This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
On Jul 30, 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> | Because (1) inline is implicit in C++,
> No, that is *your* invention. Inline is NOT implicit.
For a member function defined inside the class body, it is.
[dcl.fct.spec]/3 Sorry that I wasn't clear.
> Only because you have decided to transmute the original meaning of C++.
I haven't chosen anything, I just quoted the C Standard. It clearly
calls for compiler's effort towards fast execution over inline
substitution. Compared with that, what you claim to be C++'s intended
meaning (inline even if the resulting code is worse) seems as a very
misguided idea.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer