This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
- From: "Paolo Bonzini" <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- To: <bkorb at veritas dot com>,"Ishikawa" <ishikawa at yk dot rim dot or dot jp>
- Cc: <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>,<gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>,"GCC Development" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:11:23 +0200
- Subject: Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
- References: <3F1D6403.14114943@veritas.com> <3F1D6C8E.66B94923@yk.rim.or.jp> <3F1D8391.18514C1E@veritas.com>
> > see many wrappers that setup or extract the
> > environmental info such as the line number of
> > the source file, source file name itself, etc..
This should not be a problem. I am willing to do improvements to
libsnprintfv to help it being integrated in GCC.
> > >The only tile missing to the 1.0 release is dynamic loading of custom
> > >specifiers.
> >
> > How is the tile coming?
>
> I don't know precisely what Paolo is referring to. Paolo? :-)
This meant dynamic loaded .so modules. I don't find it particularly useful,
but Gary Vaughan did, maybe because he needed it in m4. But now, 1.0 has
been released and does have this.
> Yeah, the library ought to get hacked to allow the float stuff to be
> compiled out. As it stands, it does require libm, but it ought
> to be a simple configury thing to fix it.
Yes, patch gladly accepted (because I am going on vacation soon, not because
it is hard).
> 4. It was written to be included with libiberty.
I don't remember what we decided on ANSIfication... IIRC we went on because
GCC was being ANSIfied. I am a bit rusty (and bored) on libiberty, when
will it be ANSIfied at last???
Paolo