gcc archive
date index for July, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2003
23:41 Re: std::pow implementation Segher Boessenkool
23:41 Re: std::pow implementation Segher Boessenkool
23:37 [tree-ssa] [gfortran] bootstrap failure in exp_c8.c in Darwin Andrew Pinski
23:27 Re: different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Andrew Pinski
23:26 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Conn Clark
23:23 different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage Lothar Werzinger
23:11 Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:56 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
21:51 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
19:45 Re: GCC tm_gccmail
19:38 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Alexandre Oliva
18:45 Re: GCC Gerald Pfeifer
18:15 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
17:24 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Martin Brain
17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Steven Bosscher
17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Diego Novillo
16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
16:41 Re: GCC cgd
16:09 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
14:57 Re: GCC Steven Bosscher
14:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:44 Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port Chris Devers
14:13 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
14:08 Problems with -pg option Vishwas H.K
14:07 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Andrew Pinski
14:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list Diego Novillo
13:58 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
13:53 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Fergus Henderson
13:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:12 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
13:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
12:41 Re: GCC Gerald Pfeifer
12:05 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:59 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:50 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
11:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
11:04 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:02 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:57 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
10:54 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
10:50 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
10:49 RE: std::pow implementation Rob Taylor
10:38 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
10:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
10:19 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Robert Dewar
10:08 Re: GCC Robert Dewar
10:02 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Andreas Schwab
09:33 Re: GCC Lars Segerlund
09:30 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
09:25 new FAILs on HEAD gcc
09:11 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
08:37 Re: definition of "implicit" inline? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:14 definition of "implicit" inline? Martin Reinecke
07:58 Re: GCC Randy.Dunlap
07:20 new FAILs on HEAD gcc
06:49 Re: GCC Aaron Lehmann
06:42 GCC Steven Bosscher
04:42 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Alexandre Oliva
04:04 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Alexandre Oliva
02:46 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
02:40 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
02:10 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon Zack Weinberg
00:30 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva

July 30, 2003
23:31 RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Mike Thomas
23:21 Re: Using multiple compilers Mike Stump
22:49 Using multiple compilers J.B. Brown
22:28 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
21:55 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
21:51 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
21:49 Re: std::pow implementation Richard B. Kreckel
21:32 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
20:36 Mainline bootstrap failure on IRIX 6 O32 with GNU as Rainer Orth
20:14 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
20:07 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
20:06 Re: [GCC] Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Trevor Jenkins
20:05 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Pop Sébastian
19:57 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Nathanael Nerode
19:54 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
19:31 Status of GCC 3 on IRIX 5.3 Rainer Orth
19:24 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Andreas Jaeger
19:21 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Zack Weinberg
19:17 Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal Andreas Meier
19:12 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Zack Weinberg
19:08 Re: upcast-downcast Martin Brain
18:56 RE: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Ken Faiczak
18:42 Re: std::pow implementation tm_gccmail
18:34 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
18:22 Re: std::pow implementation Felix Lee
18:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Pop Sébastian
18:06 Re: std::pow implementation Daniel Berlin
17:46 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
17:42 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 David Edelsohn
17:41 upcast-downcast Fabio Salvucci
17:38 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
17:35 Re: std::pow implementation Daniel Berlin
17:32 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Zack Weinberg
17:32 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
17:26 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Zack Weinberg
17:24 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:22 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
17:22 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
17:10 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
17:06 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
17:02 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
17:01 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Richard Henderson
16:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20030730 is now available gccadmin
16:55 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Devang Patel
16:52 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:50 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:49 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:47 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
16:40 Re: std::pow implementation Joe Buck
16:39 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:37 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:36 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR andPRE Andrew MacLeod
16:29 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
16:29 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
16:24 incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3 Ken Faiczak
16:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
16:16 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
16:09 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
16:08 Re: Some questions of GCC cross tool 3.3 for ColdFire linux Bernardo Innocenti
16:06 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
16:01 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:56 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:53 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:50 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:49 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
15:45 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:44 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:43 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:42 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
15:33 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
15:29 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:29 [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE Daniel Berlin
15:27 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
15:08 Re: std::pow implementation Scott Robert Ladd
14:55 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
14:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:44 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
14:32 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: std::pow implementation Paolo Carlini
14:29 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:26 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:25 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:21 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:19 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:18 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:11 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:10 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:05 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:04 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
14:04 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
14:02 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
14:01 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:59 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:59 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:56 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:53 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:52 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:51 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:49 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:47 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:46 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:41 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
13:38 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
13:30 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:26 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:25 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
13:24 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
13:22 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
13:19 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
13:13 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:06 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:01 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:59 Re: std::pow implementation Robert Dewar
12:55 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:46 Re: std::pow implementation Karel Gardas
12:42 Re: std::pow implementation Martin Reinecke
12:31 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:23 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:20 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:13 Re: std::pow implementation Stephan T. Lavavej
12:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:58 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:57 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
11:46 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:43 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:36 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
11:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
10:46 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Gerald Pfeifer
10:37 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Earnshaw
10:33 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
10:32 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems Eric Botcazou
10:11 Re: Discouraging contributors Bernardo Innocenti
08:35 Mudflap based memprofiler alexili
07:21 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
07:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:57 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
06:45 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
06:38 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
06:13 Re: Token Pasting operator Alexandre Oliva
06:08 Re: Token Pasting operator Neil Booth
05:45 Token Pasting operator Srivatsan S
05:40 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
05:33 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init John David Anglin
05:26 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
05:24 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
05:18 gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling??? Mojx
05:12 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Alexandre Oliva
05:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Alexandre Oliva
05:00 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Alexandre Oliva
04:58 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
04:56 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
04:25 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
04:19 Re: std::pow implementation Alexandre Oliva
01:40 Re: Optimizing hypot() Richard Henderson
00:40 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
00:40 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff

July 29, 2003
23:47 Re: Loop optimizer issues tm_gccmail
23:38 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
23:20 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Mike Stump
23:16 Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure in libjava Rainer Orth
23:10 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Geoffrey Keating
23:05 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Jonathan Lennox
22:54 help if you can Dave Gibelli
22:26 #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble Neil Booth
22:16 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
22:02 Re: Loop optimizer issues Gerald Pfeifer
21:58 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Gerald Pfeifer
21:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
21:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
21:06 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once Kai Henningsen
21:06 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Kai Henningsen
21:01 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
20:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues Richard Henderson
20:37 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? tm_gccmail
20:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:29 Re: Loop optimizer issues tm_gccmail
20:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
20:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
19:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
19:50 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
19:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
19:35 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 law
19:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
19:15 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: std::pow implementation Neil Booth
19:09 Re: Loop optimizer issues law
19:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues Daniel Berlin
19:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Zack Weinberg
18:50 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jason Merrill
18:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:35 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
18:28 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Jason Merrill
18:27 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Kelley Cook
18:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? law
18:20 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:19 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
18:18 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
18:16 Re: Loop optimizer issues Jan Hubicka
18:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
18:12 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
18:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Zdenek Dvorak
18:08 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Gabriel Dos Reis
18:08 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Jan Hubicka
18:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Daniel Berlin
18:05 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
18:01 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Zack Weinberg
17:57 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? law
17:56 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zack Weinberg
17:53 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Jason Merrill
17:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure Phil Edwards
17:48 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Tom Tromey
17:44 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
17:40 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Chris Lattner
17:40 Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*) Jan Hubicka
17:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Zack Weinberg
17:24 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
17:15 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
17:13 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
17:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Andrew Pinski
17:09 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 law
17:00 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
16:57 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
16:46 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Daniel Berlin
16:30 Re: Installation questions Gerald Pfeifer
16:28 [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early? Daniel Berlin
16:26 Installation questions Jim Keener
16:20 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Richard Earnshaw
16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Gabriel Dos Reis
16:05 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects Richard Earnshaw
15:59 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 aliasing between const and non-const objects Michael Matz
15:38 Jump threading after basic block reorder? Dave Hudson
15:37 RE: std::pow implementation Rob Taylor
15:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Kelley Cook
15:11 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:51 Re: std::pow implementation Michael Matz
14:43 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Michael Matz
14:36 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:35 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
14:31 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Albert Chin
14:24 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
14:24 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:22 public and extern Anders Ãdland
14:17 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:17 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage law
14:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
14:08 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
13:59 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Eyal Lebedinsky
13:36 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Andreas Jaeger
13:28 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:22 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error Diego Novillo
13:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:14 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
13:05 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
13:00 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
12:59 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:58 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:55 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:53 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:53 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:49 Re: std::pow implementation Paolo Carlini
12:49 Re: std::pow implementation Andrew Pinski
12:47 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:44 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:38 libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage Gerald Pfeifer
12:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:25 Re: std::pow implementation Steven Bosscher
12:14 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
12:10 tree-ssa internal compiler error Jeffrey . S . Whitaker
12:10 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
12:04 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
12:02 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Andrew MacLeod
11:57 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:52 [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64 Diego Novillo
11:51 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:45 Re: std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
11:37 Re: std::pow implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
11:37 [tree-ssa] g95 bootstrap failure on alpha Diego Novillo
11:32 Re: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE Ayal Zaks
11:04 std::pow implementation Richard Guenther
09:52 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
09:48 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
09:25 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Anders Ãdland
07:06 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure Steven Bosscher
06:50 Re: [Axiom-developer] portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Arthur Norman
06:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init John David Anglin
03:46 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Dan Kegel
01:29 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Fergus Henderson
01:15 ideas for modeling a condition-code FIFO? Greg McGary
00:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Geoff Keating
00:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Joe Buck
00:11 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary

July 28, 2003
23:55 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
23:31 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Jan Hubicka
23:30 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? tm_gccmail
23:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Michael Matz
23:17 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Andrew Pinski
23:16 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Richard Kenner
23:15 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
23:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
23:08 HP-UX 11 and ld +init Mark Mitchell
22:58 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:58 ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers? Greg McGary
22:48 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Paolo Bonzini
22:45 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Ralf Corsepius
22:41 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:37 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Phil Edwards
22:21 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Paolo Bonzini
22:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Zack Weinberg
22:00 Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues) Steven Bosscher
21:34 portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls Camm Maguire
21:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Daniel Berlin
21:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Daniel Berlin
21:19 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Ziemowit Laski
21:11 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Richard Kenner
21:09 Re: PR 10540 Mark Mitchell
21:04 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Phil Edwards
20:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latestcvs-version Steven Bosscher
20:43 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
20:42 [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version Linus Sjöberg
20:40 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
20:36 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
20:33 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
20:24 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
19:54 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
19:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
19:19 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
19:00 Re: Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref Peter Barada
17:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Phil Edwards
17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030728 is now available gccadmin
16:58 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Joe Buck
16:45 Re: Fortran front end webpages Joe Buck
15:55 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p Mark Mitchell
15:36 Re: C++ standard Fergus Henderson
15:28 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire Peter Barada
15:25 Re: C++ standard Kelley Cook
15:13 Re: Implementing alloca with malloc Fergus Henderson
14:13 PowerPC Cross compailer Shulov Leonid
13:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues Andrew MacLeod
12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
12:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
10:31 [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list Erik Schnetter
09:59 Implementing alloca with malloc Stephen Biggs
09:08 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Andreas Schwab
09:03 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff
07:25 C++ standard voidbox
07:06 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Nathanael Nerode
06:58 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Ralf Corsepius
06:55 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c??? Anders Ãdland
06:35 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Ranjit Mathew
06:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Dan Kegel
04:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-) Phil Edwards
03:58 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Daniel Berlin
03:57 Understanding Multilibs ;-) Nathanael Nerode
03:24 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C) Bernardo Innocenti
03:01 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
01:59 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Bruce Korb
00:38 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
00:26 re: Help compiling gcc 3.3 Dan Kegel
00:16 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Daniel Jacobowitz
00:15 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? Dan Kegel
00:01 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
00:00 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? kaz Kojima

July 27, 2003
23:59 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
23:50 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Daniel Jacobowitz
23:49 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, newautoconf versions Zack Weinberg
23:33 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
23:17 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
23:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
23:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues Steven Bosscher
22:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues David Edelsohn
22:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues Zdenek Dvorak
22:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages Gerald Pfeifer
21:50 gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status? Dan Kegel
20:14 Re: dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
20:11 dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3 Hans Breuer
16:09 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
14:02 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Andrew MacLeod
12:06 Re: Patches Needed for MingW 3.4 Andrew Haley
06:25 Re: Is IR machine independent? Marty Hauff
06:09 Possible bug in regrename.c??? Marty Hauff
05:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
03:07 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p Jason Merrill
02:18 att ressources humaines merci gerson . neptune
01:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
01:08 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
00:03 Help compiling gcc 3.3 Deskin Miller

July 26, 2003
22:32 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Paul Brook
22:21 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Steven Bosscher
22:20 Re: Fortran front end webpages Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
22:10 Re: Fortran front end webpages Paul Brook
21:55 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Paul Brook
21:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages Toon Moene
21:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
20:59 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
20:43 stmts_are_full_exprs_p Nathan Sidwell
19:57 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Marc Espie
19:57 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
19:54 Re: (offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Marc Espie
19:44 Re: Fortran front end webpages Zack Weinberg
19:26 Re: Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2 Nathan Sidwell
19:20 Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2 Rob Emanuele
19:10 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ... Joseph S. Myers
19:09 Fortran front end webpages Paul Brook
18:26 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
18:07 Re: URLConnection Anthony Green
17:59 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:59 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
17:59 Re: URLConnection Tom Tromey
17:37 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:26 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ? John Levon
17:22 mainline broken on newlib based targets? Dara Hazeghi
17:14 backward compatibility of g++ ? trinks
15:44 URLConnection Thijs Cadier
15:08 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Thijs Cadier
15:01 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application Tom Tromey
13:53 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Paul Brook
13:50 NullPointerException in a win32 application Thijs Cadier
12:42 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Erik Schnetter
12:08 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend Paolo Bonzini
09:49 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Kai Henningsen
05:16 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Nathanael Nerode
04:37 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform John David Anglin
04:33 Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL) Nathanael Nerode
04:25 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
02:47 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Phil Edwards
02:37 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Andrew MacLeod
02:17 Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'? Nathanael Nerode
01:12 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:41 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:24 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Robert Dewar
00:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Gerald Pfeifer

July 25, 2003
22:48 Re: PR 11637 Janis Johnson
22:47 Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions Phil Edwards
22:47 [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda Daniel Berlin
17:34 Re: Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...) Daniel Berlin
16:53 Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...) Joe Buck
16:49 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
16:15 Re: Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference Toon Moene
16:00 Re: gcc mirror site Gerald Pfeifer
15:55 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725snapshot) Benjamin Kosnik
15:11 Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference Lisa M. Opus Goldstein
15:03 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Daniel Berlin
13:48 Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref Anders Ãdland
13:00 Re: gcc mirror site Jin-Shan Tseng
12:29 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
11:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Diego Novillo
11:20 Re: Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog) Andrew Pinski
11:04 Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog,ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog) Steven Bosscher
10:55 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Mukta Punjani, Noida
10:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Richard Kenner
10:21 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Joseph S. Myers
09:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Andrew Haley
09:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
08:56 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Nathan Sidwell
07:22 Re: PR 10540 Richard Sandiford
05:29 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell
05:29 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft Mark Mitchell
04:22 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot) Bernardo Innocenti
04:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 Andrew Pinski
04:11 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Per Bothner
03:39 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
03:32 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? Alexandre Oliva
03:01 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
02:56 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ? Alexandre Oliva
02:37 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Phil Edwards
02:18 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Jean-Pierre Radley
02:05 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Tolga Dalman
02:02 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C Andrew Pinski
02:00 changing struct bitfield allocation ? DJ Delorie
01:49 Ghost testcase eb42.C Daniel Jacobowitz
01:00 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Richard Kenner
00:40 [cs] compile server branch creation Mike Stump
00:35 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Mark Mitchell

July 24, 2003
23:49 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Xose Vazquez Perez
23:24 Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon Zack Weinberg
23:19 Bug in newlib malloc causing libstdc++ test failures Daniel Jacobowitz
23:13 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Paolo Bonzini
23:07 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Paul Jarc
23:01 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Tolga Dalman
22:04 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Don Lindsay
21:46 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
21:27 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform Andrew Pinski
21:12 GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform Steve Ellcey
21:00 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin Phil Edwards
20:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Thiemo Seufer
20:17 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' DJ Delorie
20:14 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
20:12 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism tm_gccmail
19:57 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?) tm_gccmail
19:51 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C Per Bothner
19:38 Re: Libtool and target libraries Paul Brook
19:37 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Mark Mielke
19:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Eric Christopher
19:29 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Joe Buck
19:21 Re: PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
19:09 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
19:06 GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6 Rainer Orth
18:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Scott Robert Ladd
18:08 Re: Optimizing hypot() Zack Weinberg
18:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Dave Butenhof
17:37 Re:(offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Xose Vazquez Perez
17:29 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
17:22 Re: PR 8878 Mark Mitchell
17:18 Re: PR 8878 Aldy Hernandez
17:06 Re: Optimizing hypot() Roger Sayle
17:06 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Bruce Korb
17:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Bruce Korb
17:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Bruce Korb
16:58 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea Mike Stump
16:50 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Joe Buck
16:41 Re: Translation of GCC Manual Joseph S. Myers
16:34 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Joseph S. Myers
16:32 installation help Green, Nick
16:23 Re: Translation of GCC Manual Zack Weinberg
16:21 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Bruce Korb
16:07 Re: Optimizing hypot() Zack Weinberg
16:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges Jan Hubicka
15:49 snprintfv 1.1 pre-release Paolo Bonzini
15:37 Relocation of code with gcc sebastien dot di-mercurio at l
15:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status Jeff Sturm
14:59 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator Michael Matz
14:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Gerald Pfeifer
13:30 Re: Optimizing hypot() Roger Sayle
13:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
13:06 RE: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' S. Bosscher
12:39 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation' Kean Johnston
12:35 unsubscibe Thomas Anders
12:30 Fixincludes/C++ namespaces question(s) Nathanael Nerode
12:30 [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges Pop Sébastian
11:44 [FEATURE] to suppress nested attribute deprecated marked uses? Samium Gromoff
11:08 Is IR machine independent? Xingbo Wang
08:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06 Toon Moene
08:25 unsubcribe hung
07:57 unsubcribe poulard