This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2

From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
References: <Pine.BSF.4.56.0307091514040.22140@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><3F0C70CF.15796C06@hotmail.com>

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to now name the "LATEST-IS" files
> "LATEST-3.4-IS-20030709" or "3.4-LATEST-IS-20030709"?

Starting with LATEST is better from a lexicographic sorting point of view
(so that these two files are more visible).

Concerning the name, I suppose the idea was that the second half of the
filename is equal to the directory name in questions, that is, something
like LATEST-3.4-IS-3.4-20030709 might be better in that spirit?

I have no strong preference either way, but I'm willing to implement any
change at least two folks (<> myself) can agree on.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry"   pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

References:
- Mainline snapshots, take 2
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]