This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 30 Jul 2003 15:51:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: std::pow implementation
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307301543450.561-100000@goofy>
Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
| > | With Gaby's suggested interpretation, the compiler has *no* choice; it
| > | must obey the inlining constraint because the programmer always knows
| > | better... Even when prepared to admit that he doesn't.
| >
| > That assertion is wrong.
|
| Which one? That the compiler has no choice?
Mostly. See my answer to (the other) Richard.
-- Gaby