On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:50:06PM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2003 13:14, Gunther Nikl wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 11:24:43AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > Note that GAS accepts both syntaxes, so if every supported target is
> > > using GAS then we can rip it out immediately.
> >
> > Not every GAS version supports it. Why removing MIT syntax? The same
> > could be demanded for Motorola syntax...
>
> Maintaing both syntaxes adds complexity
Yes, but not that much.
> and makes every change to the m68k back-end harder to write and test.
No. If you don't like the #idefs then make MOTOROLA a 0/1 define and use
real if()s.