This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
- From: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: 'Ben Elliston ' <bje at wasabisystems dot com>,"'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: "'paul at nowt dot org'" <paul at nowt dot org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 01:25:11 +0200
- Subject: RE: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
The idea was that g95 should be gfor as in Gnu FORtran. But the name change
never happened. We'll look at this before the merge.
Gr.
Steven
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Elliston
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Sent: 15-7-03 15:12
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
Paul Brook <paul@nowt.org> writes:
> We thing we're now ready for inclusion. Nothing special needs to be
> done: just drop in the g95 and libgfor directories, and a small
> patch to teach toplevel configure about libgfor.
libgfor seems like an award name -- it's not clear what "for" stands
for. [:-)] Is it the G95 runtime? If so, how about libg95?
Ben