gcc archive
author index for July, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

"Uílton O. Dutra"

• 2003-07-18 19:36 strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault

Linus Sjöberg

• 2003-07-17 11:52 Re: Tree-SSA failure on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE
• 2003-07-28 20:42 [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version

Pop Sébastian

• 2003-07-17 10:01 Re: How to copy a tree ?
• 2003-07-17 10:07 Re: Using GCC as a C++ front-end.
• 2003-07-23 17:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-24 12:30 [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges
• 2003-07-30 18:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE
• 2003-07-30 19:58 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE

sebastien dot di-mercurio at laposte dot net

• 2003-07-24 15:37 Relocation of code with gcc

Sebastien DI MERCURIO

• 2003-07-18 06:09 Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax

Tobias Schlüter

• 2003-07-07 13:53 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on cygwin
• 2003-07-08 15:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap broken on cygwin

Branko Äibej

• 2003-07-06 23:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-09 21:26 Re: static declaration

Anders Ãdland

• 2003-07-15 09:32 Re: Reloading failes
• 2003-07-15 14:03 Porting question: legitimate address
• 2003-07-25 13:48 Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref
• 2003-07-28 06:55 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c???
• 2003-07-29 09:25 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c???
• 2003-07-29 14:22 public and extern

Aaron Lehmann

• 2003-07-13 19:56 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag)
• 2003-07-31 06:49 Re: GCC

Agust Karlsson

• 2003-07-02 12:27 RE: Packed structures

Alan Modra

• 2003-07-10 01:42 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-21 13:06 bit shifting CQImode values
• 2003-07-21 13:43 Re: bit shifting CQImode values

Albert Chin

• 2003-07-29 14:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init

Aldy Hernandez

• 2003-07-15 17:32 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-18 17:26 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-24 17:18 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-24 17:29 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-24 19:09 Re: PR 8878

Alexandre Oliva

• 2003-07-01 13:47 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 13:49 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
• 2003-07-01 14:38 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-01 14:45 Re: fix-header crash (gcc 3.3.1 20030630)
• 2003-07-01 14:54 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 14:57 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
• 2003-07-01 15:29 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 20:09 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-02 14:31 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ?
• 2003-07-02 14:35 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug
• 2003-07-03 18:55 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-07 15:02 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-07 15:05 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'.
• 2003-07-07 19:29 Re: Fixincludes cleanup + system headers
• 2003-07-08 01:15 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-08 01:19 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 03:09 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-08 05:19 Re: inquiry about RTL
• 2003-07-09 18:13 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered
• 2003-07-09 18:19 Re: libtool reloadable object files versus multilib
• 2003-07-10 02:42 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered
• 2003-07-10 07:30 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-13 20:54 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-15 00:48 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag?
• 2003-07-15 00:57 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag)
• 2003-07-15 01:00 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms
• 2003-07-15 02:44 Re: install vs. install-sh
• 2003-07-15 16:52 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-22 07:02 (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-22 23:50 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin
• 2003-07-23 00:01 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 00:07 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-23 00:11 Re: Libtool and target libraries
• 2003-07-23 05:14 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 06:11 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 21:39 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-25 02:56 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ?
• 2003-07-25 03:32 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ?
• 2003-07-30 04:19 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 04:25 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 05:00 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*)
• 2003-07-30 05:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 05:12 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-30 05:26 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 05:40 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 06:13 Re: Token Pasting operator
• 2003-07-30 06:45 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 10:33 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 21:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 00:30 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 04:04 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-31 04:42 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-31 19:38 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions

alexili

• 2003-07-30 08:35 Mudflap based memprofiler

Alexy Khrabrov

• 2003-07-01 20:36 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-02 03:33 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-02 03:53 /tmp full
• 2003-07-02 17:56 Re: /tmp full
• 2003-07-03 18:29 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done
• 2003-07-03 19:11 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done
• 2003-07-04 07:14 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done

andersa

• 2003-07-07 13:15 Reloading failes

Andre Majorel

• 2003-07-04 15:57 Disabling warnings from within the source

Andrea Arcangeli

• 2003-07-10 20:20 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures

Andreas Jaeger

• 2003-07-05 04:14 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 04:20 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 04:40 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 04:51 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-05 08:37 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-05 11:15 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-05 11:24 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-05 11:30 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-05 11:50 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-05 12:23 Re: New problem building on Alpha
• 2003-07-05 14:22 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 14:25 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-06 18:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-07 07:00 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-07 19:16 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-07 19:31 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-09 05:17 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-10 04:28 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars
• 2003-07-10 04:43 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars
• 2003-07-12 12:52 c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms
• 2003-07-13 15:25 Re: x86_64 ld error
• 2003-07-13 20:21 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms
• 2003-07-15 03:16 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-18 11:42 Re: missing entry on build status list
• 2003-07-19 17:58 Re: mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/
• 2003-07-29 13:36 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage
• 2003-07-30 19:24 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal

Andreas Meier

• 2003-07-30 19:17 Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal

Andreas Schwab

• 2003-07-01 17:54 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-03 10:54 Ada bootstrap failure on ia64
• 2003-07-07 09:00 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-07 09:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 10:16 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 10:53 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 13:05 [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 13:07 Re: ld -defsym option
• 2003-07-08 14:10 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 14:45 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 16:13 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 11:41 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-14 12:53 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag?
• 2003-07-15 07:47 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 11:48 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 14:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-16 09:17 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-16 12:55 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-28 09:08 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-31 09:47 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?

Andreas Tobler

• 2003-07-07 18:14 [darwin] unwind context question
• 2003-07-07 20:16 Re: [darwin] unwind context question
• 2003-07-08 04:48 Re: [darwin] unwind context question
• 2003-07-16 05:10 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 17:04 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 08:54 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-18 06:04 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure

Andrew Cagney

• 2003-07-02 17:49 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
• 2003-07-03 16:01 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1

Andrew Haley

• 2003-07-11 10:06 "make install" in libjava recompile many files?
• 2003-07-22 17:35 [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-23 12:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-23 12:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-25 09:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-27 12:06 Re: Patches Needed for MingW 3.4
• 2003-07-31 16:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status

Andrew MacLeod

• 2003-07-09 14:22 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-11 00:25 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-16 20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do?
• 2003-07-26 02:37 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-27 14:02 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-28 13:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 12:02 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-30 16:36 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR andPRE

Andrew Pinski

• 2003-07-01 15:12 Re: Successful build
• 2003-07-01 16:02 Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
• 2003-07-02 02:10 Re: Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 13:03 Re: question about "precompiled headers"
• 2003-07-02 16:01 Re: std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (apple gcc 3.3)
• 2003-07-02 20:58 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-04 12:59 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-04 17:17 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-04 23:21 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 04:28 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 12:57 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 14:25 Re: patch format
• 2003-07-08 12:07 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 22:09 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 11:52 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 12:59 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 14:33 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 17:02 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-10 11:51 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-10 17:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 20:44 Re: iconv problems
• 2003-07-11 05:25 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 15:51 Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1
• 2003-07-11 16:07 [PATCH] Fix: Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1
• 2003-07-11 23:15 Re: PR 10510 (was Re: PR 10501)
• 2003-07-11 23:50 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-11 23:53 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 00:18 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 00:28 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 02:56 Bootstap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 due to warnings in cgraphunit.c
• 2003-07-12 18:06 Web Page
• 2003-07-13 21:19 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-17 00:25 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-17 12:26 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361
• 2003-07-17 15:08 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361
• 2003-07-18 21:50 Re: How to mark a builtin function volatile?
• 2003-07-20 22:34 [RTLOPT] cannot compile branch
• 2003-07-22 17:23 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-07-24 21:27 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform
• 2003-07-25 02:02 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C
• 2003-07-25 04:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-07-25 11:20 Re: Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog, ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog)
• 2003-07-28 23:17 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 12:49 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 13:00 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 17:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-30 13:24 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 14:07 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-07-31 23:27 Re: different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage
• 2003-07-31 23:37 [tree-ssa] [gfortran] bootstrap failure in exp_c8.c in Darwin

Andris Pavenis

• 2003-07-02 06:55 Re: gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-13 21:55 Re: State of djgpp support?

Anthony Green

• 2003-07-12 00:42 Donating libffi (was: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...)
• 2003-07-14 13:00 Re: auto* versions for gcc?
• 2003-07-26 18:07 Re: URLConnection

Arnold Vogelsang

• 2003-07-01 10:30 Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f

Arpad Beszedes

• 2003-07-02 15:16 GCC Code-Size Benchmark Environment (CSiBE)

Arthur Norman

• 2003-07-29 06:50 Re: [Axiom-developer] portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls

Ayal Zaks

• 2003-07-17 21:24 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-23 15:21 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-29 11:32 Re: Redundant Load Elimination in GCSE

Ben Elliston

• 2003-07-04 05:39 Re: C compile time
• 2003-07-13 02:32 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-13 02:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-14 08:54 Re: building
• 2003-07-14 09:01 Re: target names and glibc versions on linux
• 2003-07-14 23:59 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-15 05:29 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-15 05:32 Re: Sugesstion on gcc compiler
• 2003-07-15 05:51 prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-15 23:13 Re: Testsuite custom environment (second try at posting)
• 2003-07-15 23:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
• 2003-07-16 01:35 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-16 01:35 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-16 22:35 Re: prolog vs prologue

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2003-07-01 18:15 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f
• 2003-07-02 12:44 Re: New 7.cc tests
• 2003-07-04 16:04 Re: (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change
• 2003-07-07 23:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-09 19:25 Re: Multifile test cases (Re: Intermodule patch)
• 2003-07-10 15:33 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++
• 2003-07-16 20:38 Re: A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-21 16:35 what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine?
• 2003-07-21 19:25 Re: what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine?
• 2003-07-22 15:28 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-25 15:18 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725snapshot)

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2003-07-05 13:23 Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-05 14:20 patch format
• 2003-07-05 17:11 Re: Backporting CRDS removal patch to 3.3.x (Was: remove CRDS support from m68k back-end)
• 2003-07-05 20:33 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-06 07:03 function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-07 10:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 12:50 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 05:36 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 05:47 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 06:06 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 06:20 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-08 06:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 06:37 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 09:30 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 09:46 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 13:15 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 15:39 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 21:07 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 23:14 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 23:30 Re: Papers (Was: PATCH: m68k: remove NO_ADDSUB_Q dependent code)
• 2003-07-09 07:47 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 17:42 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 17:51 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 17:57 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 18:11 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 18:23 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 18:55 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-10 17:38 Re: Papers
• 2003-07-10 19:32 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures
• 2003-07-10 22:59 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures
• 2003-07-13 17:46 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
• 2003-07-13 20:09 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
• 2003-07-13 22:37 Re: SPAM[RBL] Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
• 2003-07-14 05:38 INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() in m68k backend
• 2003-07-20 23:19 INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() breakage in gcc 3.3 + ColdFire patches
• 2003-07-22 02:18 gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire
• 2003-07-22 11:31 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030722 snapshot)
• 2003-07-25 04:22 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-25 12:29 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-25 16:49 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-28 03:01 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-28 03:24 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 20:43 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire
• 2003-07-28 21:04 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 23:15 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 23:55 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-30 00:40 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-30 10:11 Re: Discouraging contributors
• 2003-07-30 16:08 Re: Some questions of GCC cross tool 3.3 for ColdFire linux

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2003-07-22 23:57 RE: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin

Bonzini

• 2003-07-05 09:45 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-14 13:53 Re: auto* versions for gcc?

BORSENBERGER Pierre

• 2003-07-03 09:18 Support for VxWorks Pentium

Bradley Lucier

• 2003-07-17 18:35 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-20 19:43 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8
• 2003-07-21 03:08 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8
• 2003-07-21 05:31 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8
• 2003-07-21 17:11 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8

Bram Wijngaarden

• 2003-07-15 16:01 Successful build 3.2.3 / Red Hat 7.2 / binutils 2.11.90

Brian R. Gaeke

• 2003-07-01 00:30 fix-header crash (gcc 3.3.1 20030630)

Brian Sammon

• 2003-07-18 14:13 comments on onlinedocs webpage

Bruce Korb

• 2003-07-07 19:04 Fixincludes cleanup + system headers
• 2003-07-12 16:21 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 17:42 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester...)
• 2003-07-13 04:16 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h?
• 2003-07-22 16:19 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
• 2003-07-22 18:34 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
• 2003-07-24 16:21 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 17:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release
• 2003-07-24 17:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 17:06 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release
• 2003-07-28 01:59 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL)

Camm Maguire

• 2003-07-28 21:34 portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls
• 2003-07-30 21:55 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls
• 2003-07-31 21:51 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls

Carl Oppedahl

• 2003-07-09 06:44 trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-11 04:49 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?

Cezar Augusto de Freitas Anselmo

• 2003-07-23 19:40 gcc for windows XP

cgd

• 2003-07-11 23:24 Tarball of contributed tool (gcc, gdb, binutils) modifications.
• 2003-07-31 16:41 Re: GCC

Cheng, Cheuk

• 2003-07-10 22:05 #define and struct name

Chris Devers

• 2003-07-31 14:44 Clarification in the docs for possible bugs with the Alpha port

Chris Lattner

• 2003-07-29 17:40 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:05 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:35 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?

Christian Joensson

• 2003-07-05 05:13 ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc-linux: error: head insn 98 for block 0 not found in the insn stream
• 2003-07-05 05:17 ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error: head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream
• 2003-07-05 06:21 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'.
• 2003-07-05 06:26 gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type
• 2003-07-05 07:55 Re: gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type
• 2003-07-05 08:57 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc-linux: error: head insn 98 for block 0 not found in the insn stream
• 2003-07-05 09:00 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error: head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream
• 2003-07-05 11:24 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-06 08:03 Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script
• 2003-07-06 19:47 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script
• 2003-07-07 09:30 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'.
• 2003-07-07 17:05 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on cygwin: *** No rule to make target `../intl/libintl.a', needed by `cc1.exe'.
• 2003-07-07 17:10 Re: gcc-ss-20030707 is now available
• 2003-07-08 08:27 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20030708 on cygwin: winnt.c:110: warning: unknown conversion type character `D' in format
• 2003-07-08 20:57 gctest failure for sparc64-linux on gcc 3.3.1 20030707 snapshot
• 2003-07-09 08:00 ICE building gcc cvs HEAD 20030709 on cygwin; sorry, unimplemented: had to relocate PCH in libstdc++-v3/testsuite/testsuite_hooks.cc

Christoph Hellwig

• 2003-07-13 12:16 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-21 21:09 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-22 06:22 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once

Christopher Faylor

• 2003-07-02 04:51 Re: PR 7910/11021
• 2003-07-04 03:42 Re: NOTICE: Downtime for gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-07-12 18:21 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-13 15:08 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 22:05 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag)
• 2003-07-22 14:34 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin
• 2003-07-23 01:21 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin

Colin Douglas Howell

• 2003-07-03 07:27 Warning in Ada front end breaks mainline bootstrap
• 2003-07-03 07:41 Re: Warning in Ada front end breaks mainline bootstrap
• 2003-07-05 11:01 Mainline bootstrap broken for i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-16 05:45 Re: Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void*
• 2003-07-16 05:59 Re: Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void*
• 2003-07-22 06:14 Re: Inquiry about RTL

Conn Clark

• 2003-07-31 23:26 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Corinna Vinschen

• 2003-07-22 11:17 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin

Cristina Camara

• 2003-07-11 06:01 Border color and background color

Dale Johannesen

• 2003-07-02 17:40 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-02 22:01 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-03 17:08 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-10 19:54 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures
• 2003-07-12 00:00 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-14 21:51 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 20:59 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)
• 2003-07-15 22:30 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)
• 2003-07-15 23:55 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-16 00:11 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)

Dan Kegel

• 2003-07-09 15:42 release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing release tag?
• 2003-07-13 17:35 "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler
• 2003-07-13 18:06 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
• 2003-07-13 19:17 Re: "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler
• 2003-07-13 22:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3 uClinux toolchain 20030712 snapshot
• 2003-07-13 22:51 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag?
• 2003-07-14 06:41 crosstool-0.12 release. Builds gcc/glibc cross-toolchain, runs gcc/g++/libstdc++testsuite remotely.
• 2003-07-20 21:13 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'
• 2003-07-21 18:59 [gcc-3.3 patch] fix for "FAIL: g++.jason/thunk3.C" in gcc-3.3 testsuite
• 2003-07-27 21:50 gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status?
• 2003-07-28 00:15 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status?
• 2003-07-28 00:26 re: Help compiling gcc 3.3
• 2003-07-28 06:03 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)
• 2003-07-29 03:46 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)

Dan Schult

• 2003-07-01 15:06 Successful build

Daniel Berlin

• 2003-07-04 21:41 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops
• 2003-07-09 00:10 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-10 18:57 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:18 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:45 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:52 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:57 Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300k lines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c
• 2003-07-12 05:44 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-13 01:12 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-13 05:05 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-15 13:07 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-15 20:00 [tree-ssa]: remove_stmt in tree-cfg.c doesn't update bb end properly
• 2003-07-17 18:09 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 18:45 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 20:16 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 16:45 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-23 18:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-25 15:03 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-07-25 17:34 Re: Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...)
• 2003-07-25 22:47 [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-26 21:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-27 01:20 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-27 05:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-27 16:09 Re: [tree-ssa]: After edge insertion, two bb's share the same heda
• 2003-07-28 03:58 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 21:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 21:33 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-07-29 16:28 [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 16:46 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 19:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 15:29 [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE
• 2003-07-30 16:47 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE
• 2003-07-30 17:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 18:06 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 18:34 Re: [tree-ssa]: Constant propagation into PHI's screws up IVR and PRE

Daniel Egger

• 2003-07-14 21:38 Cross from powerpc-linux-gnu to mipsel-linux-gnu broken?

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2003-07-01 18:57 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 18:59 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-07 20:59 Re: --with-cpu
• 2003-07-07 22:17 Re: --with-cpu
• 2003-07-11 21:45 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-15 14:34 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-18 14:21 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-24 23:19 Bug in newlib malloc causing libstdc++ test failures
• 2003-07-25 01:49 Ghost testcase eb42.C
• 2003-07-27 20:14 Re: dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3
• 2003-07-27 23:50 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 00:16 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-29 14:24 Re: [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.3.1 uClinux/ColdFire toolchain (20030725 snapshot)

Danny Smith

• 2003-07-01 21:08 Re: PR 7910/11021

Dara Hazeghi

• 2003-07-05 18:43 make info and make dvi depend on make all?
• 2003-07-06 01:08 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all?
• 2003-07-13 15:36 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 21:38 State of djgpp support?
• 2003-07-13 22:36 Re: State of djgpp support?
• 2003-07-18 15:53 Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al.
• 2003-07-18 16:30 ia64-linux binutils requirements?
• 2003-07-22 00:56 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-26 17:22 mainline broken on newlib based targets?
• 2003-07-26 17:59 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets?
• 2003-07-26 18:26 Re: mainline broken on newlib based targets?

Dave Butenhof

• 2003-07-24 18:02 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release

Dave Gibelli

• 2003-07-29 22:54 help if you can

Dave Hudson

• 2003-07-12 21:52 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-15 19:35 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-29 15:38 Jump threading after basic block reorder?

David Ayers

• 2003-07-22 21:41 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once

David Edelsohn

• 2003-07-01 02:57 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-01 20:39 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-02 03:41 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-02 14:53 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /?10021
• 2003-07-02 17:08 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-02 17:22 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-02 21:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:24 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:59 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 22:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 22:43 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 19:09 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, done
• 2003-07-04 23:21 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 03:54 Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-05 06:18 Re: Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM))
• 2003-07-05 22:53 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-05 23:30 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-07 19:05 Re: Building with AIX gcc 3.3
• 2003-07-07 19:30 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 14:18 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 18:04 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-09 04:37 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 04:54 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 15:30 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-10 15:21 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-16 01:48 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)
• 2003-07-17 18:15 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-27 22:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-27 23:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 19:36 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 17:42 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3

David Jobet

• 2003-07-05 17:45 Re: bad dead code detection ?

David O'Brien

• 2003-07-14 17:32 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding

davidfranks

• 2003-07-10 11:15 gcc compiler

Dennis Dams

• 2003-07-01 22:03 [tree-ssa] field names

Deskin Miller

• 2003-07-27 00:03 Help compiling gcc 3.3

Devang Patel

• 2003-07-30 16:55 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble

Diego Novillo

• 2003-07-02 13:26 Re: Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 16:08 Re: [tree-ssa] SSAPRE failure caused by other pass?
• 2003-07-02 23:58 Re: [tree-ssa] any plans to merge from mainline???
• 2003-07-04 15:15 [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-04 18:36 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-04 22:07 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-04 22:12 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-04 22:20 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-04 23:07 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 14:41 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 16:25 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 16:37 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 22:59 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-08 11:34 [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 12:52 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 13:31 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 16:10 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-10 11:43 Re: gcc compiler
• 2003-07-16 19:23 Re: [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do?
• 2003-07-17 14:09 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 19:21 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 20:40 Re: A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-18 15:37 Re: How can GNU help me?
• 2003-07-21 14:03 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-21 14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-22 12:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-22 13:55 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-22 17:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6
• 2003-07-22 18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-23 12:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status
• 2003-07-23 17:15 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22
• 2003-07-23 18:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-23 18:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22
• 2003-07-25 11:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-29 11:37 [tree-ssa] g95 bootstrap failure on alpha
• 2003-07-29 11:52 [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-29 12:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-29 13:22 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-07-29 15:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-29 17:15 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-29 20:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 21:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-31 13:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-31 13:58 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-07-31 14:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list
• 2003-07-31 14:13 Re: tree-ssa internal compiler error
• 2003-07-31 17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status

DJ Delorie

• 2003-07-01 14:38 gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-01 15:42 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 15:43 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures
• 2003-07-01 18:50 Re: gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-02 18:00 Re: /tmp full
• 2003-07-08 02:21 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-15 00:45 install vs install-sh
• 2003-07-15 01:33 Re: install vs. install-sh
• 2003-07-15 17:37 Re: 3.4 mips64-linux build problem
• 2003-07-16 00:19 RFC: some target macro->hook conversions
• 2003-07-21 21:43 RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-21 21:54 RFC: target-defs.h inclusion backwards?
• 2003-07-21 23:15 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 17:05 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 18:00 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 18:24 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 18:27 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 19:06 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-22 19:10 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c
• 2003-07-22 19:15 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 19:17 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 19:18 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-23 00:17 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
• 2003-07-23 00:22 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 20:17 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-25 02:00 changing struct bitfield allocation ?
• 2003-07-25 03:01 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ?
• 2003-07-25 03:39 Re: changing struct bitfield allocation ?

Don Lindsay

• 2003-07-24 22:04 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Dorit Naishlos

• 2003-07-07 15:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4
• 2003-07-17 12:43 auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 11:50 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 13:16 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 13:31 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 13:52 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 13:57 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-22 13:39 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-22 13:48 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-23 16:48 [tree-ssa] Re: auto vectorization in gcc

Doug Shubert

• 2003-07-13 14:09 x86_64 ld error

Dr William Bland

• 2003-07-01 15:14 Re: Getting information on symbols and linkages at run-time

Dr. Jian-Xin Zhu

• 2003-07-17 16:31 gcc 3.3 successfully built on RedHat 7.3

Eben Moglen

• 2003-07-11 05:02 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?

elettronicmail

• 2003-07-21 19:19 MingW

Eljay Love-Jensen

• 2003-07-17 14:44 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3.
• 2003-07-17 15:02 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3.
• 2003-07-17 15:06 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3.

Eric Botcazou

• 2003-07-04 17:11 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-04 22:50 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-05 08:03 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-05 09:02 objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 11:55 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 12:00 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 13:20 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 14:38 Re: patch format
• 2003-07-05 15:41 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-06 23:17 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-08 13:23 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-12 07:57 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 22:28 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 22:56 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 23:11 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 07:01 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 07:01 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-15 07:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 07:17 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 18:57 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 20:34 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 20:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 21:44 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 23:02 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-16 11:59 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 11:59 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-16 12:24 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-16 12:34 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-16 13:40 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-16 13:52 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 15:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 15:46 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 16:29 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 20:05 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-16 20:29 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-16 20:30 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 20:59 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 21:11 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 21:19 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 22:18 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 06:01 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 06:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 08:18 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-30 10:32 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems

Eric Christopher

• 2003-07-08 17:55 Re: lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails
• 2003-07-09 18:05 Re: Proposed new target maintainers
• 2003-07-10 07:03 Re: Proposed new target maintainers
• 2003-07-24 19:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-24 21:46 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-28 20:33 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-30 17:38 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6

Eric Dillaber

• 2003-07-03 14:45 GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples

Erik Schnetter

• 2003-07-26 12:42 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend
• 2003-07-28 10:31 [tree-ssa] Using -M to create dependency list

Erik Trulsson

• 2003-07-07 00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos

Erwin Saranillo

• 2003-07-09 03:45 GCC can't find header files

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2003-07-04 15:03 [tree-ssa mudflap] things are better now
• 2003-07-05 03:45 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions
• 2003-07-05 14:11 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions
• 2003-07-06 02:30 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions
• 2003-07-24 00:55 [tree-ssa mudflap] stikll problems with latest update
• 2003-07-29 13:59 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage

Fabio Alemagna

• 2003-07-08 12:15 Re: ld -defsym option
• 2003-07-08 13:43 Re: ld -defsym option

Fabio Salvucci

• 2003-07-30 17:41 upcast-downcast

Felix Lee

• 2003-07-05 21:32 Re: patch format
• 2003-07-30 18:22 Re: std::pow implementation

Felvegi Peter Andras

• 2003-07-01 22:44 gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ?
• 2003-07-02 16:03 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ?

Fergus Henderson

• 2003-07-04 21:58 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-04 22:26 Re: bad dead code detection ?
• 2003-07-04 22:31 Re: bad dead code detection ?
• 2003-07-05 06:31 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-06 14:43 Re: bad dead code detection ?
• 2003-07-07 02:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-08 03:32 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-15 04:30 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies
• 2003-07-15 05:55 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-21 02:23 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-21 10:59 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-28 15:13 Re: Implementing alloca with malloc
• 2003-07-28 15:36 Re: C++ standard
• 2003-07-29 01:29 Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls
• 2003-07-31 13:53 Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls

Florian Krohm

• 2003-07-17 17:14 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts
• 2003-07-17 20:37 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts

Florian Weimer

• 2003-07-13 18:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-17 09:31 [FYI] Files with RCS keywords

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2003-07-05 12:46 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions
• 2003-07-05 18:57 Re: [tree-ssa libmudflap long] multithreading fixes, build reorg, testsuite extensions

Franz Sirl

• 2003-07-02 17:51 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-07 13:23 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 14:03 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-10 08:08 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-15 19:52 PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2003-07-02 07:23 Re: PRs assigned to you
• 2003-07-07 08:05 Re: C++ defect reports: how to behave
• 2003-07-07 08:19 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-07 08:22 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-08 08:19 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-10 06:36 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-10 06:39 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-10 06:53 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-12 18:22 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch))
• 2003-07-12 19:43 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-13 06:33 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-13 18:59 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-16 21:12 Re: A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-18 19:50 Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-18 21:09 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-18 22:31 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-19 08:52 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-19 11:09 Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 15:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 15:47 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 16:07 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 16:57 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 17:05 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:07 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:31 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:42 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 18:44 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:53 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:55 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:58 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 19:25 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 19:27 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:31 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:44 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 21:30 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 21:33 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 21:38 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 21:54 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-20 00:59 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-20 04:04 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-20 13:46 Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only)
• 2003-07-20 14:57 statement expression and sequence point
• 2003-07-21 07:51 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-21 13:04 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-07-21 13:25 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-21 17:41 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-21 22:41 [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
• 2003-07-21 23:03 Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
• 2003-07-22 19:16 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-26 17:37 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ?
• 2003-07-26 17:59 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ?
• 2003-07-29 11:37 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 11:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:04 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:37 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 13:05 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 13:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:17 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:23 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:27 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:31 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:43 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 15:11 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 15:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 18:08 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 19:15 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 19:50 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 04:56 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 04:58 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 06:31 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 06:38 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 07:17 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 07:21 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:31 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:43 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:46 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:09 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:11 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:20 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:47 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:55 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:06 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:26 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:30 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:41 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:49 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:01 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:05 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:11 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:21 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:25 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:29 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:32 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:44 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:17 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:29 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:39 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:01 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:32 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 22:28 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 02:40 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 02:46 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 08:37 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 09:30 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 10:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 10:38 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 11:02 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 11:04 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 11:31 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 11:59 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 12:05 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 13:37 Re: std::pow implementation

Gabriel Paubert

• 2003-07-02 10:41 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)

Gawain Bolton

• 2003-07-11 18:39 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++

gcc

• 2003-07-31 07:20 new FAILs on HEAD
• 2003-07-31 09:25 new FAILs on HEAD

gccadmin

• 2003-07-07 17:01 gcc-ss-20030707 is now available
• 2003-07-14 17:00 gcc-ss-3.3-20030714 is now available
• 2003-07-21 17:08 gcc-ss-3.3-20030721 is now available
• 2003-07-23 23:58 gcc-ss-3.4-20030723 is now available
• 2003-07-28 17:03 gcc-ss-3.3-20030728 is now available
• 2003-07-30 16:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20030730 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2003-07-02 20:52 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-02 22:27 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related

Geoff Keating

• 2003-07-02 19:05 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /Â?10021
• 2003-07-02 19:10 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 20:44 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-08 01:11 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 21:25 Re: question regarding atomicity.h on powerpc
• 2003-07-09 00:11 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-12 01:16 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-12 04:20 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-12 21:43 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-13 04:01 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-13 04:15 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-13 19:11 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 19:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-14 20:54 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-17 21:11 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361
• 2003-07-23 00:05 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin
• 2003-07-29 00:31 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)

Geoffrey Keating

• 2003-07-07 18:39 Re: [darwin] unwind context question
• 2003-07-07 18:47 What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-07 19:24 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-07 20:59 Re: [darwin] unwind context question
• 2003-07-07 23:01 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 17:44 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-15 01:06 Re: c-decl.c broken on 64-bit platforms
• 2003-07-29 23:10 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble

Georgy Yunayev

• 2003-07-21 12:53 modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically
• 2003-07-21 14:23 Re[2]: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2003-07-01 14:59 Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-02 12:55 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-02 14:36 Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-02 16:01 Re: std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (applegcc 3.3)
• 2003-07-02 21:32 Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-03 10:14 Re: Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-04 09:29 (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change
• 2003-07-04 16:54 Re: (Parallel) bootstrap failure due to recent libstdc++ change
• 2003-07-04 17:15 Re: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-06 22:10 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-07 07:31 Re: Minor Documentation Problems
• 2003-07-07 12:47 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-08 09:29 -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++
• 2003-07-08 09:47 Re: gcc-ss-20030707 is now available
• 2003-07-08 21:50 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-09 09:47 Re: Your change breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 10:34 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 11:11 bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 13:23 Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-09 19:20 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 22:22 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 23:15 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-10 00:14 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-10 10:43 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-10 11:50 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++
• 2003-07-10 13:15 C++ regression: comparing unsigned against integer literal
• 2003-07-11 21:59 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-13 12:01 removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag)
• 2003-07-13 14:14 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all?
• 2003-07-13 17:26 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-13 20:28 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-13 22:31 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag?
• 2003-07-14 12:26 Additional maintainer for our build machinery (*.in)
• 2003-07-14 14:48 Release criteria (was: PATCH for Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap brokenbuilding 64-bit libgcc)
• 2003-07-15 15:09 Re: release tarballs should have LAST_UPDATED containing releasetag?
• 2003-07-16 18:10 gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available
• 2003-07-17 12:17 New compiler crash for PR8361
• 2003-07-17 19:09 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available
• 2003-07-18 12:39 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-18 22:05 Re: gcc mirror site
• 2003-07-19 13:53 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-21 22:46 Re: New GCC Mirror
• 2003-07-22 10:43 Re: need help
• 2003-07-23 09:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-24 14:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-25 16:00 Re: gcc mirror site
• 2003-07-26 00:02 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-27 22:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-29 12:38 libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage
• 2003-07-29 16:30 Re: Installation questions
• 2003-07-29 21:58 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage
• 2003-07-29 22:02 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 10:46 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling???
• 2003-07-31 12:41 Re: GCC
• 2003-07-31 18:45 Re: GCC

gerson . neptune

• 2003-07-27 02:18 att ressources humaines merci

ggbg ddfd

• 2003-07-22 10:35 need help

Giovanni Bajo

• 2003-07-01 22:30 Re: Your error5.C test

Graham Stott

• 2003-07-03 23:08 Re: Is gcc mainline broken?
• 2003-07-06 13:55 Re: Numbering of dump files in documentation

graydon hoare

• 2003-07-01 01:47 Re: some profiling numbers

Green, Nick

• 2003-07-24 16:32 installation help

Greg McGary

• 2003-07-28 22:58 ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 00:11 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 01:15 ideas for modeling a condition-code FIFO?
• 2003-07-29 17:09 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 18:12 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?

Guido Guenther

• 2003-07-04 17:08 Re: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-15 17:20 3.4 mips64-linux build problem
• 2003-07-16 12:17 Re: 3.4 mips64-linux build problem
• 2003-07-19 15:55 mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/
• 2003-07-21 21:23 Re: mips64-linux multilib vs -B mips64-linux/lib32/

Gunther Nikl

• 2003-07-07 11:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 11:13 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:00 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:34 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:40 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 13:53 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 07:47 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 08:03 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 09:41 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 12:50 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 13:02 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 13:18 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-11 14:22 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend

Gustavo Bevilacqua Leal

• 2003-07-07 18:24 Problems linking FORTRAN to C++

Guy Voncken

• 2003-07-22 14:21 Bug report - How to attach a file?

H E M A N T

• 2003-07-10 12:39 gcc Intermediate Representation

H. J. Lu

• 2003-07-01 14:24 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 15:08 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 15:52 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-01 18:27 Your patch breaks mainline
• 2003-07-01 21:33 Re: C++ demangler horrors
• 2003-07-02 05:04 Stange gcc 3.3 bug
• 2003-07-02 06:48 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-02 23:35 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-03 00:31 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-03 16:12 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-03 16:57 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-03 21:41 Is gcc mainline broken?
• 2003-07-03 21:45 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken
• 2003-07-04 03:04 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-05 02:45 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared
• 2003-07-08 14:37 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 15:07 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 21:11 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 21:56 PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:01 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:08 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 00:26 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 15:24 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 15:25 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-10 01:28 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure)
• 2003-07-10 19:22 "make install" in libjava recompile many files?
• 2003-07-11 14:09 Re: "make install" in libjava recompile many files?
• 2003-07-15 00:08 Extra Changelog entry in 3.3?
• 2003-07-15 15:43 Re: dlopen and template instantiation
• 2003-07-15 18:08 More info on gcc 3.3 ia64 bootstrap comparison failure
• 2003-07-18 04:17 Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-18 07:10 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax
• 2003-07-18 14:12 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-18 16:39 Re: ia64-linux binutils requirements?
• 2003-07-18 21:45 How to mark a builtin function volatile?
• 2003-07-19 07:43 Re: How to mark a builtin function volatile?
• 2003-07-19 15:52 Very strange ia64 code generation problem
• 2003-07-19 23:42 Re: Very strange ia64 code generation problem
• 2003-07-20 14:49 Why does -fschedule-insns2 in gcc 3.3 generates so many nops on ia64?
• 2003-07-20 15:58 Re: Why does -fschedule-insns2 in gcc 3.3 generates so many nops on ia64?
• 2003-07-23 16:18 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.5 is released
• 2003-07-23 17:11 Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work
• 2003-07-23 17:51 Re: Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work

Hameedullah Rasif

• 2003-07-21 09:10 GCC installed successfully

Hans Breuer

• 2003-07-27 20:11 dia-0.91 fails compile on gcc 3.3

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2003-07-04 22:53 Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-05 05:51 Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r,(v850, ARM))
• 2003-07-05 05:52 Re: ICE bootstrapping gcc cvs HEAD 20030704 on sparc64-linux: error:head insn 102 for block 0 not found in the insn stream
• 2003-07-05 06:10 Re: Unbreaking news (was: Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960,m32r, (v850, ARM))
• 2003-07-05 12:32 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-06 03:15 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-07 02:06 Re: Unbreaking news
• 2003-07-08 14:15 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 01:11 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 03:37 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 04:32 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 04:37 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-09 04:48 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 05:20 Re: libtool reloadable object files versus multilib
• 2003-07-09 05:27 Re: Proposed new target maintainers
• 2003-07-09 12:20 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 12:23 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 12:26 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 13:59 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 18:05 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 19:18 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 21:09 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-09 22:25 Re: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious]Fix arc build.)
• 2003-07-10 03:08 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-12 16:14 Re: RFC: DW_CFA_offset_range
• 2003-07-15 03:07 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 04:15 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 11:15 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 12:19 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 13:27 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-15 14:24 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-23 20:28 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations

Hartmut Schirmer

• 2003-07-01 20:30 Re: Patch for Granlund's soft-fp lib

Henrik Sorensen

• 2003-07-04 12:53 Good frontend manuals?

Hirschmiller, Rainer, ISO23

• 2003-07-02 12:55 question about "precompiled headers"

hung

• 2003-07-24 08:25 unsubcribe

HwanYoung,Lee

• 2003-07-21 05:19 unsubscribe......

Ian Dall

• 2003-07-06 08:37 Re: Proposed targets to deprecate (sigh)
• 2003-07-10 12:43 Re: Proposed new target maintainers

Ishikawa

• 2003-07-01 00:05 Re: Req: Disable I18N/L10N translation for gcc -print-search-dirsoutput.
• 2003-07-01 02:01 Re: GCC gprof statistics
• 2003-07-01 09:21 Re: GCC gprof statistics
• 2003-07-01 16:43 Re: GCC gprof statistics
• 2003-07-04 23:44 Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-07 22:40 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-07 22:44 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-09 23:45 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-10 21:04 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-10 21:21 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-22 16:53 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
• 2003-07-23 01:22 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier

J. Johnston

• 2003-07-09 20:42 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs

J.B. Brown

• 2003-07-30 22:49 Using multiple compilers

jagadish rouniyar

• 2003-07-03 13:11 compiling ipv4 sorce file

Jakub Jelinek

• 2003-07-07 19:52 extract_muldiv bug
• 2003-07-08 22:01 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 16:38 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 23:35 sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure)
• 2003-07-10 09:16 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure)
• 2003-07-10 15:53 builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-10 17:52 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-10 23:16 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-11 15:57 RFC: DW_CFA_offset_range
• 2003-07-11 20:57 ppc64 unwinding problem
• 2003-07-11 23:22 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-12 00:03 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem

Jamie Lokier

• 2003-07-04 02:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-06 13:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-06 13:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-12 16:12 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-22 21:57 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 22:04 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Jamie Zawinski

• 2003-07-22 22:39 -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations
• 2003-07-22 23:53 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations

Jan Hoogerbrugge

• 2003-07-21 13:24 Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-23 12:36 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?)

Jan Hubicka

• 2003-07-01 22:19 New compilation failure in bi-arch x86-64 libstdc++ build
• 2003-07-02 22:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 08:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-05 14:17 Re: Trunk broken for MMIX, CRIS, i960, m32r, (v850, ARM)
• 2003-07-09 14:12 Re: Your change breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 14:16 Re: Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 14:19 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 14:30 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 18:03 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-11 23:27 Re: PR 10501
• 2003-07-12 04:13 Re: Bootstap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 due to warnings in cgraphunit.c
• 2003-07-24 16:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Loop detection broken by the last merges
• 2003-07-28 23:31 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 16:57 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 17:00 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 17:13 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 17:24 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 17:40 Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*)
• 2003-07-29 18:07 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*)
• 2003-07-29 18:16 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 19:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 14:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 14:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 14:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues

Jan Vroonhof

• 2003-07-03 17:16 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging

Janis Johnson

• 2003-07-01 17:44 Re: Successful build of gcc-3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f
• 2003-07-07 18:04 Re: trunk broken for arm-elf target.
• 2003-07-08 16:51 Re: [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3
• 2003-07-15 18:36 Re: prefetch optimizations
• 2003-07-18 17:06 Re: missing entry on build status list
• 2003-07-25 22:48 Re: PR 11637

Janne

• 2003-07-10 18:38 Hi! About mailinglist.

Jason Merrill

• 2003-07-02 20:07 [tree-ssa] computed goto edges
• 2003-07-03 15:21 [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-21 17:31 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-21 22:48 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays
• 2003-07-27 03:07 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p
• 2003-07-29 17:53 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:28 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:50 Re: Loop optimizer issues

jbuck

• 2003-07-15 16:06 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-17 20:57 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-21 23:51 updated 3.3.1 bug fix list

Jean-Pierre Radley

• 2003-07-25 02:18 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C

Jeff Sturm

• 2003-07-01 03:08 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with: ./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'
• 2003-07-07 02:48 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-07 19:03 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted
• 2003-07-13 19:19 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with: ./.libs/libgcj.so:undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'
• 2003-07-15 17:37 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 21:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-24 15:21 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status

Jeffrey . S . Whitaker

• 2003-07-29 12:10 tree-ssa internal compiler error

Jerry Quinn

• 2003-07-02 12:46 Re: New 7.cc tests

Jhonny Everson

• 2003-07-18 15:14 How can GNU help me?

Jim Keener

• 2003-07-29 16:26 Installation questions

Jim Wilson

• 2003-07-04 01:40 Re: Verbose Output error?
• 2003-07-04 01:55 Re: Using gcc for C++ backend to checking exceptions?
• 2003-07-04 02:01 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-04 02:19 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-04 02:27 Re: Sugesstion on gcc compiler
• 2003-07-04 02:31 Re: compiling ipv4 sorce file
• 2003-07-04 02:32 Re: Linking a libraray
• 2003-07-04 02:42 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples
• 2003-07-04 02:49 Re: Support for VxWorks Pentium
• 2003-07-07 03:28 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-07 04:32 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples
• 2003-07-07 05:41 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-08 02:19 Re: Reloading failes
• 2003-07-08 02:37 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-08 02:39 Re: Backporting CRDS removal patch to 3.3.x (Was: remove CRDS supportfrom m68k back-end)
• 2003-07-08 03:11 Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers
• 2003-07-08 18:55 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 19:04 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 19:30 Re: GCC version 2 on SunOS 4.1.4
• 2003-07-08 22:14 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:53 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 23:30 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 03:26 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 03:26 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 07:59 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 08:19 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 08:44 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 19:29 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 20:20 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 22:41 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 22:49 Re: RFA: document RETURN_ADDR_OFFSET (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-09 23:19 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets withcall-part-clobbered
• 2003-07-10 01:56 Re: GCC can't find header files
• 2003-07-10 02:03 Re: Papers (Was: PATCH: m68k: remove NO_ADDSUB_Q dependent code)
• 2003-07-10 02:14 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-10 05:34 Re: sched-ebb.c bug (was Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure)
• 2003-07-11 03:16 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with
• 2003-07-11 03:41 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-11 03:55 Re: gcc Intermediate Representation
• 2003-07-11 06:55 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-11 23:29 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-11 23:44 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-12 00:05 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-12 00:36 Re: [PATCH] Fix: Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-openbsd3.1
• 2003-07-15 05:08 Re: Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-15 05:33 Re: Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-15 05:48 Re: [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe*
• 2003-07-15 18:59 Re: Reloading failes
• 2003-07-15 19:55 Re: More info on gcc 3.3 ia64 bootstrap comparison failure
• 2003-07-15 22:11 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)
• 2003-07-15 22:29 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)
• 2003-07-15 22:51 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)

Jin-Shan Tseng

• 2003-07-11 02:42 gcc mirror site
• 2003-07-25 13:00 Re: gcc mirror site

Joe Buck

• 2003-07-15 16:37 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 18:06 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-16 03:24 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 18:04 Re: prolog vs prologue
• 2003-07-16 18:12 A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-17 00:10 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-17 00:48 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-17 23:38 Re: Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++
• 2003-07-18 16:46 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-18 17:09 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-21 21:19 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-21 23:19 Re: First GCC 3.3.1 Prerelease
• 2003-07-22 20:42 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 23:47 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations
• 2003-07-23 17:39 Re: Unstable gcc mainline and the ia64 intrinsic work
• 2003-07-24 16:50 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 19:29 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-25 16:53 Bugzilla stuff (was: Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list ...)
• 2003-07-28 16:45 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-28 16:58 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ?
• 2003-07-29 00:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-07-30 16:40 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:50 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:52 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:02 Re: std::pow implementation

Joel Sherrill

• 2003-07-02 17:27 Re: GCC Code-Size Benchmark Environment (CSiBE)

Joern Rennecke

• 2003-07-04 19:51 RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers
• 2003-07-07 14:15 Re: Subject: Reloading failes
• 2003-07-07 14:47 Re: Subject: Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-09 12:11 RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered
• 2003-07-09 12:14 RFA: document RETURN_ADDR_OFFSET (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-09 12:34 RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-09 18:43 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered
• 2003-07-09 19:27 RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs
• 2003-07-09 20:12 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs
• 2003-07-10 14:50 Shcompact to SHmedia unwinding (Was: Re: RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered)
• 2003-07-10 15:51 Re: RFA (Was: Re: RFC / RFA): dwarf2 unwinding for targets with
• 2003-07-10 16:19 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 17:53 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 18:47 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 19:52 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-14 19:23 Re: Removing old-gcc (was: "Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?")
• 2003-07-17 19:35 Re: auto vectorization in gcc

Johan Rydberg

• 2003-07-02 16:29 still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-02 18:37 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with-fomit-frame-pointer

John David Anglin

• 2003-07-04 22:54 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-05 16:56 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-08 17:13 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-09 18:04 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-26 04:37 Re: GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform
• 2003-07-29 06:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-30 05:33 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init

John Levon

• 2003-07-26 17:26 Re: backward compatibility of g++ ?

John Love-Jensen

• 2003-07-02 12:06 Re: Packed structures

John Parkes

• 2003-07-10 17:15 Debug initial line number

Jonathan Lennox

• 2003-07-29 23:05 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-07-29 23:38 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-07-30 16:06 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble

Jonathan Thornburg

• 2003-07-04 19:32 successful build/install of gcc 3.3 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.3
• 2003-07-18 11:38 missing entry on build status list

Josef Zlomek

• 2003-07-04 05:07 Numbering of dump files in documentation

Joseph S. Myers

• 2003-07-01 18:32 Re: gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-01 18:56 Re: gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-02 09:24 Re: gettext should not be a builtin
• 2003-07-02 23:10 Re: Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-03 19:05 [Bug c/448] Re: stdint.h
• 2003-07-04 19:47 Re: Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ?
• 2003-07-05 10:41 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-06 00:31 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all?
• 2003-07-07 19:39 Re: How is limits.h handled ?!?!?
• 2003-07-09 23:04 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-11 10:22 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-11 23:44 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-13 16:03 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-13 16:11 Re: make info and make dvi depend on make all?
• 2003-07-13 16:21 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 18:10 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-13 18:32 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 21:15 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-15 23:26 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-18 16:06 Re: [FYI] Files with RCS keywords
• 2003-07-20 14:34 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-22 19:10 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 19:12 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-22 19:37 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-22 22:20 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 23:22 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations
• 2003-07-22 23:57 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations
• 2003-07-23 00:09 Re: -std=c89 shouldn't allow post-statement declarations
• 2003-07-24 16:34 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release
• 2003-07-24 16:41 Re: Translation of GCC Manual
• 2003-07-25 10:21 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C
• 2003-07-26 19:10 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ...

Julia Nilsson

• 2003-07-11 08:59 GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-11 15:28 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-15 17:35 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-15 17:39 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures

Kai Henningsen

• 2003-07-11 07:13 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-16 01:44 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h?
• 2003-07-16 01:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-20 13:33 Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only)
• 2003-07-26 09:49 Re: Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL)
• 2003-07-29 21:06 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage
• 2003-07-29 21:06 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once

Karel Gardas

• 2003-07-04 14:22 i686->arm cross gcc3.2.3 miscompilation of MICO.
• 2003-07-07 09:32 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 09:37 trunk broken for arm-elf target.
• 2003-07-08 05:47 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-30 12:46 Re: std::pow implementation

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2003-07-01 04:06 New bootstrap failures with remaining clk_* uses
• 2003-07-04 19:35 Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ?
• 2003-07-05 00:15 Re: Should we eliminate HOST_PTR_PRINTF ?
• 2003-07-05 01:06 Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-05 06:25 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-05 06:40 Re: gcc cvs HEAD 20030705 on sparc64-linux: toplev.h:63: warning: `__gcc_diag__' is an unrecognized format function type
• 2003-07-05 16:38 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-06 01:56 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-06 17:46 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-07 02:43 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-07 05:37 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-07 15:00 Re: Minor Documentation Problems
• 2003-07-07 15:22 Re: %D
• 2003-07-09 21:49 [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
• 2003-07-14 17:44 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 03:40 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 14:37 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-17 13:58 Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts
• 2003-07-17 19:23 Re: Finding unnecessary (K&R compat) casts
• 2003-07-18 20:49 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-18 22:04 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-19 03:11 Re: Your changes to diagnostic machinery
• 2003-07-19 14:02 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 15:56 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:02 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-20 03:45 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-22 15:40 Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c
• 2003-07-22 18:00 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-23 00:53 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c
• 2003-07-23 04:39 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-24 04:25 Re: Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-31 23:11 Questions about the ATTRS field of builtins.def

kaz Kojima

• 2003-07-28 00:00 Re: gcc floating point usage / -mno-implicit-fp status?

Kazu Hirata

• 2003-07-13 12:50 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 21:08 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-14 23:43 Time to rotate ChangeLog?
• 2003-07-15 20:05 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-16 20:37 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-17 02:48 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure

Kean Johnston

• 2003-07-24 12:39 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Kelley Cook

• 2003-07-14 20:20 Re: Disabling PCH headers
• 2003-07-17 18:59 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available
• 2003-07-18 18:59 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax
• 2003-07-23 15:59 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on cygwin
• 2003-07-28 15:25 Re: C++ standard
• 2003-07-29 15:24 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-29 18:27 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init

Ken Faiczak

• 2003-07-30 16:24 incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3
• 2003-07-30 18:56 RE: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3

Ken Foskey

• 2003-07-07 11:43 Building with AIX gcc 3.3

Kevin Handy

• 2003-07-22 19:36 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Kun Wei

• 2003-07-18 22:15 gcc 3 problem on sigaction and system

Lars Segerlund

• 2003-07-31 09:33 Re: GCC

Lassi A. Tuura

• 2003-07-02 18:00 Re: gcc support for memory debuggers (operator delete) ?

Laurent GUERBY

• 2003-07-05 12:31 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-07 10:46 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-21 18:04 Re: what happened to the donated FSF/Europe machine?

law

• 2003-07-02 03:37 Re: Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] computed goto edges
• 2003-07-02 21:38 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 16:48 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-03 17:26 NOTICE: Downtime for gcc.gnu.org
• 2003-07-03 18:37 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 20:10 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken
• 2003-07-03 22:09 Re: Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken
• 2003-07-03 23:05 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 23:09 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 23:16 Re: Is gcc mainline broken?
• 2003-07-04 22:05 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-04 22:16 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 16:14 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-07 16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap miscomparison failure on PPC
• 2003-07-08 12:46 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 13:21 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 13:43 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-10 22:13 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars
• 2003-07-10 23:21 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-15 15:25 Re: Time to rotate ChangeLog?
• 2003-07-16 23:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Coalescing/killing redundant labels?
• 2003-07-17 18:12 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 18:26 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 19:43 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-29 14:17 Re: libmudflap/mf-hooks2.c portability breakage
• 2003-07-29 17:01 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64
• 2003-07-29 17:57 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 18:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: GIMPLE lowering array references too early?
• 2003-07-29 19:09 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap comparison failure on ppc and ppc64

Lisa M. Opus Goldstein

• 2003-07-25 15:11 Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference

Lothar Werzinger

• 2003-07-31 23:23 different code behaviour with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage

Lu, Hongjiu

• 2003-07-23 15:18 RE: Your change
• 2003-07-23 15:23 RE: Your change

Manfred Hollstein

• 2003-07-13 17:17 Re: acconfig.h and Makefile.in

Marc Espie

• 2003-07-07 21:23 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-07 21:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 08:05 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 22:38 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 23:24 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-26 19:54 Re: (offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-26 19:57 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Marcel Cox

• 2003-07-18 07:43 Re: Is this a bad pointer bug?
• 2003-07-21 07:37 Re: strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault

Marcus Meissner

• 2003-07-02 06:43 Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 /?10021
• 2003-07-08 11:38 question regarding atomicity.h on powerpc
• 2003-07-09 08:43 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-09 08:48 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-10 16:07 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021

Mark Mielke

• 2003-07-22 17:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 19:37 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Mark Mitchell

• 2003-07-01 18:03 Your error5.C test
• 2003-07-01 18:19 PR 7910/11021
• 2003-07-02 02:03 Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 02:19 Re: Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 03:42 New 7.cc tests
• 2003-07-02 03:43 Re: Removing -fssa
• 2003-07-02 04:07 Re: Your error5.C test
• 2003-07-02 04:55 PRs assigned to you
• 2003-07-02 04:57 PR 2873
• 2003-07-02 05:51 Re: PR 7910/11021
• 2003-07-02 15:36 Re: PRs assigned to you
• 2003-07-02 15:36 Re: PR 2873
• 2003-07-02 15:39 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 / 10021
• 2003-07-02 17:15 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-02 18:49 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-02 19:49 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug 9745 / 10021
• 2003-07-04 16:15 GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-06 03:38 Re: Packed structs and C++
• 2003-07-07 14:29 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-07 22:59 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 15:35 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++
• 2003-07-08 17:51 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 18:28 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 19:15 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-09 02:14 Your change breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 02:49 Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 16:13 Re: Your inlining change also breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-09 16:44 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 17:43 friend19.C regression
• 2003-07-09 21:25 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-09 23:00 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83
• 2003-07-10 16:01 Re: -Wcast-qual broken(?) for libstdc++
• 2003-07-10 16:20 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-11 20:53 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-11 21:14 TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-11 23:04 PR 10681
• 2003-07-11 23:06 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-11 23:08 PR 10501
• 2003-07-11 23:23 GCC Release Status (2003-07-11)
• 2003-07-14 18:26 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-14 21:39 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 00:29 Re: Extra Changelog entry in 3.3?
• 2003-07-15 03:35 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 05:40 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 08:53 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 17:03 PR 7993
• 2003-07-15 17:19 Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 17:20 PR 8878
• 2003-07-15 17:22 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 17:25 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-07-15 17:35 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-15 18:15 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 20:31 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)
• 2003-07-15 20:54 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 00:21 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-16 08:47 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR10021)
• 2003-07-16 16:35 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 16:49 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 17:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-16 20:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 21:28 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 22:39 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 04:17 Re: 3.3 regression, PR 11366 (was Re: GCC Release Status(2003-07-11))
• 2003-07-17 17:43 Re: Release criteria (was: PATCH for Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrapbroken building 64-bit libgcc)
• 2003-07-17 22:12 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays
• 2003-07-19 21:24 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-20 00:41 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-20 00:48 Important PRs assigned to you
• 2003-07-20 01:32 GCC Release Status (2003-07-19)
• 2003-07-21 06:11 First GCC 3.3.1 Prerelease
• 2003-07-21 14:40 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-21 17:51 Re: [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-21 23:11 Re: [C++] NEW_EXPR and PR c++/11406
• 2003-07-22 18:30 Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-22 19:26 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-23 07:09 Your change
• 2003-07-23 18:29 Re: RFC: some target macro->hook conversions
• 2003-07-23 19:35 g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-23 23:04 PR 10540
• 2003-07-23 23:06 PR 8878
• 2003-07-23 23:29 PR 11637
• 2003-07-23 23:56 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-24 17:22 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-24 19:21 Re: PR 8878
• 2003-07-25 00:35 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-25 05:29 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-25 05:29 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-25 15:55 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-28 15:55 Re: stmts_are_full_exprs_p
• 2003-07-28 21:09 Re: PR 10540
• 2003-07-28 23:08 HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-29 09:52 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-29 22:16 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init

Martin Brain

• 2003-07-21 11:36 Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support for SIMDISA extensions in gcc
• 2003-07-21 15:15 Re: Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support forSIMD ISA extensions in gcc
• 2003-07-22 17:04 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-30 19:08 Re: upcast-downcast
• 2003-07-31 17:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status

Martin Reinecke

• 2003-07-30 12:42 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:19 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:04 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:19 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:36 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:16 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:22 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 08:14 definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 09:11 Re: std::pow implementation

Martin Schaffner

• 2003-07-10 23:22 Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies
• 2003-07-11 11:15 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies
• 2003-07-14 15:07 Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies
• 2003-07-15 22:36 Re: Feature idea for GCC: link dependencies

Martin Schlemmer

• 2003-07-13 17:13 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'
• 2003-07-13 20:48 Re: gcc-3.3 CVS failing during libjava compile with:./.libs/libgcj.so: undefined reference to `__gcc_personality_v0'

Marty Hauff

• 2003-07-01 00:56 Re: Would you help me?
• 2003-07-27 06:09 Possible bug in regrename.c???
• 2003-07-27 06:25 Re: Is IR machine independent?
• 2003-07-28 09:03 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c???
• 2003-07-30 00:40 Re: Possible bug in regrename.c???

Matt

• 2003-07-02 03:27 Verbose Output error?

Matt Austern

• 2003-07-05 17:44 Re: C++ defect reports: how to behave
• 2003-07-08 03:30 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 18:45 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 19:19 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-14 22:39 Re: starting compile server - advice needed

Matt Kraai

• 2003-07-07 07:24 Errors in -start targets for stage2 and later

Matthias Klose

• 2003-07-12 07:10 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-13 10:07 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...

Matthieu Moy

• 2003-07-16 16:24 Using GCC as a C++ front-end.
• 2003-07-17 07:47 How to copy a tree ?

Michael Eager

• 2003-07-08 17:08 Re: --with-cpu

Michael Elizabeth Chastain

• 2003-07-01 15:36 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures
• 2003-07-01 15:43 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures
• 2003-07-01 15:52 Re: 'make check' in libiberty, 31 failures
• 2003-07-09 15:10 (fyi) gcc 3.3.1, small change in 'operator int' method name
• 2003-07-09 15:17 Re: (fyi) gcc 3.3.1, small change in 'operator int' method name
• 2003-07-10 19:07 Re: Debug initial line number
• 2003-07-22 19:13 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Michael Matz

• 2003-07-01 11:16 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-02 18:17 Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021
• 2003-07-03 11:43 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-07 06:18 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes
• 2003-07-08 13:02 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-10 17:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding fortargets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-15 20:02 Re: PR 11319 analyzed (Re: Patch fixing 3.3 bug PR 9745 and PR 10021)
• 2003-07-16 01:21 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-16 02:01 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-16 21:23 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 18:02 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 12:46 Re: Implementing fine grain parallelism and automatic support forSIMD ISA extensions in gcc
• 2003-07-24 14:59 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-28 23:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-07-29 14:36 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 15:59 aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 16:15 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 17:44 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 18:19 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects

Michael Meissner

• 2003-07-15 17:12 Re: Porting question: legitimate address
• 2003-07-17 20:30 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-23 21:53 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism

Michael N. Moran

• 2003-07-05 12:40 Re: const warning...

Mike Stump

• 2003-07-10 18:08 Re: prefetch optimizations
• 2003-07-10 18:47 Re: Hi! About mailinglist.
• 2003-07-11 19:01 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-11 22:16 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-21 21:03 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-21 21:18 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-22 18:13 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-22 19:31 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-24 16:58 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-25 00:40 [cs] compile server branch creation
• 2003-07-29 23:20 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-07-30 23:21 Re: Using multiple compilers

Mike Thomas

• 2003-07-30 23:31 RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: portable cdecl 'elliptic' function calls

Mohamed Zouari

• 2003-07-03 13:15 Linking a libraray

Mojx

• 2003-07-30 05:18 gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling???

Mukta Punjani, Noida

• 2003-07-01 10:11 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-02 05:39 RE: new-reg-alloc branch status ?
• 2003-07-08 12:03 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-24 05:48 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-25 10:55 RE: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator

Natasha Wilson

• 2003-07-15 09:54 Requesting scratch register

Nathan Sidwell

• 2003-07-05 12:47 Re: New problem building on Alpha
• 2003-07-05 19:27 Packed structs and C++
• 2003-07-07 09:19 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-09 20:01 Re: RFA: Add ftruncate support to newlib/gdb-sim to unbreak -fprofile-arcs
• 2003-07-12 18:25 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-14 15:58 structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 08:49 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 11:40 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 14:09 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-16 17:01 Re: "Best development tool" award"
• 2003-07-21 13:08 [C++] Deprecating default arguments on function types
• 2003-07-25 08:56 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-26 19:26 Re: Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2
• 2003-07-26 20:43 stmts_are_full_exprs_p

Nathanael Nerode

• 2003-07-05 19:29 Moving fixinc to top level?
• 2003-07-07 17:25 How is limits.h handled ?!?!?
• 2003-07-07 18:05 Starting cleanup project: help wanted
• 2003-07-08 04:33 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted
• 2003-07-09 22:03 RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-09 22:15 ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious] Fix arc build.)
• 2003-07-09 22:19 Attn. Steering Committee
• 2003-07-09 22:40 Re: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious]Fix arc build.)
• 2003-07-11 05:03 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing options to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:08 Re: [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 05:12 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-11 06:25 new Bugzilla keywords
• 2003-07-11 23:28 Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-11 23:45 OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 00:08 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-12 01:29 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 02:14 Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch)
• 2003-07-12 16:35 __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludespatch))
• 2003-07-12 19:14 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-12 23:37 Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h?
• 2003-07-13 06:03 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h?
• 2003-07-15 01:30 Re: install vs. install-sh
• 2003-07-15 05:28 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 22:03 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss
• 2003-07-22 14:01 Call for help: anyone running SysV r4?
• 2003-07-24 12:30 Fixincludes/C++ namespaces question(s)
• 2003-07-26 02:17 Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?
• 2003-07-26 04:25 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?
• 2003-07-26 04:33 Any idea what this is for? (fixincludes for svr4, _KERNEL)
• 2003-07-26 05:16 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 03:57 Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-28 07:06 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-30 19:57 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal
• 2003-07-30 21:32 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?

Neil Booth

• 2003-07-01 05:32 Re: New bootstrap failures with remaining clk_* uses
• 2003-07-10 05:28 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-13 15:36 Re: __WCHAR_TYPE__ and friends (was Re: OpenBSD tester wanted (fixincludes patch))
• 2003-07-21 05:40 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-21 20:47 Re: Fwd: unsubscribe......
• 2003-07-22 19:04 Re: Testing a speedup to libiberty/concat.c
• 2003-07-22 19:10 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 19:42 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-29 19:11 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 22:26 #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-07-30 05:24 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble
• 2003-07-30 06:08 Re: Token Pasting operator
• 2003-07-30 20:07 Re: #import, #pragma once yadda yadda mumble grumble

Niavis Panagiotis

• 2003-07-10 11:41 prefetch optimizations

Nick Burrett

• 2003-07-16 14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95

Nicola Pero

• 2003-07-08 10:01 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 10:14 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-15 17:12 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-07-21 09:00 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once
• 2003-07-22 09:49 Re: FSF GCC, #import and #pragma once

Nitin Gupta--SSW, Noida

• 2003-07-29 14:40 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 17:15 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-30 14:55 RE: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?

Nix

• 2003-07-02 23:01 Re: Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces
• 2003-07-02 23:01 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained

Olaf Hering

• 2003-07-01 14:17 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained
• 2003-07-04 21:32 gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared
• 2003-07-04 21:47 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared
• 2003-07-04 22:07 Re: gcc-3_3-branch bootstrap broken, $$r undeclared
• 2003-07-06 11:56 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained
• 2003-07-08 16:05 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-08 17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] PPC bootstraps still broken
• 2003-07-22 18:11 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Oscar Fuentes

• 2003-07-12 05:01 Re: problems with gcc3.2.3 and wide character support
• 2003-07-12 05:06 Re: Disabling PCH headers
• 2003-07-21 21:11 Re: MingW

Out_Of_Office

• 2003-07-03 07:15 Mark Golden/APPLIED MATERIALS is out of the office.

Paolo Bonzini

• 2003-07-22 23:29 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier
• 2003-07-24 15:49 snprintfv 1.1 pre-release
• 2003-07-24 23:13 Re: snprintfv 1.1 pre-release
• 2003-07-26 12:08 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend
• 2003-07-28 22:21 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 22:48 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions

Paolo Carlini

• 2003-07-02 10:33 Re: New 7.cc tests
• 2003-07-29 12:49 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:31 Re: std::pow implementation

Pascal Francq

• 2003-07-16 10:07 Problems with multiple inheritance

Paul Brook

• 2003-07-22 22:32 Libtool and target libraries
• 2003-07-24 19:38 Re: Libtool and target libraries
• 2003-07-26 13:53 Re: [tree-ssa]New fortran frontend
• 2003-07-26 19:09 Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-26 21:55 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ...
• 2003-07-26 22:10 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-26 22:32 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ...

Paul Hudson

• 2003-07-16 16:52 "Best development tool" award"

Paul Jarc

• 2003-07-16 21:07 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-24 23:07 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

penumarthy sreenivas

• 2003-07-11 00:28 Reg near and far call syntax

Per Bothner

• 2003-07-09 06:24 Re: Minor Documentation Problems
• 2003-07-11 21:40 starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-11 23:25 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-22 17:16 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 17:56 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 22:49 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-23 23:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-24 19:51 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-25 04:11 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C

peter . huisken

• 2003-07-03 03:04 Peter Huisken/EHV/RESEARCH/PHILIPS is out of the office.

Peter Barada

• 2003-07-02 13:37 gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire
• 2003-07-04 04:14 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-04 11:55 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-04 21:04 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-07 05:09 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-07 13:21 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register onColdFire
• 2003-07-08 15:12 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 16:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-09 15:16 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 18:21 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-09 20:10 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire
• 2003-07-09 20:35 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-10 13:22 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire
• 2003-07-10 13:36 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire
• 2003-07-14 13:07 Re: INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET() in m68k backend
• 2003-07-28 15:28 Re: gcc-3.3 with -fomit-frame-pointer finally works on ColdFire
• 2003-07-28 19:00 Re: Pseudo register replaced by a symbol_ref

Phil Edwards

• 2003-07-01 16:21 Re: Draft: Changes concerning GCC snapshots (and releases)
• 2003-07-02 00:58 Re: New compilation failure in bi-arch x86-64 libstdc++ build
• 2003-07-02 17:59 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
• 2003-07-03 18:38 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-03 21:44 Re: Is gcc mainline broken?
• 2003-07-04 21:11 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-04 21:12 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source
• 2003-07-04 21:12 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source
• 2003-07-04 21:14 Re: Disabling warnings from within the source
• 2003-07-04 23:03 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-05 05:29 Re: libstdc++ check-abi not selfcontained
• 2003-07-06 19:17 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script
• 2003-07-06 21:49 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs HEAD 20030706 on i686-linux: /usr/bin/ld:libstdc++-symbol.ver:59: parse error in VERSION script
• 2003-07-06 22:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-06 22:27 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-07 09:46 regression search server moves to the web
• 2003-07-08 02:55 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-10 19:31 How is "make install" supposed to work on sparc-sun-solaris2, 3.3-branch?
• 2003-07-13 18:27 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVS tag)
• 2003-07-13 18:47 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-13 18:49 Re: "make check--target-libstdc++-v3" failing for cross-compiler
• 2003-07-13 19:03 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?
• 2003-07-14 17:49 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-14 19:36 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-14 20:07 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-14 20:36 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 22:35 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 22:47 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-14 23:59 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-15 15:48 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-15 23:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-15 23:09 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 16:49 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 17:08 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 19:34 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-16 20:10 Re: Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-16 20:15 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 20:41 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 21:08 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 21:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-16 22:26 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-17 02:58 3.3 regression, PR 11366 (was Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-11))
• 2003-07-17 17:25 fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline
• 2003-07-17 18:17 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline
• 2003-07-17 19:57 Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++
• 2003-07-22 01:20 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-22 02:04 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-22 18:56 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 19:35 Re: Why does Makefile depend on version.c?
• 2003-07-23 06:02 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 06:17 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 06:20 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-23 06:52 Re: Bug report - How to attach a file?
• 2003-07-23 16:51 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-24 21:00 Re: (no) GCC pre-compiled headers on Cygwin
• 2003-07-25 02:37 Re: Ghost testcase eb42.C
• 2003-07-25 22:47 Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-26 02:47 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?
• 2003-07-26 20:59 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-27 23:33 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-27 23:59 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 00:01 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 00:38 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 04:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-28 17:25 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-28 19:54 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latest cvs-version
• 2003-07-28 22:37 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-28 22:41 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 22:58 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-29 17:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-30 19:54 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?
• 2003-07-31 18:15 Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, new autoconf versions
• 2003-07-31 21:56 Re: Does C++ std::queue really conflict with C header 'struct queue'?

Phil Prentice

• 2003-07-02 11:03 Packed structures

poulard

• 2003-07-24 07:57 unsubcribe

R Nagamanickam

• 2003-07-16 05:37 Help needed - cannot convert void* to const void*

Rainer Orth

• 2003-07-03 13:44 Ada bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-03 17:31 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-03 19:04 Solaris 9/Intel Ada bootstrap broken
• 2003-07-04 12:51 Solaris 8/SPARC bootstrap broken building 64-bit libgcc
• 2003-07-14 16:30 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-14 19:42 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-14 20:27 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-15 10:30 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-15 17:44 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-15 20:08 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-17 00:32 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-17 11:33 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-18 09:45 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.8 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-18 17:17 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al.
• 2003-07-18 18:21 Status of ACT GNAT with GCC mainline
• 2003-07-18 18:45 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al.
• 2003-07-24 19:06 GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-28 20:24 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-28 20:36 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-29 23:16 Tru64 UNIX bootstrap failure in libjava
• 2003-07-30 17:22 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6
• 2003-07-30 19:31 Status of GCC 3 on IRIX 5.3
• 2003-07-30 20:36 Mainline bootstrap failure on IRIX 6 O32 with GNU as

Ralf Corsepius

• 2003-07-28 06:58 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)
• 2003-07-28 22:45 Re: Understanding Multilibs ;-)

Randolph Chung

• 2003-07-14 05:29 auto* versions for gcc?

Randy.Dunlap

• 2003-07-18 14:18 Re: Docs on At&T X86 asm syntax
• 2003-07-31 07:58 Re: GCC

Ranjit Mathew

• 2003-07-03 05:35 Re: Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-03 11:00 Re: Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-04 16:46 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-04)
• 2003-07-07 04:44 Minor Documentation Problems
• 2003-07-07 06:18 Re: Mainline snapshots
• 2003-07-09 19:45 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-09 19:53 Re: Mainline snapshots, take 2
• 2003-07-13 01:32 Re: Fastjar, copyright, and upstream...
• 2003-07-16 20:22 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20030716 is now available
• 2003-07-22 06:56 Re: MingW
• 2003-07-28 06:35 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application

Ray Sheppard

• 2003-07-01 20:47 Problems building 64-bit version of GCC on AIX (Power 4) 5.1 SP.

Rich DAddio

• 2003-07-09 23:31 RE: ARC support, or lack thereof (was Re: [committing as obvious] Fix arc build.)

Richard B. Kreckel

• 2003-07-30 21:49 Re: std::pow implementation

Richard Earnshaw

• 2003-07-09 13:12 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-15 10:32 Re: Requesting scratch register
• 2003-07-29 16:05 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-29 16:20 Re: aliasing between const and non-const objects
• 2003-07-30 10:37 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:22 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:38 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:02 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:18 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:29 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:10 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:24 Re: std::pow implementation

Richard Guenther

• 2003-07-23 22:28 Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-29 11:04 std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 11:45 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 11:57 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:10 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:44 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:55 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:58 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 13:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 13:28 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 18:18 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 19:35 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:58 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:23 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:13 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:47 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:51 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:08 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:24 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:26 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:44 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:42 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:45 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:06 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 17:46 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 10:02 Re: std::pow implementation

Richard Henderson

• 2003-07-02 18:26 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-02 21:37 Re: still using frame pointer when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2003-07-02 21:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 04:19 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalid assembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-03 16:00 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-08 00:09 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 16:34 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 16:35 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 19:20 Re: Numbering of dump files in documentation
• 2003-07-09 17:49 Re: [tree-ssa] copy prop vs. debugging
• 2003-07-09 18:57 Re: gcc-3.3 problem with reloading byte into address register on ColdFire
• 2003-07-09 21:26 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 17:07 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-10 17:24 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 18:13 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 22:04 Re: [PATCH] Fix do_div() for all architectures
• 2003-07-10 22:57 Re: RFA: Use _Unwind_Ptr (Was: Re: RFC / RFA: dwarf2 unwinding for targets with call-part-clobbered registers)
• 2003-07-10 23:05 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-10 23:06 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-11 21:58 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem
• 2003-07-11 23:24 Re: PR 10681
• 2003-07-12 06:54 Re: ppc64 unwinding problem
• 2003-07-15 22:47 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-15 22:59 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-15 23:13 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-16 00:03 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c
• 2003-07-16 00:12 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c
• 2003-07-16 00:15 Re: structure members of packed structures
• 2003-07-16 01:31 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-17 17:48 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 18:20 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-21 17:18 Re: bit shifting CQImode values
• 2003-07-29 20:49 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 01:40 Re: Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-30 16:59 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6

Richard Kenner

• 2003-07-03 01:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:28 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:48 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-04 02:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-05 00:28 Problem with iconv undefined
• 2003-07-05 00:32 Re: Problem with iconv undefined
• 2003-07-05 10:47 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 12:02 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 12:04 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 12:19 New problem building on Alpha
• 2003-07-05 12:34 Re: New problem building on Alpha
• 2003-07-05 13:45 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-05 16:33 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-06 18:42 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-07 19:56 Re: extract_muldiv bug
• 2003-07-10 20:41 iconv problems
• 2003-07-10 20:49 Re: iconv problems
• 2003-07-13 11:53 acconfig.h and Makefile.in
• 2003-07-15 21:32 Documenation in ifcvt.c
• 2003-07-16 00:05 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c
• 2003-07-16 00:34 Re: Documenation in ifcvt.c
• 2003-07-25 01:00 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-25 10:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C
• 2003-07-28 21:11 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)
• 2003-07-28 23:16 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)

Richard Sandiford

• 2003-07-07 11:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-25 07:22 Re: PR 10540

Richard Stallman

• 2003-07-11 03:49 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-12 05:32 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?
• 2003-07-13 00:10 Re: FW: trademark filings for GCC?

Rob Emanuele

• 2003-07-26 19:20 Template functions with STL in gcc 3.2.2

Rob Taylor

• 2003-07-29 15:37 RE: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 10:49 RE: std::pow implementation

Robert Dewar

• 2003-07-01 03:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-01 13:56 Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
• 2003-07-05 05:35 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-05 12:31 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-05 12:59 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-17 21:17 Re: Request for Assistance: GCC 3.3.1 Code-Gen Problems
• 2003-07-23 00:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-26 00:24 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-26 00:41 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-26 01:12 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-30 12:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:40 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:46 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:52 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:56 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:04 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:08 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:10 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 14:11 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:49 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:09 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 20:05 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 20:08 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 20:14 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 10:08 Re: GCC
• 2003-07-31 10:19 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 10:50 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 10:54 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 10:57 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 11:08 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?
• 2003-07-31 11:50 Re: definition of "implicit" inline?

Robert McNulty Junior

• 2003-07-02 19:23 Disabling PCH
• 2003-07-06 22:47 GCC 3.4 broken on Cygwin
• 2003-07-07 12:24 %D
• 2003-07-11 03:07 Stunned
• 2003-07-12 04:23 Disabling PCH headers

Robert Myers

• 2003-07-04 13:22 Re: GCC Intermediate Representation & recommended reading & examples

Roger Sayle

• 2003-07-24 13:30 Re: Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-24 17:06 Re: Optimizing hypot()

Russ Allbery

• 2003-07-07 18:28 Re: Errors in -start targets for stage2 and later
• 2003-07-15 06:46 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-18 17:20 Re: Tru64 5.1 bootstrap fails with missing symbols: libiconv et al.

Ryan Smiderle

• 2003-07-14 19:18 GCC test results for SH targets

S. Bosscher

• 2003-07-02 22:04 RE: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-08 00:01 RE: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 22:57 RE: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-15 23:26 RE: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
• 2003-07-24 13:06 RE: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Sachin Zingade

• 2003-07-10 12:38 problems with gcc3.2.3 and wstring
• 2003-07-12 04:31 problems with gcc3.2.3 and wide character support

Sami Potirca

• 2003-07-08 15:10 [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3
• 2003-07-09 08:12 Re[2]: [newbee] trouble compiling gcc 3.3

Samium Gromoff

• 2003-07-24 11:44 [FEATURE] to suppress nested attribute deprecated marked uses?

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida

• 2003-07-03 10:19 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4
• 2003-07-08 08:36 RE: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4
• 2003-07-18 11:17 RE: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4

scott

• 2003-07-09 21:01 static declaration

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2003-07-01 01:13 Re: C99 features
• 2003-07-01 15:59 Re: Dell vs. GPL
• 2003-07-01 16:05 Re: Dell vs. GPL (Apologies)
• 2003-07-24 18:43 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 20:14 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-27 01:08 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-30 15:08 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:27 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:29 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:43 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:01 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:25 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:37 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 16:49 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 13:12 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 16:09 Re: std::pow implementation

Segher Boessenkool

• 2003-07-04 00:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-04 00:56 Re: GCC 3.3 build on AIX 5.2, ICE
• 2003-07-06 02:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-16 01:31 Re: 3.3 problem of -fzero-initialized-in-bss w/-ffreestanding
• 2003-07-31 23:41 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 23:41 Re: std::pow implementation

Shashikant Hire

• 2003-07-17 03:57 Mac OS X - seeking help

Shaun Jackman

• 2003-07-01 15:56 configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
• 2003-07-01 16:20 Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
• 2003-07-03 18:51 stdint.h
• 2003-07-07 20:57 --with-cpu
• 2003-07-07 22:14 Re: --with-cpu
• 2003-07-08 17:16 lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails
• 2003-07-08 19:31 Re: lib1funcs.asm udivsi3 fails
• 2003-07-11 13:52 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-11 14:12 Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-11 14:16 Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-11 14:28 [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe*
• 2003-07-15 14:29 Re: Enable newlib and libstdc++ for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-15 14:41 Re: Add -lwinsock -lcoredll to LIB_SPEC for arm-wince-pe [PATCH]
• 2003-07-15 14:43 Re: [PATCH] libffi/configure.in: Add arm-*-pe*
• 2003-07-22 21:13 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Shulov Leonid

• 2003-07-28 14:13 PowerPC Cross compailer

Siddharth

• 2003-07-03 11:02 Sugesstion on gcc compiler

Simon Gareth Best

• 2003-07-02 18:00 Successful Build Report for GCC 3.2.3

Simon Law

• 2003-07-15 04:01 Re: function arguments offset computation with -fomit-frame-pointer

srajguru

• 2003-07-17 06:33 Loading multiple versions of libstdc++
• 2003-07-17 22:33 RE: Re: Loading multiple versions of libstdc++

Srinivasan Jagannathan

• 2003-07-08 15:58 GCC version 2 on SunOS 4.1.4

Srivatsan S

• 2003-07-30 05:45 Token Pasting operator

SRUTHY C.N.

• 2003-07-08 04:36 inquiry about RTL
• 2003-07-22 04:17 Inquiry about RTL

Stan Shebs

• 2003-07-01 21:16 Re: Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces
• 2003-07-02 23:12 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalidassembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-08 01:47 ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 03:33 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 19:24 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 19:39 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-15 18:07 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-07-22 22:31 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Stefan Seefeld

• 2003-07-15 15:38 dlopen and template instantiation
• 2003-07-15 17:26 Re: dlopen and template instantiation

Stephan T. Lavavej

• 2003-07-30 12:13 Re: std::pow implementation

Stephen Biggs

• 2003-07-28 09:59 Implementing alloca with malloc

Steve Ellcey

• 2003-07-24 21:12 GCC ToT boostrap error on hppa64* platform

Steven Bosscher

• 2003-07-02 22:48 [tree-ssa] any plans to merge from mainline???
• 2003-07-03 18:41 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-04 15:13 [tree-ssa] performance with loops
• 2003-07-04 15:16 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops
• 2003-07-04 20:31 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops
• 2003-07-10 02:23 fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars
• 2003-07-10 02:29 Re: fold-const declarations way longer than 80 chars
• 2003-07-10 13:09 [Bugzilla] Missing option to go from WAITING to UNCONFIRMED?
• 2003-07-11 09:10 Re: [Bug middle-end/10060] ICE (stack overflow) on huge file (300klines) due to recursive behaviour of copy_rtx_if_shared, in emit_rtl.c
• 2003-07-11 10:04 Mainline bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2003-07-11 23:01 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-12 01:14 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-11)
• 2003-07-12 01:28 Re: TRANSLATION_UNIT_DECL breaks bootstrap
• 2003-07-12 18:10 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-14 17:23 Removing old-gcc (was: "Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags?")
• 2003-07-16 19:14 [tree-ssa] What does bsi_next_in_bb do?
• 2003-07-16 22:59 [tree-ssa] Coalescing/killing redundant labels?
• 2003-07-17 13:03 Re: New compiler crash for PR8361
• 2003-07-17 19:53 Re: auto vectorization in gcc
• 2003-07-17 20:47 Re: A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-18 19:44 Re: strcpy(stc->val,var) = Segmention Fault
• 2003-07-20 10:22 Re: GCC Release Status (2003-07-19)
• 2003-07-22 21:40 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-23 18:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-22
• 2003-07-25 11:04 Please review the patch for PR10060 (compile-time-hog,ice-on-valid-code, memory-hog)
• 2003-07-26 22:20 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-26 22:21 Re: gcc ./ChangeLog.tree-ssa ./Makefile.def ./Make ...
• 2003-07-27 23:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-27 23:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-27 23:17 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 20:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Problems building fortran (gmp) with latestcvs-version
• 2003-07-28 22:00 Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-28 23:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-28 23:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 07:06 [tree-ssa] Bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-29 09:48 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 12:25 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:47 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 12:59 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:08 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:24 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 14:36 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-29 18:13 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 20:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 06:57 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:36 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 11:57 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 12:31 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:01 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 13:25 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:33 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:50 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-30 15:56 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 06:42 GCC
• 2003-07-31 14:53 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 14:57 Re: GCC
• 2003-07-31 17:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Java byte compiler status

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2003-07-04 18:21 const warning...
• 2003-07-04 18:52 Re: const warning...
• 2003-07-21 13:30 Re: modify gcc to handle byteorder issue automatically

Thiemo Seufer

• 2003-07-24 20:32 Re: GCC testsuite differences with and without gas on IRIX 6

Thijs Cadier

• 2003-07-06 11:26 gcj: java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler
• 2003-07-26 13:50 NullPointerException in a win32 application
• 2003-07-26 15:08 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application
• 2003-07-26 15:44 URLConnection

Thomas Anders

• 2003-07-21 12:37 Fwd: unsubscribe......
• 2003-07-24 12:35 unsubscibe

tm_gccmail

• 2003-07-08 22:07 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-09 20:46 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-10 00:54 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-10 18:13 Re: prefetch optimizations
• 2003-07-11 01:12 Re: Reg near and far call syntax
• 2003-07-11 22:38 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-15 19:38 Re: GCC for 8051 based architectures
• 2003-07-18 23:53 Re: gcc 3 problem on sigaction and system
• 2003-07-21 18:49 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-22 19:47 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-24 19:57 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism (peepholes?)
• 2003-07-24 20:12 Re: Transformations to increase parallelism
• 2003-07-28 23:30 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 20:29 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 20:37 Re: ideas for modeling pipeline with bypass registers?
• 2003-07-29 23:47 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 18:42 Re: std::pow implementation
• 2003-07-31 19:45 Re: GCC

Tolga Dalman

• 2003-07-24 23:01 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-25 02:05 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Tom Tromey

• 2003-07-06 15:17 Re: gcj: java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler
• 2003-07-18 13:49 Re: [FYI] Files with RCS keywords
• 2003-07-21 01:03 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8
• 2003-07-21 05:00 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure linking jv-convert on Solaris2.8
• 2003-07-26 15:01 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application
• 2003-07-26 17:59 Re: URLConnection
• 2003-07-29 17:48 Re: NullPointerException in a win32 application

Toon Moene

• 2003-07-03 20:13 Re: GCC 3.3.1 and GCC 3.4 Schedule
• 2003-07-04 19:58 Re: [tree-ssa] performance with loops
• 2003-07-08 12:33 [tree-ssa] PowerPC bootstrap ...
• 2003-07-09 21:18 Re: Problems linking FORTRAN to C++
• 2003-07-10 21:17 Re: Minor Documentation Problems
• 2003-07-16 12:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
• 2003-07-16 15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Maintaining g95
• 2003-07-17 20:24 Re: A radical suggestion for g95
• 2003-07-17 20:44 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-17 22:09 Re: 3.3.1 bug fix list, first crude draft
• 2003-07-21 16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-22 08:12 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-23 21:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-24 08:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-24 13:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-25 09:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-07-06
• 2003-07-25 16:15 Re: Technical people needed for Using GCC editing phone conference
• 2003-07-26 21:18 Re: Fortran front end webpages

Trevor Jenkins

• 2003-07-30 20:06 Re: [GCC] Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal

trinks

• 2003-07-26 17:14 backward compatibility of g++ ?

Ulrich Weigand

• 2003-07-05 22:35 Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes
• 2003-07-07 17:13 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes
• 2003-07-10 17:44 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-10 18:44 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-11 16:17 Re: builtin_str{,n}cmp bug on s390{,x}
• 2003-07-14 23:19 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-17 12:55 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and REG_DEAD notes (fwd)
• 2003-07-17 15:04 C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays
• 2003-07-21 15:22 Re: C++ frontend bug involving pointers to arrays

UVMDudeMan

• 2003-07-06 03:37 Take me off this list

VENKATESH GANGAL

• 2003-07-09 13:07 configure: error: no acceptable ld found in $PATH

Vishwas H.K

• 2003-07-31 14:08 Problems with -pg option

Vivek Rajan

• 2003-07-02 15:57 std::cout causes EXC_BAD_ACCESS from a dynamic library (apple gcc 3.3)

Vladimir Makarov

• 2003-07-02 17:23 Re: Register Rematerialization In New Register Allocator
• 2003-07-03 22:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4
• 2003-07-23 14:12 Re: Your change
• 2003-07-23 16:03 Re: Your change

Vladimir Merzliakov

• 2003-07-09 16:59 Re: bootstrap failure: libstdc++-v3/include/stdc++.h:83

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2003-07-18 13:53 Re: issues with first scheduling pass on SH4

voidbox

• 2003-07-28 07:25 C++ standard

Volker Reichelt

• 2003-07-15 14:31 Re: Decision on gccbug?

Webmaster

• 2003-07-15 11:35 New Mirror
• 2003-07-21 10:52 New GCC Mirror

Wolfgang Bangerth

• 2003-07-09 22:56 Re: RFA: __imag__ and __real__ in C++ (bug 11437)
• 2003-07-14 14:18 Re: Decision on gccbug?
• 2003-07-14 14:32 Re: removing old snapshot CVS tags? (was: gcc_latest_snapshot CVStag)
• 2003-07-15 14:02 Re: Decision on gccbug?

Xingbo Wang

• 2003-07-24 07:21 Translation of GCC Manual
• 2003-07-24 11:08 Is IR machine independent?

Xose Vazquez Perez

• 2003-07-22 14:28 SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 17:37 Re:(offtopic) SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-24 23:49 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'

Yuly Novikov

• 2003-07-17 14:14 Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3.
• 2003-07-17 14:47 Re: Need help with dynamic_cast across shared libraries with gcc 3.2.3.

yzz

• 2003-07-14 01:37 YES

Zack Weinberg

• 2003-07-01 06:23 Ovidiu Predescu's address in MAINTAINERS bounces
• 2003-07-02 06:19 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug
• 2003-07-02 06:59 Re: Stange gcc 3.3 bug on Linux/ia64
• 2003-07-02 07:14 Re: PR 2873
• 2003-07-02 17:07 RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
• 2003-07-02 17:56 Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
• 2003-07-02 22:14 Re: [Bug target/10129] Ada bootstrap fails on PPC-Darwin - invalidassembler emitted - PIC related
• 2003-07-03 16:51 Re: What does PWD = $${PWDCMD-pwd} do in make?
• 2003-07-05 00:17 Re: Support for %d$c format specifier in diagnostics.c
• 2003-07-05 00:29 Re: Problem with iconv undefined
• 2003-07-05 00:59 Re: Problem with iconv undefined
• 2003-07-05 07:01 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-05 17:01 Re: objects_must_conflict_p
• 2003-07-06 00:21 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-06 17:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-06 18:17 Re: Bootstrap broken because of missing intl routines
• 2003-07-06 19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-07 00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-07 01:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Computed gotos
• 2003-07-07 22:49 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted
• 2003-07-07 22:55 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 00:39 Re: What happened to libfeutil?
• 2003-07-08 03:00 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 04:39 Re: Starting cleanup project: help wanted
• 2003-07-08 20:29 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 21:46 Re: Cleanups for the m68k backend
• 2003-07-08 21:55 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:01 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:04 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:08 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-08 22:12 Re: PATCH: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-09 04:52 Re: [3.3 branch] IA64 bootstrap failure
• 2003-07-11 06:20 Re: Border color and background color
• 2003-07-12 18:19 Re: Web Page
• 2003-07-13 06:58 Re: Why do we need to fixinclude HUGE_VAL definitions in math.h?
• 2003-07-13 16:51 Re: acconfig.h and Makefile.in
• 2003-07-17 17:35 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline
• 2003-07-17 18:43 Re: fixincl failure on solaris2 mainline
• 2003-07-19 15:34 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 16:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 16:16 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 17:12 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:28 Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 18:32 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:33 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 18:52 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 18:52 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:08 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 19:10 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:11 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:40 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-19 19:46 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:49 Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker
• 2003-07-19 19:52 Re: Scopes in which __label__ can appear
• 2003-07-21 21:57 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 06:31 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 15:44 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 21:00 Re: SCO systems and 'Target Deprecation'
• 2003-07-22 22:04 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-22 23:12 Re: RFC: target macro->hook migration idea
• 2003-07-24 16:07 Re: Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-24 16:23 Re: Translation of GCC Manual
• 2003-07-24 18:08 Re: Optimizing hypot()
• 2003-07-24 23:24 Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon
• 2003-07-26 19:44 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-26 19:57 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-26 22:11 Re: Fortran front end webpages
• 2003-07-27 23:49 Re: [autoconf-conversion] Re: Toplevel configury, multilibs, newautoconf versions
• 2003-07-28 22:10 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 17:25 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-29 17:56 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 18:01 Re: Unit-at-a-time in real world (Re: Development plan *ducks*)
• 2003-07-29 18:58 Re: HP-UX 11 and ld +init
• 2003-07-29 19:00 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 19:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 20:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-30 17:26 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3
• 2003-07-30 17:32 Re: gcc do not consider the head file change when compiling???
• 2003-07-30 19:12 Re: incorrect __vxworks__ usage in longlong.h (3.3) was ok in 3.2.3
• 2003-07-30 19:21 Re: Status of Chill-frontend and Pascal
• 2003-07-31 02:10 Re: Bay Area GCC hackers luncheon

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2003-07-01 18:47 Re: Pre_dec and Post_inc insns
• 2003-07-02 18:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:06 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:16 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 21:50 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 22:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 22:11 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-02 23:34 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:07 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-03 18:12 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-20 23:24 Re: [RTLOPT] cannot compile branch
• 2003-07-27 22:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 12:45 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 12:46 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 12:54 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 19:19 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-28 20:40 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 18:08 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 18:11 Re: Development plan *ducks* (Re: Loop optimizer issues)
• 2003-07-29 18:20 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 18:26 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 18:42 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 19:15 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 20:33 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 20:58 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 21:01 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-29 21:14 Re: Loop optimizer issues
• 2003-07-31 17:24 Re: Loop optimizer issues

Ziemowit Laski

• 2003-07-08 02:10 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 18:53 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-08 23:52 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-09 00:32 Re: ObjC improvements and ObjC++
• 2003-07-09 02:03 Problem creating branch (Was: ObjC improvements and ObjC++)
• 2003-07-09 21:16 Re: Problem creating branch (Was: ObjC improvements and ObjC++)
• 2003-07-14 22:49 Re: starting compile server - advice needed
• 2003-07-15 18:51 Re: PR 7993
• 2003-07-22 00:24 Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-22 01:18 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-22 01:26 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-22 01:39 Re: Cannot build C/ObjC on TOT...
• 2003-07-28 21:19 Re: Discouraging contributors (Was: g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon7.C)

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)