This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: 14 Jul 2003 21:48:03 -0300
- Subject: Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag?
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <3F0C3B68.20409@kegel.com><Pine.BSF.4.56.0307140026550.16544@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Jul 13, 2003, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
>> I see that file is supposed to be created by contrib/gcc_update with
>> the date. It might be nice for the released gcc tarballs to contain
>> a LAST_UPDATED file containing just the release tag.
> Hmm, we could do that, but I'm not sure whether that's still needed
> once test_summary has been fixed?
It's not needed, for sure, but I do like the idea of having such a
file in our tarballs. Dan's patch with Andreas' fix are approved for
mainline (and 3.3, if I'm still entitled to approve patches for it).
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer