Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:15:54PM -0400, Jean-Pierre Radley wrote:
> Andrew Pinski typed (on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:02:13PM -0400):
> 
> | On Thursday, Jul 24, 2003, at 21:49 US/Eastern, Daniel Jacobowitz
> | wrote:
> |
> | >I noticed today that one of my checkouts has
> | >gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb42.C in it, and another two
> | >don't.
> | >`
> | >I went to investigate and I'm heartily confused - the file was dead,
> | >then brought back to life by bkoz, but remains in the Attic in CVS.
> | >So sometimes it gets checked out and sometimes it doesn't, according
> | >to the phase of the moon.
> | >
> | >Am I interpreting this right?  If so would someone mind fixing the
> | >repository?
> |
> | This looks like it has been messed up for a long time.
> | The last time it was touched was 2 years and 3 months ago
> | but it was messed up before that from reading the log:
> | <http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g%2b%2b.old-
> | deja/g%2b%2b.robertl/Attic/eb42.C>.  The reason I say it was messed up
> | before that was from log about the merges into the branches.
> |
> | I think sometime in 1998 it was messed up.
> 
> Because robertl was (and is) a SCO employee?

If your comment was intended to be humorous, that wasn't clear.  Consider
including a smiley in the future.

If your comment was intended as childish sniping, demonstrating only
immaturity and a willingness to jump to ridiculous conclusions (the problem
has apparently existed for a long time, but SCO just recently begin making
fools of themselves), then you've succeeded.


Phil

-- 
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace.  We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms.  Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.            - Samuel Adams