On inlining in C++) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03 libffi/include/Makefile.am - hack_DATA - whats it for? Kean Johnston
09:57 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
09:54 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
09:37 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Gerald Pfeifer
09:37 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
09:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Richard Earnshaw
09:24 Dominator Information in new-ra Mukta Punjani, Noida
08:59 Re: [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build Linus Sjöberg
08:55 Re: On inlining in C++ Thomas Kunert
08:55 Re: On inlining in C++ Steven Bosscher
08:39 Re: [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build Pop Sébastian
08:26 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Guenther
07:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Lars Segerlund
07:44 Re: On inlining in C++ Richard Sandiford
07:43 [tree-ssa] gcc/java/except.c does not build Linus Sjöberg
07:39 Re: processor architects say it's hard to work with us? Lars Segerlund
07:37 Re: On inlining in C++ Thomas Kunert
07:11 RE: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?) S. Bosscher
06:58 Re: what mailing list to follow (for gcc-gfortran ?) Joost VandeVondele
05:49 Re: On inlining in C++ Mike Stump
03:41 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
03:38 is movccsi a standard names? Shen Hui
03:28 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Mark Mitchell
03:17 Class definitions in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:00 Re: bugzilla mail loop Daniel Berlin
03:00 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Robert Dewar
02:51 Bugzilla Bug 605 fun fixed Daniel Berlin
02:44 Re: bugzilla mail loop Phil Edwards
02:41 bugzilla mail loop Alan Modra
00:47 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? law

August 04, 2003
22:57 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Joe Buck
22:49 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Nathanael Nerode
22:28 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:23 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
22:14 Re: std::pow implementation tm_gccmail
22:05 Re: std::pow implementation Mark Hahn
22:04 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Steven Bosscher
21:48 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Robert Dewar
21:00 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Matt Kraai
20:44 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Nathanael Nerode
20:33 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Diego Novillo
20:27 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Steven Bosscher
20:24 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Robert Dewar
20:20 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Diego Novillo
20:18 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Zack Weinberg
20:11 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status law
20:02 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Steven Bosscher
19:55 Re: [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: System call comparison Mike Stump
19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Diego Novillo
19:29 Re: library creation Phil Edwards
19:27 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Phil Edwards
19:22 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Phil Edwards
19:21 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Steven Bosscher
19:19 [libiberty copyright assignment audit] cp-demangle.c status Nathanael Nerode
19:12 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
19:09 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Geoff Keating
19:01 library creation Marcelo Zannin da Rosa
19:00 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
18:46 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: On inlining in C++ Geoff Keating
18:44 Re: std::pow implementation Bernd Schmidt
18:42 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:38 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Robert Dewar
18:36 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Laurent GUERBY
18:35 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Alexandre Oliva
18:33 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Diego Novillo
18:31 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
18:30 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
18:29 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
18:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Paul Brook
18:28 Re: On inlining in C++ Bernd Schmidt
18:27 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:22 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Robert Dewar
18:21 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
18:21 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Robert Dewar
18:19 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
18:17 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
18:15 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
18:14 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
18:12 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:09 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:09 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
18:08 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Robert Dewar
18:05 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
18:05 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:59 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
17:57 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Laurent GUERBY
17:54 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:53 Re: On inlining in C++ Daniel Jacobowitz
17:52 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
17:52 Re: On inlining in C++ Daniel Berlin
17:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
17:50 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:48 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:44 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:43 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:41 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
17:40 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:39 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
17:38 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:36 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:35 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:35 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
17:34 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
17:33 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
17:33 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:28 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:26 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:22 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:21 Re: On inlining in C++ Andrew Haley
17:19 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
17:18 Re: On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux) Paul Jarc
17:12 Re: GCC Joe Buck
17:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Zdenek Dvorak
17:11 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:08 processor architects say it's hard to work with us? Joe Buck
17:05 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030804 is now available gccadmin
17:03 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
17:02 Re: On inlining in C++ Andrew Haley
16:55 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Gerald Pfeifer
16:53 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
16:50 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
16:46 Re: std::pow implementation Bernd Schmidt
16:45 Re: LD_PROFILE usage Alexandre Oliva
16:44 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
16:43 Re: On inlining in C++ Andrew Haley
16:39 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
16:38 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
16:37 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Joe Buck
16:36 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Joe Buck
16:35 Re: On inlining in C++ Robert Dewar
16:34 Re: [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? law
16:31 Re: On inlining in C++ Joe Buck
16:30 Re: Source code for GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:09 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
15:15 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Andrew Pinski
15:14 Re: GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1 David Edelsohn
15:13 [tree-ssa] How to increase PHI capacity? Steven Bosscher
14:58 Source code for GCC Антон
14:50 LD_PROFILE usage Amol Lad
14:47 The Zen of Optimizing C++ - What is the sound of one compiler inlining? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:39 Re: std::pow implementation Daniel Berlin
14:32 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:56 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Andrew Pinski
13:52 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
13:51 Re: std::pow implementation Theodore Papadopoulo
13:39 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Michael Matz
13:11 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Gabriel Dos Reis
13:07 On inlining in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
13:06 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Michael Matz
12:55 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Alexandre Oliva
12:38 First? gfortran build for mips-sgi-irix6.5 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
12:35 Re: std::pow implementation Theodore Papadopoulo
12:09 Re: gcc/gcc version.c Mark Mitchell
11:55 Re: gcc/gcc version.c Andrew Pinski
11:22 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Andrew Morton
11:14 Re: missed uninitialised variable warning Michael Matz
08:49 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
07:50 Re: GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1 Joerg . Richter
07:42 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Linus Sjöberg
07:34 GCC 2.9 on AIX 5L V5.1 Helmut Schrger
05:47 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1/3.4 ColdFire toolchain for uClinux (20030804 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
05:46 Re: GCC Zack Weinberg
04:56 missed uninitialised variable warning Andrew Morton
04:44 Re: C++ STD headers not being generated for multilib arm-elf cross compiler Phil Edwards
04:42 Re: GCC David O'Brien
03:06 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Phil Edwards
02:45 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Frank Heckenbach

August 03, 2003
23:00 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Geoff Keating
21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Daniel Berlin
21:30 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
21:28 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Daniel Berlin
21:25 System call comparison Neil Booth
20:39 Re: Implementing real*16 in Fortran Erik Schnetter
20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Chris Lattner
20:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Pop Sébastian
19:37 C++ STD headers not being generated for multilib arm-elf cross compiler Pablo Bleyer Kocik
18:54 Re: Implementing real*16 in Fortran Jakub Jelinek
18:09 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Andreas Jaeger
17:24 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Nathanael Nerode
16:52 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Nathanael Nerode
16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Zdenek Dvorak
16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Zdenek Dvorak
16:26 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux) Zack Weinberg
16:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Steven Bosscher
16:20 Successful build of gcc 3.2.3 on Slackware 9.0 Ged Haywood
16:15 re: cross-compiling libiberty in gcc-3.4 Dan Kegel
16:12 GCC Release Status (2003-08-03) Mark Mitchell
15:16 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Andreas Jaeger
14:48 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Nathanael Nerode
14:09 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Andreas Jaeger
13:46 Re: multilibbing libgfortran Alexandre Oliva
13:44 Re: gcc 3.2.3 (Linux) Alexandre Oliva
12:57 ADDRESSOF handling in alpha_expand_block_move Richard Kenner
12:30 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
11:25 gcc 3.2.3 (Linux) Piotr Gogolewski
11:18 Implementing real*16 in Fortran Erik Schnetter
09:14 multilibbing libgfortran Andreas Jaeger
06:38 cross-compiling libiberty in gcc-3.4 Bernardo Innocenti
02:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Diego Novillo
01:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Pop Sébastian

August 02, 2003
23:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Diego Novillo
23:31 [tree-ssa] Syntactic structures Zdenek Dvorak
22:34 Fast Free Eclipse Prize Mark Wielaard
17:21 built gcc-3.2.3 on hpux10.20 successfully Tobias Jordan
15:41 Re: Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port Chris Devers
11:16 Re: Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port Falk Hueffner
10:35 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Marc Espie
03:24 Re: Efficacy of optimizations. Scott Robert Ladd
01:37 Re: need function decl/type in get_parm_info Zack Weinberg
00:42 on vacation... DJ Delorie
00:30 need function decl/type in get_parm_info DJ Delorie

August 01, 2003
23:07 Followup on cfg splitting problem and proposed patch Richard Kenner
22:59 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? Zack Weinberg
22:17 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? Diego Novillo
22:15 Problem in split_basic_block Richard Kenner
22:13 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? DJ Delorie
21:40 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Laurent GUERBY
21:23 Re: Efficacy of optimizations. tm_gccmail
21:08 Efficacy of optimizations. kernel_learner
20:46 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:42 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? Andrew Pinski
20:38 Re: current_function_decl or cfun->decl? Zack Weinberg
20:33 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?) tm_gccmail
20:10 current_function_decl or cfun->decl? DJ Delorie
19:49 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Paolo Carlini
19:33 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Geoff Keating
19:24 RE: gcc or g77 in MS Windows tm_gccmail
18:11 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Andrew Pinski
18:10 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error law
16:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues Dorit Naishlos
15:47 Re: gcc or g77 in MS Windows Colin Douglas Howell
15:39 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def Roger Sayle
15:25 RE: gcc or g77 in MS Windows Tiwary, Rajiv
15:17 Re: gcc or g77 in MS Windows Philipp Thomas
14:47 Re: GCC cgd
14:07 gcc or g77 in MS Windows Tiwary, Rajiv
13:55 [tree-ssa] java bytecode tests failures Andrew Haley
13:45 [tree-ssa] java bytecode tests failures Diego Novillo
11:37 Re: GCC Martin
11:13 Re: GCC Dave Hudson
10:31 Re: Using conditional instructions in a macro Alexandre Oliva
10:20 Using conditional instructions in a macro Pascal Francq
09:56 Re: GCC Robert Dewar
09:52 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Robert Dewar
08:58 [IA32] -fschedule-insns and -fschedule-insns2... Daniel Blueman
08:45 Re: GCC Martin
08:34 Re: different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Nathan Sidwell
07:56 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Paolo Carlini
04:17 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Robert Dewar
04:01 Java PRs Tom Tromey
03:38 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:03 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Richard Kenner
02:59 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Michael Matz
02:49 Re: [PATCH] Optimize x*x*x*x*x*x using 3 multiplications. Richard Kenner
02:29 Re: duplicates of list messages Christopher Faylor
01:22 duplicates of list messages Colin Douglas Howell
00:41 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Tom Tromey
00:06 Re: Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def Roger Sayle


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3