This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: (offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
In article <3F201905.1010004@wanadoo.es> you write:
>Kean Johnston wrote:
>> to endure in along time. All I can say is I encourage people to think
>> about the words "open",
>why don't you spend time trying to explain the meaning 'open' to sco lawyers?
>maybe an intensive UNIX course would do them to change the point of view.
>> and to look at the real scope of SCO's lawsuits
>> not at reactionary, often misguided and religiously "patriotic"
>> assertions made in the heat of passion and not in the cold light of logic.
>where did you stay last months?
>reactionary, patriotic, heat of passion, cold light of logic :-?
Why do you automatically assume Kean Johnston did not do any of these
things over the last few months ?
He's obviously not at liberty to discuss political matters internal to SCO,
but you shouldn't presume he's not doing anything to remedy the current
situation.
That said, if the FSF, as an organization, decides to deal with SCO, the
corporation, globally, there's absolutely nothing individual geeks within SCO
should have to do with the matter.
If it's purely a question of `explaining' to SCO what the FSF and the GPL
stands for, individuals don't necessarily have anything to do about it.
How that relates to a philosophical definition of `freedom' wrt `individuals'
is another can of worm entirely.