This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: jbuck at synopsys dot com
Cc: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, janr at molienergy dot com
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 15:06:45 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
References: <82AC106BCB3DD611812E004854506D6938E31F@mailserv.molienergy.bc.ca> <20030626112755.A28282@synopsys.com> <200306261857.OAA26473@caip.rutgers.edu> <20030626120051.A28482@synopsys.com>

> We could.  But should we?  Why not just build libstdc++ before the
> demangler?

Remember that we also need the demangler for binutils, which is built
before gcc in a combined tree.  Solving the problem for the target
demangler won't help much; we already have a target demangler in
libstdc++.

References:
- RE: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Jan Reimers
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: RFA: Please review the new C++ demangler patch
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]