This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: zack at codesourcery dot com
Cc: dj at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
References: <200307212143.h6LLh1J21190@greed.delorie.com> <87ptk3pmpx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <200307212315.h6LNFrw22520@greed.delorie.com> <87brvnhy2v.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <200307221704.h6MH4x316873@greed.delorie.com> <87r84i5ice.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.56.0307222310290.4522@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <87d6g2dukt.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

 > I have no hard numbers to prove this, but I have never seen any of the
 > routines that would be affected show up anywhere near the top of a
 > profile.
 > zw

Because target macros are used all over the place, I suspect any
slowdown from hook conversion is one of those things that results in a
general slowdown not confined to any particular hotspot.

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu

References:
- RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]