This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:
| Can you stop bashing and be reasonable for once?
I'm reasonable. Being reasonable does not imply not recognizing that
the original meaning of "inline" has been transmuted.
| If you were so great you would have declated __cmath_power inline in
| the first place.
Did I claim I am "great" or "so great"?
There are reasons I didn't declare __cmath_power inline in the first place.
That is why I asked for data and ways to reproduce them.
[...]
| Now cut away all the redundant labels and other cruft, and you end up
| with:
In short, you have demonstrated that if "inline" is given its obvious
meaning, the compiler can do a better job. That is what I claimed in
the first place.
-- Gaby