This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos

From: Jamie Lokier <jamie at shareable dot org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher at koffie dot nl>
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>, paul at nowt dot org, positrone at freemail dot it, aph at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 14:23:11 +0100
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
References: <20030701030149.F367AF2A64@nile.gnat.com> <3F02EA1A.8050204@koffie.nl> <20030704020029.GB18928@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <3F06E2D6.2070802@koffie.nl> <20030706132058.GA4227@mail.jlokier.co.uk>

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Do all GCC ports provide uintptr_t?  Nice loophole, btw.
> 
> No, but they all support "long" or "long long" which works in practice.

Sorry, I probably meant "yes", as in one of these two is a suitable
definition of uintptr_t on all GCC targets AFAIK:

	typedef unsigned long uintptr_t;
	typedef unsigned long long uintptr_t;

-- Jamie

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
  - From: Jamie Lokier

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]