This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: std::pow implementation


Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:

| On Jul 29, 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
| 
| > The point you seem to be missing is that whether a function is inlined
| > depends on the context of use -- not just on its intrinsinc complexity.
| > That is what is absurd.  Not the mere statement of that fact.
| 
| The context of use can make a *lot* of difference on whether it's
| worth to inline a function or not.

But, why don't you trust the programmer?  Why do you insist that you
know better than the programmer?

| Consider a very complex function
| that takes a boolean argument, used to enable or disable most of the
| complexity in the function.  If the caller passes a false boolean
| argument, the function would simplify to pretty much nothing.

This is not a convincing example.

| Therefore claiming that the context of use shouldn't play any role in
| deciding whether a function should be inlined is absurd.

No, what is absurb is the imaginary scenario you describ above.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]