This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: std::pow implementation


On Jul 29, 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> wrote:

> The point you seem to be missing is that whether a function is inlined
> depends on the context of use -- not just on its intrinsinc complexity.
> That is what is absurd.  Not the mere statement of that fact.

The context of use can make a *lot* of difference on whether it's
worth to inline a function or not.  Consider a very complex function
that takes a boolean argument, used to enable or disable most of the
complexity in the function.  If the caller passes a false boolean
argument, the function would simplify to pretty much nothing.
Therefore claiming that the context of use shouldn't play any role in
deciding whether a function should be inlined is absurd.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]