This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC

From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap at osdl dot org>
To: <aaronl at vitelus dot com>
Cc: <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: GCC
References: <1059633859.3637.8.camel@steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl> <20030731064707.GA20389@vitelus.com>

> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 08:44:19AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> I'm not sure why they think it is so difficult.  It would seem that if the
>> patch is architecture-specific and well-formed (ie. conforming to the
>> coding style, etc), it typically just goes in, period.  And patches to
>> target-independent code may go through one or two review cycles, but
>> again, if the patch looks good, it goes in.  At least, I got the
>> impression that patches are seldomly rejected.
>
> Copyright assignments.

Yes, it seemed to be more about legal issues
than working with the gcc developers.

~Randy

References:
- GCC
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC
  - From: Aaron Lehmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]